Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Vol 17 No 3 (2026): Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Comparative study of MAPLE, MATLAB, and conventional mathematics instruction on students’ critical thinking

Rahmawati, Noviana Dini (Unknown)
Buchori, Achmad (Unknown)
Prasetyowati, Dina (Unknown)
Yuliana, Umi (Unknown)



Article Info

Publish Date
21 Sep 2026

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare students’ post-test critical-thinking performance across Maple-based, MATLAB-based, and conventional mathematics instruction and to examine whether statistically significant differences were observed between the instructional conditions. Method: This quantitative post-test-only comparative study involved 90 eleventh-grade students from a public senior high school in Blora Regency, Indonesia. Three intact classrooms were designated as Maple-based learning (n = 30), MATLAB-based learning (n = 30), and conventional instruction (n = 30) conditions. Data were collected using an essay-based critical-thinking test assessing interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. Multiple linear regression with dummy-variable coding was used, with conventional instruction as the reference condition. Findings: The Maple classroom obtained a mean post-test critical-thinking score of 81.47 (SD = 7.23), followed by the MATLAB classroom at 78.23 (SD = 8.15) and the conventional instruction classroom at 62.90 (SD = 9.47). Relative to the conventional instruction condition, the Maple coefficient was 18.57 points (β = .521, p < .001), while the MATLAB coefficient was 15.33 points (β = .430, p < .001). The regression model was statistically significant, F(2, 87) = 47.83, p < .001, with R² = .524. Although the Maple classroom obtained a higher mean than the MATLAB classroom, the direct difference was not statistically significant (t = 1.61, p = .112). Significance: The findings indicate that, within the participating classrooms, both technology-supported instructional conditions were associated with higher post-test critical-thinking performance than conventional instruction. The results do not support the conclusion that Maple was superior to MATLAB. Because the study used a post-test-only design and one intact classroom represented each instructional condition, the findings should be interpreted as observed between-condition differences rather than definitive causal effects of the software environments.

Copyrights © 2026






Journal Info

Abbrev

AL-JABAR

Publisher

Subject

Education Mathematics

Description

Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, with registered number p-ISSN: 2086-5872 (print), e-ISSN: 2540-7562 (online), is a scientific journal published by Mathematics Education IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. The aim of this journal publication is to disseminate new theories and research results that ...