cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
IJEMS (Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability)
Published by ARTS Publishing
ISSN : 25986260     EISSN : 25986279     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science, Agriculture, Social,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Energy Environmental Science Public Health
This journal aimed to be a platform for academics, regulators, practitioners, and also policy makers to share and discuss how to manage their surrounding environment in order to build and develop a sustainable environment. The scope of this journal includes all issues of fundamental environmental science, management, technology and related fields. In particular, the journal welcomes the following field: Waste and wastewater management, Air, soil, and water pollution, Climate change and its aspects, Natural energy and resources, Environmental policy and Risk analysis and assessment of public health.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September" : 5 Documents clear
Geomembrane Filter Thread Technique’s Potential to Increase Salt Production in Jeneponto Regency Zakia Asrifah Ramly; Nur Ahmad; Nur Asriyanti Juhaseng
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September
Publisher : Research Centre of Inorganic Materials and Complexs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26554/ijems.2022.6.3.76-81

Abstract

The problem of salt production byJeneponto Regency is influenced by the traditional way of making salt. The introduction of GFTT (Geomembrane Filter Thread Technique) as a salt-making technology is an effort to increase salt production in the Jeneponto district, both in quality and quantity. This activity was carried out in Biring Parang Jaya Village, Jeneponto Regency. Activities are carried out by applying threaded techniques to salt ponds, making filter devices on salt ponds, and installing geomembranes as salt tablets. Based on the application of technology, the salt produced by GFTT has better quality and quantity than traditional salt. Salt produced by GFTT is classified as high grade with 99.96% NaCl and 0.04% moisture content.
Assessment of Seasonal Variations of Air Quality and AQI Status: Evidence from Chittagong, Bangladesh Mir Md. Mozammal Hoque; Md. Moshiuzzaman Khan; Md. Eusuf Sarker; Md. Nuralam Hossain; Md. Sirajul Islam; Md. Mehedi Hasan Khan; Manik Shil; Md. Nazirul Islam Sarker
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September
Publisher : Research Centre of Inorganic Materials and Complexs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26554/ijems.2022.6.3.88-97

Abstract

With the rate of fast urbanization, the devasting effects of air pollution are spreading across the globe. Due to its connection to people’s health, air quality should be given more importance than other environmental measures. Air pollution is considered a cause of many human diseases. Therefore, this study intends to investigate seasonal variation of air quality and “Air Quality Index (AQI)” in Chittagong city due to its volume, large population density, and importance as a commercial capital city of Bangladesh. Air pollution data on PM10, PM2.5, NO2 , NOx, SOx, CO, and O3 levels have been collected from TV station, Khulshi Continuous Air Monitoring Station (CAMS). Component-specific analyzers have been used to continuously measure trace gases where O3 is observed with a UV photometric analyzer. This study detect the highest peak (PM2.5= 93.5 µg/m3, PM10= 210 µg/m3) in January and the lowest concentrations (PM2.5= 14.6 µg/m3 and PM10= 26.9 µg/m3 ) during July and August. The highest average concentration has been recorded as the value of SO2= 12.8 ppb (monsoon season), NO2= 64.9 ppb (pre-monsoon), CO= 1.2 ppm (monsoon) and lowest SO2= 3.2 ppb (winter season), NO2= 24.4 ppb (monsoon), CO= 0.6 ppm (pre-monsoon) respectively. The AQI values (223.6), (109.5), (194.5), and (317.3) indicate that the air quality during the pre-monsoon, monsoon, post-monsoon, and winter season is very unhealthy, cautious, unhealthy, and extremely unhealthy, respectively.
Efficacy of Scattering Application and Paint-on Application of Insecticide in Controlling Housefly on a Broiler Farm Ramoncito Cenon T. Asuncion; Listya Purnamasari; Joseph P. Olarve; Joseph F. Dela Cruz
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September
Publisher : Research Centre of Inorganic Materials and Complexs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26554/ijems.2022.6.3.82-87

Abstract

The study was performed to determine the efficacy of dinotefuran in controlling housefly (Musca domestica) infestation on a commercial broiler farm. The efficacy of the two modes of application of the insecticide was compared to thiamethoxam. The experiment was divided into two groups with five treatments (T) and three replicates per treatment. The first group was scatter application composed of T1: control, T2: dry 20 g dinotefuran, T3: wet 20 g dinotefuran, T4: dry 20 g thiamethoxam, and T5: wet 20 g thiamethoxam. The second group was a paint-on application composed of T1: control, T2: 10 g dinotefuran with 10 g sugar, T3: 20 g dinotefuran, T4: 10 g thiamethoxam with 10 g sugar, and T5: 20 g thiamethoxam. Dead flies were counted after 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-application. In the scatter group, the control was significantly different from dinotefuran and thiamethoxam, but no significant differences were observed between dinotefuran and thiamethoxam. Dinotefuran treatments from paint-on were significantly different from the other three treatments. Lastly, wet dinotefuran from the scattering bait group and dinotefuran treatments from paint were not significantly different. Wet and paint-on treatments of dinotefuran were effective for fly control in broiler farms.
Blockchain Technology in Waste Management: Theoretical Evaluation for System Adoption Setiawan; Agus Dana Permana; Heri Rahman
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September
Publisher : Research Centre of Inorganic Materials and Complexs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26554/ijems.2022.6.3.104-113

Abstract

In recent years Blockchain technology has become increasingly important and accepted (i.e business sector, supply chain, and other aspects of sustainability). The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of Brewer spent yeast and determine the possibility of blockchain adoption in Brewer Spent Yeast (BSY) waste management. This study uses primary data and literature studies in the preparation of blockchain-based waste management. The data obtained were analyzed using the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method to extract the relationship between criteria within the blockchain framework. From the results of this study, it is known in the blockchain management aspect, it was found that the availability of technology and understanding of technology use insights were the most dominant cause criteria (Ri–Ci)>0.00. While the impact criteria with a value (Ri-Ci)<0.00 such as the criteria can be used for many sources of waste, cheaper transactions, and aspects of a culture of transparency in the implementation of waste treatment. The cause criteria will influence the effect criteria in the process of adopting the blockchain model in Brewer Spent Yeast (BSY) waste management.
Current Management of Pesticides Wastes in Some Cultivating Models in Vietnamese Mekong Delta
Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September
Publisher : Research Centre of Inorganic Materials and Complexs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26554/ijems.2022.6.3.98-103

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate the current status of use and management of waste from pesticides on some farming models in the Mekong Delta through interviews with 140 households cultivating triple-rice, Durian Ri6 and E-dor longan. The results of the study showed that 130 types of pesticides and 99 active ingredients were used on three farming models. The study also discovered that five banned active ingredients are still used in the triple-rice practice and four banned substances in the Durian Ri6 cultivation. The proportions of toxic groups (according to WHO’s classification) at levels II, III, IV were 33.3%, 29.3% and 37.4%, respectively. The triple-rice crop model used the most pesticides, but the frequency of spraying was only in the range of 6.48±1.72 to 7.33±1.82 times/crop. Meanwhile, the Durian Ri6 model, although using fewer pesticides, the frequency of spraying was very high (about 61.8±9.1 times/crop), 9 times higher than a rice crop. The cultivation of E-dor longan uses the least amount of pesticides as well as a very low frequency of spraying. The methods of handling pesticidal wastes are mainly burning, burying and these practices are not meeting the requirements for protecting health and the environment. The study provides important information for decision-making to choose a farming model and the accompanying environmental protection solutions to minimize the adverse effects of the use of pesticides.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 4 (2025): December Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): September Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): June Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): March Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): December Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): September Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): June Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): March Vol. 7 No. 4 (2023): December Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): September Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): June Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): March Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): December Vol. 6 No. 3 (2022): September Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): June Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): March Vol. 5 No. 4 (2021): December Vol. 5 No. 3 (2021): September Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021): June Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): March Vol. 4 No. 4 (2020): December Vol. 4 No. 3 (2020): September Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): June Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): March Vol. 3 No. 4 (2019): December Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019): September Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019): June Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): March Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): December Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018): September Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): June Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): March Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): December More Issue