Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan
JPP will periodically present papers related to development planning and policy in Indonesia, linking academic and scientific knowledge to public policy. JPP takes a position as one of the bridging knowledge to policy tools. The subjects are each development processes, from the planning, implementing, monitoring, and policy evaluation phases.
Articles
192 Documents
<![CDATA[Analyzing Civic Satisfaction on Public Service Using Twitter Data ]]>
<![CDATA[Ade Hendraputra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): September 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1314.933 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i2.15
<![CDATA[In recent years, digital technology has transformed rapidly, allowing social media to become an important place for people to express their thoughts and opinion on any topic that they want. In this paper, we present an analysis of Twitter data regarding civic satisfaction and opinion of public service in Indonesia. We try to capture the tweets which discussed several topics related to traffic condition, public service and driving license service. Then we present an analysis process using a framework and present the result which may help the government have a better picture of certain problems.]]>
<![CDATA[Adaptive Governance for Building Urban Resilience: Lessons from Water Management Strategies in Two Indonesian Coastal Cities ]]>
<![CDATA[Ewin Sofian Winata]]>;
<![CDATA[Samuel Geldin]]>;
<![CDATA[Kristin Qui]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): September 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (351.341 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i2.16
<![CDATA[Using a combination of vulnerability and resilience frameworks, this paper examines governance challenges and strategies to coastal and water-related resilience in two Indonesian cities. It compares the methods that local governments have used to engage different stakeholders and enact various policy solutions, in order to understand how multi-scalar elements of governance influence vulnerability and adaptive capacity to water-related hazards. After discussing shocks and stresses of note that span the social, economic and environmental realm, a comparative analysis will be carried out for two large coastal cities in Indonesia, Surabaya, and Semarang. A combination of resilience frameworks as a basis for analysis reveals the different approach of each city to enhance resilience. While Surabaya centered on enhancing people participation and efforts internally, Semarang more focused on instituting comprehensive plans and external collaboration. These different approaches suggest that resilience can be built in different ways. A combination of adequate financing, technical capacity, excellent leadership, an understanding of the root causes and pressures, and long-term visions is necessary for impactful governance.]]>
<![CDATA[Enhancing Local Economic Independency by Issuing Local Government Bond: Comparing Japan and Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Alen Ermanita]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): September 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1613.265 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i2.17
<![CDATA[For more than a decade, Indonesia has been practicing decentralization. During this period, local governments still experience difficulties in generating local revenues to fund their development. Local government bonds (LGBs) are actually one of the finest sources for financing local development. However, until now there is no real practice in issuing local bonds in Indonesia though it is allowed in the existing regulation. There are still many considerations which hindered the realization of LGB issuance ranging from the rule of mechanism to the local governments’ readiness themselves. To gain more insights about the issue, learning from another country (in this case: Japan) on how they manage LGBs effectively and securely will be beneficial. Comparison model between the two countries is chosen to see the regulation and managerial aspects in LGB implementation including the main institution in central level, rules of the game, buyers and purposes. By having this comparison, it is expected that some crucial factors can be looked at, which may then provide us some information on why LGBs are yet to bloom in Indonesia. Moreover, the comparison is expected to provide some basics about the possibility to ease policy adoption for Indonesia in managing LGBs.]]>
<![CDATA[Popularizing Bridging Knowledge to Policy in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhyiddin Muhyiddin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): September 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i2.18
<![CDATA[When Growth is Inclusive in Indonesia? ]]>
<![CDATA[Nugraha Pukuh]]>;
<![CDATA[Hayu Fadlun Widyasthika]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1435.296 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.19
<![CDATA[This study aims to measure and analyze the inclusive growth rate in Indonesia by using per capita expenditure data from Indonesian population. Inclusiveness of growth is observed from the Growth Incidence Curve and pro-poor growth approach using Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) method. It also sees the effect of growth and income redistribution on poverty change using Decomposition of Poverty through Shapley value. This research is divided into two periods, i.e. 2012-2014 and 2014-2016 by grouping the territory of Indonesia into three areas, i.e. Java and Bali, Sumatra and Kalimantan Island, and Eastern Indonesia. The result shows that in 2012-2014, the income growth in Indonesia is inclusive, while in 2014-2016 its growth is not inclusive yet. This is due to the effect of economic growth still hampered by the effect of income inequality over the years 2014 to 2016.]]>
<![CDATA[The Contribution of Natural Resources on Economic Welfare In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Palupi Anggraeni]]>;
<![CDATA[Peter Daniels]]>;
<![CDATA[Peter Davey]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1316.979 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.20
<![CDATA[The objective of this research is to examine the relationship between natural resource abundance and economic welfare at the national level of Indonesia. Four variables of institutional quality, investment level, education level, and industry value added are considered in the study as the moderating variables between economic welfare and natural resource rents. This study found that the results are not robust to conclude that the rent generated from natural resources is contributing to the economic welfare in Indonesia. Nevertheless, this study found there are three moderating variables that can become a support to strengthen the relationship between natural resources and economic welfare, these are institutional quality through improvement in the political stability, strengthening the accountability, stringent the regulations, and enforcing the rule of law; primary completion level; and industry value added.]]>
<![CDATA[Socio-Political And Economic Determinants Of Income Inequality In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Ichsan Zulkarnaen]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (801.888 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.21
<![CDATA[Income inequality in Indonesia has rapidly enlarged in recent years. This paper aims to examine the causes of highly persistent income inequality in Indonesia. Incontrast to other previous studies that investigated income inequality focusing only on economic factors, this paper also looks at social and political elements. Using Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method, I found that democracy has no significant impact on income inequality. In addition, the study found a significant relationship between government spending and income inequality. In addition, I also found evidence that foreign direct investment (FDI) flows have an impact to improve income inequality in Indonesia. There are several relevant policy conclusions that can be drawn from this study.]]>
<![CDATA[Social Finance and Social Enterprises: A New Frontier for Development in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[David Soukhasing]]>;
<![CDATA[Valencia Dea]]>;
<![CDATA[Christie Ruslim]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1397.557 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.22
<![CDATA[The number of social finances and social enterprises are steadily growing in Indonesia. However, there is yet to be comprehensive research in this context. The objective of this study is to explore and identify the unique challenges of social investment in Indonesia. There are three key players in social investment ecosystem in Indonesia. Social enterprises, which aim to solve social or environmental problems, are mostly at their early stage and not investment ready. Meanwhile, many investors, with or without intention to invest for social mission, are not willing to fund early-stage enterprises. There are also challenges or false perceptions from traditional financial institutions in giving external funding to social enterprises. Enablers act as catalysts for the growth of social enterprises; however, their presence in Indonesia received an equivocal review, as many of them are lacking instruments as a social enterprise enabler. Blended finance is explored to be the solution to the unmet demand and supply of funding. There are two tools to implement blended finance model. With direct funding scheme, investors are given guarantees in exchange for the higher risks of investing in seed- and growth-stage social enterprises. Alternatively, support mechanisms acknowledge and address different issues in every lifecycle through various building capacity and programs.]]>
<![CDATA[Linking Open Data and the Fight Against Corruption in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Arthur Glenn Maail]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.23
<![CDATA[In 2015 the G20 Anti-Corruption Open Data Principles were developed, as a first step towards leveraging open data as a crucial tool for enabling a culture of transparency and accountability in order to address corruption. The purpose of this study is to assess the extent to which Indonesia is meeting its commitments towards fighting corruption by applying and implementing the principles and actions set out in the G20 Principles. Hence, the G20 Anti-Corruption Open Data Principles is used as an analytical framework to guide the analysis. The research findings show that the government of Indonesia puts the disclosure of public information at the front and center of both its open government and anti-corruption agenda, which is consistent with the first of the G20 Anti-Corruption Open Data Principles. However, the current legal frameworks lack the proactive disclosure and openness components advocated by the open data principles.]]>
<![CDATA[Demographic Bonus for Indonesia: Challenges and Policy Implications of Promoting Universal Health Coverage ]]>
<![CDATA[Sidayu Ariteja]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning Vol. 1 No. 3 (2017): December 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ministry of National Development Planning Republic of Indonesia/Bappenas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (890.447 KB)
|
DOI: 10.36574/jpp.v1i3.24
<![CDATA[Indonesia has been promoting Universal Health Coverage (UHC) since 2014 as targeted in the national development plan document. Indonesia has also enteredthe stage of demographic bonus that could enhance the benefit of social welfare. Starting from the idea of demographic bonus and the campaign of acceleratingUHC in Indonesia, this paper tries to answer the question of how demographic dividend affects the promotion of UHC declared by the government of Indonesia. Then, this paper analyzes the effects of demographic bonus based on two specific policies, supply-side policy and demand-side policy. The results of the analysis might not directly relate to the issue of demographic bonus. However, it could recommend several suggestions which could deal with the opportunity of demographic bonus. This paper is limited as it only based on some simple calculations on meeting the needs and the gaps on UHC.]]>
