cover
Contact Name
Yogi Febriandi
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6281267445658
Journal Mail Official
legalite@iainlangsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gampong Meurande, Kota Langsa, Aceh
Location
Kota langsa,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26147971     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Legalite is published by the Islamic Sharia Law Study Program Faculty of IAIN Langsa. This journal contains a study related to the law, thoughts, and renewal of Islamic Criminal Law both in Indonesia and abroad. This journal is published twice a year: June and December.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 214 Documents
Efektivitas Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak terhadap Pencegahan Perundungan Anak di Indonesia dan Malaysia Miranti Puspita Sari; Syaddan Dintara Lubis
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2026): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v11i2.15394

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of child protection laws in preventing bullying among children in Indonesia and Malaysia, examine the implementation of the applicable regulations, and identify the factors influencing the effectiveness of bullying prevention from the perspectives of criminal law and Islamic criminal law. This research is a library study employing a qualitative approach and a normative legal research method. The findings indicate that both Indonesia and Malaysia have established adequate regulations to protect children from bullying. However, the effectiveness of prevention is determined not only by the substance of the law but also by factors such as law enforcement, reporting systems, supporting facilities, community participation, and legal culture. Malaysia tends to be more effective in terms of implementation through a centralized monitoring and reporting system, while Indonesia demonstrates stronger protection of children’s rights and greater application of restorative justice.
Analisis Unsur Mens Rea dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kasus Korupsi Tom Lembong Shinta Aulia Zahrani; Gelar Ali Ahmad
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2026): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v11i2.15639

Abstract

This study aims to examine the doctrinal construction of mens rea in criminal liability, assess the fulfillment of the mens rea requirement in the corruption case involving Tom Lembong, and analyze its implications for legal certainty in the enforcement of anti-corruption law in Indonesia. This research employs a qualitative library research design using a normative juridical approach through statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were analyzed using descriptive-analytical methods supported by legal interpretation and content analysis. The findings demonstrate that establishing mens rea cannot rely solely on evidence of state financial loss or procedural irregularities but must be supported by proof of intent, knowledge, and conscious abuse of authority aimed at achieving an unlawful objective. The study further reveals that positioning mens rea as the central element of criminal liability strengthens legal certainty by distinguishing legitimate governmental discretion exercised in good faith from criminal abuse of authority. This framework also provides a more balanced standard for anti-corruption enforcement while reducing the risk of criminalization of public policy and reinforcing the principle of culpability within Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Kriminalisasi dalam Ruang Siber: Antara Perlindungan Negara dan Ancaman terhadap Kebebasan Sipil Saparudin Saparudin
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2026): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v11i2.14732

Abstract

The criminalization policy in cyberspace in Indonesia faces a fundamental dilemma between the state's need to protect its citizens from digital crimes and the threat to civil liberties and human rights. This research critically examines four dimensions of cyber criminalization: its concept and development in criminal law, the urgency of state protection, implications for civil liberties, and the reconstruction of fair policies by considering Constitutional Court Decisions Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 and 115/PUU-XXII/2024. Using normative legal methods with a juridical-normative approach through library research, this study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials descriptively-analytically. The findings reveal that structural imbalances in cyber criminalization policies stem from the dominance of security approaches that neglect procedural justice principles and participatory oversight mechanisms, exacerbated by gaps in law enforcement officers' understanding at the implementation level. The progressive Constitutional Court decisions provide positive signals for protecting civil liberties, yet their impact on law enforcement practices still requires strict supervision. This research concludes that balancing state security and civil liberties can only be achieved through three main pillars: independent judicial oversight, substantive public participation, and effective remedy mechanisms for aggrieved citizens.
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Narkotika: Analisis Proporsionalitas Putusan Nomor 105/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Plj Ainul Badri; Lailatul Qodriyanti; Muhammad Ikhwan
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2026): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v11i2.15157

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to sentencing disparity, judicial considerations, and the conformity of sentencing with the principle of proportionality in Decision Number 105/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Plj. This study employs a normative juridical legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an analysis of the court decision and relevant legal literature. The findings indicate that sentencing disparity is influenced by the broad discretion afforded to judges, the lack of optimal standardized sentencing parameters, differences in the degree of offenders’ involvement, and a predominantly repressive orientation in addressing narcotics offenses. The panel of judges sentenced ODS to five years and six months of imprisonment and NP to five years of imprisonment, with each receiving a fine of IDR 1,000,000,000, subsidiary to six months of imprisonment. This difference indicates an attempt to apply individualized sentencing; however, the sentencing gap does not fully reflect the differences in the roles and levels of culpability of the defendants. This study contributes to strengthening sentencing policy by emphasizing the need for more objective, measurable, and proportional sentencing guidelines to minimize disparities without undermining judicial independence.