cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Justitia et Pax
Published by Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08521883     EISSN : 25413007     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JEP is primarily aimed to facilitate the legal scholars, researchers or practitioners in publishing their original or reviewed articles as well as to support the enactment of in-depth discussions on the related issues. It is also purposed to become a source of reference for those are involved in legal field. JEP covers any topics related to Indonesian laws and legal system, spanning from the private and public law and covering various legal approaches, such as the comparative law, sociology of law, legal history and many others. Other contemporary legal studies, such as commercial and business law, medical law, law and technology, natural resources law and Islamic law are also covered. Hence, any contributions from legal scholars and practitioners are appreciatively welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 296 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
PERLINDUNGAN BAGI KELOMPOK AGAMA MINORITAS MENGHADAPI KELOMPOK AGAMA MAYORITAS: STUDI KASUS AHOK DAN MELIANA Sundari, Elisabeth; Simangunsong, Anna Marieta; Valerie, Isabelle; Nurlatu, Matheus
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.3118

Abstract

Through the case studies, Ahok and Meliana, this research aims to explain how the religious minority try to obtain protection to fulfill human rights when faced with religious majority pressure from the majority group. Normative research will answer the problem by analyzing the process of prosecution, the adjudication, and the punishment for Ahok & Meliana and the demonstration both outside the court and in the trial process demanding severe punishment for the accused of religious blasphemy. The result shows that even though it is difficult to prove directly, the mobilization of the masses in the judicial process can affect judges' independence to provide protection and justice for religious minority. The case of Ahok and Meliana shows how difficult it is for minority religious groups to seek protection against pressure from the majority religious groups because the State and Judges cannot prevent and take firm action against mass pressure from the majority religious groups against minority religious groups. The case such as Ahok and Meliana will occur as long as blasphemy's criminalization is still in effect. If the principle of non-discrimination or commutative justice is applied, and not the principle of protection based on 'partiality for the vulnerable,' the protection for religious minority groups will not be realized fully.
Subject Index Volume 35 2019 Manager, Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v35i2.3615

Abstract

TINJAUAN PENGGUNAAN GPS SAAT MENGEMUDI OLEH PENGEMUDI TRANSPORTASI ONLINE DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN Wijaya, Emilia Metta Karunia
Justitia et Pax Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i1.3599

Abstract

This legal paper writing discusses the use of GPS review by online transportation drivers in Sleman Regency. The formulation problem is how to the use of GPS review by online transportation drivers in Sleman Regency. This study uses a normative legal research method supported by interviews with resource persons. Regulations using GPS on online transportation drivers while driving is fulfilling philosophically and juridically. Unfortunately, this arrangement is not sociologically recognized by the community, so it has not to be accepted and implemented. The prohibition of using GPS for online transportation drivers while driving is not optimally implementing. This is because investigators have difficulty in cracking down on online transportation drivers who see GPS while driving.
HAK ULAYAT SUKU PAGU DAN PENGAKUAN HUKUM PEMERINTAH (STUDI DI KECAMATAN KAO HALMAHERA UTARA) Hibata, Nolfan; Laike, Reli Jevon
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.3532

Abstract

The implementation of the recognition of indigenous legal rights always raises issues such as the civility of ulayat rights and the implementation of recognition by the state. This is as well as the rights of the Pagu tribe. The purpose of this research is to examine the existence of the rights of the ulayat tribe and the problem has not been recognized by the government. This study uses normative research with its main focus on the right of ulayat from the legal aspects and recognition of local governments to be analyzed based on the results of the study of primary legal materials to come to a conclusion. The results of the study found that the existence or existence of pagu ulayat rights still exists, but leaves some problems among them until this saaat the government has not recognized its customary territory which has an impact on the neglect of the rights contained in it. Second, the rights of the Pagu tribe have not been recognized by the local government on the other side of the pagu institution has been recognized, this then leaves a complicated and prolonged problem, where the Pagu tribe does not get protection and legal certainty, thus ignoring the rights to use, seek and collect the results that exist within its customary territory. It should be recognized by the institution of the Pagu tribe by itself has been covered by the rights of ulayat in it.
Author Index Volume 34 2018 Manager, Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i2.3616

Abstract

Author Index Volume 36 Nomor 2 Desember 2020 Justitia Et Pax, Manager
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.4345

Abstract

AKIBAT HUKUM PENERAPAN PENGATURAN SOLE LIMITED COMPANY NEGARA LAOS DI INDONESIA Budi, Jessica Kirana
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.3259

Abstract

Laos has been successful in maintaining high and relatively stable growth for 2 (two) decades.  This continuously developing country also makes Laos as 1 (one) of the 10 (ten) fastest growing economies in the world. Regarding to this, Laos has several types of business organizations in the country, one of them is a limited company. This limited company is also regulated in Indonesian law. Referring to this, it is interesting to conduct research on how the sole limited company is regulated in Laos and what are the legal consequences that will arise if the same regulation of Laos's sole limited company is applied in Indonesia. Based on above, the writer expects the research can provide additional knowledge from the law perspective. Regarding the arrangement of Laos's sole limited company and the legal consequences that could arise if Indonesia using the same concept. This research used normative legal research methods. The conclusion of this research is that a limited company in Laos can turn into a sole limited company if the shareholders are less than 2 (two) persons and can change back into a limited company if the shareholders are at least 2 (two) persons or not more than 30 (thirty) persons. Then the legal consequences are that if Indonesia is using a sole limited company, like Laos, the shareholders are personally responsible and can be sued in the District Court by authorized persons.
Subject Index Volume 34 2018 Manager, Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i2.3617

Abstract

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP MALPRAKTIK MEDIS PADA RUMAH SAKIT Retnowati, Anny; Sundari, Elisabeth
Justitia et Pax Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v37i1.3303

Abstract

Malpractice still occurs a lot, both by hospitals and doctors, although there are several legal instruments that regulate hospitals, as well as medical practice with sanctions for violators of health laws. The purpose of this study is to explore the deficiencies that exist in legal policies, and to propose new legal policies in order to optimally prevent and overcome hospital malpractice. The research method used is a normative research method by examining aspects of criminal law in health law concerning malpractice, as well as theories and expert opinions for better legal policy proposals. From the qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal material data, the following results were obtained: first, there are weaknesses in the health law policy so that it cannot prevent and overcome malpractice optimally, namely incompleteness and lack of clarity regarding the formulation of malpractice and its strict sanctions, as well as a turn towards acts against the law and the limitations of the hospital's responsibility for malpractice committed by doctors or medical personnel. Second, a new legal policy that can be proposed, namely by clearly formulating and detailing the limits of hospital malpractice in health law, accompanied by strict sanctions or accountability both criminal, civil, and administrative, the hospital is also responsible for malpractice committed by doctors with conditions in certain conditions, procedural law must be lex specialis by, for example, imposing strict liability.
Author Index Volume 36 Nomor 1 Juni 2020 Manager, Justitia Et Pax
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i1.3612

Abstract

Page 8 of 30 | Total Record : 296

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 41 No. 2 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 Vol. 41 No. 1 (2025): Justitia et Pax Volume 41 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023): Justitia et Pax Volume 39 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Justitia et Pax Volume 37 Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Justitia et Pax Volume 35 Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol 34, No 1 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 2 (2017): Justitia et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Vol 32, No 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Justitia Et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 32, No 1 (2016): Justitia et Pax Volume 32 Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Vol 31, No 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015): Justitia Et Pax Volume 31 Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 More Issue