cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) MELALUI PENILAIAN TEMAN SEJAWAT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA MTsN DI KABUPATEN SRAGEN Sholeh Muntasyir; Budiyono Budiyono; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research is aimed to view: (1) which gives a better learning achievement,  learning Numbered Head Together (NHT) with the AfL through peer assessment, NHT or direct learning, (2) which gives better achievement, low, medium or high level creativity in mathematics learning, (3) which has better mathematics learning achievement, student having low, medium or high learning creativity on each learning model, (4) which learning model gives better achievement in learning mathematics, learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) with the AfL through peer assessment, learning models Numbered Head Together (NHT) or direct learning model on each student’s creativity level. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The study population was all students MTsN in Sragen. The sampling technique used a stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 294 students, consisted of 95 students in the first experimental class, 100 students in the second experimental class and 99 students in the control class. Data collected through mathematics achievement tests and questionnaires of study mathematics creativity. Hypothesis testing used two- way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results show as follows. (1) The NHT with the AfL through peer assessment model provide a better learning performance than the NHT and direct learning model. The NHT model provide a better learning performance than the direct learning model. (2) Students with a high level learning creativity have a better achievement than students who have medium and low creativity. Students with medium and low level creativity gain the same learning achievement. (3) In the NHT learning model with the AfL through peer assessment, students with a high level creativity gain better learning achievement than students with medium learning creativity, but when compared with students who have low learning creativity get the same academic achievement. While using NHT  model and direct learning, students with high, medium and low creativity get the same learning achievement. (4) At the high level of creativity,  NHT with the AfL through peer assessment model gived a better performance than the NHT and direct learning, NHT and direct learning models provide the same learning performance. Students having medium and low level of creativity provide the same learning achievement in each learning models.Keywords : NHT, AfL, peer assessment,  creativity in learning.
EKPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY DAN GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Ira Vahlia
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the student creativity. The learning model compared were discovery, group investigation and conventional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of Junior High School in Surakarta city on academic year 2012/2013. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples consist of 281 students who were divided into 94 students in the first experiment class, 94 students in the second experiment class, and 93 students in the control class. The results of this research are as follows: (1) the discovery learning model results in better learning achievement than the group investigation and conventional learning model. The group investigation learning model results in an equal learning achievement to the conventional learning model, (2) the students having high level of creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity, (3) on the discovery learning model, students having high creativity have better learning achievement than those having medium and low levels of creativity and students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low creativity. On the group investigation model, students in each level of creativity have the same learning achievement, (4) the students who were tought with the discovery learning model have better learning achievement than those taught with the group investigation and conventional learning model in the category of having high level of creativity. The students who were tought group investigation and conventional model results in an equal learning achievement in the category of having high level of creativity. The students having medium level of creativity have an equal learning achievement to those having low level of creativity in each learning model.Key words: discovery, group investigation, learning achievement, and creativity
ANALISIS PROSES SCAFFOLDING PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 4 KARANGANYAR Wahyu Nofiansyah; Imam Sujadi; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research was aimed to describe scaffolding process in mathematics learning in the learning material of straight line equation at grade VIII Junior High School Number 4 in Karanganyar Regency in the  Academic Year of 2013/2014 for conceptual and procedural knowledge. This research was a descriptive qualitative research. The main subject of this research was a mathematics teacher grade VIII Junior High School Number 4 in Karanganyar Regency. Meanwhile, the minor subject in this research was students getting scaffolding from teachers in the learning process. The selection of  research subject was by purpossive sampling technique. In this research, researcher used passive participation observation and not structured interview recorded by using handycam. In this research, the data validity technique was triangulation technique. The result of research showed as follows. 1) The scaffolding process of learning activities in the learning material of straight line equation for conceptual knowledge given by teacher was to keep students on task, and provide clear direction and reduce students confusion. It was scaffolding process given often by teachers. While the scaffolding process given occasionally by teachers was presenting the conducting questions, clarifies expectations and incorporates assessment, and presented the information clearly. 2) The scaffolding process of learning activities in the learning material of straight line equation for procedural knowledge given by teachers was to present the information clearly and present the conducting questions. It was scaffolding process given often by teachers. While the scaffolding process given occasionally by teachers was directed students against reference, keeps students on task, involved student’s participation, provides clear direction and reduces students’ confusion, and clarifies expectations and incorporates assessment.Keywords: scaffolding, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge
STRATEGI GURU DALAM MEMBELAJARKAN MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI LINGKARAN KEPADA ANAK TUNAGRAHITA (Studi Kasus pada Siswa Kelas VIII SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu) Anita Dewi Utami; Imam Sujadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to describe teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle to intellectual disability students in SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The subject of this  study was classroom mathematics teacher and all students of eighth grade of SLB Muhammadiyah Cepu. The data of this study was teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle taken from the result of recording transcription of teaching and learning process through two observations. The data validity technique used in this study was member check, a process of data checking taken by the researcher from the subject of the study to examine the possibilities of different assumptions. The result reveal that in opening activity (pre-activity) and closing activity (post-activity), teacher implemented movement and rhythm strategy by asking the students to sing circle song. While in the main activity, teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle was dealing with conceptual knowledge by implementing  Bruner’s learning theory at enactive stage, it is by introducing the concept of the form of circle with some learning media to students. Then, the teacher’s strategy in teaching mathematics on the topic of circle which deals with procedural knowledge was by implementating guided discovery model, it is by guiding the students to do activity to count the circle’s  circumference by using thread. But, because of the limitation of the mentally handicapped students’ intellectuality, the guided discovery model which was implemented by the teacher was firstly by giving some examples to the students, then asking the students to practice to find the circle’s circumference from the length of the thread by the students themselves.Keywords: teacher’s strategy, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, mathematics teaching learning, student with intellectual disability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) DIMODIFIKASI CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL), THINK PAIR AND SHARE (TPS) DAN KONVENSIONAL PADA BAB BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK Toipur Toipur; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Mania Roswitha
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which learning model of the TPS modified with CTL, the TPS, and the conventional learning; (2) which students of those with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have a better learning achievement in Mathematics; (3) in each learning style, which learning model of the TPS modified with CTL, the TPS, and the conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which learning style of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles results in a better learning achievement in Mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. The population of the research was the students of Islamic Junior Secondary Schools in Tulungagung regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research consisten of 294 students; 95 students belonged to experiment class one, 93 students belonged to experiment class two, and 106 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The students instructed with TPS modified with CTL have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the TPS. Both the TPS modified with CTL and TPS have a better learning achievement than those instructed with the conventional learning. 2) The students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics. 3) In each learning style, the students instructed with TPS modified with CTL have the same learning achievement in Mathematics as those instructed with the TPS. Both the TPS modified with CTL and TPS have a better learning achievement than those instructed with the conventional learning. 4) In each category of the learning models, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: Learning style, think pair and share, contextual teaching and learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING , PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, DAN THINK-TALK-WRITE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Umi Supraptinah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to find out: (1) which one that gives better mathematical problem solving abilities, among learning models of discovery learning (DL), problem based learning (PBL), or think-talk-write (TTW) using  scientific approach, (2) which one has better mathematical problem solving abilities, the students having high, medium, or low self regulated learning, (3) in each learning model, which one has better mathematical problem solving abilities, the students having high, medium, or low self regulated learning, (4) in each category of self regulated learning, which one that gives better mathematical problem solving abilities, among learning models of DL, PBL, or TTW using  scientific approach. This research was in quasi experimental. The population were all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Sragen Regency on the second semester of 2014/2015 academic years. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling and then selected 296 students. The instruments used for data collection were a questionnaire for self regulated learning of student and mathematical problem solving ability test in the form of essay. Hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells, with a significance level of 5%. The results of research showed as follows. (1) PBL model using scientific approach to provide mathematical problem solving abilities is better than DL and TTW models using scientific approaches, while DL model is better than TTW model; (2) Students with high self regulated learning have  mathematical problem solving abilities better than medium or low self regulated learning, while students with medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematical problem-solving ability; (3) In the DL, PBL, and TTW models using scientific approach, students with high, medium, or low self regulated learning have the same mathematical problem-solving ability; (4) For students with high self regulated learning, the use of DL and PBL models provide the same  mathematical problem-solving ability, the DL and TTW models provide the same  mathematical problem-solving ability, but  PBL model is better  than TTW model, for students with medium self regulated learning, PBL model provides mathematical problem-solving ability better than DL and TTW models, while DL and TTW models provide the same mathematical problem-solving ability, for students with low self regulated learning, the use of DL, PBL, and TTW models provide the same  mathematical problem-solving ability.Keywords: learning model, discovery learning, problem based learning, think talk write, scientific approach, self regulated learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING PADA MATERI POKOK BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VIII SEKOTA MADIUN Lingga Nico Pradana; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Budi Usodo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models viewed from the student multiply intellegence. The learning models compared were NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. This research  was a quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x4. The population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation, tests and questionnaires method. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testing were concluded that: (1) NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (2) students with type linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement, (3) on each type of multiple intelligences, NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement, (4) on each models of learning, learning achievement of students with linguistic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, and spatial had the same achievement.Keywords: cooperative learning NHT, CTL approaches, multiple intelligences, learning achievement
EFEKTIVITAS MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PMR DAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE GI DENGAN PMR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Yadi Ardiawan; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research are to know: (1) which one gives better students’ mathematics achievement, cooperative model of NHT type with RME, cooperative model of GI type with RME or conventional model, (2) which one has better students’ mathematics achievement, student having high creativity, medium or low, and (3) for any level of creativities, which one gives better students’ mathematics achievement, cooperative model of NHT type with RME, cooperative model of GI type with RME or conventional model and for any kind of models which one has better students’ mathematics achievement, student having high creativity, medium or low. The type of this research was a quasi experimental by 3x3 factorial design.The population in this research was the seventh grade students of junior high school in Pontianak in the academic year 2012/2013. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The instrument of research using mathematics achievement test and verbal creativity test. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) There is an influence of the learning model toward students’ mathematics achievement. Cooperative model of NHT type with RME provides  students’ mathematics achievement better than the cooperative model of GI type with RME and conventional model. Cooperative model of GI type with RME provides students’ mathematics achievement better than the conventional model. (2) There is an influence of the student’s creativity level toward students’ mathematics achievement. Students having high creativity have better mathematics achievement than students having medium and low creativity. Students having medium creativity have better mathematics achievement than students with low creativity. (3) For any level of creativities that the cooperative model of NHT type with RME gives better student’s mathematics achievement than cooperative model of GI type with RME and conventional model, and cooperative model of GI type with RME gives better students’ mathematics achievement than conventional model. For any kind of models, students having high creativity have better mathematics achievement than students having medium and low creativity, and students having medium have better mathematics achievement than students having low creativity. Keywords: Cooperative Model of NHT (Numbered Heads Together) type, Cooperative Model of GI (Group Investigation) type, RME (Realistic Mathematics Education) Approach, Student’s Creativity
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TEAMS ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI OPERASI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Marchamah Ulfa; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of research was to know the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the student learning style. The learning models compared were TAPPS, TAI and classical with scientific approach. This research used the quasi experimental method. The population was the students of junior high school in Surakarta regency on academic year 2014/2015. The tecnique of taking sample was stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 291 students. The instruments used were examination test and learning styles test. The proposed hypothesis were analyzed using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions were as follows. 1) TAPPS with scientific approach have better mathematics achievement than TAI and classical with scientific approach, TAI and classical with scientific approach have the same achievement. 2) auditory students have better mathematics achievement than visual and kinesthetic students, visual and kinesthetic students have the same achievement. 3) In TAPPS with scientific approach, auditory students have better achievement than visual students, kinesthetic studentshave the same achievement as visual and auditory students. In TAI with scientific approach, auditory students have better achievement than visual and kinesthetic students, visual and kinesthetic students have the same achievement. In classical with scientific approach, auditory students have the same achievement as visual and kinesthetic students, visual students have better achievement than kinesthetic students. 4) In visual students, TAPPS with scientific approach have the same achievement as TAI and classical with scientific approach,  classical with scientific approach have better achievement than TAI with scientific approach. In auditorial students, TAPPS and TAI with scientific approach have the same achievement, TAPPS and TAI with scientific approach have better achievement than classical with scientific approach. In kinesthetic students, TAI with scientific approach  have the same achievement as TAPPS and classical with scientific approach, TAPPS with scientific approach have better achievement than classical with  scientific approach.Key words: TAPPS, TAI, classical, scientific approach, learning styles, achievement of learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING (AfL) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA Habibi Ratu Perwira Negara; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aim to find out the effect of the learning models on achievement and mathematics communication ability viewed from cognitive style. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning of TPS type with AfL, cooperative learning of TPS type, and the direct learning mode. The research was quasi experimental. The population was all students of grade VII State Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways multivariat analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL gives better achievement and mathematics communication ability than the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives better achievement and mathematics communication ability than the direct learning model. (2) Students with the FI cognitive style had better achievement than students with the FD cognitive style, while students with the FI cognitive style had the same mathematics communication ability as students with the FD cognitive style. (3) On FD cognitive style and FI cognitive style, the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL gives a better achievement than the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives a better achievement than the direct learning model. On FD cognitive style, the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of TPS type, and the direct learning model gives the same mathematics communication ability. On FI cognitive style, the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL gives the same mathematics communication ability as the cooperative learning model of TPS type, and the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL and the cooperative learning model of TPS type gives a better mathematics communication ability than the direct learning model. (4) On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, students with the FI cognitive style had better achievement than students with the FD cognitive style. On the cooperative learning model of TPS type with AfL, the cooperative learning model of TPS type and the direct learning model, students with the FI cognitive style and FD cognitive style had the same mathematics communication ability.Keywords: TPS, AfL, cognitive style, mathematics achievement, mathematics communication ability. 

Page 5 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue