cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Bagus Hary Prakoso
Contact Email
wincifirdaus1@gmail.com
Phone
+62213847537
Journal Mail Official
ijeajournal@kemdikbud.go.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan, dan Perbukuan - Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Center for Assessment and Learning – Agency of Research, Development, and Book, Ministry of Education and Culture Jl. Gunung Sahari Raya No. 4, Jakarta, 10710, Indonesia. Tel. 62.21.3847537, Fax. 62.21.3849451
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assesment
Published by Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
ISSN : 26552892     EISSN : 26848074     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v2i2.30
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment (hence IJEA) is a national journal providing authoritative source of scientific articles for researchers in academia, research institutions, government agencies, industries, and others. We publish original research papers, review articles, and case studies focused on educational assessment and evaluation, policy and management on assessment, ICT in assessment, as well as related topics. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees. IJEA is published and imprinted by the Center for Assessment and Learning (PUSMENJAR), Agency of Research and Development, Ministry of Education and Culture. IJEA is managed to be issued twice (June and December) in every volume.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA" : 7 Documents clear
Hasil UN SMP 2018 Ditinjau dari Latar Belakang Pekerjaan Orang Tua Siswa Safari, NFN
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4756.87 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.16

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to answer the following question. Is there any influence on the parents' work background of the 2018 SMP national exam (UN) results? The population of this study is junior high school students who are studying in 2018, while the sample is junior high school students in grade 9. The reason for selecting samples is students who are attending the National Examination in 2018. The data in this study take the form of test scores and questionnaires answered by junior high students in 34 analysis of one-way variance, the following results are obtained. Based on the national average value, the work provinces in all over Indonesia, namely 3224331 students from 37859 SMP. Based on the results of the of parents of junior high school students participating in the 2018 UN influences the 2018 National Examination results is proven. This means that there is a significant effect (P <0,000) of parents' work background on 2018 UN results for subjects: Indonesian, English, Mathematics, and Sciences, both on father's work, mother's work, or both together ( Sig. 0,000). The father's occupational background is more dominant in Indonesian and Mathematics subjects (lodging factors 0.467 and -0.218) than maternal occupational backgrounds (lodging factors are 1.261 and 0.195). The maternal occupational background is more dominant in English and Science subjects (lodging factor 0.244 and -0,054) than father's occupational background (lodging factors are 0,280 and 0,066) The conclusion is that the background of the work of parents of junior high school students has a significant influence on 2018 UN results.abstrakTujuan utama studi ini adalah menjawab pertanyaan berikut. Apakah terdapat pengaruh latar belakang pekerjaan orang tua siswa terhadap hasil ujian nasional (UN) SMP 2018? Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa SMP yang sedang belajar pada tahun 2018, sedangkan sampelnya adalah siswa SMP kelas 9. Alasan pemilihan sampel adalah siswa yang sedang mengikuti UN tahun 2018. Data dalam penelitian ini berbentuk skor tes dan kuesioner yang dijawab siswa SMP di 34 provinsi di seluruh Indonesia, yaitu  3224331 siswa dari 37859 SMP. Berdasarkan hasil analisis varian satu jalur diperoleh hasil seperti berikut. Berdasarkan nilai rata-rata nasional, pekerjaan orang tua siswa SMP peserta UN 2018 berpengaruh terhadap hasil UN 2018 adalah terbukti. Artinya terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan (P<0,000) latar belakang pekerjaan orang tua siswa terhadap hasil UN 2018 untuk mata pelajaran: Bahasa Indonesia, Bahasa Inggris, Matematika, dan IPA, baik pada pekerjaan ayah, pekerjaan ibu, maupun keduanya secara bersama-sama (Sig. 0,000). latar belakang pekerjaan ayah lebih dominan pada mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Matematika (loding faktornya 0,467 dan -0,218) daripada latar belakang pekerjaan ibu (loding faktornya 1,261 dan 0,195. Latar belakang pekerjaan ibu lebih dominan  pada mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris dan IPA (loding faktornya 0,244 dan -0,054) daripada latar belakang pekerjaan ayah (loding faktornya 0,280 dan 0,066). Kesimpulannya adalah bahwa latang belakang  pekerjaan orang tua siswa SMP sangat berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap hasil UN 2018.
Analisis Tematik Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberhasilan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Sains Tae, Lidwina Felisima; Ramdani, Zulmi; Shidiq, Galih Albarra
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.226 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.18

Abstract

Successful learning is determined by various factors involved in it. These factors are not only derived from the personal individuals involved themselves, but also are the result of collaboration between human resources and other resources in the same context. This study tries to explore the factors that determine a person's success in science learning. The study is conducted by identifying the attributes that are considered important in the learning process. Those involved in this study numbered 65 respondents who acted as teachers, educators, tutors, or lecturers who taught and focused on science materials. The method used is a thematic analysis approach that specifically categorizes the themes that are considered important and becomes the initial indicator in determining the success of learning. The results of the study show that a success in the learning process of science depends on the aspects in it including good collaboration between students and teachers, self-management, methods used in learning, applied evaluation strategies, as well as external factors which are not directly determines the success of learning such as the cultural, social, and environmental context in which the individual grows and develops.
Validitas Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Remaja (TKBKR) di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia R. Marfu’i, Lucky Nindi; Krisnanda, Veno D.
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6116.264 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.15

Abstract

This study aims to examine the validity of tests of critical thinking skills in adolescents. Validity tested based on; 1) test content, 2) response process, and 3) internal structure. The constructs of Critical Thinking Skills are 23 questions with the correct answer wrong with the answer answers in the form of reasons supporting the correct wrong answers. The subjects in this study amounted to 304 students from six faculties, namely FPMIPA, FIP, FPOK, FPIPS, FPBS, and FPTK at the Indonesian University of Education. The results of the study showed that of the 36 questions there were only 23 questions that could be maintained because 13 questions that had fallen had poor validity and measurement of adolescent critical thinking skills. Based on the results of the validity test of proof of the contents of the language expert, critical thinking experts, and experts in analytical ability mathematically evaluate that this test is feasible to use and the constructed answer key is in accordance with the questions presented. Based on evidences of the internal structure, it is explained that the KMO value of the results of factor analysis shows the number 0.570 with 2 components formed, namely analysis and evaluation capabilities. Suggestions for further research, TKBK has not been tested in its external validity in depth so that there needs to be evidence based on the relationship to other variables and based on the consequences of the test.
Refleksi Diri untuk Memperbaiki Hasil Belajar berdasarkan Hasil TIMSS Fahmi, NFN; Purwati, Rumondang
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5578.651 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.13

Abstract

The aim of this study is to obtain information about the mathematics competency of Indonesian students based on international benchmark in TIMSS 2011. This study is a quantitative descriptive study based on TIMSS 2011 data. The population of this study is all students in the junior high schools (SMP) in Indonesia. The subjects of the research are 5.795 Indonesian students from 154 schools.  The methods of multistage stratified and random sampling are conducted as sample-determining technic. Data analysis was administered by International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) using IDB analyzer program.The average mathematics score acquired by Indonesian students is 386, below the international average score (500). Indonesian students is at rank 40 of 45. Based on international benchmark, there are 0% Indonesian students who can achieve advanced level, 2% reaching the high level, 15% achieving intermediate level, and 43% in the low level. For most of Indonesian students the  mastery of Mathematics material is very low, especially in solving the problem at proficient level and high level. The research concludes that: (1) Indonesian students are less accustomed to work on items in applying and reasoning cognitive domain, especially in constructed-response items; (2) Indonesian students are less accustomed to work on items that need more than one process of solving the questions; (3) Misconception among Indonesian students about arithmetic operations (+, -, x, :), which one should be done first; and (4) Indonesians students have more difficulties in working on algebraic operations than number operations.Abstract. The aim of this study is to obtain information about the mathematics competency of Indonesian students based on international benchmark in TIMSS 2011. This study is a quantitative descriptive study based on TIMSS 2011 data. The population of this study is all students in the junior high schools (SMP) in Indonesia. The subjects of the research are 5.795 Indonesian students from 154 schools.  The methods of multistage stratified and random sampling are conducted as sample-determining technic. Data analysis was administered by International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) using IDB analyzer program.The average mathematics score acquired by Indonesian students is 386, below the international average score (500). Indonesian students is at rank 40 of 45. Based on international benchmark, there are 0% Indonesian students who can achieve advanced level, 2% reaching the high level, 15% achieving intermediate level, and 43% in the low level. For most of Indonesian students the  mastery of Mathematics material is very low, especially in solving the problem at proficient level and high level. The research concludes that: (1) Indonesian students are less accustomed to work on items in applying and reasoning cognitive domain, especially in constructed-response items; (2) Indonesian students are less accustomed to work on items that need more than one process of solving the questions; (3) Misconception among Indonesian students about arithmetic operations (+, -, x, :), which one should be done first; and (4) Indonesians students have more difficulties in working on algebraic operations than number operations.AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah memperoleh informasi tentang kemampuan matematika siswa Indonesia berdasarkan benchmark Internasional dalam TIMSS 2011. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif berdasarkan data TIMSS tahun 2011. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMP/MTs dan sampel penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP/MTs. Jumlah siswa yang menjadi sampel sebanyak 5.795 siswa dari 154 sekolah. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan metode multistage stratified dan acak. Analisis data dilakukan oleh International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) menggunakan program IDB analyzer. Rerata skor matematika siswa Indonesia adalah 386, di bawah rerata skor Internasional (500). Indonesia berada pada peringkat 40 dari 45 negara peserta. Capaian siswa Indonesia untuk level mahir 0%, level tinggi 2%, level menengah 15%, dan level rendah 43%. Penguasaan materi matematika bagi sebagian besar siswa Indonesia masih sangat rendah terutama untuk menyelesaikan soal-soal pada level mahir dan level tinggi. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah: (1) siswa Indonesia masih menemui kesulitan untuk menyelesaikan soal aplikasi dan penalaran, terutama untuk soal uraian, (2) dalam konsep operasi hitung (+, - , x, : ) masih ditemukan siswa yang belum memahami urutan oprerasi hitung yang dikerjakan terlebih dahulu, dan (3) siswa Indonesia masih kesulitan menyelesaikan soal dalam bentuk variabel atau operasi aljabar.
School Refusal pada Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun Ditinjau dari Perkembangan Sosial Fitroh, Siti Fadjryana; Oktavianingsih, Eka; Mayangsari, Dewi; Fa’idah, Mutimmatul
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4493.601 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.19

Abstract

This study aims to perceive the social development of  children aged 4-5 years with school refusal. This research used descriptive qualitative approach. Data analysis is conducted through three stages: data reduction, display data, and conclusions: drawing/verifying. The participants of this study are 4 children aged 4-5 years. The results of this study indicated that 1) The behavior captured on school refusal in children aged  4-5 year olds consisted of refusing to go to school, having absent for several days, and having difficulties in learning or making friends. There was a difference in school refusal for boys and girls. Boys  are more dominantly having school refusal than girls. 2) The social development of children’s school refusal especially on the self-awareness aspect are: the children’s lack of confidence and they need help to understand the rules and be discipline. In the sense of responsibility to theirself and others, they need a assist to share, support and help friends. In the aspect of child’s prosocial behavior, they require a help to get along with their friends, less appreciate the friends’ work, and do not show their empathy. Furthermore, it has been found the differences of social development on school refusal children between men and women. It has been revealed that boys tend to be less independent, not confident, unfrriendly, and less appreciate their friends’ work. Moreover, girls are more independent, showing confidence, willing to play with friends, and appreciate friends’ help.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan sosial anak school refusal usia 4-5 tahun. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif metode deskriptif. Analisis data dilakukan melalui tiga tahapan: data reduction, data display, dan conclusions: drawing/verifying. Subjek dalam penelitian ini 4 anak usia 4-5 tahun. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa 1) Gambaran school refusal anak usia 4-5 tahun terdiri dari menolak berangkat sekolah, absen sekolah selama beberapa hari, dan kesulitan belajar atau bergaul. Ditemukan perbedaan school refusal anak laki-laki dan anak perempuan. Anak laki-laki lebih mengalami school refusal daripada anak perempuan. 2) Perkembangan sosial anak school refusal yaitu pada aspek kesadaran diri anak kurang percaya diri dan membutuhkan bantuan untuk memahami peraturan dan disiplin. Pada aspek rasa tanggung jawab terhadap diri sendiri dan orang lain membutuhkan bantuan untuk berbagi, menolong dan membantu teman. Pada aspek perilaku prososial anak membutuhkan bantuan untuk bergaul dengan teman, kurang menghargai karya teman, dan tidak menunjukkan empati. Ditemukan perbedaan perkembangan sosial anak school refusal antara laki-laki dan perempuan. Terlihat anak laki-laki cenderung kurang mandiri, tidak percaya diri, menyendiri, dan kurang menghargai teman. Anak perempuan lebih mandiri, menunjukkan percaya diri, mau bermain bersama teman, dan mau menghargai teman dengan bantuan.  
Integritas Akademik: Prediktor Kesejahteraan Siswa di Sekolah Ramdani, Zulmi; Prakoso, Bagus Hary
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (263.734 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.14

Abstract

 Student’s school well-being is one of the factors that determine the extent to which the quality of education can be felt effectively by all individuals in it. The concept of wellbeing arises because of the overall collaboration and mutual support among the elements of education in schools. One of the factors that contribute to the student’s school wellbeing is academic integrity. Academic integrity refers to the tendency of students to behave as the values of truth that they believe in and in accordance with the demands of the environment. This study aims to examine the influence and contribution of academic integrity to the well-being of students at school. The quantitative research design by testing of regression assumptions was carried out in this study. The subjects involved in this study amounted to 186 participants by being selected based on the random sampling method. The results of the study indicate that academic integrity moderately influences the well-being of students at school. This assumes that personal factors such as academic integrity are needed to support the quality of effective learning, because learning outcomes depend on how the mental and psychological conditions of the students themselves.Abstrak Kesejahteraan siswa di sekolah menjadi salah satu faktor yang menentukan sejauhmana kualitas pendidikan itu bisa dirasakan efektif oleh seluruh individu yang ada di dalamnya. Kesejahteraan muncul karena adanya kolaborasi yang menyeluruh dan saling mendukung di antara elemen pendidikan di sekolah. Salah satu faktor yang ikut berperan terhadap kesejahteraan siswa di sekolah adalah integritas akademik. Integritas akademik mengacu kepada kecenderungan siswa untuk bersikap dan bertingkah laku sebagaimana nilai kebenaran yang mereka yakini dan sesuai dengan tuntutan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh dan kontribusi integritas akademik terhadap kesejahteraan siswa di sekolah. Desain penelitian kuantitatif dengan pengujian asumsi regresi dilakukan dalam penelitian ini. Subjek yang terlibat dalam penelitian berjumlah 186 partisipan dengan dipilih berdasarkan metode random sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integritas akademik secara moderat mempengaruhi kesejahteraan siswa di sekolah. Hal ini mengasumsikan bahwa faktor personal seperti integritas akademik dibutuhkan dalam menunjang kualitas pembelajaran yang efektif, karena hasil belajar itu tergantung pada bagaimana kondisi mental dan psikologis siswa itu sendiri
Masih Pentingkah UN bagi Siswa? Is UN Still Important for Students? Lestari, Suci Paramitha; Safari, NFN
Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA
Publisher : Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4938.23 KB) | DOI: 10.26499/ijea.v2i1.20

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to answer the following question. Is there any influence of junior high school student’s opinion on the importance of the National Examination against the 2018 National Examination results because currently the National Examination is no longer a determinant of graduation? The population of this study was junior high school students participated in the National Examination in 2018. The data in this study were in the form of test scores and students’ answers to questionnaires in 34 provinces throughout Indonesia. Filling out questionnaires was carried out voluntarily on the last day of the National Examination, so the number of respondents filling out the questionnaire was 3.224.331 from 37.859 junior high school students. The number of respondents is the sample in this study. Based on the results of the t-test analysis obtained as follows. The influence of student opinions stating that the UN is important and not important to the 2018 UN results even though the UN is not a determinant of graduation is proven. This means that there is a significant influence (P <0,000) of the student's opinions towards the 2018 National Examination results for subjects: Indonesian, English, Mathematics, and Science, (Sig. 0,000). Most of the SMP / MTs students amount to 199.222 (90.7%) stated that the National Examination was important, while students who stated that the UN was not important were 20.340 (9.3%) students. The conclusion is that there is an influence of the junior high school students’ opinion about the importance of the National Examination towards the 2018 UN results even though the National Examination is not a determinant of graduation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 2 (2021): IJEA Vol 4, No 1 (2021): IJEA Vol 3, No 2 (2020): IJEA Vol 3, No 1 (2020): IJEA Vol 2, No 2 (2019): IJEA Vol 2, No 1 (2019): IJEA Vol 1, No 2 (2018): IJEA 2018 Vol 1, No 1 (2018): IJEA 2018