cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : 10.31078
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
Jurnal Konstitusi merupakan media triwulanan guna penyebarluasan (diseminasi) hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual tentang konstitusi dan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi terbit empat nomor dalam setahun (Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember). Jurnal Konstitusi memuat hasil penelitian atau kajian konseptual (hasil pemikiran) tentang konstitusi, putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi serta isu-isu hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan yang belum pernah dipublikasikan di media lain. Jurnal Konstitusi ditujukan untuk kalangan pakar, akademisi, praktisi, penyelenggara negara, LSM, serta pemerhati hukum konstitusi dan ketatanegaraan.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 896 Documents
 86   87   88   89   90 
Kedudukan Hukum Khusus dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi Fitra Arsil; Qurrata Ayuni
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (388.051 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk19410

Abstract

In general, the Constitutional Court has the view that political parties that have seats in the DPR and/or members of the DPR already have legislative space and do not have the legal standing to review laws. However, there are a number of exceptions in many cases where political parties and members of the DPR are considered to have a special position even though they are also discussing the passed laws. This paper discusses the jurisprudential pattern of the Constitutional Court in granting special legal status to political parties and members of the DPR. Using the case approach method in collaboration with the comparison method this paper seeks to map the potential for testing with specific constitutional rights. The findings in this paper reinforce the concept that although the results of law formation in the legislature and legal review in the judiciary are equally binding for citizens, the process of law formation and legal review has a different character and these differences are beneficial within the framework of checks and balances.
Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Rumawi Rumawi; Udiyo Basuki; Mellisa Towadi; Supianto Supianto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (565.067 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1933

Abstract

This article aims to analyze legal subjects whose rights have been violated by the Fiduciaire Act. The Act law can be revoked by the Constitutional Court. The act that violates the rights of subjects is the rule in the provisions of parate executie on Fiduciaire Act. The first analysis is the ontology of parate executives that inflict certain subjects, and the second analysis is the ratio decidendi decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This paper uses dogmatize analysis. The decisions of the Constitutional Court are analyzed with the doctrine of experts and regulations. Parate execution is a right attached to the recipient fiduciary which can exercise if the fiduciary giver breaks the commitment. Collateral is auctioned through a public offering submitted by the recipient of guarantee. Default by a fiduciary giver occurs if there is an agreement between the giver and the fiduciary recipient. Default occurs based on legal remedies in determining the default. The agreement of the collector with the fiduciary acquirer, the emergence of a broken pledge experienced by the fiduciary giver can give birth to a parate executie.
Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia Catur Alfath Satriya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (466.115 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1932

Abstract

One of the features of the presidential system is the process of presidential impeachment. Before the amendment, Indonesia did not have a clear mechanism to impeach the president in the middle of his term. The impeachment of the president is determined by a majority vote in the People’s Consultative Assembly. This is a problem because the impeachment of the president only uses a political process, and there is no legal process in it. After the amendment, the presidential impeachment concept was born that in a presidential system, the president cannot be dismissed only through a political process; there must be a legal process before the political process. Based on the analysis, the process of presidential impeachment in Indonesia does not follow the principle of checks and balances. This is because the impeachment process for the president in Indonesia does not involve the second chamber in the process
Constitutional Issue of the Executional Power of Fiduciary Certificates as Equal to Court Decision Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (464.978 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1935

Abstract

The enactment of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law is expected to be able to answer problems in the financing business, but it causes a loss of constitutional rights because it equalizes the executorial power of a judge's decision legally binding with fiduciary certificates. The analysis was carried out by Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/ PUU-XVII/2019; the was carried out by document study and analyzed prescriptively and descriptively. The results showed that the normative basis of the executive power on the fiduciary certificate was born from an agreement registered. So that it can be used as perfect evidence to prove the debtor in breach of contract, and the judge's legal consideration to declare the inconsistent provisions tested are based on not the existence of legal certainty in determining the time of breach of contract (default) and the mechanism for the execution of the Fiduciary Certificate
Ratio Legis Pembatasan Kedudukan Hukum bagi Pembentuk Undang-Undang dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Fence Wantu; Novendri Mohamad Nggilu; Suwitno Imran; Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (522.196 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1931

Abstract

The discourse on limiting the legislators standing to submit a constitutional review is not an entirely new issue to analyze. However, these things still need to be examined to explore the legal ratio of limitation of the legislator’s standing to submit a constitutional review by the Constitutional Court. This research specifically answers the questions: (a) how are the dynamics of the use of the legislators standing in the constitutional review? (b) what is the legal ratio for limiting legislators standing in the constitutional review? This study uses a normative legal research method by analyzing secondary data in the form of legislation, the Constitutional Court decisions, and literature related to legislators standing to submit the constitutional review. The results of this study indicate that the legal ratio limiting legislators’ standing can be traced through the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court decisions from 2003-2019.
Isu Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Desa Terhadap Kewenangan Pengawasan Pemilihan Kepala Desa Supriyadi Arief; Rahmat Teguh Santoso Gobel
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (350.933 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1946

Abstract

The election of village heads (Pilkades) is the representation of democracy at the village level. Nevertheless, the supervision mechanism by the district/city level election committee (PPK) becomes problematic when the authority also coincides with the authority to operate. It is important to know the legal construction regarding the supervision of village head elections and the model of village head election supervision in the future. These will be analyzed normatively using a statutory approach, case approach, and concept approach. The results of this study show that Pilkades is an important process to actualize the Constitutional rights of communities, democracy and village autonomy. However, the regulations governing the pilkades are not in line with democratic values and the principle of free and fair election because of the unification of the authority to operate and supervise simultaneously at the Village Head Election Committee formed by the regional Head. Therefore, improvements to the supervision of the Pilkades in the future can be carried out with three models, namely: involving district/city Bawaslu, forming district/city Pilakdes Supervisors, direct supervision by district/city Bawaslu.

Page 90 of 90 | Total Record : 896

 86   87   88   89   90 

Filter by Year

2010 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19, No 4 (2022) Vol 19, No 3 (2022) Vol 19, No 2 (2022) Vol 19, No 1 (2022) Vol 18, No 4 (2021) Vol 18, No 3 (2021) Vol 18, No 2 (2021) Vol 18, No 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) More Issue