cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Yusram, S.Pd., M.Pd
Contact Email
journal.lamintang@gmail.com
Phone
+6281268339633
Journal Mail Official
journal.lamintang@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Building of LET Centre. Buana Impian, Blok B1 No. 27. Kota Batam 29452, KEPRI. Indonesia
Location
Kota batam,
Kepulauan riau
INDONESIA
International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP)
Published by Lamintang Education & Training Centre
ISSN : 27216934     EISSN : 27216942     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aim of this journal is to publish high-quality articles dedicated to all aspects of the latest outstanding developments in the field of Law and Public policy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2020)" : 5 Documents clear
The Practice of General Data Protection Regulations Fine and Penalty on Google Inc. vs CNIL Case Rian Nugraha; Maskun
International Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol 2 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0201.85

Abstract

The development of technology on this era is bringing two side on the humanity which is the positive and negative side. On the positive side, the technology could help human to finding information easily from their device (e.g smartphone), while on the other side this techonology could bring harm on privacy side. There fore, with those harm, the concept of privacy is vital. On European Union where they have concern toward the personal data with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). On the GDPR, European Union have their own rule about the right of erasure, it also known as the right to be forgotten (RTBF) which written on Article 17. This article has it own problem due to the scope of application. On may 2015 the French Commission Nationale de l’informatique et libertés (CNIL) served a formal notice on google if individual asking about the remvoval of links to web page from the list of result displayed following a search performed on that individual name etc. Google have to apply that removal on all google domain (google.com) and not remove it just in the google local domain (google.fr). Due to the difference of perspective toward the Article 17 of General Data Protection Regulation, google wont remove it on the google main domain (google.com), and so on march 2016 (CNIL) found that google failed to comply the formal notice and imposed a penalty of €100.000 and so google sought to have the adjudication annulled. 11 September 2018, the European Court of Justice hearing this case where it is about the territorial scope of European data protection law. But then on 24 September 2019, Court of Justice held that the right to be forgotten on the article 17 doesn’t require google to de-list search result on all of its domains, however google still required to de-list the result on the all of the European Union domain. The purpose of this study to analyze wether the court opinion and decision toward the google.inc v CNIL case. On other side it will also determine wether the European Union data protection law could be applied outside the European Union or not.
Good Corporate Governance Principles in Indonesian Syariah Banking Andrew Shandy Utama
International Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol 2 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0201.86

Abstract

Sharia banks are banks that carry out their business activities based on the principles of Islamic law in banking activities based on fatwas issued by the National Sharia Council of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia. This research aims to explain the Good Corporate Governance principles in Indonesia sharia banking. The method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the research explained that to maintain the trust of Indonesian people who are predominantly Muslim, sharia banking must apply the Good Corporate Governance principles in its management. The application of the Good Corporate Governance principles in sharia banking is strictly regulated in Article 34 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 21 of 2008, which emphasizes that sharia banks must implement good governance that includes the principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, professionalism and fairness in carrying out its business activities. Form of application of the Good Corporate Governance principles in sharia banking is supervision conducted by the National Sharia Council of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia in general and the Sharia Supervisory Board specifically in each sharia bank.
Role of Local Governments in Managing Mangrove Damage: The Manokwari Case Hasbi As Siddiq; Enny Martha Sasea; Maskun
International Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol 2 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0201.87

Abstract

Mangrove ecosystems are known as forests that are able to live adapt to extreme coastal environments such as changing salinity (2-22 ‰ to reach 38 ‰), but the existence of mangrove ecosystems is vulnerable to environmental changes, such as wind, erosion and abrasion. Changes in the environment are caused by ecological pressure that comes from nature and humans. Forms of ecological pressure originating from humans are generally associated with the use of mangroves such as land conversion for settlements, fishponds, and tourism. The development of mangrove forests in Kabupaten Manokwari requires the attention of the government and the community, because the lack of public awareness and coordination between agencies will greatly influence the preservation of mangrove forests, especially the damage to ecosystems in mangrove forest areas.
The Legal Aspects in the Implementation of CSR Private Corporate Towards Improvement of Community Welfare Sandra Dewi
International Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol 2 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0201.88

Abstract

There are 33 private companies with large investment value in Pelalawan Regency, Riau Province. Article 74 of Law Number 40 of 2007 affirms that companies that carry out their business activities in the field of natural resources and / or fields related to natural resources must implement Corporate Social Responsibility. However, the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility of these private companies is very minimal felt by the community because Pelalawan Regency is the second most populous region in Riau Province. This research aims to explain the legal issues in the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility of private companies to improve community welfare in Pelalawan Regency, Riau Province. The method used in this research is socio-legal research. The results of this research explain that there are several legal issues that cause the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility of private companies in Pelalawan Regency not running optimally, namely the absence of local regulations that specifically regulate Corporate Social Responsibility in Pelalawan Regency, the lack of supervision from the government regions, the lack of legal knowledge of the Pelalawan Regency community regarding Corporate Social Responsibility, and the absence of strict criminal sanctions for companies that do not implement Corporate Social Responsibility in Regional Regulation No. 6 of 2012 concerning Corporate Social Responsibility in Riau Province
Law Enforcement of Criminal Forests and Land Fire in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau Rizana
International Journal of Law and Public Policy Vol 2 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Lamintang Education and Training Centre, in collaboration with the International Association of Educators, Scientists, Technologists, and Engineers (IA-ESTE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0201.89

Abstract

Forest and land fires are not a rare phenomenon in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province. This research aims to explain the law enforcement of forest and land fire crimes in District of Indragiri Hilir, Riau Province. The method used in this research is socio-legal research. Based on Article 50 Paragraph (3) Letter d of Law Number 41 of 1999 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from burning forests. In line with that, based on Article 69 Paragraph (1) Letter h of Law Number 32 of 2009 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from clearing land by burning. However, in 2019 there will still be forest and land fires in District of Indragiri Hilir, Riau Province covering an area of approximately 827 hectares. The implementation of Law Number 41 of 1999 and Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning forest and land fires in District of Indragiri Hilir hasn’t run as expected. Burning forests and land is a crime. Law enforcement against forest and land fires in District of Indragiri Hilir based on Article 78 Paragraph (3) of Law Number 41 of 1999 states that anyone who intentionally burns a forest can be threatened with a maximum of 15 years imprisonment and a maximum fine IDR 5,000,000,000. Pursuant to Article 108 of Law Number 32 of 2009 it is also emphasized that every person who burns a land shall be sentenced to a minimum imprisonment of 3 years and a maximum of 10 years, and a fine of at least IDR 3,000,000,000 and a maximum of IDR 10,000,000,000.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7 No 2: September 2025 Vol 7 No 1: March 2025 Vol 6 No 2: September 2024 Vol 6 No 1: March 2024 Vol 5 No 2: September 2023 Vol 5 No 1: March 2023 Vol 4 No 2: September 2022 Vol 4 No 1: March 2022 Vol 3 No 2: September 2021 Vol 3 No 1: March 2021 Vol 2 No 2: September 2020 Vol 2 No 1 (2020) Vol 1 No 1 (2019) More Issue