<![CDATA[This study lies in the field of decision support systems, focusing on the application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) for ranking alternatives based on predefined organizational criteria. A persistent challenge in this domain is the instability and subjectivity of ordinal weighting methods - such as Rank Order Centroid (ROC), Rank Sum (RS), Rank Reciprocal (RR), and Rank Order Distribution (ROD), which derive weights solely from rank positions, often leading to inconsistent and unreliable outcomes. To address this, this study introduces Rank Geometric (RG) weights, a geometric mean aggregation of ROC, RS, RR, and ROD designed to reduce subjectivity, stabilize weight distribution, and enhance robustness. By using the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method, the RG against Times Higher Education’s (THE) official weights were evaluated, and the four individual ordinal methods, applied to the top 10 Indonesian universities across five THE 2025 ranking criteria. Empirical results show that RG-CoCoSo produces stronger and more consistent correlations with THE’s rankings than THE-CoCoSo, as validated by Spearman and Pearson correlation tests, with a p-value of 0.0251. This study contributes a practical, data-driven weighting framework that strengthens the reliability of MCDM-based institutional performance evaluation and can be generalized to other ranking contexts.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
