cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
aktieva tri tjitrawati
Contact Email
jurist-diction@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
+6285736326396
Journal Mail Official
jurist-diction@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia Telp. 031 5023151/5023252 Fax. 031 5020454
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurist-Diction
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : 27218392     EISSN : 26558297     DOI : 10.20473/jd.v3i3.18622
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The aims of Jurist-Diction is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; International Law; Islamic Law; Law and Society; Economic and Business Law; Environmental Law; Medical Law; and Labour Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 724 Documents
 69   70   71   72   73 
The Limits of Police Discretion in Handling Demonstrations: A Comparative Administrative Law Analysis of Indonesia and South Korea Husein Kurnia Hoetomo; Chesta Adabi; Faiqatul Himmah; Muhammad Rafly Athaya; Ria Casmi Arrsa
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Volume 9 No. 3, September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i3.92290

Abstract

This study examines the limits of police discretion in managing demonstrations from a comparative administrative law perspective, focusing on Indonesia and South Korea. It analyzes the constitutional limits of discretionary authority and the legal safeguards necessary to prevent abuses of power that may threaten freedom of assembly. Using a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia’s open-ended legal norms may enable de facto licensing practices and repressive measures. By contrast, South Korea provides a more structured model in which the principle of proportionality is reinforced through active judicial oversight by the Constitutional Court. The analysis demonstrates that police discretion should be constrained by the principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and accountability. Restrictions on demonstrations must pursue a legitimate aim, respond to concrete risks, and employ the least restrictive effective measures. Dispersal and the use of force require separate justification, while peaceful participants must be distinguished from individuals engaging in violence. The study concludes that Indonesia should reform its police legislation to incorporate proportionality as an operational standard and strengthen judicial oversight, thereby shifting crowd management from a coercive toward a facilitative paradigm and ensuring more effective protection of constitutional rights.
The One Roof System Concept in Handling Ethical Issues: Toward the Establishment of a National Ethics Institution in Indonesia Christian Dwi Cahyo Siringoringo Siringoringo; Muhammad Muhdar; Herdiansyah Hamzah; Herdiansyah Hamzah
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Volume 9 No. 3, September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i3.92622

Abstract

Ethical issues in Indonesia’s legal practice and public bureaucracy frequently arise from fragmented authority, overlapping regulations, and weak coordination among oversight institutions. This article examines the feasibility of reconstructing the One Roof System (Sistem Satu Atap), previously applied to judicial reform, as a model for integrated ethics enforcement through a National Ethics Institution (Lembaga Etik Nasional). Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the discussion maps ethics enforcement in Indonesia, draws lessons from the pre- and post-2004 judicial One Roof System reform, and proposes an institutional design comprising an authority structure, coordination mechanisms, a single-window complaint mechanism, and a phased implementation roadmap. The analysis indicates that a centralised institutional design can strengthen standardisation, independence, and accountability, provided it is supported by an adequate legal basis, external oversight safeguards, and careful management of authority relations with constitutionally anchored institutions. These findings require further legislative elaboration and empirical testing.
Beyond Infrastructure: Land Conflict Resolution as a Core Strategy for Slum Upgrading in Jakarta Gunanegara Gunanegara
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Volume 9 No. 3, September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i3.94737

Abstract

In many Global South megacities, slum-upgrading programs improve infrastructure but often leave tenure insecurity and land conflicts unresolved. This study proposes a law-based framework that places land-conflict resolution at the core of slum upgrading in Jakarta. Using a socio-legal method combining normative legal analysis, interviews, focus-group discussions, field observations, and comparative references. The study identifies four land-conflict typologies: occupation of private land, state-owned land, legally prohibited areas, and legally owned land with inadequate housing conditions. The findings show that each typology requires a distinct legal response, while uniform upgrading policies are ineffective. The absence of a clear legal framework weakens upgrading programs and perpetuates tenure insecurity. The study concludes that tenure security and land-conflict resolution must be integrated into slum-upgrading policy. It recommends differentiated, legally grounded mechanisms that classify conflicts, secure tenure, and combine legal settlement with physical improvement to achieve sustainable and just slum development.   ABSTRACT:
In many Global South megacities, slum-upgrading programs improve infrastructure but often fail to resolve tenure insecurity and land conflicts. This study proposes a legal framework that places land-conflict resolution at the center of slum-upgrading efforts in Jakarta. Using a socio-legal approach that combines normative legal analysis, interviews, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative references, the study identifies four typologies of land conflict: occupation of private land, state-owned land, legally prohibited areas, and legally owned land with inadequate housing conditions. The findings indicate that each typology requires a distinct legal response, while uniform upgrading policies are largely ineffective. The absence of a clear legal framework undermines upgrading programs and perpetuates tenure insecurity. The study concludes that tenure security and land-conflict resolution must be integrated into slum-upgrading policies. It recommends differentiated and legally grounded mechanisms that classify conflicts, secure tenure rights, and integrate legal resolution with physical upgrading to promote sustainable and equitable slum development.
Appraising Child Custody Laws and Addressing Parental Child Abductions in Egypt: A Critical Analysis Abdalla Ahmed Abdrbou Emam Eldeib; Abdul Ghafur Hamid
Jurist-Diction Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Volume 9 No. 3, September 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v9i3.96033

Abstract

Deeply ingrained in Islamic law, the Egyptian legal system offers a distinctive and difficult framework for handling child custody and parental abduction. Egyptian courts struggle with custody disputes involving interfaith couples or non-Muslim children, since rulings depend significantly on the child's religious identity, generating questions about fair treatment. Cross-border parental abduction is another serious problem, made worse by Egypt's refusal to ratify the Hague Abduction Convention. This article critically evaluates the sufficiency of Egyptian law and the judiciary in addressing interfaith custody and parental child abduction. It is doctrinal legal research supplemented by comparative and analytical methods. The article finds that the Egyptian laws on custody and parental abduction are inadequate for these problems, and that although the family court system promotes informal mediation, its application of the law is inconsistent. It concludes with reform recommendations balancing Islamic law with international standards, in the best interests of the child.

Page 73 of 73 | Total Record : 724

 69   70   71   72   73 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): Volume 9 No. 3, September 2026 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Volume 9 No. 2, Mei 2026 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Volume 9 No. 1, Januari 2026 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Volume 8 No. 2, Mei 2025 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Volume 8 No. 1, Januari 2025 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): Volume 7 No. 4, Oktober 2024 Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): Volume 7 No. 3, Juli 2024 Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Volume 7 No. 2, April 2024 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Volume 7 No. 1, Januari 2024 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): Volume 6 No. 4, Oktober 2023 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): Volume 6 No. 3, Juli 2023 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Volume 6 No. 2, April 2023 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Volume 6 No. 1, Januari 2023 Vol. 5 No. 6 (2022): Volume 5 No. 6, November 2022 Vol. 5 No. 5 (2022): Volume 5 No. 5, September 2022 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2022): Volume 5 No. 4, Juli 2022 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): Volume 5 No. 3, Mei 2022 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Volume 5 No. 2, Maret 2022 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Volume 5 No. 1, Januari 2022 Vol. 4 No. 6 (2021): Volume 4 No. 6, November 2021 Vol. 4 No. 5 (2021): Volume 4 No. 5, September 2021 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2021): Volume 4 No. 4, Juli 2021 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): Volume 4 No. 3, Mei 2021 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Volume 4 No. 2, Maret 2021 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Volume 4 No. 1, Januari 2021 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2020): Volume 3 No. 6, November 2020 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2020): Volume 3 No. 5, September 2020 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2020): Volume 3 No. 4, Juli 2020 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): Volume 3 No. 3, Mei 2020 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Volume 3 No. 2, Maret 2020 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Volume 3 No. 1, Januari 2020 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2019): Volume 2 No. 6, November 2019 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2019): Volume 2 No. 5, September 2019 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2019): Volume 2 No. 4, Juli 2019 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): Volume 2 No. 3, Mei 2019 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Volume 2 No. 2, Maret 2019 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Volume 2 No. 1, Januari 2019 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Volume 01 No 1, September 2018 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Volume 1 No. 2, November 2018 More Issue