Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Juridisch
Kadi Sukarna
Magister Hukum, Universitas Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Lelang Negara dalam Pemulihan Aset Korupsi: Studi Kasus Rafael Alun Trisambodo Andresya Barqiyyatul Munjilah; Ani Triwati; Kadi Sukarna; Wahab Aznul Hidaya
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13589

Abstract

This study aims to analyses the implementation of the auction of assets resulting from corruption in the Rafael Alun Trisambodo case, reviewed from the perspective of auction law in Indonesia. The background of the study begins with the importance of the execution auction mechanism as an instrument for implementing court decisions as well as a means of recovering state assets in corruption cases. The implementation of the execution auction must also be carried out in accordance with the principles of law and good governance. The urgency of writing this article lies in strengthening legal policies regarding the practice of auctioning confiscated state assets so that they are not only oriented towards the formality of execution, but also guarantee the protection of public interests through the principles of value for money, due process of law, and the principles of good governance. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach to court decisions that have permanent legal force. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the auction of Rafael Alun Trisambodo assets has fulfilled the normative principles of procurement law and auction law, particularly transparency, accountability, fair competition, and legal certainty. The execution auction mechanism in this case not only functions as an implementation of court decisions, but also as a means of recovering state assets in line with the goals of eradicating corruption and implementing good governance. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of auction law analysis with the principles of government procurement of goods/services and good governance in the context of auctions for the execution of corruption crimes, which have not been studied comprehensively in Indonesian legal literature.
Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Anak Pelaku Pencurian di Kota Bima Uzifatur Rizkiyah Mahendra; Ani Triwati; Kadi Sukarna; Ni Nyoman Tri Partini
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13716

Abstract

This study aims to juridically analyze the implementation of restorative justice for juveniles as perpetrators of theft crimes in Bima City. The background of this research is grounded in the continued dominance of retributive approaches within the juvenile criminal justice system, which may adversely affect children’s development and contradict the principles of child protection and the best interests of the child as mandated by Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The urgency of this study lies in the need to evaluate the effectiveness and consistency of restorative justice implementation by law enforcement authorities, particularly in handling juvenile theft cases at the investigation stage. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, supported by an analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and the practical application of restorative justice in Bima City. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive examination of the conformity between restorative justice practices and positive legal norms as well as substantive justice values within the local context of Bima City. The findings indicate that restorative justice has been applied to juvenile theft cases in Bima City; however, its implementation remains suboptimal due to structural, cultural, and procedural constraints. Therefore, strengthening the understanding of law enforcement officers and harmonizing policies are necessary to ensure the protection of children’s rights and the sustainable realization of restorative justice.. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis penerapan restorative justice terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana pencurian di Kota Bima. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada masih dominannya pendekatan retributif dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak, yang berpotensi menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap tumbuh kembang anak serta bertentangan dengan prinsip perlindungan anak dan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Urgensi penulisan tesis ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas dan konsistensi penerapan restorative justice oleh aparat penegak hukum, khususnya dalam konteks penanganan perkara pencurian yang melibatkan anak di tingkat penyidikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus, yang didukung oleh analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, serta praktik penerapan restorative justice di Kota Bima. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif mengenai kesesuaian praktik restorative justice dengan norma hukum positif dan nilai keadilan substantif, khususnya pada konteks lokal Kota Bima. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan restorative justice terhadap anak pelaku pencurian di Kota Bima telah dilakukan, namun belum optimal karena masih ditemui kendala struktural, kultural, dan prosedural, sehingga diperlukan penguatan pemahaman aparat penegak hukum serta harmonisasi kebijakan untuk menjamin perlindungan hak anak dan tercapainya keadilan restoratif secara berkelanjutan.  
Penegakan Hukum dan Pengawasan Obat Bahan Alami Ilegal: Studi di Lubuk Linggau Terry Rangga Nugraha; Kadi Sukarna; Ani Triwati; Aji Mulyana
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.14041

Abstract

This study aims to analyze law enforcement and supervision of illegal Natural Medicinal Products (Obat Bahan Alam/OBA) containing Medicinal Chemical Substances (BKO) in Lubuk Linggau. Previous studies mainly focused on regulatory mechanisms and BPOM enforcement but have not specifically examined the relationship between administrative-oriented performance indicators and the substantive effectiveness of public health protection. This research employs a normative-empirical legal method through statutory, case, and conceptual approaches supported by limited empirical data from interviews and field findings. The results show that preventive and repressive measures have been implemented; however, preventive supervision remains ineffective because administrative targets are prioritized over risk-based substantive protection, resulting in low compliance among business actors and the continued circulation of illegal OBA. Repressive law enforcement has created a deterrent effect but still faces juridical and institutional constraints. The novelty of this study lies in demonstrating that administrative-oriented supervisory indicators contribute to the ineffectiveness of substantive public health protection, thus requiring a more outcome-oriented supervisory policy model.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum dan pengawasan terhadap peredaran Obat Bahan Alam (OBA) ilegal yang mengandung Bahan Kimia Obat (BKO) di Kota Lubuk Linggau. Penelitian terdahulu umumnya berfokus pada mekanisme regulasi dan bentuk penegakan hukum oleh BPOM, namun belum secara khusus mengkaji hubungan antara indikator kinerja yang berorientasi administratif dengan efektivitas substantif perlindungan kesehatan masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif-empiris melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual yang didukung data empiris terbatas dari wawancara dan temuan lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa upaya preventif dan represif telah dilaksanakan, tetapi pengawasan preventif masih belum efektif karena target administratif lebih diprioritaskan dibandingkan perlindungan berbasis risiko, sehingga kepatuhan pelaku usaha rendah dan peredaran OBA ilegal tetap terjadi. Penegakan hukum represif telah memberikan efek jera, namun masih menghadapi kendala yuridis dan kelembagaan. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada temuan bahwa indikator pengawasan yang berorientasi administratif berkontribusi terhadap ketidakefektifan perlindungan kesehatan masyarakat secara substantif, sehingga diperlukan model kebijakan pengawasan yang lebih berorientasi pada dampak nyata.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Perkawinan dalam Sistem Administrasi Negara Bambang Wuragil Untung; Endah Pujiastuti; Kadi Sukarna; Unggul Basoeky
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.14204

Abstract

This study aims to analyze juridically the falsification of marriage documents as a crime against public trust and the resulting criminal liability. The falsification of marriage documents not only affects the legal validity of marital relationships but also undermines the legitimacy of state institutions and public confidence in administrative systems. The urgency of this study lies in the increasing occurrence of document forgery conducted systematically by exploiting weaknesses in administrative verification systems, as reflected in the case at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) of Patebon, Kendal Regency. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by empirical data obtained through interviews. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative approach combining criminal law and administrative law perspectives in examining marriage document forgery as a crime against public trust. The results indicate that such falsification fulfills the elements of the crime of document forgery under Article 391 of the Criminal Code and involves multiple actors in a structured manner. Furthermore, weaknesses in administrative systems are identified as the primary enabling factor, highlighting the need for strict law enforcement and the strengthening of integrated digital verification systems to prevent future occurrences.     Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis pemalsuan dokumen perkawinan sebagai kejahatan terhadap kepercayaan publik serta pertanggungjawaban pidana yang timbul. Pemalsuan dokumen perkawinan merupakan permasalahan yang tidak hanya berdampak pada keabsahan hubungan hukum para pihak, tetapi juga berpotensi merusak legitimasi institusi negara dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem administrasi. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada meningkatnya praktik pemalsuan dokumen yang dilakukan secara sistematis dengan memanfaatkan kelemahan sistem verifikasi administratif, termasuk dalam kasus di KUA Patebon Kabupaten Kendal. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, serta didukung oleh data empiris melalui wawancara. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada pendekatan integratif antara hukum pidana dan hukum administrasi negara dalam mengkaji pemalsuan dokumen perkawinan sebagai kejahatan terhadap kepercayaan publik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemalsuan dokumen perkawinan telah memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan surat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 391 KUHP, serta melibatkan berbagai pihak dengan pola yang sistematis. Selain itu, kelemahan sistem administrasi menjadi faktor utama yang memungkinkan terjadinya pemalsuan, sehingga diperlukan penegakan hukum yang tegas serta penguatan sistem verifikasi berbasis digital untuk mencegah terulangnya kejahatan serupa. 
Co-Authors Aji Mulyana Andresya Barqiyyatul Munjilah Ani Triwati Bambang Wuragil Untung Endah Pujiastuti Ni Nyoman Tri Partini Terry Rangga Nugraha Unggul Basoeky Uzifatur Rizkiyah Mahendra Wahab Aznul Hidaya