Jurnal Akta
JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Master Program (S2) Notary, Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islmic University. JURNAL AKTA published four times a year in March, June, September and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal has been acredited
Articles
818 Documents
<![CDATA[The Effectiveness of Implementing Internship in Making A Professional Notary in Jepara District ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Nur Aklif]]>;
<![CDATA[Aryani Witasari]]>;
<![CDATA[Widhi Handoko]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 4 (2020): December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i4.14167
<![CDATA[The implementation of internships for Notaries is very important, however, in reality the awareness of the Notary candidates has not been carried out effectively, this is due to the practicality of prospective Notaries who want to practice immediately so that not infrequently, the internships are not carried out according to the time set by the existing regulations. The method in this writing is descriptive analytical. Based on the available data, it is found that in fact the effectiveness of the extension of the internship period is 12 (twelve) months to 24 (twenty four) months depending on the intention of the prospective notary who interned himself. Some notaries experience difficulties and experience confusion when opening an office even though they have undergone an internship period of 24 (twenty four) months. This is because they do not take advantage of time and do not undergo apprenticeship activities properly. The absence of an internship implementation guideline and the absence of programs that must be undertaken during the apprenticeship makes the effectiveness of the internships back to each prospective notary who interns. So can be said that the ineffective implementation of the Notary's apprenticeship has resulted in a lack of experience and at the same time resulted in a lack of quality of Notaries in carrying out their functions and duties in the community, especially in the Jepara Regency area.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Aspects & Evaluation of Operational Service Performance Standards of Boom Baru Container Terminal Palembang ]]>
<![CDATA[Tulus Umy Purwati]]>;
<![CDATA[Erika Buchari]]>;
<![CDATA[Edi Kadarsah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 4 (2020): December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i4.16005
<![CDATA[This research was conducted to evaluate legal aspects and the service performance of the Boom Baru Palembang Container Terminal has implemented the DIRJENHUBLA Standard. The research was conducted by collecting data from the Boom Baru Container Terminal and then calculating and evaluating based on applicable regulations. Performance analysis is carried out by calculating BOR (Berth Occupancy Ratio), YOR (Yard Occupancy Ratio), BTP (Berth Troughput), and Effective Time Ratio (ET: BT). Performance analysis shows that the 2018 for BOR value does not match the rules which is 58.57% and it is above the UNCTAD recommended value of 50% and the 2019 BOR value of 48.36%. The 2018 Effective Time Ratio (ET: BT) value of 55% is under minimum DIRJENHUBLA standard of 70%.]]>
<![CDATA[ILLEGAL LAND GRAB: ISRAEL'S SEIZURE OF LAND IN PALESTINE ]]>
<![CDATA[Saleh Raed Shatat]]>;
<![CDATA[Ong Argo Victoria]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 8, No 2 (2021): June 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v8i2.15685
<![CDATA[Since 1967, each Israeli government has invested significant resources in establishing and expanding the settlements in the Occupied Territories, both in terms of the area of land they occupy and in terms of population. As a result of this policy, approximately 380,000 Israeli citizens now live on the settlements on the West Bank, including those established in East Jerusalem (this report does not relate to the settlements in the Gaza Strip). During the first decade following the occupation, the Ma'arach governments operated on the basis of the Alon Plan, which advocated the establishment of settlements in areas perceived as having "security importance," and where the Palestinian population was sparse (the Jordan Valley, parts of the Hebron Mountains and Greater Jerusalem). After the Likud came to power in 1977, the government began to establish settlements throughout the West Bank, particularly in areas close to the main Palestinian population centers along the central mountain ridge and in western Samaria. This policy was based on both security and ideological considerations. The political process between Israel and the Palestinians did not impede settlement activities, which continued under the Labor government of Yitzhak Rabin (1992-1996) and all subsequent governments. These governments built thousands of new housing units, claiming that this was necessary to meet the "natural growth" of the existing population. As a result, between 1993 and 2000 the number of settlers on the West Bank (excluding East Jerusalem) increased by almost 100 percent.]]>
<![CDATA[Relevance of Justice Value to Legal Protection for Goods and Service Providers in Corruption Criminal Cases ]]>
<![CDATA[Maryanto Maryanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 8, No 3 (2021): September 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v8i3.17817
<![CDATA[The pace of infrastructure development in Indonesia is increasing rapidly, this is a form of the government's commitment to improving people's welfare. The pace of infrastructure development in reality often has problems, including failure to build. The absence of criminal provisions in Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning Procurement of Government Goods and Services has resulted in the blurring of the boundaries of the criminal and civil realms as well as administrative law in setting sanctions for providers of goods and services deemed negligent. This is often seen in cases of corruption in the procurement of goods and services, which often attracts service providers to become one of the perpetrators of criminal acts. This situation is clearly wrong, because not all acts of service and goods providers can be said to be related to the occurrence of corruption in the procurement of goods and services. This study aims to further analyze the legal protection for service and goods providers in cases of corruption in the procurement of goods and services. The method in this writing is normative. Based on the existing studies, it can be seen that the implementation of criminal sanctions for corruption in the procurement of goods for infrastructure development has not been based on the legal politics of procurement of goods, so that the criminal sanctions are still unclear, because the issue of procurement of goods should not be directly subject to criminal sanctions as an ultimum remidium, considering the procurement of goods regulated by administrative law not criminal law, while criminal threats are only as a last resort when violations in the realm of procurement of goods in infrastructure development are not controlled.]]>
<![CDATA[The Inheritance Dispute Settlement In Court ]]>
<![CDATA[Armunanto Armunanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 8, No 3 (2021): September 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v8i3.17946
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is regarding the settlement of inheritance law disputes, which is one of the reasons a person gets an inheritance, including marriage, blood relations, parents or close sibling relationships or because of testament. This has also been regulated in the provisions of the civil law code of the Civil Code B.W, because someone receives an inheritance because of a nashab/kinship relationship and because of marriage. Meanwhile, for the occurrence of inheritance, it is necessary to have the following elements: 1. The existence of a person who dies (erflater) The person who dies is the person who leaves the inheritance and is called the heir. 2. There are people who are still alive (erfgenaam) people who are still alive, namely people who according to the law or testament are entitled to inherit from the person who died. They are called: Heirs. 3. The existence of objects that are left behind (erftenis, nalatenschap) objects that are left behind are things that are left by the testator at the time of his death, which is called inheritance. The form of this inheritance can be in the form of Activa (receivables, bills) or Liabilities (debts). Problems regarding the distribution of inheritance have basically been regulated in the legal provisions in Indonesia. Both in the provisions of the civil code and in the provisions of the compilation of Islamic law. Where are the provisions regarding Islamic inheritance disputes whose dispute resolution authority is in the religious courts. As for people who are non-Muslims, the settlement process is in the state court. Where in its implementation it must be able to reflect a sense of justice, while still upholding the principle of kinship that applies in the social life of the community.]]>
<![CDATA[MEKANISME PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH KARENA JUAL BELI DALAM HAL SALAH SATU PENJUAL MASIH DI BAWAH UMUR DAN PENDAFTARANNYA DI KANTOR PERTANAHAN KOTA TEGAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Anjar Restu]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i1.1529
<![CDATA[Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana mekanisme peralihan hak atas tanah, apa saja kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dan bagai mana pemecahanya tersebut dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi pihak yang terkait dalam proses tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan Penelitian yuridis sosiologis merupakan penelitian yang mengkaji kaidah-kaidah hukum dan norma-norma hukum serta peraturan-peraturan yang ada, yang kemudian menganalisis dan mengkaji bekerjanya di masyarakat.bekerjanya hukum di masyarakat dapat di kaji dari tingkat efektifitasnya hukum, kepatuhan terhadap hukum, peranan lembaga atau istitusi hukum di dalam penegakan hukum, implementasi aturan hukum, pengaruh aturan hukum terhadap masalah sosial tertentu atau sebaliknya, pengaruh masalah sosial terhadap hukum.Berdasarkan metode tersebut penelitian menghasilkan pada pokoknya perwalian dan izin menjual dapat dibuat oleh pengadilan negeri dan desa yang disahkan kecamatan, untuk pengadilan agama hanya perwalian saja. Setiap jual beli berkaitan pertanahan harus menggunakan akta jual beli dari PPAT atau PPATS. Akta tersebut sebagai bukti untuk melakukan pendaftaran di kantor pertanahan.Masalah yang dihadapi di lapangan adalah kurang pahamnya masyarakat tentang hukum pertanahan, perwalian dan izin menjual, aplikasi pertanahan sering eror, tidak teraturnya buku warkah juga mempersulit kerja. Cara mengatasi masalah tersebut adalah dengan memberikan pengarahan hukum kepada masyarakat dan pengantian sistem warkah menjadi komputerisasi.Mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi wali,sepanjang si-Wali dapat membuktikan bahwa harta sepanjang dipergunakan untuk kepentingan si-Anak maka, maka wali tersebut bebas demi hukum, namun berlaku sebaliknya apabila si-Wali melanggar ketentuan tersebut maka anak tersebut dapat menuntut haknya selama dapat dibuktikan sebaliknya peralihan tersebut mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang kuat (bukan mutlak).Kata kunci : jual beli, di bawah umur, perlindungan hukum]]>
<![CDATA[The Existence Of The Sale And Purchase Agreement (PPJB) As Authentic Evidence Tool Based On Government Regulation No. 24 Of 2016 On The Position Rules Of Land Deed Official Position In Cilacap Regency ]]>
<![CDATA[Basuki Basuki]]>;
<![CDATA[Wildan Auliya]]>;
<![CDATA[Ngadino Ngadino]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 7, No 2 (2020): June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v7i2.7670
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to: 1) To analyze the implementation of the Agreement manufacture Sale and Purchase of Land by the Land Deed Official (PPAT). 2) To analyze the existence of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as Authentic Evidence based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 Concerning the Rules of Land Deed Official Position in Cilacap Regency. 3) To know and analyze the process of land registration with the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) as Authentic Evidence.This study using sociological or empirical juridical approach. In sociological juridical approach of law as law in action, described as a social phenomenon that is empirical, descriptive analysis specifications. The data collection was obtained by interview and literature.The research results are: 1) In the implementation of the keel PPJB included power from seller to buyer to sign the Sale and Purchase Agreements, so that the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreements do not require the presence of the seller. PPJB is not paid, the payment is made if the selling price received by the seller has not paid off. In the chapters PJB not paid at least the specified amount of advance paid at the time of signing the deed of CHD, ways or terms of payment, when repayment and the agreed sanctions if one party defaults. PJB not paid off must also be followed by AJB at settlement. 2) the PPJB is binding for both parties (seller and buyer) as well as for the heirs or assigns who died.Keywords: PPJB; Authentic Evidence; Deed of Sale and Purchase.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Government Authority of Semarang City On State Land Tenure (Case Study in Kebonharjo village of Tanjung Mas) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Yahya]]>;
<![CDATA[Gunarto Gunarto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i2.5015
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to: 1). To analyze the implementation of goverment authority Semarang to State land tenure. 2). To analyze the weaknesses of the implementation of goverment authority Semarang to State land tenure. 3). To analyze the solutions of the weaknesses of the implementation of goverment authority Semarang to State land tenure. This research uses empirical research with the sociological approach. Collecting data using primary legal materials and secondary data were collected through observation, interviews and studies of legal documents. Data analysis is done qualitatively, what respondents expressed orally or in writing, and their actual behavior are researched and studied as a part of the whole.Based on the results penelitaan, then obtained some results conclusions; (1). Implementation of Semarang city government authority does not comply with the authority is in this regard is the acquisition of state land that the land is basically controlled by or under control of juridical by PT. KAI and an asset of Ministry of Finance. (2). Weaknesses of implementation of goverment authority Semarang toward mastery of state land that is;First an error in exercising authority and policies implemented by the previous Mayor with the Chief Daop IV Semarang. Both lack of legal certainty over the ownership rights to the land, so that their certificates canceled citizens of the State Administrative Court which considered disabled Semarang administration. Thirdly absence of justice and legal protection against their certificates of citizens, so that between PT. KAI and residents to date on the status of each claim ownership of the land. (3). The solution of the weaknesses that arise in the implementation of goverment authority Semarang toward mastery of state land that is; Semarang city government first sought mediation between citizens and PT. KAI. Both governments Semarang to seek their compensation from PT. KAI to citizens affected. Semarang three governments seeking their relocation and providing temporary shelter for residents.Keywords: Implementation; Government Authority; State Land.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Akta Fidusia Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Yang Diluar Daerah Jabatannya ]]>
<![CDATA[Dafitson Husthinob]]>;
<![CDATA[Zulfikar Hanafi Bahri]]>;
<![CDATA[Anis Mashdurohatun]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 5, No 1 (2018): March 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v5i1.2543
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKPasal 17 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris yang mengatur bahwa Notaris hanya berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik diwilayah hukum atau wilayah jabatannya, maka akta yang dibuat tidak mempunyai kekuatan sebagai akta notariil.Problematik penelitian ini adalah : bagaimana pengaturan kedudukan Akta Fidusia dan peran Notaris dalam pembuatan Akta Fidusia?; apakah dibenarkan seorang Notaris membuat Akta Fidusia diluar wilayah jabatannya? dan bagaimana Kedudukan Akta Fidusia yang dibuat Notaris diluar wilayah jabatannya?. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis-normatif yang bersumber dari pengumpulan data yang diperoleh dari data primer dan data sekunder, kemudian dianalisis dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan (undang-undang, pendapat para ahli dan literatur-literatur buku mengenai penelitian ini). Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis data kualitatif.Hasil temuan peneliti menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Undang- Undang Nomor 42 tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia menyebutkan bahwa yang berwenang membuat Akta Fidusia adalah seorang notaris, sedangkan Pasal 17 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris yang mengatur bahwa Notaris hanya berwenang untuk membuat akta otentik diwilayah hukum atau wilayah jabatannya. Notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran dalam peraturan Undang-undang tentang Jabatan Notaris ataupun melanggar Kode etik notaris akan medapatkan sanksi berupa teguran lisan dan teguran tulis yang selanjutnya akan dijatuhi sanksi administratif, sanksi bisa berupa pemberhentian sementara, pemberhentian dengan hormat bahkan jika kesalahan memang benar-benar sudah fatal dan terbukti melanggar aturan dapat diberikan sanksi berupa pemberhentian secara tidak hormat. Kedudukan hukum terhadap akta yang dibuat oleh notaris yang telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap undang-undang notaris yaitu akta notaris tersebut dalam pembuatanya dilakukan diluar wilayah jabatan maka akta notaris tersebut tidak otentik dan akta tersebut tidak memiliki kekuatan seperti akta dibawah tangan apabila ditanda tangani oleh para pihak yang bersangkutan.Saran kepada pemerintah bahwa notaris yang bekerja di luar wilayah kerja wajib sanksi hukumnya ditegakkan dan optimalisasi serta profesionalisme dalam melaksanakan kinerja notaris dalam memberikan pelayanan kepada masyarakat yang membutuhkan lebih berorientasi kerja berbasis kepentingan ekonomi, prestige dan lain-lain yang berada pada lingkaran wilayah kepentingan pribadi hendaknya dapat dikalahkan demi kepentingan umum tanpa melanggar aturan yang berlaku.Kata kunci : Akta Fidusia, Notaris dan Kedudukan Hukum Notaris ABSTRACT Article 17 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 amendment to Law Number 30 Year 2004 Concerning Notary Public Offering stipulating that Notary is only authorized to make an authentic deed in its jurisdiction or territory, the deed is not authorized as a notarial deedThe problematic of this research are: how to regulate the position of Fiduciary Deed and Notary's role in making Fiduciary Deed ?; is it justified by a Notary to make a Fiduciary Deed outside the territory of his / her position? and how is the position of the Fiduciary Deed made by a Notary outside his / her position ? The method used in this research is with the juridical-normative approach derived from data collection obtained from the primary data and secondary data, then analyzed by qualitative analysis method. Data collection techniques used are literature studies (laws, expert opinions and book literature on this thesis). Data analysis techniques used qualitative data analysis.The findings of the researcher indicate that Article 5 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 42 Year 1999 regarding Fiduciary Guarantee states that the authority to make Fiduciary Deed is a notary while Article 17 of Law Number 2 Year 2014 amendment to Law Number 30 Year 2004 Concerning Position of Notary which stipulates that Notary is only authorized to make an authentic deed in its jurisdiction or jurisdiction. A Notary who commits a violation in the Law on Notary Publicity or violates the Notary Code of Ethics shall obtain sanctions in the form of oral and written reprimands which shall be subjected to administrative sanctions, sanctions may be temporary dismissal, dismissal with respect even if the error is indeed fatal and proven to violate the rules can be given sanctions in the form of dismissal in disrespect. The legal status of a deed made by a notary who has committed a violation of a notarial act is that the notary deed is made outside the territory of the notary so that the notarial deed is not authentic and the deed does not have the power as a deed under the hand if it is signed by the parties concerned.Suggestion to the government that a notary working outside the working area shall be sanctioned by law and optimization and professionalism in carrying out notary performance in providing services to people who need more work-oriented based on economic interests, prestige and others who are in the circle of private interest area should may be defeated in the public interest without violating any applicable rules.Keywords : Position, Fiduciary Deed and Notary]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Kasus Tumpang Tindih Kepemilikan Atas Sebidang Tanah Di Badan Pertanahan Nasional/ATR Kabupaten Kudus ]]>
<![CDATA[Kuswanto Kus]]>;
<![CDATA[Akhmad Khisni]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Akta Vol 4, No 1 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/akta.v4i1.1596
<![CDATA[Tesis ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui cara penerbitan sertipikat baru juga permasalahan hak atas tanah yang melebihi tanah dari tetangga batasnya, dalam penelitian ini dilakukan wawancara langsung dengan responden serta nara sumber untuk memperoleh data dalam penyusunan penelitian ini, tetapi juga dengan menggambarkan keadaan obyek yang diteliti.Prosedur terbitnya sertipikat baru dengan ketentuan undang-undang pokok agraria yaitu PPAT/pemohon membawa dan memberikan berkas yang diminta oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional/ATR untuk didaftarkan ke loket juga membayar ke Bendahara berdasarkan PP No. 46 tahun 2002 berbunyi tarif biaya pendaftaran tanah di BPN. Selanjutnya dilakukan pengukuran tanah, apabila ada pengalihan hak maka disertakan juga akta yang dibuat oleh PPAT berdasarkan peta bidang yang sudah dicetak BPN, tetapi apabila tidak ada peralihan hak maka bisa langsung diproses pembuatan sertipikat di BPN, dalam kurun waktu + 8 (delapan) bulan, sertipikat tersebut bisa diambil di BPN. Penyebab tumpang tindih kepemilikan hak atas sebidang tanah di Badan Pertanahan Nasional / ATR Kabupaten Kudus dengan adanya pihak BPN tidak teliti dalam rangka penerbitan Sertipikat dan tidak cermat melihat arsip peta bidang pendaftaran tanah sebelumnya, juga sebagai Pemilik/Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah lalai dalam memberikan patok-patok batas bidang tanah yang dimiliki berdasarkan PP RI No. 24 Tahun 1997 Pasal 17 ayat (3). Perlindungan hukum terhadap para pemegang hak atas tanah bilamana terjadi tumpang tindih kepemilikan sebidang tanah tercantum dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997, beberapa Pasal 19 ayat (2) huruf c, dan Pasal 23 ayat (2), juga Pasal 32 ayat (2) serta Pasal 38 ayat (2) UUPA, yang berbunyi surat-surat tanda bukti hak berlaku sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat demikian juga Pemegang hak atas tanah yang menjadi obyek sengketa tidak mendapatkan perlindungan hukum setelah adanya keputusan pencabutan atas sertipikat tanah tersebut.Kata Kunci : Leter C Desa, Surat Ukur, Sertipikat Asli. ]]>
