cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Masruchin
Contact Email
aldzikra@radenintan.ac.id
Phone
+6281379788639
Journal Mail Official
aldzikra@radenintan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Quran dan al-Hadits
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
ISSN : 19780893     EISSN : 27147916     DOI : 10.24042
Core Subject : Religion, Education,
Religion Education
Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Quran dan al-Hadits [ISSN 2714-7916] is peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publish the scholarly study of Quran and Hadits from many different perspectives. Particular attention is paid to the works dealing with: Quranic and Hadits Studies, Quranic and Hadits sciences, Living Quran and Hadits, Quranic and Hadits Studies accros different areas in the world (The Middle East, The West, Archipelago and other areas), Methodology of Qur’an, Tafsir and Hadits Studies. Publishes twice in a year [June and December]. by Quranic and Tafsir studies Programme at Ushuluddin Faculty, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol 20 no 2 (2026)" : 3 Documents clear
The Meaning of Lies and Falsehood in the Qur'an (A Comparative Study of Lexical Terms from the Perspective of al-Wujuh wa an-Nazā'ir) Syukron L, Ahmad; Amran; Andri Warseto
AL-DZIKRA: JURNAL STUDI ILMU AL-QUR'AN DAN AL-HADITS Vol 20 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/al-dzikra.v20i2.32643

Abstract

Abstract The study of Qur'anic vocabulary from the perspective of al-wujuh wa an-Nazā’ir has proven capable of uncovering profound scientific messages behind the selection of specific lexical items that are generally considered to share similar meanings (synonyms/mutaradif). This research examines four terms in the Qur'an that convey the meaning of "lying and falsehood," namely al-Kadzib, al-Ifk, al-Iftira', and al-Buhtan. Employing a qualitative approach with library research methods and content analysis, this study aims to identify the various meanings (wujuh) of each term, analyze their similarities and differences from the perspective of an-Nazā’ir, and establish a hierarchy of the severity of falsehood among the four terms. The findings reveal that al-Kadzib (mentioned 251 times) encompasses the broadest range of meanings and can, on occasion, carry positive connotations under certain conditions. Al-Ifk (30 times) signifies the distortion of facts and is synonymous with the notion of "hoax." Al-Iftira' (60 times) denotes a fabricated lie deliberately constructed and involving another party who does not consent to the falsehood attributed to them. Al-Buhtan (6 times) represents the highest level of falsehood, as it combines elements of both al-Kadzib and al-Iftira', with its perpetrator often exhibiting arrogance and haughtiness. In conclusion, these four terms are not freely interchangeable, as they possess a hierarchical structure of meaning: al-Kadzib (lowest level), al-Ifk, al-Iftira', and al-Buhtan (highest level). This finding reaffirms the Qur'an's existence as an eternal miracle, wherein every single word contains a precise and unparalleled scientific message. Keywords: Al-Buhtan; Al-Iftira'; Al-Ifk;   al-Kadzib; Al-Wujuh wa An-Nazā’ir.   Abstrak Studi tentang kosakata Al-Qur'an dalam perspektif al-wujuh wa an-Nazā’ir telah terbukti mampu mengungkap pesan ilmiah yang mendalam di balik pemilihan lafadz-lafadz tertentu yang secara umum dianggap memiliki kesamaan makna (sinonim/mutaradif). Penelitian ini mengkaji empat lafadz dalam Al-Qur'an yang bermakna "bohong dan dusta", yaitu al-Kadzib, al-Ifk, al-Iftira', dan al-Buhtan. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode kepustakaan (library research) serta analisis isi (content analysis), penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi ragam makna (wujuh) dari masing-masing lafadz, menganalisis persamaan dan perbedaannya dalam perspektif an-Nazā’ir, serta menyusun hierarki bobot kebohongan di antara keempat lafadz tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa al-Kadzib (251 kali disebut) memiliki cakupan makna paling luas dan terkadang dapat bernilai positif dalam kondisi tertentu. Al-Ifk (30 kali) bermakna pemutarbalikan fakta dan identik dengan pengertian "hoax". Al-Iftira' (60 kali) berarti kebohongan yang diada-adakan dengan sengaja melibatkan pihak lain yang tidak merelakan kebohongannya. Al-Buhtan (6 kali) merupakan kebohongan level tertinggi karena merupakan paduan dari al-Kadzib dan al-Iftira', dengan pelaku cenderung angkuh dan sombong. Kesimpulannya, keempat lafadz tersebut tidak dapat dipertukarkan secara bebas karena memiliki hierarki makna berjenjang: al-Kadzib (level terendah), al-Ifk, al-Iftira', al-Buhtan (level tertinggi). Temuan ini menegaskan kembali eksistensi Al-Qur'an sebagai mukjizat abadi yang setiap kosa katanya mengandung pesan ilmiah yang presisi dan tidak tertandingi. Kata Kunci: Al-Buhtan; Al-Iftira';  Al-Ifk;  al-Kadzib; Al-Wujuh wa An-Nazā’ir.
Gender Epistemology as a Contextual Interpretation Method in the Contemporary Era: A Study of Nasaruddin Umar’s Thoughts Zulyadain, Zulyadain; Muhammad Taufiq; Wely Dozan
AL-DZIKRA: JURNAL STUDI ILMU AL-QUR'AN DAN AL-HADITS Vol 20 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/al-dzikra.v20i2.32764

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses Nasaruddin Umar, who has made a significant contribution, particularly through his ideas on gender, and proposes gender as a method of contextual interpretation of the Qur'an in the Contemporary Era. Although researchers have widely studied gender, this article focuses more specifically on the urgency of gender as a method of contextual interpretation in Nasaruddin Umar's approach to Qur'anic interpretation. This study addresses several academic problems. First, how is Nasaruddin Umar's thought constructed regarding the importance of gender as a method of interpretation? Second, what is the model of the gender approach in the study of Qur'anic interpretation, particularly in relation to Nasaruddin Umar's ideas? Third, this study seeks to reveal the implications of gender for interpretation in the Contemporary Era, which constitutes the researcher’s finding and the study's academic novelty. More specifically, this study employs a literature review based on library research, analyzing relevant references aligned with the study's main theme. The findings indicate that, from Nasaruddin Umar’s perspective, gender plays an important role in implementing a more just and equal interpretation. Nasaruddin Umar emphasizes the importance of understanding the esoteric dimension within interpretive perspectives as a strategy for achieving gender-equal interpretation and rejecting discriminatory interpretations. Its implication in the Contemporary Era is that gender serves as the only contextual interpretation method that can provide respect for women, so that they are not influenced by patriarchal culture and the ideology of the mufassir in the interpretation. Keywords: Contemporary; Contextual; Gender; Interpretation; Nasaruddin Umar.   Abstrak Tulisan ini mendiskusikan tentang Nasaruddin Umar yang memiliki kontribusi besar terutama gagasan terhadap gender sekaligus menawarkan gender sebagai metode interpretasi kontekstual dalam penafsiran al-Qur’an di Era Kontemporer. Penelitian terhadap gender belakangan ini sudah banyak peneliti temukan, namun demikian, tulisan ini lebih menyoroti bagaimana urgensi gender sehingga dijadikan sebagai metode interpretasi kontekstual dalam pemikiran tafsir Nasaruddin Umar. Fokus penelitian ini membahas beberapa problem akademik diantaranya, Pertama, Bagaimana kontruksi dari pemikiran Nasaruddin Umar terkait pentingnya gender sebagai metode tafsir? Kedua, Bagaimana model pendekatan gender dalam kajian tafsir al-Qur’an terlebih gagasan terhadap Nasaruddin Umar? Ketiga, Penelitian ini akan mengungkapkan bagaimana implikasi gender dan pengaruhnya terhadap tafsir di Era Kontemporer, karena hal tersebut sebagai penemuan peneliti dan kebaharuan akademik dalam penelitian tersebut. Lebih spesifik, penelitian ini menggunakan studi literature review dengan berbasis pustaka dengan menganalisis berbagai referensi yang relevan sesuai dengan tema pokok pembahasan dalam penelitian ini. Temuan peneliti bahwa, gender dalam kacamata Nasaruddin Umar sebagai peran penting untuk mengimplementasikan penafsiran yang lebih adil dan setara. Nasaruddin Umar lebih menekankan pentingnya memahami dimensi esoterisme dalam wawasan penafsiran sebagai strategi untuk mencapai penafsiran berbasis kesetaraan gender dan menolak interpretasi yang diskriminatif. Implikasinya di era kontemporer yaitu gender sebagai jalan satu-satunya metode interpretasi kontekstual untuk memberikan penghormatan bagi kaum perempuan, agar tidak terkontaminasi budaya patriarkhi dan ideologi mufassir dalam penafsiran tersebut. Kata Kunci: Gender; Interpretasi; Kontekstual; Kontemporer; Nasaruddin Umar.
Textual Negotiation and the Reality of Interpreting Verses on the Ethics of War: A Comparative Study of Tafsĭr Marāḥ Labĭd and Tafsĭr al-Iklĭl Hikmah, Wiqayatul
AL-DZIKRA: JURNAL STUDI ILMU AL-QUR'AN DAN AL-HADITS Vol 20 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/al-dzikra.v20i2.32815

Abstract

Abstract The discourse on the ethics of war in Islam has always involved a negotiation between the authority of the Qur’anic text and the demands of the socio-historical realities surrounding a mufasir. Studies of Nusantara tafsir on verses concerning war remain limited in comparing classical Arabic-language tafsir works with vernacular Javanese-language works. As a result, local dynamics in the construction of the ethics of war have not been sufficiently explored. This study aims to analyze the negotiation between text and reality in the interpretation of verses concerning the ethics of war in Tafsĭr Marāḥ Labĭd by Syekh Nawawi al-Bantani and Tafsĭr al-Iklĭl fĭ Ma‘ānĭ al-Tanzĭl by KH. Misbah Mustafa, focusing on QS. al-Baqarah (2): 190–193 and QS. al-Naḥl (16): 125–126. The study employs a qualitative approach based on library research, using thematic (mauḍū‘ĭ) and comparative (muqāran) tafsir methods. The findings show that Marāḥ Labĭd interprets the verses on war within the framework of classical Fiqh, emphasizing the normative boundaries of defensive jihad. In contrast, al-Iklĭl interprets these verses through a Javanese local perspective that places preaching with wisdom and self-restraint at the core of the ethics of war, while mitigating tendencies toward political-radical interpretations. The study concludes that both tafsir works negotiate the sacred text with the realities of their respective periods, producing two variants of the Nusantara ethics of war: a Fiqh-normative variant and a cultural-preaching variant. Both contribute to the construction of a moderate discourse on jihad in Indonesian Islam. Keywords: Ethics of War; Nusantara Tafsir; Text-Reality Negotiation.   Abstrak Diskursus etika perang dalam Islam senantiasa berada pada titik negosiasi antara otoritas teks Al-Qur’an dan tuntutan realitas sosial-historis yang melingkupi seorang mufasir. Kajian tafsir Nusantara atas ayat-ayat perang masih terbatas dalam membandingkan karya tafsir klasik berbahasa Arab dengan karya tafsir vernakular berbahasa Jawa, sehingga dinamika lokal dalam konstruksi etika perang belum banyak terungkap. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis negosiasi antara teks dan realitas dalam penafsiran ayat-ayat etika perang pada Tafsĭr Marāḥ Labĭd karya Syekh Nawawi al-Bantani dan Tafsĭr al-Iklĭl fĭ Ma‘ānĭ al-Tanzĭl karya KH. Misbah Mustafa, dengan fokus pada QS. al-Baqarah (2): 190–193 dan QS. al-Naḥl (16): 125–126. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan dengan metode tafsir tematik (mauḍū‘ĭ) dan komparatif (muqāran). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Marāḥ Labĭd menafsirkan ayat-ayat perang dalam kerangka fikih klasik yang menonjolkan batas-batas normatif jihad defensif, sedangkan al-Iklĭl menafsirkannya dengan nuansa lokal Jawa yang menempatkan dakwah hikmah dan pengendalian diri sebagai inti etika perang, sembari meredam kecenderungan pemaknaan politis-radikal. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kedua tafsir menegosiasikan teks suci dengan realitas zamannya masing-masing sehingga melahirkan dua varian etika perang Nusantara: varian fikih-normatif dan varian dakwah-kultural, yang keduanya berkontribusi bagi konstruksi wacana jihad yang moderat dalam Islam Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Etika Perang; Negosiasi Teks- Realitas; Tafsir Nusantara.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 20 No 2 (2026) Vol 20 No 1 (2026) Vol 19 No 2 (2025) Vol 19 No 1 (2025) Vol 19 No 1 (2025): Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur'an dan al-Hadits Vol 18 No 2 (2024) Vol 18 No 1 (2024) Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022) Vol 15 No 2 (2021) Vol 15 No 1 (2021) Vol 14 No 2 (2020) Vol 14 No 1 (2020) Vol 13 No 2 (2019) Vol 13 No 1 (2019) Vol 12 No 2 (2018) Vol 12 No 1 (2018) Vol 11 No 2 (2017) Vol 11 No 1 (2017) Vol 10 No 2 (2016) Vol 10 No 1 (2016) Vol 9 No 2 (2015) Vol 9 No 1 (2015) More Issue