Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist has a focus to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. It is an open access and peer-reviewed journal, published by Faculty of Law, Muhammadiyah University of Buton. The journal is a biannual which is published on April and December. Articles submitted might cover topical issues in Constitutional Law, Human Rights, Criminal Law, Islamic Law, Civil Law, International Law, Agrarian Law, Adat Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Administrative Law, Environmental Law and so forth which related to the Science of Law
Articles
246 Documents
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PENYEDIA ATAS PENGHENTIAN KONTRAK PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA ]]>
<![CDATA[DIMAS TEGAR PALILING]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 1 (2017): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i1.104
<![CDATA[From the juridical standpoint that there are issues that are not acomodate in the technical regulations for the procurement of goods and services, in this presidential regulation Number 54 year 2010 along with the revised document. In an implementation of the contract for the procurement of goods and services, such as the implementation of the construction made possible the occurrence state of kahar. the goal of the research in this paper is analyzing the meaning of termination of contracts in the procurement of goods and services and analyze the legal consequences of termination of the contract against the execution of a contract for the procurement of goods and services .Research methods used in the writing of scientific papers using normative legal research methods. Research results show that the meaning of termination and termination of Contracts for the procurement of goods and services differs. Termination of the contract is a contract that is caused by the suspension not work power force of the implementation of the contract, but the contract still exist, such as the circumstances of the termination of legal consequences whereas kahar contract is the Provider is entitled to payment for the work that has been done and the user must make payment upon receipt of the goods/services; and the provider is entitled to financial compensation, in unison with the user having to provide financial compensation for the delay in payment, include the clause of the contract to change the determination of the length of time until when the contract is terminated and payout system.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK ANAK DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS I A MAKASSAR ]]>
<![CDATA[HERLINA SULAIMAN]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 1 (2017): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i1.105
<![CDATA[The perpetrator of the criminal act of the child cannot be equated with criminal adults. Therefore it needs more attention in the case of children. However, the child is the successor Nations that should be developed physically and mentally. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of the Ombudsman in the performance of Marisa Polres versioned as well as analyze constraints are faced by Investigators in Marisa Polres versioned. This type of research is research used empirical research focus i.e. normative on secondary data sources (research libraries). This research uses the main data source i.e. secondary data, backed up with primary data sources. Secondary data is used that is derived from legislation such as the ACT on the criminal justice system of the child, the child protection ACT, Act No. 8 Of 1981 Year Book of the Police Act, Police ACT and some of the literature-literature as well as the results of his research, and books related to the role of the Ombudsman in conducting versioned on criminal act committed by the child. Research results show that Marisa Polres in performing the investigation is a criminal act committed by the child by women and children protection Unit (UPPA). Starting from the stage of investigation, arrest, detention up at the stage of investigation conducted in accordance with the mandate of the ACT on the criminal justice system. Investigators in conducting versioned, get consideration from BAPAS. In addition, the investigators also act as mediator to conduct deliberations involving the child and the parent/guardian, the victim and the parent/guardian, supervisor of community, social professional pekera based on approach restorative. Obstacles faced by Investigators in the conduct of Marisa Polres diversion that is not yet the existence of BAPAS in counties Marisa so complicate investigators to coordinate-in terms of asking for consideration in doing versioned. In addition the party victims sometimes do not want to make peace so that the attempted diversion by Investigators was not achieved.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGGUNA HELM DI UNIVERSITAS HALUOLEO ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Sri Widiasih]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.106
<![CDATA[Violations committed by motorists with not using a helmet shows compliance (compliance) are low traffic rules as regulated in section 57 subsection (2) of Act No. 22 of year 2009 about traffic Transport and streets. This type of research is conducted with the normative-legal research efforts are empirical. The research results showed that the factors cause motorists not wearing a helmet at the cross roads and surrounding A H.E. Mokodompit still in Kecamatan Kambu is a factor of consciousness and behavior, because almost all violations and traffic accidents on the road sekitasrnya and H.E. à Mokodompit that Kecamatan Kambu is still in its primary cause is the rider. These factors gave rise to differences of level of knowledge and/or understanding of the people against the prevailing rules resulted in a disparity that potentially gave rise to traffic problems in particular knowledge of the importance of the benefits the use of helmets for motorbike riders of vehicles that do not wear a helmet, both between road users themselves as well as between road users with apparatus that served to carry out law enforcement on highways, environmental factors contribute active in creating behavior-behavior that deviates. The citizens of the society like the breach of rules that have been set out in the legislation are likely to form a bad or aberrant personality on the individual efforts being done Satlantas Polres Kendari in tackling traffic offences caused by motorcyclists not wearing a helmet at the cross streets of H.E. à Mokodompit is by way of enforcing methods of pre-emptif, is an effort or prevention efforts against irregularities.]]>
<![CDATA[YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANCAMAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA ]]>
<![CDATA[Al Furqon]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.107
<![CDATA[This research was carried out at the Makassar District Court in Makassar, with research methods using data collection techniques by means of research library and field research. The results of this research indicate that all the elements of a criminal offence committed by the pengancaman the second defendant had sesuasi with the elements contained in article 335 of the PENAL CODE with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. This is apparent from satisfy all the elements in accordance with the article didakwakan on the defendant. Article didakwakan, namely Article 335 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. With satisfy the elements and look at the application of the criminal law against the crime pengancaman, then the defendant must account for his actions in accordance with the ruling of the District Court Judges deposed by the Makassar imprisonment of three (3) months and pay the fees. In deciding the matter State Court judge Makassar has pretty much consideration, starting from the demands of the public prosecutor, the accused, description of witnesses, as well as satisfy the elements pursuant to article didakwakan, as well as the things that are incriminating and relieve. So defendants are convicted with imprisonment for 3 (three) months and pay the fees, not fully contain the benefit law. Considering the act committed by the two defendants, then according to the author, the criminal who dropped by the Tribunal of judges rated very lightly.]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN DISSENTING OPINION DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Dewi Ratnasari Rustam]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.108
<![CDATA[Dissenting opinion is the difference of opinion between the Tribunal judges who handle certain a matter with other judges of the Tribunal dealing with certain cases. Dissenting opinion does not have the force of law because it cannot be the Foundation for the inception of the award. Dissenting opinion itself is an aspect of the law that need to be examined in order to prevent the formation of false opinion among the public. So, nowadays have started to formed the perception that dissenting opinion was an engineering law, instead of enforcing the rule of law but rather media that gave the opportunity for the defendant in corruption regardless of criminal trapping; but on the other hand is a form of difference of opinion and the independence of the judges as the metre is guaranteed by the provisions of the law; that the importance of dissenting opinion in the Court ruling was the judge's opinion be weighted, in an attempt of law appeal or cassation; as an indicator to determine the career judge, as an attempt to avoid the practice of corruption, Collusion and Nepotism (KKN) and the judicial mafia; as a real step towards the transparency of judicial democratization; the judiciary; and kemandiarian the judge require the freedom of speech.]]>
<![CDATA[RESIKO MEDIS DAN KELALAIAN MEDIS DALAM ASPEK PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Wahyu Rizki Kartika Ilahi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.109
<![CDATA[Healthy is very important for every people, keep healthy is very important, if some people ill and must opname when the doctor must get to make medic for some people, but the end of get medic is unsatisfactory result.in the term of unsatisfactory result from get medic, make medical loss for patient and patient’s family, in medical loss result make many issues for doctor. but must know in the fact, not every unsatisfactory result get responsibility.this thesis make a normative yuridis metode with statue approach and conceptualapproach metode. in this thesis discuss about responsibility doctor for medical risks and medical risks which can be account for by doctor]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK
BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Dony Pribadi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.110
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) sudah disahkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia, UU No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak ini menggantikan UU No. 3 tahun 2007 tentang Pengadilan Anak. UU SPPA ini telah memberikan perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum sejak proses awal penanganannya sampai pada pelaksanaan hukuman. Hasil kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa menurut UU No. 11 tahun 2012, perlindungan terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum melalui beragam bentuk. Anak Berhadapan Hukum (ABH) dibagi atas 3 klasifikasi yaitu sebagai Anak Pelaku, Anak Korban dan Anak saksi. Selain itu dalam penanganannya Anak berhadapan hukum harus dibedakan dari orang dewasa pada setiap tingkatan proses, baik itu dari mulai penyelidikkan, penyidikkan maupun saat litigasi. Selain itu, setiap pelaksanaan proses Anak wajib didampingi oleh pendamping. Pada aturan yang baru ini juga mengenalkan dan menekankan diversi, yaitu aspek non litigasi dalam menyelesaikan perkara. Pada proses diversi, penyelesaian kasus diupayakan sebisa mungkin di luar peradilan.]]>
<![CDATA[PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI MENURUT PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN YANG BERLAKU ]]>
<![CDATA[Ida Bagus Made Putra Manohara]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.111
<![CDATA[Aborsi merupakan masalah kesehatan masyarakat karena memberikan dampak pada kematian ibu. Sebagaimana diketahui penyebab utama kematian ibu hamil dan melahirkan adalah perdarahan, infeksi, dan eklampsia namun sebenarnya aborsi juga merupakan penyebab kematian ibu dalam bentuk komplikasi perdarahan sepsis. Dibeberapa negara seperti di Amerika Serikat memperbolehkan aborsi dengan alasan medis tertentu, aborsi ini disebut sebagai aborsi terapeutik di negara Jepang dan Eropa Timur memperbolehkan aborsi dengan alasan terbatasnya jumlah penduduk sehingga praktik aborsi di negara tersebut dilegalkan. Namun di Indonesia melarang keras praktik aborsi dalam bentuk apapun, namun menurut Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 praktik aborsi diperbolehkan dengan indikasi medis, namun dalam ketentuan yang tertera dalam Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 menjadi dilematis antara memperbolehkan atau melarang tindakan aborsi tersebut. Setelah mengalami gejolak yang sangat panjang pemerintah mencabut peraturan tentang Undang-Undang Kesehatan Tahun 1992 dan diganti dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 seiring dengan perkembangan jaman dan banyak penolakan terhadap peraturan yang lama. Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sendiri perbuatan aborsi merupakan tindakan kriminal atau dikatagorikan sebagai kejahatan terhadap nyawa, Pasal yang mengatur terhadap kejahatan terhadap nyawa adalah Pasal 229, Pasal 346, Pasal 349, dan Pasal 535. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Serta menggunkan sumber bahan hukum sekunder sebagai sumber data utama, yang didasarkan pada bahan hukum primer yaitu Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, catatan-catatan ilmiah dan sumber bahan hukum lainnya.. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa hanya Undang-Undang Kesehatan yang memperbolehkan seorang wanita melakukan aborsi dengan alasan faktor penyakit bawaan, dimana ternyata pada ibu hamil yang sudah melakukan pemeriksaan kehamilan mendapatkan kenyataan bahwa bayi yang dikandungnya mengalami cacat secara fisik sehingga apabila bayi tersebut lahir akan mengancam jiwa ibu maupun bayi yang akan dilahirkan.]]>
<![CDATA[KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENENTUKAN HARGA JUAL DALAM TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI TANAH DAN ATAU BANGUNAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Tis’at Afriyandi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 1 (2018): DECEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.112
<![CDATA[Bisnis properti tanah, rumah, dan bangunan merupakan suatu aktivitas bisnis yang mulai banyak diminati oleh masyarakat. Mengingat tanah dan bangunan merupakan benda tidak bergerak, maka terdapat ketentuan-ketentuan yang harus dilakukan oleh para pihak sebelum proses peralihan haknya. Dalam proses jual beli tanah dan atau bangunan menimbulkan kewajiban pajak bagi masing-masing pihak. Sebagaimana amanat dari Undang-Undang No. 28 tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah, pihak pembeli dibebankan BPHTB sebesar 5% dari harga transaksi yang telah disepakati. Kesepakatan para pihak dalam menentukan harga transaksi harus pula memperhatikan nilai wajar yang berpedoman pada nilai NJOP tanah dan atau bangunan pada saat terjadi transaksi. Pemerintah daerah sebagai pemungut pajak dapat melakukan proses validasi perhitungan BPHTB yang telah dibayarkan oleh pembeli. Dengan adanya proses validasi BPHTB ini pemerintah daerah memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penelitian perhitungan dan penelitian lapangan terkait objek jual beli tersebut. Proses validasi BPHTB ini dapat mempengaruhi harga transaksi jual beli karena dianggap harga transaksi yang disepakati masih terlalu rendah dari harga pasar.]]>
<![CDATA[Audit of state losses by the Gorontalo attorney general in a corruption case ]]>
<![CDATA[Suardi Rais]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v3i2.120
<![CDATA[In the process of proving Corruption Crime, it must fulfill the three elements contained in corruption, one of the elements of which is the loss of state finances as well as the Corruption Act. To prove the State's loss, the institutions that are authorized to audit the results of State losses will be involved. In this case the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). As in Law No. 15 of 2006 and other institutions regulated outside the constitution, based on Circular of the Chief of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016, and based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number. 31 / PUU-X / 2012. But in some of the decisions of the Corruption Criminal Court, the process of proving the loss of state finances was carried out by the Gorontalo High Prosecutor's Office who did not have the authority to audit state financial losses in cases of corruption]]>
