cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abd Kahar Muzakkir
Contact Email
muzakkir.abd.kahar@gmail.com
Phone
+6282291222637
Journal Mail Official
jurnal_alishlah@umi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Jalan Urip Sumoharjo KM.5 Makassar, Sulawesi-Selatan, Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Published by Universitas Muslim Indonesia
ISSN : 14109328     EISSN : 26140071     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Al-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum adalah jurnal peer review yang diterbitkan dua kali setahun Mei dan November oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia sejak Tahun 1998, dimaksudkan untuk menjadi jurnal untuk penerbitan hasil penelitian tentang hukum baik studi empiris dan normatif, terutama dalam masalah hukum kontemporer. Berbagai topik tetapi tidak terbatas pada: 1. Hukum Pidana 2. Hukum Konstitusi 3. Hukum Perdata dan Komersial 4. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 5. Hukum Ekonomi 6. Hukum Internasional 7. Hukum Islam atau Syariah 8. Hukum Adat 9. Hukum Lingkungan 10. Pendidikan Hukum 11. Hukum Komparatif Jurnal ini bertujuan terutama untuk memfasilitasi dan menyediakan forum bagi para sarjana hukum dan profesional untuk membahas dan mempromosikan perkembangan terkini tentang masalah hukum di seluruh dunia, diterbitkan dalam bahasa Indonesia, dan tinjauan ini berupaya memperluas batasan wacana hukum Indonesia untuk mengakses kontributor dan pembaca di seluruh dunia. Oleh karena itu, tinjauan ini menerima kontribusi dari para sarjana dan profesional hukum internasional serta dari perwakilan pengadilan, penegak-penegak hukum, otoritas eksekutif, pemerintah, dan lembaga kerjasama pembangunan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 23 No 2: November 2020" : 5 Documents clear
Keserentakan Pemilu 2024 yang Paling Ideal Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Amir, Mushaddiq
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 23 No 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v23i2.41

Abstract

The holding of concurrent elections on April 17 2019 is a new history in the general election process in Indonesia. This is the implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 14 /PUU/2013 on the review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the Election of President and Vice President. Although simultaneous elections have been considered better than previous elections, it does not mean that there are no shortcomings in the implementation. The most appalling problem is the large number of fatalities by the election organizers who are seen as the impact of the 2019 concurrent elections as well as other technical problems. Looking at various aspects raised from the 2019 elections, the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem) conducted a review of the material of the Law on the 1945 Constitution to the Constitutional Court as outlined in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019. In their argument, the petitioner conveys a number of things related to the analysis that has been carried out in the holding of simultaneous elections held in 2019 yesterday. In the results of the decision, the Constitutional Court rejected the petition of the petitioner in its entirety because it was considered to be groundless. However, the Constitutional Court provides choices regarding election models that can be chosen and considered constitutional based on the 1945 Constitution. Keyword: Concurrent elections , election model, election of 2024
Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Presiden Sebagai Upaya Menghindari Terjadinya Abuse of Power Yudhistira, Elsan
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 23 No 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v23i2.43

Abstract

President term limitation is an effort to prevent a President who takes control of the nation for a long time because the President will make it possible to abuse power. Presidential term limitation is a crucial thing to be regulated because it will make the potential abuse of power, and the authoritarian government will grow in some countries. In every nation, we can see adopting a presidential system organize about Presidential term limitation to President's candidate. Seeing that there are several types adopted by various countries that adopt the Presidential system, then it will be studied which system is the best system to decrease the possibility of the occurrence abuse of power performed by the President. The research method uses a statue approach, a historical approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that of the 20 (twenty) countries that adhere to the presidential system, it shows that the most widely used method is only one re-election and no re-election because with this system it is supposed that it can easily limit the term of office of the President and also can be determine fixed government. The chance of abusing power will reduce, while the system No Immediate re-election and No limitation re-election is a country that allows it to be in control for a long time without any restrictions to run for President so that the possibility of abuse of authority will be more open.
Kedudukan Hukum Kreditor Preferen Pajak dan Kreditor Preferen Buruh dalam Proses Kepailitan Imran Eka Saputra
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 23 No 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v23i2.44

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal position of tax-preferred creditors and labour preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process and to determine the factors that influence the occurrence of disputes between labour preference creditors and tax-preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process. The research method used is a method with the type of normative research using 2 (three) types of approaches, namely the statutory approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this study are based on a conceptual approach and a statutory approach, the authors find that the legal position of tax-preferred creditors and workers' preferences is the same. law, the factor of justice, the factor of increasing public welfare (public interest), the factor of labour rights and human rights. In order to provide certainty about the legal position of tax preferred creditors and labor preferred creditors, it is deemed necessary to improve the bankruptcy law, so that there are no problems between tax preferred creditors and labour preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process. Factors that influence the occurrence of disputes between labour preference creditors and tax-preferred creditors in the bankruptcy process can be input for members of the House of Representatives and the Government to improve the bankruptcy law Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh dalam proses kepailitan dan mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak dalam proses kepailitan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode dengan jenis penelitian normative menggunakan 2 (tiga) tipe pendekatan yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan penulis menemukan bahwa kedudukan hukum kreditor preferen pajak dan preferen buruh mempunyai kedudukan yang sama, Adapun yang menjadi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak adalah faktor kepastian hukum, faktor keadilan, faktor meninggikan kesejahteraan umum (kepentingan umum), faktor hak-hak buruh dan hak asasi manusia. Dalam rangka memberikan kepastian kedudukan hukum terhadap kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh maka dirasa perlu untuk menyempurnakan undang undang kepailitan,agar tidak terjadi permasalahan antara kreditor preferen pajak dan kreditor preferen buruh dalam prose kepailitan. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya sengketa antara kreditor Preferen buruh dan kreditor preferen pajak dalam proses kepailitan ini bisa menjadi masukan bagi para anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Pemerintah untuk menyempurnakan undang undang kepailitan
Penyelesaian Perkara Lalu Lintas Berbasis Elektronik dalam Upaya Mengurangi Penumpukan Perkara Dan Pungutan Liar Jupri, Jupri; Koni, Yoslan; Moonti, Roy
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 23 No 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v23i2.52

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the implementation of electronic-based traffic case resolution in the regions to determine the obstacles in solving electronic-based traffic cases. This type of research uses empirical research. The type of research used in this research is empirical research. Implementation of electronic-based traffic case settlement in the regions, where the offender receives a ticket ID via SMS, then makes a transfer via a bank account. After that, bring proof of e-ticket payment to the district attorney to exchange the confiscated evidence, then the offender gets a ticket ID via SMS, the offender goes to the district court to attend the trial and pay there and the offender receives the ticket ID via SMS. Offenders come to the court to see the announcement of the traffic court and the court directs to pay at the prosecutor's office and the obstacles to solving electronic-based traffic cases, namely legal factors, social factors and community factors. In the implementation of the settlement of traffic cases in the future, this should be stated in the law so that its application can still be clearer, then more in-depth socialization is also needed regarding the prosecution process so that the public will be able to understand. Abstrak:Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik di daerah untuk mengetahui hambatan-hambatan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian empiris. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini jenis penelitian empiris. Pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik di daerah yaitu pelanggar menerima ID Tilang melalui SMS, kemudian melakukan transfer melalui rekening bank. Setelah itu membawa bukti pembayaran e-Tilang ke kejaksaan negeri untuk ditukar dengan barang bukti yang disita, kemudian si Pelanggar mendapatkan ID Tilang melalui SMS, si pelanggar ke pengadilan negeri untuk mengikuti sidang dan membayar disana dan si pelanggar menerima ID Tilang melalui sms. Pelanggar mendatangi pengadilan untuk melihat pengumuman sidang lalu lintasdan pihak pengadilan mengarahkan untuk membayar di kejaksaan dan hambatan-hambatan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas berbasis elektronik yaitu faktor hukum, faktor social dan faktor masyarakat. Dalam pelaksanaan penyelesaian perkara lalu lintas kedepan seharusnya ini dituangkan di dalam undang undang sehingga penerapannya masih bisa lebih jelas, kemudian juga dibutuhkan sosialisasi yang lebih mendalam terkait dengan proses penindakannya sehingga masyarakat akan bisa memahami.
Pajak Penghasilan Pada Subjek Penghasilan Di Bawah Umur Melalui Media Sosial Sari Dewi, Retno
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 23 No 2: November 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v23i2.54

Abstract

The unregulated income tax for underage tax subjects who use social media in Indonesia needs attention from the government. The increasing number of social media users by underage tax subjects who currently do not receive supervision. The self-assessment-based income tax collection system is also an obstacle to this problem. In the study in this article using the socio-legal research method which examines the limitations of legal sources. Normative aspects and often legal issues are related to social and political contexts in empirical aspects. The findings from this study required policy formulation: mapping data on underage tax subjects with income generation using social media content, collaborating with various related parties and conducting a review of the income tax collection system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 28 No 2: Juni - November 2025 Vol 28 No 1: Desember 2024 - Mei 2025 Vol 27 No 2: Juni - November 2024 Vol 27 No 1: Desember 2023 - Mei 2024 Vol 26 No 2: Juni - November 2023 Vol 26 No 1: Desember 2022 - Mei 2023 Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022 Vol 25 No 1: Desember 2021 - Mei 2022 Vol 24 No 2: November 2021 Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021 Vol 23 No 2: November 2020 Vol 23 No 1: Mei 2020 Vol 22 No 2: November 2019 Vol 22 No 1: Mei 2019 Vol 21 No 2: November 2018 Vol 21 No 1: Mei 2018 Vol 20 No 2: November 2017 Vol 20 No 1: Edisi Mei 2017 More Issue