cover
Contact Name
Pahlefi
Contact Email
pahlefi@unja.ac.id
Phone
+6282181066381
Journal Mail Official
recital@unja.ac.id
Editorial Address
recital@unja.ac.id
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
Recital Review
Published by Universitas Jambi
ISSN : 26232928     EISSN : 26225891     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v6i2
Core Subject : Social,
Recital Review is peer-review journal published by Universitas Jambi, Magister Konatariatan, Jambi, Indonesia. Recital review receives research-based and conceptual articles with a broad range of topics related with Notary area, including: deed-making techniques, Agrarian law; Family Law; Inheritance Law; Contract Law; Auction Law; Code Ethic of Notary; Land Law; Company and Insolvency Law; Intellectual Property Rights; Tax Law; Politics of Notarial Law; Guarantee Law; Banking Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 123 Documents
Sengketa Merek Dagang ‘Ayam Geprek Bensu’ Versus ‘I Am Geprek Bensu’
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026 (On Progress)
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.48516

Abstract

The trademark dispute between Ayam Geprek Bensu and I Am Geprek Bensu highlights the complexity of trademark protection in Indonesia, particularly when involving public figures and large-scale business interests. At the core of this dispute is the application of the first to file principle under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, which affirms that legal ownership is determined by formal registration rather than prior use in commerce. This issue is not only relevant due to its controversy but also because it reflects the vulnerability of Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Many UMKM, despite operating for years, have been compelled to discontinue their brands after third parties registered them earlier. Such cases expose weaknesses in legal protection and demonstrate the limited awareness of UMKM regarding the necessity of formal trademark registration. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing both case study and statutory approaches to analyze the legal foundations, judicial reasoning, and consequences of applying the first to file system. Furthermore, it evaluates the extent to which Indonesia’s trademark regime influences the legal standing of UMKM and examines their capacity to safeguard business identity when competing against parties with greater resources and faster access to formal registration.  
Implikasi Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Tiket Konser Tidak Resmi Terhadap Konsumen
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026 (On Progress)
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.48892

Abstract

This study discusses the legal implications of unofficial concert ticket sales agreements from a civil law perspective. The practice of selling tickets through unauthorized parties creates legal uncertainty and financial losses for consumers, as tickets purchased may not be recognized by the concert promoter. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The results show that such agreements fall under innominaat contracts (unnamed contracts), which may be deemed null and void if they do not fulfill the lawful cause requirement under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Legal protection for consumers is regulated in Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions. Strengthened supervision and synergy among the government, consumer protection institutions, and digital platforms are essential to ensure effective consumer legal protection in digital transactions.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris terhadap Keabsahan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026 (On Progress)
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.49697

Abstract

This study examines the legal liability of notaries concerning the execution of Sale and Purchase Agreement Deeds (PPJB) that are misused as a disguise for loan agreements, as reflected in Supreme Court Decision No. 813 K/Pdt/2023. The main issues addressed are the forms of legal responsibility borne by notaries in drafting such deceptive agreements and the extent of legal certainty arising from them. Positioned within the framework of civil and notarial law, this research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant jurisprudence. The findings reveal that a notary may be held legally accountable civilly, administratively, or ethically if found negligent in examining the true intention and lawful cause of the agreement. A PPJB used to conceal a loan transaction fails to meet the legal requirements of a valid contract due to its unlawful cause and is therefore null and void. This study underscores the significance of the principles of prudence and professional responsibility for notaries to ensure legal certainty and the protection of parties’ rights in every authentic deed they execute.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 123