Herdiansyah Hamzah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Legal Policy of Legislation in the Field of Natural Resources in Indonesia Hamzah, Herdiansyah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (503.761 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v1i1.218

Abstract

Given the urgency for the peoples’ interests, legislation in the field of natural resources should be treated more compared to other fields. The urgency of arrangement in the field of natural resources is not only the right of every citizen to gain access to natural resources that we have, but also provide a guarantee that Indonesia’ natural resources can still be maintained and sustained to future generations. Unfortunately, the legal policy of natural resources tends to move towards free market competition, which is on one side open domination space for both private and foreign sectors, and on the other side attempted to remove the State’s role in the control and management of natural resources. This was strengthened by some of legislation in the field of natural resources were canceled in part or in their entirety by the Constitutional Court. In consideration of the Constitutional Court decision, explicitly confirms that the legislation product in the field of natural resources does not comply to the conditionally constitutional, where the right to “the control of state” of natural resources as mandated in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, is an absolute and should not be omitted. A shift in the law-political direction that tends to be pro-market, influenced by several aspects: First, the market ideology that is not prevented due to lack of firmness of attitude, principle independence and sovereignty politically by the lawmakers. Second, the inconsistent application of the Indonesia law ideal that embodied in the Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, in any formulation of laws related to the management of natural resources. Third, still neglecting the peoples’ participation, which in the process of making laws relating to the management of natural resources, they are closed to the demands of the people, so it tends to be very elitist and unresponsive to the aspirations of the Indonesian peoples.
Analysis of The Meaning of Restitution of State Losses As The Abolishment of Corruption Crimes Bonny, Michael Nicholas; Lisi, Ivan Zairani; Hamzah, Herdiansyah
Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syariah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, STAI Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/mediasas.v8i1.221

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the return of state financial losses as the abolishment of corruption crimes contained in the Circular Letter of the Attorney General Republic Indonesia Number B 1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 concerning Priorities and Achievements in Handling Corruption Cases in point 1 which essentially states that people who return state losses due to corruption crimes can be given relief to abolish the criminal elements committed. The research uses a doctrinal. The results of the study show that the return of state losses committed by the perpetrators of corruption crimes cannot be used as a reason either to abolish the authority to prosecute corruption cases that are being investigated or as a reason for the abolition of corruption crimes committed by suspects, but the return of state losses is a reference for the judges to consider imposing criminal sanctions on the perpetrators as factors that mitigated him when he was submitted to the court as contained in Article 4 of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption [Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara sebagai penghapusan tindak pidana korupsi yang tertuang dalam Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung RI Nomor B 1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 tentang Prioritas dan Capaian dalam Penanganan Kasus Korupsi pada poin 1 yang pada dasarnya menyatakan bahwa orang yang mengembalikan kerugian negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi dapat diberikan keringanan untuk menghapuskan unsur tindak pidana yang dilakukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan doktrinal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengembalian kerugian negara yang dilakukan oleh pelaku tindak pidana korupsi tidak dapat dijadikan alasan baik untuk menghapuskan kewenangan penuntutan kasus korupsi yang sedang ditelusut atau sebagai alasan penghapusan tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh tersangka, namun pengembalian kerugian negara menjadi acuan bagi hakim untuk mempertimbangkan menjatuhkan sanksi pidana kepada pelaku sebagai faktor yang meringankan dia ketika diajukan ke pengadilan sebagaimana tertuang dalam Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Korupsi]
DINAMIKA HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK Aprilia, Rizky; Syarifuddin, La; Hamzah, Herdiansyah
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i3.6373

Abstract

The aim of this research is to answer two main points of discussion, namely: first, related to the construction of the meaning of the offense of defamation. Second, the development of regulations for defamation offenses. This research uses a doctrinal approach. The sources of legal material for this research are the Criminal Code, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, and Law Number 19 2024 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions which are then analyzed qualitatively. The construction of the meaning of the offense of defamation in the ITE Law focuses on post-amendment, Articles 27A and 27B provide a more detailed definition of defamation. The development of the regulation of defamation offenses in Indonesia shows legal adjustments to technological advances, starting from the Criminal Code which does not cover electronic media to the ITE Law which regulates pollution via digital media. Defamation is regulated in the new Criminal Code in Articles 344 to Article 346 of the new Criminal Code. Existing developments, both the revision of the 2008 to 2024 ITE Law and the new Criminal Code, show a more specific definition and protection of freedom of expression, balancing the protection of individual reputations with the ever-evolving digital reality. Keywords: Dynamics, Defamation, Electronic Media
REFORMASI PARTAI POLITIK DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA: ANALISIS NORMATIF DAN KELEMBAGAAN Sakinah, Siti; Nur, Insan Tajali; Hamzah, Herdiansyah
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i3.7506

Abstract

Political parties play a vital role in Indonesia’s constitutional system, particularly in fulfilling democratic functions such as political participation, leadership recruitment, and policy formulation and oversight. However, in the post-reform era, political parties continue to face persistent internal and external challenges that weaken their strategic role in sustaining democratic governance. This study employs a normative-juridical and comparative approach, drawing upon statutory analysis, scholarly literature, and institutional practices of political parties in Indonesia and selected democratic countries. The findings reveal that the stagnation of political party reform is primarily driven by the weakness of political education, the lack of internal democracy, and limited financial transparency. The study concludes that amending Law No. 2 of 2011 on Political Parties is essential to strengthen institutional integrity and public accountability. Its main scholarly contribution lies in proposing a conceptual model of “three pillars of party reform”—political education, internal democratization, and financial transparency—which can serve as a normative framework for designing a more adaptive, inclusive, and civilized party system within Indonesia’s democracy.Keywords: Democratization; Political Parties; Reform, Transparency
The Legal Problems of Ministerial Regulations in the Presidential System of Government Dillah, Dhea Farah; Nur, Insan Tajali; Hamzah, Herdiansyah
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1699

Abstract

The problem of excessive regulation at the ministerial regulatory level in the presidential system arises because the Minister often exceeds his actual functions. This research aims to analyze the causes of overlapping regulations and authorities that cause legal uncertainty. The results show that excessive regulation is triggered by the unclear type and source of Ministers' authority, limits of authority in the formation of regulations, and the practice of direct delegation that is less controlled.
Menelaah Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Andini, Orin Gusta; Yunus; Hamzah, Herdiansyah
PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/pampas.v6i3.48492

Abstract

Research related to criminal responsibility for children who commit election crimes is necessary as an effort to minimize the misuse of children in committing election offenses and to strengthen legal certainty in the context of election law enforcement involving children as perpetrators. This study aims to describe the regulation of election crimes committed by children and analyze the criminal liability of children who commit election crimes through the implementation of diversion. The research method used is a normative research through a legislative approach and a case approach. This study concludes that the election law does not provide for the implementation of diversion for children who commit electoral crimes, while the SPPA Law only regulates diversion in general, whereby diversion can be implemented based on the consent of the victim/their family. Even though the resolution refers to the SPPA Law, the implementation of diversion for election crimes faces difficulties in terms of obtaining the victim's consent to implement the requirements for diversion. This article recommends that if a child commits an election crime that This article recommends that if a child commits an election crime that meets the requirements for diversion, then diversion should be implemented with the involvement of Bawaslu as the victim's representative to give consentfor diversion because Bawaslu is the state representative that represents the interests of the victim, whether the community, candidate pairs, or the state. Additionally, this study also recommends that future Election Laws should expressly regulate the authority to declare an agreement on the implementation of diversion. ABSTRAK Penelitian terkait dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pemilu diperlukan sebagai upaya untuk memperkecil celah penyalahgunaan anak untuk melakukan tindak pidana pemilu dan memperkuat kepastian hukum dalam rangka penegakan hukum pemilu mellaui diversi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaturan tindak pidana pemilu yang dilakukan oleh anak dan menganalisis peneran diversi terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak pidana pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa undang-undang pemilihan belum memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap pelaksanaan diversi, sedangkan UU SPPA hanya mengatur diversi secara umum dengan syarat dilakukan berdasarkan persetujuan korban atau keluarganya. Sekalipun penyelesaiannya merujuk pada UU SPPA, pelaksanaan diversi pada tindak pidana pemilu mengalami kesulitan dalam hal memenuhi syarat adanya persetujuan korban. Artikel ini merekomendasikan jika anak melakukan tindak pidana pemilu yang memenuhi syarat untuk dilakukan diversi, maka diversi dilaksanakan dengan melibatkan Bawaslu sebagai representasi korban untuk memberikan persetujuan diversi karena Bawaslu merupakan representasi negara yang mewakili kepentingan korban, baik masyarakat, pasangan calon, maupun negara. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga merekomendasikan diperlukannya penyesuaian ius constituendum aturan kepemiluan mengatur secara expressive verbiss pelaksanaan pemenuhan syarat dalam pelaksanaan diversi yang telah diatur dalam UU SPPA.