STEM project-based learning (STEM-PjBL) is widely promoted for developing creative thinking, yet evidence from Indonesian junior secondary classrooms rarely goes beyond class-mean gains, and renewable energy studies have concentrated on senior secondary students. This study examined changes in junior secondary students' creative thinking during a STEM-PjBL unit on renewable energy and described their responses to the approach. We used a pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design with one intact Grade VIII class (n = 28) in OKU Timur, South Sumatra. Over three sessions, groups designed, built, tested, and presented water-turbine, wind-turbine, and solar-panel prototypes. We measured creative thinking with an expert-validated open-ended test scored on fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and STEM integration; an observation rubric and a student response questionnaire provided supporting evidence. We analyzed data using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, effect sizes, and normalized gain. Mean scores rose from 47.26 (SD = 22.00) to 91.19 (SD = 4.95); 27 of 28 students improved (Z = −4.60, p < .001, r = .87; dz = 2.11). The class-average normalized gain was 0.83, with 24 students in the high-gain category. All five indicators improved, while STEM integration remained the lowest at posttest. Observed creative behavior and the class response profile were favorable. The findings suggest that prototype-centered STEM-PjBL can create favorable conditions for creative thinking in renewable energy learning, although the single-group design, posttest ceiling, and brief intervention call for cautious interpretation. The results support explicit scaffolding of mathematical and engineering reasoning within junior secondary project work and warrant controlled replication.
Copyrights © 2026