cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Pengaruh Peran Amicus Curiae Terhadap Proses Peradilan dan Kepastian Hukum Pieter Agustinus Mikael Rondo; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1283

Abstract

Evidence in criminal procedure law plays a very important role in the criminal proceedings. Because, in criminal procedural law, evidence is considered extremely important because its main purpose is to discover material truths in discovering criminal cases. To reveal the truth of the case, evidence is the main method used by the judge to determine whether the defendant committed a crime or to obtain the necessary basis to make a decision to resolve the case. Relevant evidence has been further stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, specifically: testimonies of witnesses, expert statements, letters, instructions, and statements of the accused. The evidence provision mechanism in criminal justice today is increasingly enriched thanks to the presence of the concept of amicus curiae or friend of the court. Amicus curiae is defined as a party who feels interested in a case and gives his legal opinion to the court. However, stakeholder participation is limited to providing opinions and is not intended to interfere with the judge. In the development of existing evidence and evidence mechanisms, one of them is the Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court). Amicus Curiae is a third party who feels interested in a case, provides legal advice to the court and does not intend to interfere with the judge. Amicus curiae has not been clearly regulated in Indonesia, but in principle it is accepted based on clause 5, paragraph 1 of the Judicial Power Law "Judges and constitutional magistrates are required to learn, comply with and understand legal values ​​and the sense of justice. exist in society. Furthermore, the admission of amicus curiae can be found in article 180, paragraph 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which states that "In case it is necessary to clarify a question raised in the 'trial, the presiding judge of the court may be asked to provide expert information and may also request the parties involved to submit new documents.The premeditated murder committed by defendant Richard Eliezer in the Jakarta area is an example of a case involving amicus curiae.
Politik Hukum dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Extraordinary Crime dalam KUHP Nasional Ewaprilyandi Fahmi Saputra; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1284

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perubahan dalam pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana atau kerap disebut sebagai KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif untuk menganalisis teks hukum yang relevan dan perubahan yang terjadi seiring waktu. Metode analisis deduktif digunakan dengan menerapkan premis mayor berupa prinsip-prinsip hukum dan ajaran terkait kejahatan korupsi, serta premis minor berupa fakta atau peristiwa hukum yang ada. Temuan utama penelitian ini adalah bahwa pembaharuan pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi dalam KUHP Nasional berpotensi menghilangkan sifat kekhususan tindak pidana itu sendiri, yang dapat menimbulkan akibat terhadap upaya pemberantasan kasus korupsi di Indonesia. Kendati demikian, perubahan tersebut mencerminkan usaha untuk mengadaptasi hukum dengan dinamika sosial dan politik, serta memperkuat kerangka hukum dalam memberantas korupsi. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan tentang perkembangan hukum korupsi dalam konteks nasional dan dampak dari perubahan hukum tersebut terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Implikasi penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang dinamika hukum dalam menghadapi tindak pidana korupsi serta memberi sumbangan dalam perbaikan lebih lanjut terhadap pengaturan hukum terkait.
Juridical Analysis of Legal Protection for Malpractice Victims by Hospitals in Patients with Brain Stem Death Post Tonsillectomy as Regulated by Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection and Law Number 17 of 2023 Concerning Health Yuyut Prayuti; Meyland Citra Oktri Sienty Effendy; Dita Nur Wardani; Hangga Harinawantara; Nadya Zhafira Asfihani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1285

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine and comprehend the legal foundation and implementation of legal protection for victims of malpractice by hospitals in Indonesia. This research seeks to assess the degree to which victims of malpractice receive legal protection and hold hospitals and involved medical personnel accountable. The research methodology employed is a literature study, encompassing secondary data collection through books, law journals, research findings, and pertinent legislative documents. Various legal sources are scrutinized in this research, including Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health. The findings reveal that there are legal frameworks providing protection for victims of malpractice, such as Law No. 44 of 2009 on Hospitals and Health Law No. 17 of 2023. Nonetheless, challenges persist in the implementation of legal protection for malpractice victims, particularly concerning the legal procedures that victims must navigate to secure compensation and accountability from hospitals or medical personnel.
Legal Analysis of Legal Protection Against Termination of Employment (PHK) by Companies Towards Breastfeeding Mothers Providing Exclusive Breastfeeding as Regulated by Presidential Regulation No. 2 Of 2022 Concerning Job Creation Aulia Ramadhan; Beni Satria; Irsyam Risdawati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1286

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal protection against Termination of Employment (PHK) by companies towards breastfeeding mothers providing exclusive breastfeeding, based on Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2022 Concerning Job Creation. The research employs a normative legal research method, examining legal regulations, doctrines, and principles relevant to the legal protection of breastfeeding mothers providing exclusive breastfeeding. In order to support the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation, there is a need for collaboration and coordination among the government, businesses, cooperatives, MSMEs, and labor force. The government must ensure that this policy is implemented fairly, taking into account workers' rights and sustainable economic empowerment. Cooperation from all relevant parties is key to achieving the goals of this structural reform in the context of the complex global economic conditions. Although Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation does not specifically regulate the rights of breastfeeding workers, women workers breastfeeding at the workplace are still protected by the Labor Law. This includes the right to leave, time and facilities for breastfeeding, as well as a prohibition on termination of employment on the grounds of breastfeeding. Despite the impact of this regulation on the labor sector, it is crucial to monitor and evaluate its implementation periodically to ensure that the goals of worker protection and economic empowerment are achieved as expected.
Postnuptial Agreement Versus Kepentingan Kreditur Elvina Elvina; Ari Wahyudi Hertanto
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1290

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 allows married couples who are already married to enter into nuptial agreement. Previously such can only be carried upon before the marriage occurred. Thus, due to the enactment of this decision, legal problems arise as an impact upon how to provide legal protection for any third parties affected by implementation of court decision regarding the nuptial agreement. Problematical issues emerge against any third parties who hold security(ies), especially creditors as holders of mortgage, are vulnerable to losses possibility should the debtor defaults due to the unclear status of assets, which were previously included as joint assets and afterwards being dispatched after a nuptial agreement was made. This research was conducted in terms of normative juridical manner using a legal theory concept approach. The outcome of this research is to provide clarity on providing legal protection for creditors, as for creditors also need to be ensured that the publicity principle of the nuptial agreement is fulfilled. Notaries as officials who make and ratify nuptial agreements also need to apply the principle of prudence in carrying out their professional duties.
Implementasi Regulasi Kepariwisataan Berbasis Harmonisasi Hukum Adat Lokal untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Studi Sosio- Legal Masyakarat Adat Suku Sasak di Batu Layar, Lombok Barat) Irham Rahman; Restu Adi Putra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1292

Abstract

The tourism sector has an important role for the country, one of which is a source of foreign exchange from tourists as state income. Apart from that, the tourism industry can encourage regional and national economic growth. One area that has potential as a tourist attraction is West Lombok Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province. The authority of the regional government as implementer of regional regulations, namely West Lombok Regency Regional Regulation Number 6 of 2016 concerning the Master Plan for Regional Tourism Development for 2016-2025, must maximize tourism policies for tourism progress. However, the people of West Lombok, Batu Layar, are the Sasak tribe who have inherent traditions and customs and culture that must be maintained. The problem faced by the government is that there is a legal gap between regional regulations for tourism development and local indigenous communities. This type of research uses empirical research methods, namely examining the application of existing laws in society. The results of this research are that the implementation of regulations from regional governments in tourism development experiences obstacles, namely misunderstandings in the interpretation of policies by villages, and clashes between indigenous communities and regional governments.
Peran Tokoh Adat Osing dalam Pemanfaatan dan Penggunaan Tanah Ulayat. (Studi Empiris Di Desa Kemiren, Kecamatan Glagah, Kabupaten Banyuwangi) Restu Adi Putra; Irham Rahman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1293

Abstract

Customary land is a very important part of customary law communities so that its existence needs to be maintained and preserved. One form of the existence of customary land or customary land that is interesting to study more deeply is customary land in the Osing Kemiren traditional village, Glagah District, Banyuwangi Regency. Customary land or customary land for the Osing Kemiren customary law community is interpreted as an ancestral heritage that needs to be preserved so that in utilisation and use it is necessary to pay attention to the values of local wisdom that have been carried out for generations. The role of traditional leaders in the Osing Kemiren customary law community is very important to preserve customary land or customary land in terms of the utilisation and use of the land. The research method used in this research is to use the sociological juridical method, namely going directly to the community. So that the results obtained that based on the results of research conducted in the field, Customary Land or Customary Land according to the Osing Kemiren village customary law community is interpreted as individual land which in its use and utilisation still upholds local wisdom values in this case still using customs that apply from generation to generation. Customary figures in the Osing Kemiren customary law community have a role to provide advice and input in every activity related to land in the region.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Oleh Suami Mohammad Haris Yusuf Albar; Bambang Pujiono; Fitri Windradi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1295

Abstract

Crimes of human trafficking still often occur to this day, even people who are supposed to be protectors of their wives are willing to sell their wives to other people with the aim of meeting their household needs. This makes it difficult for the government to provide protection to wives who are victims of human trafficking carried out by their husbands, because there could be wives who are unwilling to report their beloved husbands to law enforcement officials for what their husbands have done. In this research, normative legal research is used with a statutory approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. There are various efforts that can be made to provide legal protection to victims of human trafficking carried out by their beloved husband, including preventive and repressive efforts.
Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Hibah Kepada Pejabat Ditinjau Dari Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Viola Audy; Hery Firmansyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1296

Abstract

Humans are social creatures who need each other to interact and carry out activities. In their daily life, humans are accustomed to doing something so that from this habit, laws are born that are agreed upon by the local community where the law was born. Because with the development of the times and the massive growth of humankind that is increasingly expanding, a law is needed that will become the single rule for all of society. Laws are made to provide protection and a sense of security for the community, but in some cases even though there are laws there are still those who commit criminal acts such as corruption. So it is necessary to have laws that regulate corruption at this time, because as technology develops, the modus operandi of corruption becomes more sophisticated. One of the efforts of criminal acts of corruption is giving gifts or grants to officials which is called gratuity. This study uses a type of qualitative research that examines and analyzes legal materials from relevant literature. The difference between gratuities and grants is needed is to avoid a legal vacuum or legal uncertainty, it will be difficult to ensnare corruptors into criminal acts, because basically grants are part of civil law making it difficult to fulfill elements of corruption. However, corruption through grants can be said to be gratification if it is given to state administrators and does not report the results of receiving the grant.
Akibat Hukum Kartu Keluarga Bagi Pasangan Kawin Tidak Tercatat Menggunakan Surat Pernyataan Tanggungjawab Mutlak Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 108 Tahun 2019 Tentang Persyaratan dan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Penduduk dan Pencatatan Sipil Dian Amelia; Ulfanora Ulfanora; M. Iflah Febrizal
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1297

Abstract

Marriage in society many occur without registration by the state, or known marriages have not been registered. According to The Domestic Affairs Minister Number 108 Year 2019 regarding the terms and regulations of the registration of the population and the civil record of married couples who have no record of marriage books can also record marriages in the occupational and civil record service by signing a waivement of marriage responsibilities. The purpose of this study is to find out the mechanisms and consequences of the law of issuing family cards for unregistered married couples using a letter of absolute liability based on The Domestic Affairs Minister Number 108 Year 2019. Research using normative juridical method with the nature of descriptive analysis research. The results of this study explain that violations ways to make a new family card for unregistered married couples must complete the requirements of filling the form F1.05 or A letter of absolute liability of marriage/divorce has not been registered and known by two witnesses and attaching a letter marriage has not been registered. Second, The legal result of publishing a family card for a married couple has not been recorded using a a letter of absolute liability based on Domestic affairs minister number 108 year 2019. In general, the increase in marriage practice has not been registered, Increased application for marriage books through the validation path, Increased demand for marriage confirmation, It also affects wife and children.

Page 8 of 76 | Total Record : 758

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue