p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Juridisch
Ani Triwati
Magister Hukum, Universitas Semarang

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Lelang Negara dalam Pemulihan Aset Korupsi: Studi Kasus Rafael Alun Trisambodo Andresya Barqiyyatul Munjilah; Ani Triwati; Kadi Sukarna; Wahab Aznul Hidaya
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13589

Abstract

This study aims to analyses the implementation of the auction of assets resulting from corruption in the Rafael Alun Trisambodo case, reviewed from the perspective of auction law in Indonesia. The background of the study begins with the importance of the execution auction mechanism as an instrument for implementing court decisions as well as a means of recovering state assets in corruption cases. The implementation of the execution auction must also be carried out in accordance with the principles of law and good governance. The urgency of writing this article lies in strengthening legal policies regarding the practice of auctioning confiscated state assets so that they are not only oriented towards the formality of execution, but also guarantee the protection of public interests through the principles of value for money, due process of law, and the principles of good governance. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach to court decisions that have permanent legal force. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the auction of Rafael Alun Trisambodo assets has fulfilled the normative principles of procurement law and auction law, particularly transparency, accountability, fair competition, and legal certainty. The execution auction mechanism in this case not only functions as an implementation of court decisions, but also as a means of recovering state assets in line with the goals of eradicating corruption and implementing good governance. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of auction law analysis with the principles of government procurement of goods/services and good governance in the context of auctions for the execution of corruption crimes, which have not been studied comprehensively in Indonesian legal literature.
Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencurian di Kota Bima Uzifatur Rizkiyah Mahendra; Ani Triwati; Kadi Sukarna; Ni Nyoman Tri Partini
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13716

Abstract

This study aims to juridically analyze the implementation of restorative justice for juveniles as perpetrators of theft crimes in Bima City. The background of this research is grounded in the continued dominance of retributive approaches within the juvenile criminal justice system, which may adversely affect children’s development and contradict the principles of child protection and the best interests of the child as mandated by Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The urgency of this study lies in the need to evaluate the effectiveness and consistency of restorative justice implementation by law enforcement authorities, particularly in handling juvenile theft cases at the investigation stage. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, supported by an analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and the practical application of restorative justice in Bima City. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive examination of the conformity between restorative justice practices and positive legal norms as well as substantive justice values within the local context of Bima City. The findings indicate that restorative justice has been applied to juvenile theft cases in Bima City; however, its implementation remains suboptimal due to structural, cultural, and procedural constraints. Therefore, strengthening the understanding of law enforcement officers and harmonizing policies are necessary to ensure the protection of children’s rights and the sustainable realization of restorative justice.. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis penerapan restorative justice terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pencurian di Kota Bima. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada masih dominannya pendekatan retributif dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak, yang berpotensi menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap tumbuh kembang anak serta bertentangan dengan prinsip perlindungan anak dan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Urgensi penulisan tesis ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas dan konsistensi penerapan restorative justice oleh aparat penegak hukum, khususnya dalam konteks penanganan perkara pencurian yang melibatkan anak di tingkat penyidikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus, yang didukung oleh analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta praktik penerapan restorative justice di Kota Bima. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif mengenai kesesuaian praktik restorative justice dengan norma hukum positif dan nilai keadilan substantif, khususnya pada konteks lokal Kota Bima. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan restorative justice terhadap anak pelaku pencurian di Kota Bima telah dilakukan, namun belum optimal karena masih ditemui kendala struktural, kultural, dan prosedural, sehingga diperlukan penguatan pemahaman aparat penegak hukum serta harmonisasi kebijakan untuk menjamin perlindungan hak anak dan tercapainya keadilan restoratif secara berkelanjutan.  
Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum dan Restitusi Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Pesantren Mohamad Ikhwannudin; Januardo Sihombing; Ani Triwati
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13737

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of legal protection and restitution for victims of sexual violence in Islamic boarding schools within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Previous studies have primarily examined sexual violence in Islamic boarding schools from theological, educational, and gender perspectives, while research specifically evaluating the implementation of restitution and victim protection in judicial practice remains limited. This research addresses that gap by examining the implementation of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes and related regulations through concrete court decisions. This study employs a normative-empirical legal method with statutory, case, conceptual, and sociological approaches, focusing on Mungkid District Court Decisions Number 242/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mkd and Number 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Mkd. The findings indicate that although the legal framework concerning victim protection and restitution is normatively progressive, its implementation remains ineffective due to institutional weaknesses, limited inter-agency coordination, difficulties in enforcing restitution, and hierarchical legal culture within Islamic boarding schools. This study concludes that victim protection in judicial practice remains procedural and has not fully achieved restorative justice. The scientific contribution of this research lies in integrating victimology, legal effectiveness theory, and restorative justice through empirical analysis of restitution implementation in Islamic boarding school cases.   Penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas perlindungan hukum dan pemenuhan restitusi bagi korban kekerasan seksual di lingkungan pesantren dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Penelitian terdahulu umumnya membahas kekerasan seksual di pesantren dari perspektif teologis, pendidikan, dan gender, sedangkan kajian yang secara khusus mengevaluasi implementasi restitusi dan perlindungan korban dalam praktik peradilan masih terbatas. Penelitian ini mengisi kesenjangan tersebut dengan mengkaji penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual dan regulasi terkait melalui putusan pengadilan konkret. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, konseptual, dan sosiologis melalui analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mungkid Nomor 242/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mkd dan Nomor 106/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Mkd. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kerangka perlindungan hukum dan restitusi telah diatur secara progresif, implementasinya masih belum efektif akibat lemahnya kelembagaan, terbatasnya koordinasi antarlembaga, kesulitan pelaksanaan restitusi, serta budaya hukum hierarkis di lingkungan pesantren. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perlindungan korban dalam praktik peradilan masih bersifat prosedural dan belum sepenuhnya mewujudkan keadilan restoratif. Kontribusi ilmiah penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi pendekatan viktimologi, teori efektivitas hukum, dan keadilan restoratif melalui analisis empiris penerapan restitusi dalam perkara kekerasan seksual di pesantren.
Penegakan Hukum dan Pengawasan Obat Bahan Alami Ilegal: Studi di Lubuk Linggau Terry Rangga Nugraha; Kadi Sukarna; Ani Triwati; Aji Mulyana
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.14041

Abstract

This study aims to analyze law enforcement and supervision of illegal Natural Medicinal Products (Obat Bahan Alam/OBA) containing Medicinal Chemical Substances (BKO) in Lubuk Linggau. Previous studies mainly focused on regulatory mechanisms and BPOM enforcement but have not specifically examined the relationship between administrative-oriented performance indicators and the substantive effectiveness of public health protection. This research employs a normative-empirical legal method through statutory, case, and conceptual approaches supported by limited empirical data from interviews and field findings. The results show that preventive and repressive measures have been implemented; however, preventive supervision remains ineffective because administrative targets are prioritized over risk-based substantive protection, resulting in low compliance among business actors and the continued circulation of illegal OBA. Repressive law enforcement has created a deterrent effect but still faces juridical and institutional constraints. The novelty of this study lies in demonstrating that administrative-oriented supervisory indicators contribute to the ineffectiveness of substantive public health protection, thus requiring a more outcome-oriented supervisory policy model.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum dan pengawasan terhadap peredaran Obat Bahan Alam (OBA) ilegal yang mengandung Bahan Kimia Obat (BKO) di Kota Lubuk Linggau. Penelitian terdahulu umumnya berfokus pada mekanisme regulasi dan bentuk penegakan hukum oleh BPOM, namun belum secara khusus mengkaji hubungan antara indikator kinerja yang berorientasi administratif dengan efektivitas substantif perlindungan kesehatan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif-empiris melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual yang didukung data empiris terbatas dari wawancara dan temuan lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa upaya preventif dan represif telah dilaksanakan, tetapi pengawasan preventif masih belum efektif karena target administratif lebih diprioritaskan dibandingkan perlindungan berbasis risiko, sehingga kepatuhan pelaku usaha rendah dan peredaran OBA ilegal tetap terjadi. Penegakan hukum represif telah memberikan efek jera, namun masih menghadapi kendala yuridis dan kelembagaan. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada temuan bahwa indikator pengawasan yang berorientasi administratif berkontribusi terhadap ketidakefektifan perlindungan kesehatan masyarakat secara substantif, sehingga diperlukan model kebijakan pengawasan yang lebih berorientasi pada dampak nyata.