cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
aktieva tri tjitrawati
Contact Email
jurist-diction@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
+6285736326396
Journal Mail Official
jurist-diction@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia Telp. 031 5023151/5023252 Fax. 031 5020454
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurist-Diction
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : 27218392     EISSN : 26558297     DOI : 10.20473/jd.v3i3.18622
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The aims of Jurist-Diction is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; International Law; Islamic Law; Law and Society; Economic and Business Law; Environmental Law; Medical Law; and Labour Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 704 Documents
 67   68   69   70   71 
Restorative Justice in Medical Cases: Reflections on Criminal Law Reform Nandar, M Aris Munandar; Amir Ilyas; Said Karim; Syamsuddin Muchtar
Jurist-Diction Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v8i3.76991

Abstract

The reform of Indonesian criminal law signals a paradigm shift from a retributive model to a restorative approach grounded in fairness and humanity. This study seeks to explore how restorative justice may serve as a mechanism for resolving medical cases within the broader context of national criminal law reform. To address this question, the research relies on normative legal analysis, drawing on statutory provisions together with scholarship in criminal law, health law, and human rights. The analysis indicates that restorative justice provides a potentially fair and proportional response to medical cases, especially those involving medical personnel acting under situational pressures. Yet, the absence of detailed procedural guidelines and the overlap of authority between professional organizations and law enforcement agencies pose significant obstacles. The study concludes that stronger regulatory and institutional frameworks are required to ensure the effective and consistent application of restorative justice in the criminal justice system.
Criminal Liability in Press Law and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Disinformation: Urgency of Reform in Indonesia Arifin, Zainal; Handayani, Emi Puasa
Jurist-Diction Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v8i3.77087

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents significant challenges to the criminal liability framework under Indonesian press law, particularly in the regulation of AI-generated disinformation. This paper addresses these challenges through normative legal research, employing statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings demonstrate that existing press law provisions are inadequate to regulate the complexity of AI-driven disinformation. This inadequacy has created a legal vacuum regarding accountability, undermining both legal certainty and the effectiveness of press regulation in the digital era. The paper argues that reform is urgently required to strengthen accountability while safeguarding press freedom. Such reform must incorporate the principles of prudence, independence, and AI ethics to ensure that press law remains responsive to technological innovation and continues to uphold the integrity of digital journalism.
A Comparative Analysis of the Scope of Immaterial Damage in Indonesia and the Netherlands Arnapi, Muhammad Almer Putera
Jurist-Diction Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v8i3.77262

Abstract

The determination of immaterial damage often hinges on judicial discretion, a practice that raises important questions of fairness and consistency across jurisdictions. This paper examines how such discretion operates in Indonesia and the Netherlands. Using a normative legal method and comparative analysis, the study evaluates statutory provisions and judicial practice. Dutch law recognizes three grounds for compensation in cases of immaterial damage. In practice, however, judges apply a two-tiered test: first, to determine whether the victim’s situation falls within the recognized grounds, and second, to assess whether the suffering is of sufficient severity. In contrast, Indonesian law provides no explicit rules on immaterial damage, leaving judges with broad discretion but without official guidelines. The reliance on discretion in both jurisdictions highlights risks of subjectivity and underscores the need for clearer standards to ensure fairness and legal certainty in compensation.
Examining the Legal Foundations of Political Party Liability for Money Laundering Fitriyana, Lolita; Firmansyah, Ridho
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Volume 9 No. 1, Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v8i3.77409

Abstract

Political parties serve as platforms for individuals before they are nominated for state office. State officials, in turn, carry a significant risk of engaging in corrupt practices. However, to date, there has been no case in Indonesia in which a corruption offense committed by a state official who is also part of a political party’s leadership has resulted in the political party itself being held criminally liable. Given the frequency of such incidents, this study seeks to contribute to law-enforcement efforts to prevent and address this issue, particularly when political parties benefit from the unlawful actions of their members or officials. In addition to a statutory approach, this research adopts conceptual and case-based analyses to reinforce its findings. The results indicate that, as legal entities, political parties can indeed be held criminally liable.

Page 71 of 71 | Total Record : 704

 67   68   69   70   71 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Volume 9 No. 1, Januari 2026 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Volume 8 No. 2, Mei 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Volume 8 No. 1, Januari 2025 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): Volume 7 No. 4, Oktober 2024 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Volume 7 No. 3, Juli 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Volume 7 No. 2, April 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Volume 7 No. 1, Januari 2024 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): Volume 6 No. 4, Oktober 2023 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): Volume 6 No. 3, Juli 2023 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Volume 6 No. 2, April 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Volume 6 No. 1, Januari 2023 Vol. 5 No. 6 (2022): Volume 5 No. 6, November 2022 Vol. 5 No. 5 (2022): Volume 5 No. 5, September 2022 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): Volume 5 No. 4, Juli 2022 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): Volume 5 No. 3, Mei 2022 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Volume 5 No. 2, Maret 2022 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Volume 5 No. 1, Januari 2022 Vol. 4 No. 6 (2021): Volume 4 No. 6, November 2021 Vol. 4 No. 5 (2021): Volume 4 No. 5, September 2021 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2021): Volume 4 No. 4, Juli 2021 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): Volume 4 No. 3, Mei 2021 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Volume 4 No. 2, Maret 2021 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Volume 4 No. 1, Januari 2021 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2020): Volume 3 No. 6, November 2020 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2020): Volume 3 No. 5, September 2020 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2020): Volume 3 No. 4, Juli 2020 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): Volume 3 No. 3, Mei 2020 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Volume 3 No. 2, Maret 2020 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Volume 3 No. 1, Januari 2020 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2019): Volume 2 No. 6, November 2019 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2019): Volume 2 No. 5, September 2019 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2019): Volume 2 No. 4, Juli 2019 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): Volume 2 No. 3, Mei 2019 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Volume 2 No. 2, Maret 2019 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Volume 2 No. 1, Januari 2019 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Volume 01 No 1, September 2018 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Volume 1 No. 2, November 2018 More Issue