cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahsan Yunus
Contact Email
ahsan.yunus@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
hasanuddinlawreview@unhas.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Hasanuddin Law Review
Published by Universitas Hasanuddin
ISSN : 24429880     EISSN : 24429899     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Hasanuddin Law Review (Hasanuddin Law Rev. - HALREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University. HALREV published three times a year in April, August, and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in l
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025" : 6 Documents clear
Regulatory Frameworks to Integrate Corporate Social Responsibility with Circular Economy Principles Sunaryo, Sunaryo; Kasmawati, Kasmawati; Pham, Hong Nhung; Rahayu, Astri
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6135

Abstract

The urgency of integrating environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and circular economy principles into legal policy frameworks has become increasingly critical in the energy transition era. This study examines the regulatory challenges hindering the alignment between CSR obligations and circular economy objectives in Indonesia, particularly the legal disconnection between Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and broader environmental regulations. Utilizing a normative legal research method, the study analyzes statutory instruments, policy documents, and international legal frameworks to assess the coherence and efficacy of existing laws. Findings reveal that CSR implementation remains fragmented and often symbolic, while circular economy practices lack regulatory incentives and enforcement, especially in resource-intensive sectors. This gap not only undermines sustainability efforts but also delays the shift toward a low-carbon economic model. The study underscores the need for regulatory harmonization, including revising corporate and environmental laws to embed circular economy principles into CSR obligations. The novelty of this research lies in offering an integrative legal perspective that bridges CSR and circular economy concepts, presenting a policy blueprint to accelerate Indonesia's transition toward a more sustainable and environmentally accountable corporate ecosystem.
Sharenting in Malaysia: Balancing Parental Rights and Children’s Privacy in the Digital Age Jamaluddin, Siti Zaharah; Abu Taher, Mohammad; Ahmad Rujhan, Iman Syamil
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6285

Abstract

This study explores the phenomenon of “sharenting,” the widespread practice of parents sharing information, photos, and videos of their children online, within the Malaysian context. As social media becomes deeply embedded in daily life, sharenting serves as a common means for parents to document and share their parenting journey. However, this practice raises significant concerns about striking a balance between parental rights and children’s rights to privacy, consent, and protection from long-term digital exposure. While Malaysian parents often view sharenting as an expression of their rights, it may inadvertently infringe upon the child’s autonomy and digital footprint, which is permanent and difficult to erase. This study examines the existing Malaysian legal framework governing parental and children’s rights, with a focus on the principle of the best interest of the child as the guiding standard. Through a comprehensive review of literature, relevant legislation, and comparative perspective, the study argues that current laws are insufficiently addressing children’s digital privacy and consent rights. It recommends legal reforms that explicitly recognise children’s rights to privacy, consent, and the right to be forgotten, ensuring a more equitable balance between parental authority and the child’s digital autonomy in the digital age.
The Artist’s Resale Right: Global Perspectives and Vietnam’s Path to Protection under the EVFTA Tuan, Tran Anh; Kien, Tran
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6558

Abstract

The artist’s resale right, enabling visual artists to receive royalties from secondary market sales, is a pivotal intellectual property mechanism with varied global adoption. This article traces its historical evolution from early 20th-century legislation to its inclusion in international frameworks, contrasting the European Union and United Kingdom’s harmonized approaches with the United States’ rejection due to differing copyright philosophies. It examines the resale right provisions in a new-generation free trade agreement, analyzing Vietnam’s current legal gap under its intellectual property framework and the feasibility of incorporation. The article evaluates arguments for and against the resale right, highlighting its role in promoting artist equity and creative incentives against concerns of market distortion and administrative burdens. It argues that Vietnam should adopt the resale right to align with global standards, proposing solutions to legal, cultural, economic, and political challenges. This analysis offers insights for jurisdictions navigating intellectual property integration in trade agreements.
Feminism and Gender Equality among Orang Asli Women: Implications for Customs and Laws Abd Karim, Rafidah; Mustapha, Ramlee; Abd Wahab, Norwaliza; Aliasak, Mohd Hasrol Hafizz; Che Ghani, Nurul Farhani; Irwansyah, Irwansyah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6317

Abstract

Although Malaysia has made progress in recognising Indigenous rights, the perspectives of Orang Asli women on feminism and gender equality remain largely absent from legal and academic discourse. This article examines the legal tensions between indigenous customary laws and Malaysia’s constitutional commitment to gender equality, as perceived and experienced by Orang Asli women. The central legal issue explored is whether customary practices that reflect patriarchal norms can withstand constitutional scrutiny under Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, and how these practices align with Malaysia’s obligations under CEDAW and UNDRIP. Using a doctrinal legal methodology, the study systematically examines constitutional provisions, relevant legislation, and judicial interpretations concerning indigenous law and gender rights. A socio-legal component complements this analysis through empirical data collected from 120 questionnaires and 30 semi-structured interviews with Orang Asli women from five selected tribes, providing context to how these legal norms function in practice. This article contributes to legal theory by engaging with legal pluralism and feminist legal thought, revealing how unregulated customary practices can undermine fundamental rights. Thus, it enhances legal studies by highlighting an ethical framework for legislative and judicial reconciliation between constitutional equality and indigenous legal traditions. In a pluralistic legal circumstance, this study advocates on Malaysian legal institutions to acknowledge the changing voices of Indigenous women as catalysts of change.
A Cross-National Analysis of State Institutional Authority Disputes Hafidz, Jawade
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.5452

Abstract

The distribution of authority among state institutions is a fundamental component of any governmental framework, as it helps prevent jurisdictional overlaps that could lead to institutional conflicts. When such conflicts over authority do occur, it becomes imperative to have a mechanism in place for their resolution. This study is designed to explore and analyze the comparative regulatory structures for resolving authority disputes among state institutions, as outlined by the legislation in Indonesia, the United States, Germany, and Canada. Furthermore, the research aims to identify the characteristics of disputes concerning state institutional authority and suggest optimal regulatory solutions for their resolution. Utilizing a qualitative and descriptive research approach, this study will clarify the regulatory frameworks for dispute resolution among state institutions, as defined by the current legislation in each country. Each framework is characterized by unique institutions and methods for resolving disputes. The findings reveal that the German Constitutional Court holds the most comprehensive jurisdiction, covering all state institutions in Germany, both at the central and regional levels. In terms of procedural aspects, the legal framework for resolving authority disputes in Germany is more detailed than those in Indonesia, the United States, or Canada, thereby promoting greater transparency and accountability in the dispute resolution process in Germany.
Judicial Discretion and Ultra Petita in Employment Termination Cases: Lessons from Dutch Arbitration System Sabur, Laode Muhammad; Razak, Abdul; Halim, Hamzah; Jamhur
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6521

Abstract

The principle of ex aequo et bono occupies a unique position within Indonesia’s legal landscape: although not expressly codified, it is increasingly invoked by judges to pursue substantive justice in employment termination disputes. This judicial practice, however, raises concerns regarding legal certainty and the boundaries of judicial authority, especially when decisions extend beyond the parties’ claims and risk violating the ultra petita doctrine. This article examines the application of ex aequo et bono in Indonesian labor courts through a normative legal analysis, using both comparative and conceptual approaches. A focal point of the study is Supreme Court Decision No. 223 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2017, in which the court terminated an employment relationship despite neither party explicitly requesting such relief. By comparing Indonesia’s judicial approach with the Netherlands, where ex aequo et bono is permitted exclusively within arbitration and only with explicit party consent. This article highlights the structural safeguards embedded in Dutch law that preserve both fairness and legal certainty. The results show that Indonesia’s unregulated use of ex aequo et bono creates inconsistencies and risks judicial overreach, underscoring the urgent need for statutory guidance. This study argues that incorporating explicit party consent and clearer procedural boundaries into Indonesia’s labor dispute resolution framework would better harmonize equity-based reasoning with the principles of legal certainty and judicial accountability.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 11 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2025 VOLUME 11 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2025 VOLUME 11 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2025 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2024 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2024 VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2023 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2023 VOLUME 9 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2023 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2022 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2022 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2022 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2021 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2021 VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2021 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2020 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2020 VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2020 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2019 VOLUME 5 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2019 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 3 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2015 VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2015 More Issue