cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abd Kahar Muzakkir
Contact Email
muzakkir.abd.kahar@gmail.com
Phone
+6282291222637
Journal Mail Official
jurnal_alishlah@umi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Jalan Urip Sumoharjo KM.5 Makassar, Sulawesi-Selatan, Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Published by Universitas Muslim Indonesia
ISSN : 14109328     EISSN : 26140071     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Al-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum adalah jurnal peer review yang diterbitkan dua kali setahun Mei dan November oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia sejak Tahun 1998, dimaksudkan untuk menjadi jurnal untuk penerbitan hasil penelitian tentang hukum baik studi empiris dan normatif, terutama dalam masalah hukum kontemporer. Berbagai topik tetapi tidak terbatas pada: 1. Hukum Pidana 2. Hukum Konstitusi 3. Hukum Perdata dan Komersial 4. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 5. Hukum Ekonomi 6. Hukum Internasional 7. Hukum Islam atau Syariah 8. Hukum Adat 9. Hukum Lingkungan 10. Pendidikan Hukum 11. Hukum Komparatif Jurnal ini bertujuan terutama untuk memfasilitasi dan menyediakan forum bagi para sarjana hukum dan profesional untuk membahas dan mempromosikan perkembangan terkini tentang masalah hukum di seluruh dunia, diterbitkan dalam bahasa Indonesia, dan tinjauan ini berupaya memperluas batasan wacana hukum Indonesia untuk mengakses kontributor dan pembaca di seluruh dunia. Oleh karena itu, tinjauan ini menerima kontribusi dari para sarjana dan profesional hukum internasional serta dari perwakilan pengadilan, penegak-penegak hukum, otoritas eksekutif, pemerintah, dan lembaga kerjasama pembangunan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 24 No 2: November 2021" : 5 Documents clear
Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Kekerasan Akibat Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Bunyamin, Bunyamin
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 2: November 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i2.279

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of violence due to the criminal of mishandling in Bone Regency and the factors that influence it. In this study the researcher uses normative and empirical research which is descriptive and prescriptive. The process of collecting data in this study were through by interview, documentation, and also literature study. The analysis method is carried out by systematically identifying and connecting the primary data with the primary legal materials. The result of this study indicates that legal protection for the victim of violence due to criminal of mishandling in Bone Regency is still running less effective. In this point, mishandling case is tend to increase every day. In other hand there are still several cases that have not been completely resolved, which is by the police considered as lack of solid evidences. Likewise, there are still mishandling cases in the court that have not been resolved because they are still in process. In addition, the fulfillment of victims’ rights has not been fully implemented, such as the right to receive spiritual guidance services. So, even though the implementation of government’s obligation and law enforcement has been effective, it still needs to be improved in order to achieve the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of mishandling criminal under the jurisdiction of Bone subregional police. The factors that influenced the effectiveness of legal protection for the victims of mishandling criminal in Bone Regency, namely the legal substance factor, legal structure factor, legal culture factor, facilities and infrastructure factor, legal knowledge factor, and legal awareness factor. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the professionalism of law enforcement towards officers, and fulfil the rights of the victims. In addition, the government and law enforcement must be maximized the providing of legal protection, especially by considering the factors that affect the effectiveness, so that legal protection can be optimally realized in the future.
Aktualisasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Sistem Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Sapada, Andi Tenri; Rezah, Farah Syah
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 2: November 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i2.286

Abstract

This study aims to examine the actualization of general principles of good governance in the government administration system at Bone Regency. The type of research used is empirical research. Data collection techniques used in this study were interviews and literature study. The research data were analyzed quantitatively and then presented descriptively. The results showed that the actualization of general principles of good governance in the government administration system at Bone Regency is still not implemented. One of the main reasons is that the professionalism and competence of SCA resources in Bone Regency are still low. Furthermore, the factors that influence realizing the general principles of good governance in the government administration system at Bone Regency include leadership capability, supervision, SCA resources, and consensus between government and citizens. Therefore, substantial efforts are needed to improve the professionalism and competence of SCA resources through education and the provision of special training. In addition, leadership capability, supervision, and consensus between government and citizens also need to be improved and carried out consistently so that the actualization of general principles of good governance in the government administration system at Bone Regency can be carried out well in the future.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Selaku Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Atas Penyalahgunaan Kepercayaan Terkait Penggelapan Sertifikat Aryani, Vioni Fadhila; Pulungan, M. Sofyan
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 2: November 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i2.294

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the Notary Public’s accountability as an LDMO for the abuse of trust related to certificate embezzlement and legal remedies that can be taken by the appeared as the aggrieved party for this action. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical research. The type of data used in this research is secondary data through document studies or literature studies. The legal materials that have been collected are then processed and analyzed systematically using qualitative data analysis methods. The results showed that the Notary Public as LDMO has accountability for the abuse of authority given based on trust related to embezzlement of certificates in the management of land rights transfer registration. The accountabilities that can be charged are administrative, criminal, and moral accountabilities. In addition, legal remedies taken by parties who feel aggrieved are categorized through two channels, namely the non-litigation by reporting to the local Regional Supervisory Council of Notary Public and the litigation by reporting to the local police. Based on this conclusion, it is recommended that the Notary Public and the Notary Public as LDMO carry out their duties and positions by upholding and complying with the applicable code of ethics and laws and regulations. Then an amendment to Law No. 2 of 2014 and Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016. In this case, it is necessary to add provisions on criminal sanctions against the Notary Public’s actions that violate the Office Law and the code of ethics to have a deterrent effect. In addition, the Notary Public and LDMO will be more careful, responsible, and professional in carrying out their professions and offices.
Implikasi Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum terhadap Penyelesaian Konflik Pengadaan Tanah Larasati, Meka Azzahra; Sujadi, Suparjo
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 2: November 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i2.304

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and analyze legal certainty in resolving conflicts over land acquisition for development in the public interest in the context before and after the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2012. The research uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach. The method of analysis in this study is to use qualitative analysis. The study results indicate that legal certainty in resolving conflicts over land acquisition for development in the public interest in the context before and after the enactment of Law No. 2 of 2012, obviously very different. However, from the two cases, land acquisition and compensation for land rights for development in the public interest have not been processed and run effectively. Based on this conclusion, it is recommended that laws and regulations on land acquisition for development in the public interest be more clarified, particularly regarding deliberation activities and the form/amount of compensation value. In addition, all stakeholders involved in negotiating the agreement must attach importance to the principle of deliberation and consensus regarding land acquisition for development in the public interest.
Analisis Yuridis tentang Presidential Threshold di Indonesia Rezah, Farah Syah; Sapada, Andi Tenri
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 2: November 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i2.310

Abstract

This study aims to determine the juridical fundamentals and analyze the constitutionality of the provisions of the Presidential Threshold against the 1945 Constitution. The type of research used is normative or doctrinal legal research using a comparative law approach. The method of analysis in this study is to use qualitative analysis. The study results indicate that the Presidential Threshold mechanism in Indonesia has had juridical fundamentals from 2004 until now. In this case, it includes Article 6A section (2) and section (5) of the 1945 Constitution, Article 5 section (4) and Article 101 of Law No. 23 of 2003, Article 9 of Law No. 42 of 2008, to Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017. However, Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 is a closed legal policy and not an open legal policy. Therefore, the Presidential Threshold mechanism regulated in Articles of Law up to Article 222 of Law no. 7 of 2017 can be judged unconstitutional or contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Based on this conclusion, it is suggested that the Constitutional Court consider the juridical language of Article 6A section (5) of the 1945 Constitution. In this case, Law No. 7 of 2017 does not contradict the 1945 Constitution. In addition, it is also recommended for Legislators to make amendments to Law No. 7 of 2017. Furthermore, it is hoped that Legislators will consider increasing the Parliamentary Threshold as an effort to strengthen the presidential system in Indonesia.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 28 No 2: Juni - November 2025 Vol 28 No 1: Desember 2024 - Mei 2025 Vol 27 No 2: Juni - November 2024 Vol 27 No 1: Desember 2023 - Mei 2024 Vol 26 No 2: Juni - November 2023 Vol 26 No 1: Desember 2022 - Mei 2023 Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022 Vol 25 No 1: Desember 2021 - Mei 2022 Vol 24 No 2: November 2021 Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021 Vol 23 No 2: November 2020 Vol 23 No 1: Mei 2020 Vol 22 No 2: November 2019 Vol 22 No 1: Mei 2019 Vol 21 No 2: November 2018 Vol 21 No 1: Mei 2018 Vol 20 No 2: November 2017 Vol 20 No 1: Edisi Mei 2017 More Issue