Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif
Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026)

Religious Tolerance among Muslim NGOs in Humanitarian Missions during the Aceh Floods from a Qur’anic Perspective

Marzatillah (Unknown)
Syahrizal Abbas (Unknown)
Kamaruzzaman Bustamam Ahmad (Unknown)
Syamsul Rijal (Unknown)
M. Firdaus Annur (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
19 Jun 2026

Abstract

The devastating floods that struck Aceh in late 2025 not only generated a large-scale humanitarian crisis but also reactivated latent tensions between universal humanitarian solidarity and local religious sensitivities. The presence of interfaith humanitarian actors in a region characterized by the formal implementation of Islamic law positioned humanitarian assistance within a social arena marked by complex ethical negotiations. This article examines how local Muslim NGOs interpret and practice interfaith solidarity by drawing upon the Qur’an as a living and contextual ethical framework. Employing an interpretive qualitative approach with socio-ethical analysis, the study is based on in-depth interviews, limited field observations, and the examination of secondary disaster-related data. The findings reveal that Qur’anic ethics, as enacted by Muslim NGOs, does not function as a fixed set of normative prescriptions; rather, it operates as a form of negotiated ethics continuously shaped through interactions among sacred texts, lived humanitarian experiences, and Aceh’s socio-religious environment. Interfaith solidarity is understood as a religious obligation that affirms a universal commitment to human dignity while maintaining clear ethical boundaries against the instrumentalization of humanitarian aid for non-humanitarian agendas. This study contributes to the growing scholarship on interfaith humanitarianism and Islamic ethics by offering empirical insights from a Muslim-majority context characterized by heightened religious sensitivity. It further enriches contemporary understandings of humanitarian practice as a reflective, socially embedded, and contextually negotiated ethical process.

Copyrights © 2026