Unes Law Review
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Articles
135 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023)"
:
135 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS INPRES NO. 1 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PELAKSANAAN PROGRAM JAMINAN KESEHATAN DALAM KEBERLAKUANNYA PENDAFTARAN HAK ATAS TANAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Arsanti, Wulan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.344
<![CDATA[The issuance of Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 2022 concerning Optimizing the Implementation of the Health Insurance Program instructs all Ministries to optimize the JKN program, this also instructs the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency to implement the Circular Letter of the Director General of Land Rights Determination and Registration (Dirjen PHP) No.02/ 153-400/II/2022 which contains the Determination of Rights and Registration of Land, as a form of follow-up to Presidential Instruction No. 1 of 2022, so that every application for registration services for the transfer of land rights or ownership rights to apartment units due to sale and purchase must be accompanied by a photocopy of the health insurance social service provider (BPJS) participant card (active participant in the Health Insurance Program (JKN). Type of research The method used is normative (doctrinal) juridical research. land rights because buying and selling are not by legal principles or norms in general, namely the principle of legal certainty, where Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2022 creates legal uncertainty and is only a policy regulation (beleidsregel/pseudo wetgeving) and is optional or (aanvullendrecht).]]>
<![CDATA[KEADILAN RESTORATIF BAGI ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari, Ghisca Putri Anjar]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.345
<![CDATA[Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menguraikan restorative justice bagi anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum pada tahapan pra adjudikasi, adjudikasi dan pasca adjudikasi, dan posisi lembaga pemasyarakatan dalam menegakkan keadilan restoratif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder, dengan analisa deskriptif serta penarikan kesimpulan secara deduktif. Keadilan Restoratif lebih melihat pemidanaan dengan pemikiran yang berbeda, yakni berkaitan dengan pemenuhan atas kerugian yang dialami oleh korban sehingga perdamaian ini menjadi tujuan akhir dari konsep ini. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa restorative justice merupakan salah satu alternatif yang berfungsi untuk memecahkan suatu perkara pidana, yang awalnya berfokus pada pemidanaan menjadi proses diskusi serta mediasi dengan melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga pelaku atau korban, dan pihak yang terkait, untuk mewujudkan kesepakatan dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan pidana dengan adil dan seimbang. Tujuan dilaksanakannya restorative justice serta diversi ini untuk menghindarkan dan menjauhkan Anak dari peradilan pidana sehingga Anak dapat menghindari stigmatisasi negatif serta harapannya agar Anak dapat diterima kembali ke dalam lingkungan sosialnya secara wajar.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN KARTU FLAZZ YANG DITERBITKAN OLEH BANK BCA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ramadhan, Fauzan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.347
<![CDATA[Technological developments have brought changes to payments in the form of cash in conventional metal and paper forms, which have now developed in the form of electronic payment instruments. The use of non-cash payment electronic money (FLAZZ) besides being able to facilitate transactions can also cause losses to the owner if the FLAZZ is lost or stolen. Transactions using e-money can be carried out without going through an authorization process such as a PIN (Personal Identification Number) so that e-money can be used easily by unauthorized persons. Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 20/6/PBI/2018 contains regulations related to financial compensation but are not clear and detailed, so these unclear regulations lead to different interpretations between institutions. The purpose of this paper is to find out the legal arrangements for electronic money owners in the event of a loss on an e-money card and to find out the responsibility of the bank as a provider of non-cash payment instruments for losses suffered by e-money. - the owner of the money card. The research method used in this paper is normative legal research method. Studies show that electronic money compensation can only be made if there is damage from the issuer. The bank is not responsible for losses to e-money owners due to user negligence that violates consumer protection principles. Banks as issuers of electronic money are not responsible for losses to FLAZZ owners where this rule violates the principle of consumer protection.]]>
<![CDATA[RESTORATIF JUSTICE TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA UJARAN KEBENCIAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Lubis, Ali Hakim]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.349
<![CDATA[Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk memberikan saran terhadap para penegak hukum di negara ini dalam hal ini instansi Kepolisian, Kejaksaan dan Hakim agar dalam menangani suatu permasalahan hukum dengan mengedepankan pendekatan keadilan restorasi dalam penyelesaian kasus hukum ujaran kebencian. Metode penulisan ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dan memakai sumber data sekunder dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penulisan ini mebuktikan bahwa penyelesaian dengan metode pendekatan Restorative Justice dapat digunakan kepada pelaku kejahatan ujaran kebencian sebagaimana ketentuan di dalam “ UU No. 19 Tahun 2016” tentang “Perubahan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008” Tentang “Informasi dan Transasksi Elektronik ( ITE )”. Penulisan ini dibuat untuk menjawab apakah penyelesaian secara restorative justice dalam tindak pidana ujaran kebencian merupakan sebuah solusi hukum? karena, semangat dari penyelesaian restortif justice adalah pemulihan terhadap keadaan semua bukan sebagai pembalasan. Oleh sebab itu, tujuannya agar upaya pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana ujaran kebencian dapat diminimalisir dan dilakukan pendekatan dengan cara mediasi atau duduk bersama antara pelaku dengan korban tindak pidana ujaran kebencian.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WHISTLEBLOWER DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Podungge, Alamsyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.353
<![CDATA[This research examines the legal protection of whistleblowers in corruption crimes in Indonesia. The role of the reporter is very necessary or important in law enforcement. The presence of whistleblowers helps law enforcement agencies and makes them more accessible in uncovering cases of corruption criminal activity. Therefore, the state must provide legal protection to the Petitioners to protect their rights by law. Second, the state must also pay tribute to the reporter. Because the award is a form of recognition from the state to the applicants for their participation in helping law enforcement and protecting our country. Like the suspected corrupt journalists in Cirebon, they should be legally protected from prosecution. Nevertheless, he is under suspicion and the LPSK must assist in every way possible to ensure that his rights are protected or fully recognized. This study answers several questions. (1) Legal protection for reporters of corruption cases in Indonesia. (2) legal mechanisms in the criminal justice system to ensure the safety of reporters in corruption cases; This study uses social laws to study with the help of social sciences. First, the research results show that there is legal protection for reporters. This means that, based on Article 10 of Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, they do not only receive physical and immaterial legal protection, but also physical and psychological protection. Second, whistleblower regulations have not been regulated clearly so that special rules and legal guarantees are needed for whistleblowers to protect them from threats.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP ]]>
<![CDATA[Gunawan, Lidya Pratiwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.356
<![CDATA[The goal of this research is to investigate and determine the regulation of environmental offenses under Law 32 of 2009(known as environmental law) and how to be responsible for environmental crimes according to environmental law This research uses normative legal research methods using primary and secondary data, with descriptive analysis and deductive conclusions. Environmental crimes can be include within intentional or unintentional acts. Subjects of criminal law may be individuals, legal bodies, or non-legal entities. In this scenario, both legal entities and non-legal entities are companies. Responsibility in Article 88 means 'absolute accountability,' or the so-called "strict liability idea. Under the liability requirements of this article, the plaintiff is not necessary to prove the existence of an element of error as the basis for compensation. When the principle of strict liability is invoked, the legal subject is held accountable for pollution and environmental harm in the living environment in line with Article 88 of environmental legislation.]]>
<![CDATA[GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI INDONESIA, SINGAPORE, MALAYSIA : KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Tendra, Denny]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.357
<![CDATA[Pada 20 Agustus 2019 Mahkamah Agung melakukan pembaharuan hukum terkait gugatan sederhana dengan mengeluarkan PerMA No.14 Tahun 2019 , salah satu isinya merubah jumlah nominal kerugian materi yang bisa di akomodir gugatan sederhana menjadi maksimum 500 juta rupiah. Hal ini membawa angin segar bagi para pelaku usaha umkm, besar & para konsumen yang memiliki sengketa perdata umum, karena gugatan sederhana dapat dilakukan untuk nominal kerugian materi sampai maksimal 500 juta rupiah dengan jangka waktu penyelesaian yg cepat dan berbiaya ringan. Gugatan Sederhana di dunia dikenal dengan nama small claim court ( SCC ), di Singapura small claims court sudah diberlakukan sejak tahun 1985 sampai sekarang. dengan jumlah max kerugian materi yang di akomodir 20 ribu – 30 ribu SGD, sementara di Malaysia Small Claims Procedure di berlakukan sejak tahun 2012 sampai sekarang, dengan jumlah max kerugian materi yang diakomodir 5 ribu RM. Dengan melihat perbandingan hukum terkait gugatan sederhana antara Indonesia, Singapura, & Malaysia makan akan terlihat bahwa gugatan sederhana yang diberlakukan di Indonesia lebih baik dalam hal jumlah nominal kerugian materi yang bisa diakomodir dan kecepatan prosesnya. Tetapi jika kita lihat pada sistem informasi penelusuran perkara pengadilan negeri di kota-kota besar Indonesia jumlah perkara gugatan sederhana sangat sedikit sekali jumlahnya dibanding gugatan perdata biasa. Oleh karena itu keunggulan prosedur gugatan sederhana ini perlu di berdayakan secara masif dan berkesinambungan lewat seminar, webminar, talkshow, penulisan artikel, jurnal oleh pemerintah, akademisi, praktisi hukum, pemilik usaha, atau oleh siapapun agar menjadi budaya hukum pilihan utama ketika menghadapi sengeketa perdata umum sejumlah tertentu.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELAMATAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF ]]>
<![CDATA[YS, Masyitoh]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.359
<![CDATA[This research aims to explore how state financial recovery is carried out in Indonesia and analyze it using progressive law. Law enforcement against fraud in government activities is still a major problem in Indonesia. This fraud resulted in state losses, but the fines and compensation imposed were far below the value of state losses. The formulation of the problem is how is the state financial recovery carried out in Indonesia? and has the state's financial recovery considered a progressive legal approach? This research is a qualitative research, with normative research methods and carried out by means of literature studies. The data used is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This research shows that there is a disparity in sentencing that causes recovery against the impact of losses on state finances that is not optimal. The verdict of the panel of judges seems to only focus on the interests of punishing the perpetrators rather than recovering the victims. In conclusion, in law enforcement, punishment alone does not restore state losses, so it has not fulfilled the people's sense of justice. Progressive steps are needed from law enforcement officials to take action to save state finances which are the people's rights. This is in line with progressive legal theory and improves the image of law enforcement in Indonesia for the better through judge decisions that prioritize a sense of justice for the people.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENEMPATAN TENAGA KERJA INDONESIA (TKI) DI LUAR NEGERI ]]>
<![CDATA[Setiawan, Dian Aji]]>;
<![CDATA[Ratnawati Gultom, Elfrida]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.360
<![CDATA[Law enforcement against crime relates with placement of Indonesian migrant worker abroad according to Indonesian rules number 39 of 2004 about placement and protection of Indonesian migrant worker Abroad that relation to protection of Indonesian migrant worker. But the reality of legislation is more many set concerning placement rather than protection, and the law is not synchronization with others legislations, whether operate vertical or horizontal, and that has conflicts of authority which raises the dualism of Institutional between BNP2TKI and Ministry of Manpower RI. The objectives of research for analyze: Policy of law enforcement placement of Indonesian migrant worker abroad; protection of criminal law for Indonesian migrant worker abroad; And others crime law enforcement in placement of Indonesian migrant worker abroad. This research is normative juridical research is qualitative, based to primary, secondary and tertiary data, through data collection documentaries and interviews, analyses in qualitative. Presenting conclusion: Policy law enforcement of Indonesian migrant worker to empower Police of Indonesian Investigator who are employed in BNP2TK1, and cases handled by investigators of PPNS BNP2TK1 is just for limited crime law of administration; criminal law protection of Indonesian migrant worker placement abroad is hopeless, because there is not to have synchronization of rules, also legislation is more emphasize of Indonesian migrant worker placement aspect is not protection aspect; and my suggestions: Indonesian police investigator who are employed in BNP2TKI should be empowered; subscribe regulation with placement and protection of Indonesian migrant workers abroad into immediately amendment; BNP2TKI as a non Departmental Government Institutions residing in and responsible indicated to the President, must be independent and free as an institution independent opened, tripartite, proactive, and funded well.]]>
<![CDATA[HAK KEKEBALAN DIPLOMATIK SEORANG DIPLOMAT DALAM MENJALANKAN TUGAS DI NEGARA PENERIMA ]]>
<![CDATA[Kinanti, Ananda Surya]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.363
<![CDATA[Kekebalan diplomatik adalah bentuk kekebalan hukum dan kebijakan yang dilakukan antara pemerintah, yang menjamin bahwa diplomat diberikan perjalanan yang aman dan tidak dianggap rentan terhadap gugatan atau penuntutan di bawah hukum negara tuan rumah (walaupun mereka bisa dikeluarkan). pejabat diplomat menikmati kekebalan diplomatik adalah demi kelancaran yang efisien dari tugas-tugas perwakilan diplomatik yang mewakili negara pengirim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang Kekebalan diplomatik yang mana merupakan suatu keistimewaan khusus yang dimiliki oleh seorang diplomat, staf diplomatik ataupun konsuler selama menjalankan misi yang diberikan oleh Negara pengirim. Menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang terdiri dari bahan hukum dan bersifat penelitian pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Wakil diplomatik umumnya mempunyai hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik, yaitu kekebalan terhadap yurisdiksi hukum negara penerima baik perdata maupun pidana serta kekebalan menjadi saksi. Tetapi kekebalan diplomatik yang dimaksud disini bukan kekebalan atau kelonggaran yang bersifat absolut, dalam arti melekat mutlak pada pribadi pejabat diplomatik. Melainkan kekebalan diplomatik yang bersifat fungsional. Artinya, pejabat diplomat menikmati kekebalan diplomatik adalah demi kelancaran yang efisien dari tugas tugas perwakilan diplomatik yang mewakili negara pengirim.]]>
