Aksara
Vol 32, No 2 (2020): AKSARA, Edisi Desember 2020

LICIK ATAU CERDIK? SERANGKAIAN TANGGAPAN DARING KEPADA SI KANCIL/A TRICKY OR CLEVER? THE RESPONSES ON CYBERSPACE TO THE MOUSE DEER

Tri Amanat (Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa)



Article Info

Publish Date
03 Jan 2021

Abstract

                               Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti tanggapan daring terhadap (cerita) Si Kancil. Data penelitian diambil dari google.id dan google.com pada rentang November 2019—Januari 2020 berbentuk teks-teks tanggapan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teori resepsi pembaca. Tanggapan yang ditemukan berbentuk; interpretasi, kritik sastra, dan konkretisasi. Nada tanggapan berkategori; positif, netral, dan negatif. Tanggapan interpretasi berisi; pengaruh Si Kancil pada pembentukan karakter, implikasi budayanya, nilai-nilai dalam cerita, dan sejarahnya. Tanggapan kritik sastra berupa sorotan adanya kemungkinan pengaruh negatif Si Kancil terhadap karakter pembaca, dan solusi mengatasinya. Tanggapan konkretisasi berbentuk; menerjemahkan dalam bahasa Inggris, transfer media, dan menggubah cerita Si Kancil. Ditemukan kecenderungan orang asing/non-Indonesia lebih bisa menemukan sisi positif dari Si Kancil, dengan cara mengolah cerita Si Kancil sehingga layak dikonsumsi oleh anak-anak. Sebagian penanggap orang Indonesia ada yang menganggap Si Kancil bernilai negatif, ada yang menyarankan untuk menghapus cerita ini, dan ada yang menganggap cerita bangsa lain lebih hebat. Kata kunci: cerita Si Kancil, resepsi pembaca, tanggapan daring Abstract This study aims to examine online responses to the (Kancil) mouse deer. The research data was taken from google.id and google.com in the range of November 2019-January 2020 in the form of response texts. This research uses descriptive qualitative method with reader reception theory. The response found is shaped; interpretation, literary criticism, and concretization. The tone of response categorized; positive, neutral, and negative. Interpretation responses contain; Si Kancil’s in uence on character formation, cultural implications, values in the story, and its history. Literary criticism responses in the form of highlights of the possibility of the negative in uence of the Mouse Deer on the reader’s character, and solutions to overcome them. Concretization response takes the form of; translate in English, transfer media, and compose the story of The Mouse Deer. It was found that the tendency of foreigners / non- Indonesians was more able to nd the positive side of The Mouse Deer, by processing the Mouse Deer’s story so that it was suitable for consumption by children. Some of the Indonesian respondents consider that the Mouse Deer is negative, some suggest removing this story, and some consider the story of other nations to be more powerful. Keywords: The Mouse Deer story, reader reception, online responses

Copyrights © 2020






Journal Info

Abbrev

aksara

Publisher

Subject

Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Description

Aksara aims at providing a media or forum for researchers, faculties, and graduate students to publish their research papers in the field of linguistic and literary studies. The scope of Aksara includes linguistic, applied linguistic, interdisciplinary linguistic studies, theoretical literary ...