cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
KEK (Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan)
Published by Kementerian Keuangan
ISSN : 14103249     EISSN : 25409999     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan (KEK henceforth)was first published in 1996 as an initiative of researchers of Ministry of Finance. In the earlier years of its publication, KEK was also known as Kajian Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Keuangan (KIEK). Since then KEK has been published regularly as one of the prominent sources of reference for public policy evaluation as well as a recommendation, in particular on Indonesian state budgets and finance topics.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " Vol 16, No 3 (2012)" : 5 Documents clear
Dampak Moratorium Hutan Terhadap Ekonomi Indonesia : Analisis Menggunakan Model IRSA-Indonesia 5 Rakhmindyarto, Rakhmindyarto
Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Vol 16, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Badan kebijakan Fiskal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31685/kek.v16i3.127

Abstract

This paper discusses the economic effects of the forest moratorium policy which has been launched by the government through the Presidential Decree no. 10 of 2011 dated 20th of May 2011. The issues addressed in the paper are the impacts on: land uses and natural forest area, carbon emissions, domestic prices, export-import, GDP, and poverty rate. Using the quantitative method of IRSA-Indonesia 5 - an inter-regional CGE model, the results show that the forest moratorium policy has both positive and negative impacts on Indonesia's economy.
ANALISIS PEMBERIAN BEA MASUK DITANGGUNG PEMERINTAH (BM DTP) TAHUN 20101 Samosir, Agunan
Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Vol 16, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Badan kebijakan Fiskal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31685/kek.v16i3.67

Abstract

To augment people's purchasing power, to maintain business resilience and to raise business and industry's competitiveness, Government with its fiscal policy provides BMDTP facility. The provision was initiated with the intention to lessen the crisis impact in the midst of 2008. The measure was expected to be able to provide sufficient public goods and services. Besides, the effected real sektor may survive and raise its competitiveness. The quick research by PKAPBN concluded that the realized facility utilization trough BMDTP by Government was not optimal. The causes of low realization of BMDTP were identified, among others : (1J the mismatch between BMDTP provision with the needed sektors or industries; [2] the delayed issuance of PMK and BMDTP technical guidance; (3) the lack of knowledge of Ministry/Institution Financial Disbursement Official (Pembina K/L and KPA) on the industries having the access to acquire BMDTP. Government needs to review the cost and benefit of BMDTP on industries. The cost may be reviewed from production, and contribution on tax payment and employment creation. The Ministry/Institution or Echelon 1 which can evaluate BMDTP is FPO, MOF as the coordinator or chair of the evaluation team, and well supported by each Ministry/Institution responsible for particular industry. The task has been conducted by FPO since August 2010 and is still ongoing. In accordance with article 9 in each PMK BMDTP 2010, the evaluation timeliness may be extended to the end of February 2011.
ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS ALOKASI ANGGARAN PROGRAM KEMISKINAN PADA KEMENTERIAN NEGARA/LEMBAGA Rahayu, Sri Lestari
Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Vol 16, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Badan kebijakan Fiskal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31685/kek.v16i3.63

Abstract

Anggaran Program Kemiskinan melalui Kementerian/Lembaga dalam kurun waktu tahun 2006 - 2011 (sekitar 5 tahun] mencapai sebesar Rp351,5 triliun, hanya mampu mengurangi jumlah penduduk miskin sebesar 9,3 juta orang sehingga dalam tahun 2011 jumlah penduduk miskin di Indonesia sekitar 30,024 juta atau sebesar 11,5-12,5 persen dari jumlah penduduk Indonesia. Agar Indonesia terbebas dari kemiskinan tanpa perbaikan anggaran Program Kemiskinan maka dibutuhkan waktu sekitar 15 tahun, dan biaya sekitar Rpl.054,5 triliun. Oleh karena itu, untuk mendorong percepatan pengurangan penduduk miskin, perlu dirumuskan alternatif skenario anggaran versi baru melalui pendekatan bantuan langsung bersyarat (wajib menabung) setara dengan UMR nasional sebesar Rp908.800 per bulan diberikan kepada 17.488,007 kepala keluarga (KK) miskin, dalam waktu tiga tahun sebesar Rp572,151 triliun, diharapkan penduduk miskin sudah menjadi sejahtera, sehingga terjadi penghematan anggaran sebesar Rp482,35 triliun, dan penghematan waktu sekitar 12 tahun akan direkomendasikan dalam artikel ini.
Analisis Model Makro Ekonomi Regional Bali Pendekatan Solow Neclassical Growth Budhiasa, Gede Sudjana
Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Vol 16, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Badan kebijakan Fiskal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31685/kek.v16i3.126

Abstract

Bali Island is the most popular tourist destination in Indonesia, therfore the growth for international tourist destionation to Bali island could be impact and supporting generating income of people of Bali island. However, the policy design of one for all that was design by BTDC projects were concentrated tourist destionation at Kabupaten Badung and Kota Denpasar as main region activities.This research have been found that using econometrics two stages regression methods indicated that tourist growth center policy of BTDC is failures to distribute income and other benefits to the suburb area of 7 Kabupaten outside from center growth Kabupaten Badung and Kota Denpasar. The failure of beneficial of 7 Kabupaten to take participation is that because of the economic structure of 7 Kabupaten become dominated of primary sector and less power of industrial sectors
KETAHANAN SEKTOR KEUANGAN DAN SHADOWBANKING: ANALISA TERHADAP INDUSTRI PEMBIAYAAN DI INDONESIA Adriyanto, Adriyanto
Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Vol 16, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Badan kebijakan Fiskal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31685/kek.v16i3.57

Abstract

The failure of supervision instrument on shadow banking practice in the US has triggered financial collapse and spread accross sovereignities. The G20 has asked FSB to undertake in depth analysis of shadow banking progress along with needed recommendations to overcome the weaknesses. This paper attempts to analyze the shadow banking practice in Indonesia particularly in the consumer finance industry by using the flow of fund analysis recommended by FSB and several relevant financial ratios. The size of credit intermediation in this industry only accounts for 3% of GDP compared to bank credit accounting for 30% of GDP in 2011, however the credit growth in finance industry has superseded banking sector. The consumer finance industry are dominantly reliant on bank lending and bond which reduces the susceptibility of market shock. The asset securitization is not common in this industry. The financial sector authority has imposed strick regulation on this industry to ensure industry's financial health. Despite industry's ability to meet those requirements, the high dependency on debt for operation has raised concern for stronger equity increase. Further, the expansive credit intermediation in this industry can bring liquidity problem which requires further regulation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) Vol 20, No 3 (2016) Vol 20, No 2 (2016) Vol 20, No 1 (2016) Vol 19, No 3 (2015) Vol 19, No 2 (2015) Vol 19, No 1 (2015) Vol 18, No 3 (2014) Vol 18, No 2 (2014) Vol 18, No 1 (2014) Vol 17, No 3 (2013) Vol 17, No 2 (2013) Vol 17, No 1 (2013) Vol 16, No 3 (2012) Vol 16, No 2 (2012) Vol 16, No 1 (2012) Vol 15, No 2 (2011) Vol 15, No 1 (2011) Vol 14, No 4 (2010) Vol 14, No 3 (2010) Vol 14, No 2 (2010) Vol 14, No 1 (2010) Vol 13, No 2 (2009) Vol 13, No 1 (2009) More Issue