Unes Law Review
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Articles
758 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)"
:
758 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dan Akibat Hukum Dalam Menolak Gugatan Cerai Yang Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) Di Pengadilan Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata ]]>
<![CDATA[Raynaldo Handojo Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Mia Hadiati]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1298
<![CDATA[This research aims to carry out an in-depth analysis of the judge's basic considerations and legal consequences in rejecting an unacceptable divorce claim (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) in court, seen from the perspective of Civil Procedure Law. This study explores various legal aspects that form the basis of a judge's consideration in rejecting a divorce lawsuit and the legal implications for the parties involved. The research method used involves legal text analysis, case studies, and a comparative legal approach to understand the legal framework that supports the judge's decision to reject an unacceptable divorce lawsuit. The results of this research provide in-depth insight into the legal process involving judge deliberations in this context and its impact on both parties]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Pembuatan Perjanjian Penerbitan Surat Utang Berjangka (Medium Term Notes) oleh Notaris ]]>
<![CDATA[Maena Vianny]]>;
<![CDATA[Antarin Prasanthi Sigit]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1299
<![CDATA[The Financial Services Authority (OJK) issued Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.30/POJK.04/2019 concerning the Issuance of Debt Securities and/or Sukuk Conducted Without a Public Offering (from now on referred to as POJK EBUS) as a legal umbrella for issuance agreements Term Debt Securities or Medium Term Notes (from now on referred to as MTN). However, in reality, defaults on payments to MTN still occur frequently at this time. Moreover, in POJK EBUS there are no provisions explaining the making of an MTN Issuance Agreement by a capital market notary whereas in Circular Letter No. SE-0005/DIR-EKS/KSEI/1121 concerning the Mechanism for Registration of Debt Securities and/or Sukuk at PT Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia (KSEI) (hereinafter referred to as SE KSEI concerning EBUS Registration) explains the obligation to make the agreement by a capital market notary which has been registered with the OJK. The purpose of this research is to analyze the provisions in force in Indonesia regarding MTN Issuance Agreements, and the authority of notaries in making MTN Issuance Agreements. This doctrinal research collects secondary data through literature study, which is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of the analysis, it can be explained that there are several factors that led to MTN's default, namely the Covid-19 pandemic, the bankruptcy of the securities issuing company and manipulation of the financial reports of the securities issuing company. The MTN Issuance Agreement itself should be made in the form of an authentic deed before a notary to guarantee legal certainty and protection for the parties because the authentic deed is a perfect means of proof if a dispute arises in the future.]]>
<![CDATA[Sistem Diversi Pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Julisya Mutiara Adival]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Firmansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1300
<![CDATA[The crime of narcotics abuse in camping continues to grow, with trafficking involving children. The status of children who are vulnerable to unlawful acts means that the justice system must also consider the child's condition. Therefore, in the Indonesian justice system, the term 'juvenile criminal justice' is known, which is specifically applied to criminal acts committed by children. This also means that various criminal acts, such as narcotics crimes committed by children, must also be tried appropriately. As happened to the child defendant in decision no. 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/Pn JKT.SEL. In this case study, children were involved as intermediaries in buying and selling narcotics. Based on this background, the aim of this research was to understand the criminal justice process in narcotics crimes against children, as well as the laws that can be used as a basis for justice applied to children. The research was carried out as a normative type of research, with a statutory and case study approach. The results of this research show that the administration of juvenile justice in Indonesia for narcotics crimes that make children suspects is carried out using a restorative justice approach with a diversion system. Even so, the judge still takes into account the demands of the prosecutor, and also the legal conditions that occurred. So that the judicial process can be relevant to the diversion that has been implemented. Meanwhile, the laws used as the basis for determining punishment consist of the Law on Narcotics, the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia concerning judicial power.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Putusan Eksekusi Jaminan Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Hutang Piutang (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor 238/Pdt.G/2020/Pt.Dki) ]]>
<![CDATA[Salma Yustia Rahmah]]>;
<![CDATA[Gunawan Djajaputera]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1302
<![CDATA[The execution of collateral can be carried out when there is a court decision that takes into consideration whether there has been a breach of contract. This study employs a normative juridical approach as the basis for analyzing this legal issue. The research findings indicate that the debtor is legally entitled to execute the collateral concerning the breach of a debt agreement in the Decision of the High Court Number 238/Pdt.G/2020/PT.DKI. This is because both parties have a legally valid relationship to enter into a debt agreement, which was done by the plaintiff with the defendant I and II, with collateral in the form of a Certificate of Ownership for an Apartment Unit (SHMSRS) No. 3548/XXII/RIO DE JANEIRO, which has undergone the transfer process at the National Land Agency (BPN) in North Jakarta, registered in the name of the Defendant I, in this case, PT. Xiongji International Imp. & Exp. Group. The court decision to cancel the collateral seizure execution, which was previously determined as a result of the breach of contract by Defendant I in the Decision of the High Court Number 238/Pdt.G/2020/PT.DKI, is incorrect. This is because the petitioner of the collateral seizure has not paid the fees to the North Jakarta District Court until now. However, the judge ruled that Defendant I was at fault for the breach of contract, yet, on the other hand, the judge has canceled the collateral seizure execution against the collateral object guaranteed in the agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[Akibat Hukum Penggunaan Akta Kuasa Mutlak Sebagai Dasar Akta Jual Beli ]]>
<![CDATA[Devana Mustika]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1303
<![CDATA[A deed is a writing that is deliberately made to be used as evidence of an event (deed, agreement, or decree) and is signed. In carrying out an act, a person can give authority to another person to carry out the matter, namely to an institution of power. The existence of a power of attorney makes human life easier, but not all matters can be done with power of attorney, there are things that are prohibited by statutory regulations, one of which is the use of power of attorney in the transmission of land rights. The problem raised in this research is the legal consequences of transferring land rights through a sale and purchase based on an absolute power of attorney deed. To answer this problem, the research method used is juridical-normative. The data collection tool in this research is through document study obtained from various regulatory sources that apply in Indonesia. The final part of this research concluded that the legal consequences of using an absolute power of attorney deed in the process of changing the name of a certificate are null and void, this is because the debt acknowledgment letter which is an inseparable unit with the absolute power of attorney deed does not have an executorial title and does not meet the objective requirements of the validity of an agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[Kajian Kelangkaan Minyak Goreng Akibat Penimbunan Terjadinya Penimbunan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Falih Abdi Nugroho]]>;
<![CDATA[Jean N Sally]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1304
<![CDATA[One of the problems that often occurs in Indonesia is the problem of food shortages, one of which is cooking oil. This has a negative impact on the Indonesian people because their basic needs are decreasing. This is caused by many business actors hoarding cooking oil and reselling it at high prices to make a profit. Hoarding is defined as buying something and saving it so that the item decreases in society so that the price will increase and people will have difficulty meeting their basic needs. This kind of hoarding is prohibited because it is a crime and evidence of moral badness and makes it difficult for people to fulfill their daily needs. Humans in this case are focused on the continuity of consumer life in fulfilling their basic life needs. The researcher applies a normative juridical legal research approach, namely an approach that uses the legal positivist concept, which views law as identical to written norms created and promulgated by authorized institutions or officials. This legal concept is a normative system that is independent, closed, and apart from real social life.]]>
<![CDATA[Urgensi Pengaturan Sanksi bagi Perusahaan yang Tidak Melaksanakan Corporate Social Responsibility ]]>
<![CDATA[Auliya Rahmania]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1305
<![CDATA[One of the company's obligations is to carry out a corporate social responsibility (CSR) program, where this obligation contains sanctions for companies that do not carry out CSR. The aim of this research is to determine the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research which is carried out to look for legal problems or issues and existing legal problems. The research results show that the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement TJSL, which departs from the basic understanding that the implementation of TJSL which is a legal obligation (legal mandatory) basically confirms that TJSL is no longer interpreted as voluntary, but as a legal obligation ( legal mandatory) to be implemented.]]>
<![CDATA[Perubahan Pidana Minimal Khusus Terhadap Delik Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Axel Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Ade Adhari]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1306
<![CDATA[Tindak pidana korupsi dikatakan sebagai extraordinary crime karena dampaknya merugikan finansial juga perekonomian negara dan orang lain, delik korupsi diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor). Namun, karena perkembangan produk hukum menjadikan beberapa acuan pasal yang sebelumnya diatur dalam UU Tipikor diubah ke dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Bagian Ketiga (UU KUHP). Perubahannya salah satunya terkait mengganti strafmaat pidana minimal khusus, permasalahan yang diangkat dalam artikel ini adalah bagaimana perubahan dan kelemahan pidana minimal khusus terhadap delik korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Selain itu, metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yang dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder, hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus dinilai tidak selaras dengan konsideran dalam UU KUHP yang menyatakan bahwa harus menyesuaikan pada salah satunya keadaan, perkembangan kehidupan di masyarakat. Akan tetapi faktanya dalam acuan pasal yang baru penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus menjadi semakin ringan, dampaknya tidak dapat memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku.]]>
<![CDATA[Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur Dengan Menggunakan Media Sosisal Elektronik ]]>
<![CDATA[Margaretha Andini Oktavina]]>;
<![CDATA[Hery Firmansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1309
<![CDATA[The criminal act of defamation by minors via electronic social media is an important issue in criminal law. This research aims to determine the threat of punishment for criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media and criminal liability for minors who commit ITE criminal offenses. The research method used is the normative juridical method. The results of the research show that there is a threat of strict sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media, where the perpetrator can be punished with a maximum imprisonment of 4 years and/or a maximum fine of IDR 750,000,000.00. Criminal liability for minors who commit criminal acts of defamation through social media can be implemented by paying attention to the special provisions regarding children's rights in Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. This responsibility is imposed in accordance with the criminal elements which have been reviewed from the terms of criminal liability, so that perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation through social media can be held accountable for their actions as decided in court. Thus, the protection of children's rights and the application of criminal sanctions need to be harmonized with applicable legal provisions and pay attention to the special implementation of children's rights in the juvenile justice system.]]>
<![CDATA[Rangkap Jabatan Menteri dalam Konteks Kepentingan Negara Berdasarkan Asas – Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Perspektif Siyasah Tanfidziyah ]]>
<![CDATA[Amin Rahmad Panjaitan]]>;
<![CDATA[Irwansyah Irwansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1310
<![CDATA[Rangkap jabatan" is a term in Indonesian that refers to an individual holding multiple positions in different companies or institutions. In Indonesia, the issue of ministers holding multiple positions has become controversial. The purpose is to understand the laws and general principles of good governance that apply. The author uses a normative juridical research method to analyze every writing, rule, and its application. Based on Article 23 of Law Number 39 of 2008, it is stated that ministers are prohibited from holding multiple positions as other officials in accordance with laws and regulations, commissioners or directors of state-owned or private companies, and leaders of organizations funded by the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget/Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget. Meanwhile, in Article 10 of Law Number 30 of 2014, it is stated that officials in carrying out their duties must be based on the principles of Good Governance and must not be contradictory. In Indonesia, there are several ministers who hold positions as chairman of political parties and other large organizations at the same time. This is certainly contrary to the applicable rules. It is concluded that the practice of ministers holding multiple positions in Indonesia as chairman of political parties and leaders of other large organizations is contrary to the explanation of Article 23 of Law Number 39 of 2008 and Article 10 of Law Number 30 of 2014. Based on the perspective of siyasah tandfiziyyah, holding multiple positions by ministers in Indonesia is not in accordance with one of the principles used in the Islamic governance system.]]>
