cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
siti hatikasari
Contact Email
sitihatikasari@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jsh_fh@unib.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota bengkulu,
Bengkulu
INDONESIA
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum
Published by Universitas Bengkulu
ISSN : 1693766X     EISSN : 25794663     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum [e-ISSN 2579-4663 dan p-ISSN 1693-766X] adalah nama baru sebagai pengganti "Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bengkulu sejak Tahun 1995. Jurnal "Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum" merupakan jurnal atau media informasi dan komunikasi di bidang hukum berisi artikel ilmiah hasil penelitian terkait bidang ilmu hukum yang meliputi Hukum Perdata, Hukum Ekonomi/Bisnis, Hukum Pidana, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Konstitusi, Hukum Islam, Hukum Lingkungan, Hukum Adat, Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual, Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak, Hukum Internasional dan sebagainya yang berhubungan dengan masalah-masalah hukum.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 103 Documents
 7   8   9   10   11 
Tumpang Tindih (Overlapping) Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) dalam Pengawasan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Simanjuntak, Predderics Hockop; Novta Rizky Askohar Putri; Josephat Mario Seran Tahuk; Andi Muh Teguh Hakim
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.2.196-214

Abstract

Government procurement of goods and services plays a crucial role in national development, yet it is highly susceptible to collusion and financial mismanagement. In this context, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) and the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) serve as key supervisory bodies. KPPU focuses on preventing unfair business practices such as tender collusion, while BPK emphasizes the efficiency and accountability of state finances. This study aims to analyze the overlapping authority between these two institutions and explore solutions for harmonizing their roles. Using a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach, the findings reveal overlapping areas of supervision that risk undermining effectiveness and creating legal uncertainty. Therefore, a clear regulatory framework—through new legislation or revisions to existing presidential regulations is essential to ensure a coordinated, fair, and efficient oversight system.
Reformulation Of The Policy On The Placement Of Reclamation And Post-Mining Guarantee Funds Based On The Polluter Pays Principle Amiruddin, A.M Adzkiya'
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.2.160-178

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the placement of reclamation and post-mining guarantee funds in mining activities. These funds serve as an economic instrument that compels license holders to carry out post-mining recovery. However, compliance among license holders in placing reclamation and post-mining guarantee funds remains problematic. In addition, this research seeks to analyze the reformulation of policies regarding the placement of reclamation and/or post-mining guarantee funds as an environmental economic instrument. The research method employed is normative juridical research with a descriptive analysis model. The findings show that after licenses are issued, many license holders fail to fulfill their obligation to place guarantee funds, resulting in disrupted environmental recovery activities. Under the prevailing regulations, the obligation to place reclamation and post-mining guarantee funds is imposed on IUP/IUPK holders after obtaining a license. With such a regulatory model, many IUP/IUPK holders neglect and fail to deposit the required funds. The current concept of placing reclamation and post-mining guarantee funds, which requires submission after license is issued by government, has led to non-compliance by license holders. Therefore, the concept of guarantee fund placement must be reformulated.
MENGUATNYA AUTOCRATIC LEGALISM: MELEMAHNYA KONSOLIDASI MASYARAKAT SIPIL UNTUK PELEMBAGAAN DEMOKRASI Ramadhanil, Fadli; Kurnia Ilahi, Beni
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.2.179-195

Abstract

Levitsky and Ziblatt emphasize that threats to democracy often occur gradually through mechanisms that are legal but fundamentally weaken the system. This phenomenon is called autocratic legalism: the use of law to legitimize undemocratic actions. This phenomenon highlights how policies that appear legitimate can be abused to perpetuate power or reduce public participation space. Once all constitutional constraints have been loosened, those in power can easily use legal instruments so that their actions appear legal. In reality, this phenomenon—mutatis mutandis—weakens the consolidation of civil society in the institutionalization of democracy and even pushes it toward authoritarianism. This is exactly the condition currently occurring in legislative practice in Indonesia. Laws are made solely to fulfill the needs and desires of a small group of political elites. Examples include revisions to the KPK Law (Anti-Corruption Commission) and the State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) Law, and the enactment of the new Capital City (IKN) Law—all of which demonstrate the high intensity of autocratic legalism in Indonesia's legislative process. At the same time, legislative products that represent the aspirations of many people remain unfinished, such as the Bill on Indigenous Peoples, the Bill on Asset Forfeiture (related to corruption proceeds), and the Bill on the Protection of Domestic Workers. The problems to be answered in this research consist of two main issues: (1) What is the impact of autocratic legalism on the institutionalization of democracy in Indonesia?, and (2) How does autocratic legalism influence the weakening of civil society consolidation in Indonesia? This research aims to analyze two things, First, why is the institutionalization of democracy difficult to achieve in a situation where autocratic legalism is strengthening, and civil society consolidation is weakening? Second, the impact of autocratic legalism on the weakening of civil society consolidation in Indonesia. This research employs a doctrinal legal method, a conceptual approach, and qualitative analysis. The research findings show that the practice of autocratic legalism, which exploits legal procedures to legitimize power, has made the institutionalization of democracy difficult to function, due to the unsystematic pattern of relations between the executive and legislative branches in law-making, and executive dominance in this practice has reduced the essence of democracy and weakened human rights guarantees through the blurring of checks and balances functions, the strengthening of power coalitions, as well as the criminalization of criticism and restrictions on media freedom. Therefore, the practice of autocratic legalism must be halted through limiting presidential authority, strengthening judicial independence, and increasing meaningful public participation in government oversight.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 103

 7   8   9   10   11 

Filter by Year

2013 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 34 No 2 (2025) Vol 34 No 1 (2025) Vol 33 No 2 (2024) Vol 33 No 1 (2024) Vol 32 No 2 (2023) Vol 32 No 1 (2023) Vol 31 No 2 (2022) Vol 31 No 1 (2022) Vol 30 No 2 (2021) Vol 30, No 1 (2021) Vol 29, No 2 (2020) Vol 29 No 2 (2020) Vol 29, No 1 (2020) Vol 28, No 2 (2019) Vol 28, No 1 (2019) Vol 27, No 2 (2018) Vol 27, No 1 (2018) Vol 26, No 2 (2017) Vol 24 No 2 (2015) Vol 22, No 1 (2013) More Issue