Unes Law Review
Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)

Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Australia Tentang Pengaturan Pertimbangan Bisnis (Business Judgement)

Muninggar, Roro Ajeng (Unknown)
Saleh, Rosdiana (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
18 May 2024

Abstract

The legal systems adopted by Indonesia and Australia have differences, Indonesia adheres to civil law while Australia adheres to common law. The author in this study intends to conduct a comparative study of the legal system between Indonesia and Australia regarding business judgment arrangements. The issues studied are about the similarities and differences between business judgment arrangements in Indonesia and Australia, as well as the factors that cause these similarities and differences. The author uses normative methods by using a legal approach in the preparation of this study. The results of the comparison of legal systems between Indonesia and Australia have similarities, namely in terms of legal rules where both already have written legal rules, and the second in terms of regulating business judgment for the Board of Directors, while the differences that are seen are different legal systems, implementation of written rules, origin of rules, substance of rules, and position of jurisprudence. The factors that cause these similarities and differences include historical factors of the country, thinking characteristics, and economics.

Copyrights © 2024






Journal Info

Abbrev

law

Publisher

Subject

Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Description

UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, ...