Jurnal Konstitusi
Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.
Articles
896 Documents
Ideologi Welfare State dalam Dasar Negara Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Sistem Jaminan Sosial Nasional
Alfitri Alfitri
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (547.267 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk932
Are the objective of Indonesia “promoting the general welfare”, and the fifth principle of Pancasila “social justice for all people of Indonesia”, as well as the constitutional mandate to hold a social security system must be expressed in terms of the state positions itself to be responsible for ensuring a decent standard of living for all citizens? This paper will analyze whether the interpretation of welfare state ideology of the government in the Act No. 40/2004 on National Social Security System had violated the 1945 Constitution. This paper supports the argument of the Constitutional Court holding that social insurance programs adopted by the government meet the constitutional criteria. The existence of the constitutional criteria makesthe welfare state ideology of Indonesia open to interpretation, and this argument is more appropriate to the context and realistic about the ability of Indonesia to provide social security for its citizens.
Politik legislasi Menentukan DeMokrasi (analisis Putusan no. 15/Puu-iX/2011)
Abdul Wahid
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (426.629 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk917
Not all juridical products are along with the society’s aspiration. There are some of the juridical products assessed as against the democracy enforcement by the society. The verdict number 15/PUU-IX/2011 given by the Constitutional Court is a kind of correction to the performance of the lawmakers (UU) if the law they produce are considered contra-democracy. Besides, the verdict of the Constitutional Court to some of the articles in the Law No. 2 Year 2011 actually might be read as a warning from the Constitutional Court to the lawmakers, especially those regulating the problem of political parties so that their performance could be maximized and transparent, and consider egalitarianism in the future.
Politik Pembangunan Hukum di Bidang Investasi Suatu Keniscayaan Konstitusi Ekonomi
Saut P. Panjaitan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (944.091 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk723
The idea of welfare state of Indonesia has to can realize the national of economy order. The 1945 Contitution of the Republic of Indonesia formulated the national economic aspect as an the constitution of economy or as a social contract of economy in order to realizing the constitutional market economy. This mean that all the policies and economic development must be taken care of constitutionally aspect, including the investment policies and regulations.
Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga; Fenomena Kekuasaan Ke Arah Constitusional Heavy
Puguh Windrawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (533.716 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk942
The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic system governance. With a solid perspective of balancing state power, the court has been set up to interpret and review of conformity of every act and regulation. In Indonesia, a constitutional court presence has an important meaning amid power shifting processes. As the supremacy to some extent moving away from the executive authority, the constitutional court appears as the most prominence body instead of legislative board. In accordance with its duties and functions, the institution is able to give juridical interpretations to examine every regulation against The Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia 1945.
Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Teori dan Praktik
Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 6 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (448.551 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk861
One of the important substance of Amendment of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 is the existence of the Constitutional Court as a state institution that functions to handle certain cases in the field of state administration, in order to maintain the constitution to be implemented in a responsible manner in accordance with the will of the people and democratic ideals. Constitutional Court’s constitutional authority to implement the principle of checks and balances which places all state agencies in the equivalent position so that there is a balance in the administration of state The existence of the Constitutional Court is a real step to correct each other’s performance among state institutions. The Constitutional Court in carrying out justice to examine, hear and decide a case still refers to the organizing principle of judicial power which, among others, is carried out simply and quickly.
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Regulasi Production Sharing Contract
Cut Asmaul Husna TR
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (341.14 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk941
After the Constitutional Court ruling has implications for regulatory 36/ PUU-X/2012 production sharing contract. Relationship between BP Migas (state) with the Business Entity or Permanent Establishment has put the state’s position and business entities or permanent establishments that manage oil and gas in an equal position. As a result, the state lost discretion to make regulations for the benefit of the people, but the state, as a representation of the people in the control of natural resources should have the discretion to make rules that benefit the overall prosperity of the people. Some of the conditions are far from optimal, Indonesian oil and gas industry is still heavily dependent on foreign domination. Associated with the conditions present in Aceh, the amount of funding for oil and gas shares, did not show a decrease in the poverty rate
Penetapan Anggota Panwaslu oleh Bawaslu: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 11/Puu-Viii/2010
Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (343.59 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk822
The Constitutional Court of Indonesia in Decision Number 11/PUU- VIII/2010 stated that the provisions regarding the recruitment of members of the Supervisory Committee for the Election must be nominated by the Provincial/District General Elections Commission is contrary to Article 22E Paragraph (1) and paragraph (5), and Article 28D Paragraphs (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, to ensure a fair legal certainty and avoid disruption of the elections, the nomination and appointment of members of Supervisory Committee for the Election is conducted by one institution, namely the General Elections Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) or Supervisory Committee for the Election. The decision contains two legal meanings. First, the view that the principle of checks and balances are not only connected with separation of power at the legislative branch, executive branch, and judiciary branch, but also the relationship between “supervisors and the supervised” that based on the proportional rationality inter-state relations. Second, the case number 11/PUU-VIII /2010 actually contain elements of the dispute between the two state institutions, namely the General Elections Commission and Bawaslu because not only related to the interpretation of norms, but also the fate of members of 192 Supervisory Committee Election that not recognized and approved by the General Elections Commission. The problem handled by Constitutional Court using judicial review case against the 1945 Constitution.
Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilu yang Demokratis
Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (424.155 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk825
General Election as a means to realize the ideal of democracy does not merely aim to determine who will get the position in the parliament but it also should represent the sovereignty of the people. In the 2009 General Election, however, parliamentary threshold was prevailed and implemented. This regulation is included on Article 202 The General Election Act number 10/2008 which stated that political party of General Election participant must fulfil at least an amount of 2.5% of total valid national vote to be included in the representation determination of the House of Representative.A number of Indonesian peoples objected the rule. This is because parliamentary threshold deemed to be potentially demolished the political right of the people. Besides, the implementation of parliamentary threshold in bottom level considered to have some potential horizontal conflict because, for example, if someone voted as a selected candidate but they do not fulfil the parliamentary threshold, this particular candidate cannot obtain a seat in the parliament. This can be seen in the petition of judicial review to the Constitution Court regarding this parliamentary threshold regulation.It can be concluded that the relevance of parliamentary threshold to democratic General Election execution can not be separated from the mechanism and reasons in determining the the amount of threshold numbers in said rule. Requirement for determining the threshold is not merely based on a reason to strengthen presidential system chosen by the Indonesian people. In this case, the people’s voice should not be represented merely by the parliamentary number having position in the House of Representative. If this happens, then there will be some concerns of the emergence of political interest to strengthen the position of a particular political party in the parliament.
Pasang Surut Komisi Yudisial: Kreasi, resistensi dan restorasi
Umi Illiyina
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 3 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (436.491 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk837
In The Federalist Papers (1787), James Madison said: “If the angels to govern men, then the internal and external monitoring is not necessary”. In other words, the control is absolute. Supervisory authority weaknesses of the institution in vast expanses of the judiciary, as well as pave the way for the “dictatorship of the courts”. The Judicial Commission is present to prevent the dictatorship of the Court. With all the hope and resistance to the Judicial Commission, it remains a small candle in the corner of a coveted judicial building clean, independent and authoritative.
Mengembalikan Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Pendidikan: Kritik Terhadap Liberalisasi Pendidikan dalam Uu Sisdiknas dan Uu Bhp
Victor Nalle Williamson Nalle
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 4 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (461.184 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk846
Indonesia’s Constitution has mandated that the state has a goal to develop nation’s intellectual. In that framework, the state should have responsibility for the education of the whole people of Indonesia. But by globalization, through the WTO and GATS, Indonesia has been directed toward the liberalization of education. Liberalization is done through legislation that directs the autonomy of state-owned educational institutions, maximizing the role of communities in the state and minimize the role of the state, the format of “Badan Hukum Pendidikan” for all educational institutions, and opening the world of education for foreign educational institutions.