Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASANGARIS DAN SUDUT DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWATERHADAP MATEMATIKA KELAS VII SMP Swasti Maharani; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9994

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics, which learning model of the GI with CTL approach, TAI with CTL approach or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which students attitudes toward mathematics of the positive, neutral, or negative types results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior High Schools in Ngawi regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of this study showed that: (1) the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (2) the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics; (3) in each students attitudes toward mathematics type, the GI and TAI with CTL approach learning models result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (4) in each learning model, the mathematics learning achievement with positive attitudes toward mathematics was better than that with neutral and negative attitudes towards matematics, that with neutral attitude towards matematics was better than that with negative attitudes toward mathematics.Key words: learning model, GI, TAI, conventional, CTL approach, students attitudes toward mathematics.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10026

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: Jigsaw, NHT, interpersonal intelligence

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Heni Septi Rahayu; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10058

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TSI, TPS, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Klaten Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than TPS and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TPS was better than direct learning model. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematics was better than the students with low logical mathematics. 3) The students with high logical mathematics who were treated by TSI, TPS, direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement, students with low logical mathematics treated with TPS and TSI has the same result for both models and was better direct learning model, the students who were treated by TPS learning model was better than direct learning model, the students with low logical mathematics who were treated by TSI was same as TPS and was better than direct learning model. 4) In TSI learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematic was better than the students with both average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematic was better than students with low logical mathematics, in TPS learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was same as the achievement of students with average logical mathematics and was better than the students with low logical mathematic, in direct learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematics was same as the students with low logical mathematics.Keywords: Three Steps Interview, Think Pair Share Direct Learning Model, Logical Mathematical Intelligence.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS (SNH) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (RME) PADA PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Fitri Era Sugesti; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 1 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i1.9986

Abstract: This research aims at finding out: (1) which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type SNH through RME approach, type TSTS through RME approach, or direct instruction; (2) which one has better mathematics learning achievement among students with high, average, or low AQ; (3) at each of types (SNH through RME approach, TSTS through RME approach, and direct instruction), which group of students has better mathematics learning achievement among groups with high, average, or low AQ; (4) at each of AQ categories (high, average, and low), which one results better mathematics learning achievement among type SNH through RME approach, type TSTS through RME approach, or direct instruction.This research employed quasi-experimental design taking all of the seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Surakarta as the population. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. There were 285 students selected as the sample of this research. The techniques of collecting data were documentation which was used to know the students’ mid-test score in the even semester as the prior knowledge score, test which was used to know the students’ mathematics learning achievement, and questionnaire which was used to know the students’ AQ category. The hypothesis test used 3x3 two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells in the level of significance 0.05. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Cooperative learning type SNH through RME approach results better mathematics learning achievement than type TSTS through RME approach does and cooperative learning type TSTS through RME approach results better mathematics learning achievement than direct instruction does; (2) Students with high AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than those with average and low AQ, and students with average AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low AQ; (3) In the use of cooperative learning model type SNH through RME approach, students with high AQ have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low AQ, students with high AQ have relatively the same mathematics learning achievement as those with average AQ, and students with average AQ have relatively the same mathematics learning achievement as those with low AQ. In the use of cooperative leaning model type TSTS through RME approach, students with high, average, and low AQ have the same mathematics learning achievement; (4) For students with high AQ, the use of learning model type SNH through RME approach results better mathematics learning achievement than that of type TSTS through RME approach and direct instruction, and the use of learning model type TSTS through RME approach results the same mathematics learning achievement as that of direct instruction. For students with average and low AQ, the use of learning model type SNH through RME approach results the same mathematics learning achievement as that of type TSTS through RME approach and direct instruction, and the use of learning model type TSTS through RME approach results the same mathematics learning achievement as that of direct instruction.Key words: Cooperative Learning Model, Structured Numbered Heads, Two Stay Two Stray, Realistic Mathematics Education Approach, Adversity Quotient

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER PADA POKOK BAHASAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA MADIUN Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 4, No 2 (2014): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v4i2.9976

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of Jigsaw type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.Keywords: Jigsaw, NHT, interpersonal intelligence

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS), THINK-TALK-WRITE (TTW) DAN TWO STAY-STRAY (TSTS) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI SELF-EFFICACY Khafittulloh Viqriah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 2 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i2.10020

Abstract: The aims of this research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievements and learning interest viewed from students self-efficacy. The learning model compared were TPS, TTW, and TSTS. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all of the students in grade 8th of Junior High School in Sleman regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMPN 1 Kalasan, SMPN 4 Kalasan, and SMPN 2 Ngemplak. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self-efficacy questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TTW, and both gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS. (2) Students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (3) For TPS and TTW, students who have high, medium, and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement. For TSTS, students who have high and medium self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have medium and low self-efficacy have the same mathematics achievement, students who have high self-efficacy was better than students who have low self-efficacy. (4) For students who have high and medium self-efficacy, TPS,TTW, and TSTS gives the same mathematics achievement. For students who have low self-efficacy, TPS and TTW gives the same mathematics achievement, TPS gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS, and TTW gives better mathematics achievement than TSTS .Keywords: Think-Pair-Share (TPS), Think-Talk-Write (TTW), Two Stay-Two Stray (TSTS), self-efficacy

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL, JIGSAW DAN STAD TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA Lia Ariati; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10052

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the effect of the Problem Based Learning (PBL), Jigsaw, and Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) to the mathematics conceptual understanding and problem solving viewed from students Adversity Quotient (AQ). The type of this research was quasi-experimental with factorial design 3x3. The population was all the students of grade XI IPS SMA/MA in Wonogiri on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this research consisted of 224 students. The instruments that used to collect the data were early ability test, conceptual understanding test, problem solving test, and questionnaires Adversity Quotient of students. Data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways multivariate analysis of variance with a significance level α = 5%. The results of the research were as follows. (1)Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while students were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than with the learning model of STAD. (b) Students who were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with the learning model of Jigsaw but it have better than with the learning model of STAD while students with Jigsaw learning models have the same problem solving as students with learning model of STAD (2)Students with high AQ have better conceptual understanding and problem solving than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (3)(a) In learning model of PBL and Jigsaw, students with high AQ have the same conceptual understanding as medium AQ but better than low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better conceptual understanding than low AQ while in learning model of STAD, students with high AQ have a better conceptual understanding than students with medium and low AQ, and the students with medium AQ were better than low AQ. (b) In learning model of PBL, Jigsaw and STAD, students who have high AQ have better problem solving than students who have students with medium and low AQ, and students with medium AQ have a better problem solving than students with low AQ. (4)(a) For high and low AQ, students were subjected to the PBL learning model have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw and STAD while for medium AQ, students who were subjected to the learning model of PBL have the same conceptual understanding as students who were subjected to the learning model Jigsaw but better than STAD and students who were subjected to the learning model of Jigsaw have a better conceptual understanding than students who were subjected to the learning model of STAD. (b) In each AQ, students with the PBL learning model have the same problem solving as students with Jigsaw learning model but better than STAD learning model, and students with Jigsaw learning model have a better problem solving than students of STAD learning model.Keywords : PBL, Jigsaw, STAD, AQ, conceptual understanding, problem solving.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING SERTA MODEL THINK PAIR SHARE MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK DITINJAU DARI KATEGORI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR MATEMATIS TINGKAT TINGGI PESERTA DIDIK SMP Yudi Pramono Pawiro; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v5i1.10010

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the high order mathematical thinking skill viewed from the emotional quotient of the students. The learning models compared were model of the PBL, model of the DL and model of the TPS. This research used the quasi experimental research. It’s population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique and consisted of 253 students. They were grouped into three classes, namely: 87 in Experimental Class 1, 84 in Experimental Class 2, and 83 in Experimental Class 3. The instruments to gather the data were test of high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam, and emotional quotient questionnaire. The proposed hypotheses of the research were analyzed by using the two way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows. 1) Model of the PBL results in a better high order mathematical thinking skill than model of the DL, and model of the TPS. Model of the DL results same high order mathematical thinking skill with TPS. 2) Emotional quotient gives students a different effect on high order mathematical thinking skill on the learning topic of cube and beam. The students with the high emotional quotient have a better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the moderate emotional quotient and those with the low emotional quotient, the students with the moderate emotional quotient have a better high order mathematical thinking skill than those with the low emotional quotient. 3) There was no interaction the aforementioned learning models and the categories of the emotional quotient on the high order mathematical thinking skill of the students.Keywords: PBL, DL, TPS, High Order Mathematical Thinking Skill and Emotional Quotient.

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Venty Meilasari; Budiyono Budiyono; Isnandar Slamet
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i1.10042

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium or low independence of learning students, (3) in each learning models, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium, or low independence of learning students, (4) in each categories of independence of learning, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction learning model. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The research design was a 3×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the eight class of junior high school in Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 281 students. The instruments used were independence of learning questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) TAI model provided the mathematics achievement as good as GI model, TAI model and GI model provided better mathematics achievement than direct instruction model. (2) The high independence of learning student had better mathematics achievement than medium and low independence of learning students, and the medium had better than low independence of learning students. (3) In TAI model and direct instruction model, the high, medium, and low independence of learning had the same mathematics achievement, in GI learning model, the high independence of learning students had mathematics achievement as good as the medium independence of learning students, the high independence of learning had better than the low independence of learning, and the medium independence of learning students had the same as the low independence of learning students. (4) In high and low independence of learning, TAI model, GI model, and direct instruction model provided the same achievement, in medium independence of learning, TAI model and GI model provided the same achievement, TAI model provided better achievement than direct instruction model, GI model was the same as direct instruction model.Keyword: TAI, GI, Direct Instruction, Independence of Learning, and Mathematics Achievement

EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY DENGAN TUTOR SEBAYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KEBUMEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Miftachudin Miftachudin; Budiyono Budiyono; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract: The objective of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement of quadrangle viewed from the multiple inellegences of the students. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type with peer tutor, the cooperative learning models of the TSTS type, and the direct learning models. The kind of research is quasi-experimental research with factorial design 3x3. Population of this research is all students of State Junior High Schools in Kebumen. The sample of this research is 288 students which is 95 students in Experiment I class, 96 students in Experiment II class, and 97 students in controlled class. The hypothesis test uses two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The result of the research shows that: (1) TSTS learning model by peer tutor shows the higher achievement of students than cooperative learning model of TSTS. The cooperative learning model of TSTS results as good as the direct learning model, and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning one, (2) students with logic-mathematic linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same achievement among them, (3) at TSTS learning model by peer tutor, TSTS learning model, and direct learning model, students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence have the same result, (4) at students with logic-mathematic, linguistic, and interpersonal intelligence, TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than TSTS cooperative learning model; TSTS cooperative learning model results as good as the result of direct learning model; and TSTS learning model by peer tutor results higher achievement than the direct learning model.Keywords: TSTS learning model by peer tutor, Two Stay Two Stray, achievement, intelligence

Title

Found 45 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 45 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 45 Documents
Search