cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika" : 10 Documents clear
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DIMODIFIKASI DENGAN MIND MAPPING PADA MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII Se-KABUPATEN PEMALANG TAHUN 2012/2013 Siwi, Julian Reza; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to find out on the topic of cube and cuboid: (1) which was better between TPS Modified Mind Mapping (TPSMod), TPS or Direct model that produce learning achievement; (2) which one had better learning achievement between students with high, medium or low categories of mathematics creativity learning; (3) at each category of mathematics  creativity learning, which was better between TPSMod, TPS or Direct model that produce learning achievement; and (4) at each model, which one had better learning achievement between students with high, medium or low categories of mathematics creativity learning. This study was a quasi-experimental with 3´3 factorial design. The population was all of students in eigth grade of State Junior High School in Pemalang Regency on Academic Year 2012/2013. The samples were taken by using a stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples was students in eight grade of SMP Negeri 1 Randudongkal, Moga and Pulosari. The instrument of this study were mathematics creativity learning questionnaire and learning achievement test. The questionnaire tryout included content validity, internal consistency and reliability, and the test tryout included content validity, difficulty level, discrimination power, and reliability. Before the experiment was done, the balance of prior knowledge was examined by using unbalanced one way anova test. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways anova. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test used the Bartlett test. The results of the study were as follows: (1) the TPSMod model produce the learning achievement better than the TPS and direct learning, the TPS model give the same learning achievement as the direct learning; (2) the high and medium categories of mathematics creativity learning have the same learning achievement, and both of category of mathematics creativity learning have better learning achievement from low categories of mathematics creativity learning; (3) at each categories of mathematics creativity learning, theTPSMod model produce the learning achievement better than the TPS and direct learning, the TPS give the same learning achievement as the direct learning; and (4) at each models, the high and medium categories of mathematics creativity learning have the same learning achievement, and both of category of mathematics creativity learning have better learning achievement from low categories of mathematics creativity learning.Keywords: Learning Achievement, TPS Modified by Mind Mapping , Mathematics Creativity Learning
ANALISIS PROSES PENGINTEGRASIAN PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA KELAS X ILMU ALAMSMA NEGERI 1 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Zara Mertiana RZ; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to: (1) describe the process of integrating the characteristic values of disciplinary, creative, critical thinking, inquiring, and thorough in learning mathematics at the tenth of science class SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta, and (2) describe the students’ opinion of the tenth of science class SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta about the integration of the characteristic values of disciplinary, creative, critical thinking, inquiring, and thorough in learning mathematics. Qualitative research was applied in this research. The subject of the research are students and a mathematics teacher of the tenth grade of  SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta. The source of data was taken from informants (teacher and students), documentation (lesson plan), and learning activity. Data collection was taken by using interview, observation, and documentation. Data validity used the source of triangulation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The result of the research showed as follows. (1) Integrating character education of discipline, teacher did it implicitly (being a model) and explicitly (giving an urge). To integrate the critical character, teacher associates learning with daily life and guiding students analyse the information obtained or given to the students. Creative character done by the teacher in integrating for learning mathematics was to developed active classroom and informed with gave the opportunity for students to express their ideas in solving problems of mathematics questions. The integration of inquiring character in learning mathematics was not visible. To integrate thorough character, teacher planted thorough character by giving the test and urging the students to recheck the result of their works, listen carefully to what the teacher had said. (2) According to students’ opinion, teacher had planted the character of disciplinary, creative, critical thinking, inquiring, and thorough. However, there was no explanation about the character of inquiring because the test given was the standard questions so that it cannot encourage students to have inquiry.Keywords: Process analysis, character education, learning mathematics
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN kOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI POKOK TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA SMK DI KOTA MADIUN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Eva Tri Wahyuni; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to find out: (1) which produces better mathematics learning achievement among cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction model; (2) which have better learning achievement, students who have high emotional intelligence, medium, or low; (3) which gives a better learning achievement at each level of  emotional intelligence, cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction model; (4) which have a better learning achievement at each learning model, students who have the emotional intelligence high, medium, or low. This research was a quasi-experimental research which designed a 3x3 factorial. The population of the  research was all students  at eleventh grade high school vocational and engineering technology group in Madiun city on academic year 2013/2014. The samples of the research were 264 respondents consisting of 87 students by using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT), 89 students  by using cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS), and 88 students by using direct instruction model. Analysis of the data used two-way analysis of variance. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded: (1)  the cooperative learning model NHT  produces the same mathematics learning achievement as TPS, whereas NHT and TPS produce mathematics learning achievement better than the direct instruction model; (2) the students with high, medium and low  emotional intelligence have the same learning achievement; (3)  the emotional intelligence of each,  NHT  produces  the same mathematics learning achievement as TPS, whereas NHT and TPS produce mathematics learning achievement better than the direct instruction; (4) the learning model of each, students with high, medium and low emotional intelligence have the same learning achievement.            Keywords: NHT, TPS, Emotional Intelligence, Trigonometry.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK (PMR) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA SMP SE-KABUPATEN GROBOGAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Achmad Nurrofiq; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from students’ interpersonal intelligence. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) with Realistic Mathematics Approach (RMA) approach, Think Pair Share (TPS) with Realistic Mathematics Approach (RMA) and direct learning. This research was a quasi-experimental research using factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research was all students of the Junior High Schools in Grobogan regency. The samples of the research were seven grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Purwodadi, SMP Negeri 2 Grobogan and SMP Negeri 7 Purwodadi in Grobogan regency (88 students for for first experimental class, 96 students for second experimental class, and 92 students for control class). The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. In collecting the data, the instruments used were multiple-choice test of learning achievement in mathematics and student interpersonal intelligence questionnaire. The technique of analyzing the data was unbalanced two-ways Anova. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the cooperative learning model NHT with RMA give better achievement in mathematics than cooperative learning model TPS with RMA, and both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the direct learning model; (2) there are no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) in each interpersonal intelligence, the cooperative learning model NHT with RMA give better achievement in mathematics than cooperative learning model TPS with RMA, and both result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning achievement in mathematics.Keywords:          NHT, TPS, RMA, interpersonal intelligence, learning achievement in mathematics
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERORIENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) PADA MATERI TURUNAN UNTUK SISWA KELAS IX IPA PROGRAM AKSELERASI Sumanah Sumanah; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were: (1) to develop a valid mathematics learning set which is oriented to Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model in the topic of derivative on  XI Acceleration grade, and (2) to determine which learning model produces better learning achievement,  the developing CPS or the conventional model in the topic of derivative on XI Acceleration grade. The development of learning set in this study were observed from five aspects, they are: (1) the expert's validity, (2) the students' activity, (3) the teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, (4) the students' response to the learning process, and (5) the students' mathematics learning  achievement. This study was a development study of learning set done by applying a modified 4-D Thiagarajan model. There were three phases involved in this study; i.e. defining, designing, and developing. The subjects of the study were the students of SMA N 1 Pati grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the experiment class and the students of SMA 1 Kudus grade XI acceleration year 2013/2014 as the control class. The data was collected by using validation sheet of learning set, observation sheet of teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process, observation sheet of students' activity, students'response questionnaire, and test of students' learning achievement. Data analysis was done by descriptive and inferential statistics. The learning set produced is valid, because it has been validated with high score, that is 4.41 and after finishing the experiment, the results fulfill the pre-requirements, defined as follows: it leads to productive students' activity with average score of 4,25 having a positive effect, teacher's capability in managing teaching and learning process is very good with the score above 4,20, students' response toward the teaching and learning process is positive with the precentage above 80%, and learning achievement test is proven to be valid, reliable. Moreover, the teaching and learning process with CPS model with developing learning set is effective, because the experiment showed that the average score of learning achievement of the student is better than the conventional model.Keywords : Creative Problem Solving (CPS), The learning  set
REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII DI SMP N 9 YOGYAKARTA DALAM MEMBANGUN KONSEP SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR DUA VARIABEL Rima Aksen Cahdriyana; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe the preference of using of mathematical representations form of the seventh grade students of SMP 9 Yogyakarta who have high ability in developing the concept of a Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SLETV) and describing the characteristics of the use of such mathematical representations form. This research was categorized as a qualitative case study approach. The subjects of this study were 6 (six) students of seventh grade of SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta who have high ability. Data in this study were the use of mathematical representation forms in developing concepts of SLETV that obtained from observation and interview-based tasks. The data were analyzed into three categories of SLETV developing concepts: 1) stating SLETV definition and SLETV’s solution definition; 2) using the concept SLETV in everyday life; and 3) solving the problem of SLETV. The use of students’ mathematical representation that includes a symbolic representation, a verbal representation, and a visual representation were be seen by each category. The validity of the data being used in this study was triangulation time, through the first observational data and task-based interview, and the second observational data and task-based interviews. The same consistent data were categorized as valid data that illustrate the use of students’ mathematical representation in developing  concepts of SLETV. The results of this study are as follows. 1) The preference of the use of students’ representation forms in stating SLETV definition and solution sets by using verbal representation. Characteristics of using this representation are by mentioning SLETV’ characteristics (for SLETV definition), and by mentioning the characteristics SLETV solution (for solution sets); 2) Preference of the use of students representation forms in using SLETV concept in the daily life is by using symbolic representation. The characteristics of the use of representation are: a) by changing the description of the conditions that are known to be an equation form; b) by making a conjecture to find the right answer; c) by clarifying the rightness of the conjecture that has been made to determine the correct answer; d) by performing algebra arithmetic operations, and arithmetic operations to determine the right answer. 3) The preference of the use of students’ representation forms in finishing SLETV problem is by using  symbolic representation. The characteristics of using this representation are: a) by changing the shape that was known as an equation form; b) by manipulating the form of the equations that have been made to get the right answer easier; c) by making a conjecture to find the right answer; d) by clarifying the rightness of the conjecture that has been made to determine the correct answer; e) by doing algebra arithmetic operations and arithmetic operations to determine the right answer.Keywords : Developing  of concepts, Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SLETV), mathematical representation.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN EVERYONE IS A TEACHER HERE DAN THINK PAIR SHARE PADA MATERI KPK DAN FPB DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA Nur Anida Laila; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to determine:  (1) which had better learning achievement among students taught by using learning model Think Pair Share with Everyone is a Teacher Here (TPS  with ETH), Think Pair Share (TPS), or direct instruction, (2) which had  better learning achievement, students with motivation level of high, medium, or low (3) at each of the learning model, which had better learning achievement, students with motivation level of high, medium, or low,  (4) at each of the motivation level, which had better learning achievement among students who taught by using learning model TPS with ETH with TPS, or direct intruction.  Based on the test hypothesis, it could be concluded as follows. (1) Cooperative learning  model TPS with ETH produces learning achievement better than the model of TPS and direct learning. TPS learning produces better achievement than direct learning models. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high motivation is better than those with moderate and low motivation. The mathematics learning achievement of students with moderate motivation is better than those with low motivation. (3) At the TPS with ETH learning and direct instruction, the mathematics learning achievement of students with high motivation is as same as those with moderate motivation. Similarly, mathematics learning achievement of students with moderate motivation is as same as those with low motivation. While in the case of the TPS learning, the learning achievement of students with high motivation is as same as those with moderate motivation. Similarly, the mathematics achievement of students with the moderate motivation is the same as students with low motivation. However, the mathematics achievement of students with high motivation is better than thoese with low motivation. (4) For students with high and moderate motivation, the learning achievement of students taught with TPS learning with ETH is the same as those with those taught with merely TPS and direct learning. In the other hand TPS with ETH gives good impsct to the learning achievement than direct learning.  On the case of student’s low motivation TPS with ETH shows that the use two of the method gives good impact in the same with the student treated with TPS or direct learning.Keywords: TPS with ETH, TPS, direct learning, and Student’s Learning Motivation
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DAN TPS TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI SISWA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL POKOK MATERI PERSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL PADA SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KOTA SURAKARTA Aspriyani, Riski; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Sari S, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to know: (1) which gave achievement and motivation to do better, students who were subjected to cooperative models of NHT, TPS, or Conventional and students with high, medium, or low emotional intelligence; (2) on each model of learning and at each category of emotional intelligence which provided achievement and motivation to do better. The  population was all the students of  VII grade of Junior High Schools in Surakarta year of 2013/2014 and obtained a sample of  266 students. The instruments used was achievement test, motivation, and emotional intelligence questionnaire. Test requirements analysis included a multivariate normality and the variance-covariance homogeneity test. Balance test used a unbalanced one way multivariate and hypothesis testing used unbalanced two way multivariate. The results of research were: (1a) students subjected to NHT gave as good as the achievement of TPS but better than Conventional, and TPS provided a better achievement than Conventional. As well students subjected to NHT, TPS, and Conventional gave the same motivation, (1b) students with high emotional intelligence provided as good learning achievement as the students with moderate and low emotional intelligence. As well students who have high emotional intelligence gave better motivation than medium or low emotional intelligence but students with medium emotional intelligence provided as good  motivation as the students with low emotional intelligence; (2ai) in each learning model, students with high, medium, and low emotional intelligence gave the same achievement, (2aii) in NHT model, students with high emotional intelligence gave as good as the motivation of students with medium emotional intelligence. As well students with high and medium emotional intelligence gave motivation better than low emotional intelligence, (2aiii) in TPS model, students with high emotional intelligence gave motivation better than medium and low emotional intelligence but students with medium emotional intelligence gave as good motivation as students with low emotional intelligence, (2aiv) in Conventional model, students with high, medium, and low emotional intelligence gave the same motivation, (2bi) in each category of emotional intelligence, NHT gave as good as the achievement of TPS, but NHT and TPS gave better achievement than Conventional, (2bii) at high emotional intelligence, students subjected to NHT gave as good as the motivation of TPS, but NHT and TPS better than Conventional, (2biii) at medium and low emotional intelligence, students subjected to NHT, TPS, and Conventional gave the same motivation.Keywords: NHT, TPS, emotional intelligence, learning achievement and achievement motivation
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) DAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK PADA MATERI RELASI DAN FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SEMESTER 1 SMP N DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Sari, Rahmita Ika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with direct learning, those with GI with PMR or those with TTW with PMR approach, (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with high or medium or low learning creativity, (3) in each learning creativity, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with direct learning, those with GI with PMR or those with TTW with PMR approach, and (4) in each learning model, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with high or medium or low learning creativity. This research was a quasi experimental research employing 2 independent variables (learning model and learning creativity) and 1 dependent variable (mathematics learning achievement). The population of research was all of the VIII graders of Public Junior High Schools in the school year of 2013/2014. The sampling technique used was Stratified Cluster Random Sampling. The sample students consisted of three schools: SMP Negeri 1, SMP Negeri 6 and SMP Negeri 2 Karangmalang Sragen. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance (ANAVA) with unbalanced cells with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The results of research were as follows: (1) the students treated with direct learning model had learning achievement as good as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, those with TTW learning model with PMR approach had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, while those with TTW with PMR had learning achievement as good as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, (2) the students with high learning creativity had learning achievement as good as those with medium one, those with high and medium learning creativity had learning achievement better than those with low one, (3) in each learning creativity level, the students treated with direct learning model had learning achievement as same as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, those with TTW learning model with PMR approach had learning achievement better than those with direct learning, and those with TTW with PMR had learning achievement as same as those with GI learning model with PMR approach, (4) in each learning model, the students with high learning creativity had learning achievement as same as those with medium one, those with high and medium learning creativity had learning achievement better than those with low one.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Think Talk Write (TTW), Realistic Mathematics Education approach, Learning Creativity.
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) BERBASIS OUTDOOR STUDY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA SMA KELAS X PADA MATERI POKOK SISTEM PERSAMAAN DAN PERTIDAKSAMAAN Marfuah, Iim; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of the research were: (1) to yield valid, efficient, practical and effective learning model for equation and inequality system; (2) to know which students had better the learning achievement of mathematics using outdoor study-based NHT or NHT learning models; (3) to know which students had better learning achievement, the students with high or those with moderate or those with low social intelligence; (4) to know which for students with high social intelligence, moderat social intelligence and low social intelligence, outdoor study-based NHT had better learning achievement than NHT learning model; (5) to know which students had better learning achievement, outdoor study-based NHT or NHT learning model, in each level of social intelligence. The development of learning model was conducted referring to R&D procedure suggested by Borg & Gall. The result of development constituted the procedure/syntax of outdoor study-based NHT learning model. For effectiveness test, this research was a quasi-experimental research with a 2×3 factorial design. The instrument employed to collect the data was mathematics learning achievement test and student social intelligence questionnaire. Based on hypothesis testing, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The result of development constituted the procedure/syntax of outdoor study-based NHT were valid, efficient, practical and effective learning model with some game or activity such us ringball for SPLDV game, ringball for SPLDV game, to guess length and wide, inequality project and estafed. (2) The students’ mathematics learning achievement in outdoor study-based NHT learning model was better than that in NHT. (3) The students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with either moderate or low one, and those with moderate had mathematics learning achievement better than those with low one. (4). In outdoor study-based NHT learning model, the students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with moderate one, and those with either high or moderate social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with low one. In NHT learning model, the students with high social intelligence had mathematics learning achievement better than those with either moderate or low one, and those with moderate one had mathematics learning achievement as same as those with low one. (5) The students with high social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result (product) as same as those in NHT learning model. The students with moderate social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result better than those in NHT learning model. The students with low social intelligence in outdoor study-based NHT learning model provided the result as same as those in NHT learning model.Keywords: NHT (Numbered Heads Together), Outdoor Study, Student Social Intelligence

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2014 2014


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue