Gendered perceptions shape participation and belonging in higher education, and the rapid uptake of generative AI adds new equity and academic-integrity risks in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). This study examined how communal/agentic self-perceptions and perceived gender-inclusive classroom climate relate to responsible generative-AI orientations among Indonesian vocational students. A cross-sectional quantitative secondary analysis was conducted using an end-of-course survey (N=90) with reliability, descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses. Results indicated high communal and moderate agentic self-perceptions, generally positive inclusion perceptions with lingering stereotype signals in group tasks, and high perceived AI utility alongside strong concerns about inaccurate and biased outputs. Inclusion climate and perceived AI utility jointly predicted stronger governance-oriented norms (e.g., disclosure, citation, fairness). Scenario judgments rated AI most acceptable for summarizing, translating, and language correction when students revised/verified outputs, and least acceptable for generating whole reports or slide decks without meaningful authorship.
Copyrights © 2026