<![CDATA[This study aims to analyses the implementation of the auction of assets resulting from corruption in the Rafael Alun Trisambodo case, reviewed from the perspective of auction law in Indonesia. The background of the study begins with the importance of the execution auction mechanism as an instrument for implementing court decisions as well as a means of recovering state assets in corruption cases. The implementation of the execution auction must also be carried out in accordance with the principles of law and good governance. The urgency of writing this article lies in strengthening legal policies regarding the practice of auctioning confiscated state assets so that they are not only oriented towards the formality of execution, but also guarantee the protection of public interests through the principles of value for money, due process of law, and the principles of good governance. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach to court decisions that have permanent legal force. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the auction of Rafael Alun Trisambodo assets has fulfilled the normative principles of procurement law and auction law, particularly transparency, accountability, fair competition, and legal certainty. The execution auction mechanism in this case not only functions as an implementation of court decisions, but also as a means of recovering state assets in line with the goals of eradicating corruption and implementing good governance. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of auction law analysis with the principles of government procurement of goods/services and good governance in the context of auctions for the execution of corruption crimes, which have not been studied comprehensively in Indonesian legal literature.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
