cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 62 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER" : 62 Documents clear
Penerapan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Kecelakaan Pada Tempat Wisata Tesalonika, Beatrice; Hutabarat, Sylvana Murni Deborah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10854

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the application of consumer protection law in the accident that occurred at The Geong Glass Bridge, Banyumas. The background of the problem is an accident that resulted in one fatality and three injuries due to the shattering of the bridge's glass, caused by non-compliance with building standards and certifications as well as competency standards in design and construction processes. The urgency of this writing is the importance of legal certainty for consumers and the responsibility of business operators in meeting safety standards according to the law at tourist sites, as well as serving as an evaluation for the government to more strictly enforce regulations related to the licensing of tourist site operations. The novelty of this research lies in the importance of fulfilling legal obligations by business operators in the tourism industry, as well as the options for dispute resolution through litigation and non-litigation channels. This research offers new insights into the responsibilities of business operators in the tourism industry, a topic that has not been extensively studied in the context of consumer protection law in Indonesia. The research findings reveal that business operators have violated the Consumer Protection Law, supported by other laws, and there have also been violations of consumer rights and business operators' obligations, making the victims entitled to compensation as a form of accountability to consumers. This also emphasizes the importance of compliance with standards and permits in the management of tourist sites. This research is expected to encourage stricter government oversight to prevent similar accidents in the future. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan hukum perlindungan konsumen dalam kecelakaan yang terjadi di Jembatan Kaca The Geong, Banyumas. Latar belakang masalah yaitu kecelakaan yang mengakibatkan satu korban jiwa dan tiga orang terluka akibat pecahnya kaca jembatan, yang disebabkan oleh ketidaksesuaian standar dan sertifikasi bangunan serta standar kompetensi dalam desain serta proses konstruksi. Urgensi penulisan yaitu pentingnya kepastian hukum bagi konsumen dan tanggung jawab dari pelaku usaha dalam memenuhi standar keamanan sesuai undang-undang pada tempat wisata, serta sebagai evaluasi bagi pemerintah untuk lebih menegakan aturan terkait perizinin pengoperasian tempat wisata. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada pentingnya pemenuhan kewajiban hukum oleh pelaku usaha dalam industri pariwisata, serta opsi upaya menyelesaikan sengketa yaitu melalui jalur litigasi dan non-litigasi. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan baru mengenai tanggung jawab para pelaku usaha di industri pariwisata, topik yang belum banyak dikaji secara mendalam dalam konteks hukum perlindungan konsumen di Indoneisa. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan pelaku usaha telah melanggar Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dikuatkan dengan undang-undang lainnya, juga terjadi pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak konsumen dan kewajiban pelaku usaha sehingga korban berhak mendapatkan ganti rugi sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban kepada konsumen serta menegaskan pentingnya kepatuhan terhadap standar dan perizinan dalam pengelolaan tempat wisata. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat mendorong pengawasan yang lebih ketat dari pemerintah untuk mencegah terjadinya kecelakaan serupa di masa depan.
Analysis of the Classification of Crime of Sexual Intercourse with a Dead Body (Necrophilia) according to Anil Aggarwal in Indonesian Criminal Law Isnawan, Fuadi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9582

Abstract

This research critically examines Indonesian criminal law in addressing necrophilia's various manifestations, emphasizing the protection of deceased dignity and human rights. Using normative legal analysis, the study reveals that Indonesian criminal law provides partial coverage for necrophilia cases. Role Player necrophilia is addressed by Articles 6b and 12 of the TPKS Law, focusing on victim dignity and perpetrator sanctions. Romantic necrophilia, involving exhumation or corpse concealment, may fall under Criminal Code Articles 180 and 181, aimed at protecting the sanctity of the deceased. Necrophiliac Fantasizers, though not explicitly penalized, raise concerns due to the potential transition from fantasy to criminal acts. Tactile necrophilia is punishable under Articles 6b and 6c of the TPKS Law when physical abuse of corpses occurs. Additionally, Fetishistic necrophiles and Necromutilomaniacs who exploit corpses are subject to Criminal Code Articles 180 and 181. The findings indicate a need for legal reform, as current laws fail to comprehensively cover all necrophilia types, especially Romantic necrophilia and Necrophiliac Fantasizers. Furthermore, Homicidal and Exclusive necrophiles, committing extreme offenses, fall under Articles 338, 339, and 340, along with Article 6b and 180, addressing severe harm, murder, and corpse exploitation. This study’s novelty lies in categorizing necrophilia types within Indonesian law, highlighting gaps in legal protections. It recommends targeted legal amendments to ensure all forms of necrophilia are adequately recognized and prosecuted, thereby strengthening ethical and societal standards.
Strengthening of Position The Regional Representative Council (DPD) in the Indonesian Constitutional System Irsyada, Nadia Elza; Wardana, Dodi Jaya
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10651

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the strengthening of the position of The Regional Representative Council (DPD) In the Indonesian constitutional system, as a representative institution region. The Regional Representative Council (DPD) is a high state institution that was formed through amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945). The aim is to strengthen regional representation in decision-making at the national level. Even though it is expected to be able to fight for regional interests and act as a balancer to central power, the DPD is often considered to have limited authority compared to the People's Representative Council (DPR). This research uses a normative juridical method, which focuses on the analysis of statutory regulations and legal documents related to the position and authority of the DPD. This method is used to understand the legal provisions governing the DPD through a review of the 1945 Constitution, related laws, and relevant legal literature. After the amendment to the 1945 Constitution, Indonesia's constitutional structure underwent significant changes, including the formation of the DPD as a regional representative institution. Although the DPD has the authority to provide consideration to draft laws relating to regional interests, its role is often considered less influential than that of the DPR. These limitations, for example in the formal review of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, reflect the challenges in implementing the DPD's role and the existence of legal politics that leads to decentralization. The evaluation shows that although the DPD is designed to strengthen regional autonomy, implementing functions and coordination between the DPD, DPR, and the central government still face obstacles.
Harmonisasi Peran Badan Amil Zakat Nasional dan Lembaga Amil Zakat di Indonesia: Kajian Undang-Undang Zakat Lama dan Baru Septiandani, Dian; Fathia, Rizky Amelia; Handayani, Dwi; Herlindah, Herlindah; Shomad, Abd; Tilman, Alarico M
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.6810

Abstract

The aim of this research is to compare the roles and duties of BAZNAS and LAZ based on the old zakat law and the new zakat law, as well as the synergy of roles between the two. The urgency of this research is that it is hoped that this research can provide input for the implementation of zakat management in Indonesia to be more optimal, as well as input for the revision of the zakat law related to the duties and roles of the two zakat management institutions. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative approach, with analytical descriptive research specifications, and the type of data used is secondary data. The results of this research show that BAZNAS and LAS, both have similar tasks and similar goals, they are not competitors with each other, in fact, they are partners and must work together so that zakat management becomes more effective and efficient so that the potential of zakat in society can be maximally absorbed. The findings from this research are that there is harmonization of roles between BAZNAS and LAZ, this harmonization does not yet exist in the Zakat Law. It is hoped that the new zakat law will include this as part of an effort to increase the quality of implementing the functions of BAZNAS and LAZ as they should in accordance with current developments, especially in the digital era. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji perbandingan peran dan tugas BAZNAS dan LAZ berdasarkan UU zakat lama dan UU zakat yang baru, serta sinergi peran di antara keduanya. Urgensi penelitian ini diharapkan penelitian ini dapat menjadi masukan bagi pelaksanaan pengelolaan zakat di Indonesia agar lebih maksimal, serta masukan revisi Undang-Undang Zakat terkait dengan tugas dan peran kedua lembaga pengelola zakat tersebut. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan perbandingan, dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis, dan jenis data yang digunakan ialah data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa BAZNAS dan LAS, keduanya memiliki persamaan tugas dan kesamaan tujuan, keduanya bukan pesaing satu sama lain, justru keduanya merupakan mitra dan harus bersinergi, agar pengelolaan zakat menjadi lebih efektif, dan efesien sehingga potensi zakat di masyarakat dapat terserap secara maksimal. Temuan dari penelitian ini adanya harmonisasi peran antara BAZNAS dan LAZ, harmonisasi ini belum ada dalam Undang-Undang Zakat. Harapannya Undang-Undang Zakat yang baru nanti memasukkan terkait hal tersebut sebagain upaya untuk peningkatan kulitas penerapan fungsi BAZNAS dan LAZ sebagaimana mestinya sesuai dengan perkembangan zaman terutama di era digital.
Analisis Perjanjian Jasa Konsultan Kekayaan Intelektual Dengan Konsumen Dalam Pendaftaran Merek di Indonesia Nugroho, Setyo Dwi; Santoso, Budi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10351

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out new perspectives in the legal protection of consumers in the sector of intellectual property consultant services in trademark registration and legal remedies that can be done by consumers against acts of default committed by intellectual property consultants. There are problems including the non-fulfilment of obligations by intellectual property consultants after consumers make payments so that consumers are harmed and their rights to trademark registration services are not obtained. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. This normative legal research uses a method that is a statutory approach and then data analysis is carried out by using a qualitative method that is descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that the legal protection of consumers who use intellectual property consulting services includes the fulfilment of rights through agreements and rights to registered trademarks through intellectual property consulting services. Consumers who are harmed by the default of intellectual property consultants can take legal remedies through litigation and non-litigation channels, including reporting to the supervisory panel. Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui perspektif baru dalam perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen di sektor jasa konsultan kekayaan intelektual dalam pendaftaran merek dan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan konsumen terhadap perbuatan wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh konsultan kekayaan intelektual. Terdapat permasalahan diantaranya yaitu tidak dipenuhinya kewajiban oleh konsultan kekayaan intelektual setelah konsumen melakukan pembayaran sehingga konsumen dirugikan dan haknya atas jasa pendaftaran merek tidak didapatkan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan suatu metode yaitu pendekatan undang-undang kemudian dilakukan analisis data dengan cara menggunakan metode kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif analisis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum konsumen yang menggunakan jasa konsultan kekayaan intelektual meliputi pemenuhan hak-hak melalui perjanjian dan hak atas merek terdaftar melalui jasa konsultan kekayaan intelektual. Konsumen yang dirugikan akibat wanprestasi konsultan kekayaan intelektual dapat menempuh upaya hukum melalui jalur litigasi maupun non-litigasi, termasuk pelaporan kepada majelis pengawas.
Pemenuhan Asas Keadilan Dalam Penerapan Parliamentary Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif di Indonesia Salim, Patrick Winson; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10907

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and find out the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7 of 2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 and evaluate whether its application meets the principles of justice. This is motivated by the application of the parliamentary threshold regulated in Law No. 7 of 2027 on General Elections and reaffirmed through Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 which is considered not fulfilling the principle of justice and violating the 1945 Constitution. The urgency of this research is to provide legal clarity regarding the parliamentary threshold, which is intended to maintain the quality of representation in parliament, but in practice creates problems of injustice for parties that are unable to meet the threshold. The novelty in this author's research is to show that the application of the parliamentary threshold can reduce the diversity of political choices and affect the fairness of representation. The research method used in this study is the normative method. The results show that the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7/2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 reflects the Court's efforts to consider the principle of justice. Stating that the threshold is still needed, but it must be reviewed to ensure more proportional and democratic representation. This is in line with the concept of justice according to philosophers who view that the review of the threshold also aims to provide opportunities for underrepresented parties, support the principle of justice as fairness, and achieve justice that allows future parliamentary thresholds to be determined based on popular sovereignty. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 serta mengevaluasi apakah penerapannya memenuhi asas keadilan. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penerapan ambang batas parlemen yang diatur dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2027 tentang Pemilihan Umum dan ditegaskan kembali melalui Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 yang dianggap tidak memenuhi asas keadilan dan melanggar Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Urgensi penelitian ini ialah memberikan kejelasan secara hukum mengenai parliamentary threshold yang dimaksudkan untuk menjaga kualitas representasi di parlemen dalam praktiknya justru menciptakan permasalahan ketidakadilan bagi partai-partai yang tidak mampu memenuhi ambang batas tersebut. Kebaruan dalam penelitian penulis ini adalah menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dapat mereduksi keberagaman pilihan politik dan memengaruhi keadilan representasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 mencerminkan upaya MK mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Menyatakan ambang batas tetap diperlukan, tetapi harus ditinjau untuk memastikan representasi yang lebih proporsional dan demokratis. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan konsep keadilan menurut filsuf-filsuf yang memandang peninjauan ambang batas juga bertujuan memberi kesempatan bagi pihak yang kurang terwakili, mendukung prinsip justice as fairness serta mencapai keadilan yang memungkinkan parliamentary threshold masa depan ditetapkan berdasarkan kedaulatan rakyat.
Guarantee, Promotion and Ideas of Omnibus Law on Health in Indonesia Compared to Singapore and Taiwan Sudaryat, Sudaryat
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9728

Abstract

This study aims to compare and analyze macro health policies in Indonesia with those in Taiwan and Singapore. The results of the comparison and analysis will be used as lessons learned and input for improving health policies in Indonesia in the future. Health policies in the form of the BPJS Kesehatan program have not optimally improved the health of the Indonesian people in terms of services, medicines, medical personnel, and health facilities. Taiwan is the country with the most superior health services in the world in 2024 and Singapore is the country with the best health system in the world in 2023. Through a normative legal research method with qualitative legal data analysis, it is known that the health policies implemented by the Taiwanese and Indonesian governments are almost the same, namely using an insurance mechanism with contributions from participants, the government and the private sector, but the differences in the reach and standardization of health services in Taiwan are wider in scope compared to Indonesia, while the Singaporean government in its health policy implements four programs, namely medisave, medishield, medifund, eldershield with control over increasing health financing from the government. Health policies in Taiwan are easier for the Indonesian government to apply in perfecting the BPJS Kesehatan program than those implemented by Singapore because both have implemented health policies through mandatory insurance programs. BPJS Kesehatan must improve its service management and the government needs to increase the number of health facilities and standardization of health facilities by adjusting its characteristics as an archipelagic country. Formulate fair premi for participants so that participants get optimal health services. Health promotion must be encouraged to increase public health awareness. The health omnibus law as a national legal strategy can be used as a trigger to harmonize overlapping health policies so that health programs can be implemented optimally which has an impact on improving the health of the Indonesian people.
Reformulasi UU ITE terhadap Artificial Intelligence Dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation Respati, Adnasohn Aqilla
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10578

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal vacuum in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) related to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia in the context of deepfake. This research is motivated by the existence of several regulations on AI, these regulations are not sufficient to regulate thoroughly, especially regarding the technical aspects, implementation, and supervision of AI. So, the study to further analyze the urgency of reformulating the ITE Law due to the absence of specific regulations that are able to close the legal vacuum related to deepfake. The reformulation of the ITE Law is an urgent need to address the threat of deepfake, an AI-based content manipulation technology that is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, deepfake creates manipulative content without the victim's consent, causing psychological harm, social stigma, and serious challenges in privacy and security. This research is included in normative juridical writing using a statutory approach through analysis of laws and derivative regulations and a comparative approach through analysis of the EU AI Act and China's regulations to provide reformulation suggestions. The results show that there is a legal vacuum that has not specifically regulated AI, which risks the misuse of technology and hampers legal certainty. Comparing the EU and China AI Acts, key findings include the need to adopt the basic principles of the EU AI Act, such as transparency, security, and fairness, as well as risk classification for AI systems. The current AI Act does not regulate important aspects such as labeling, reporting mechanisms, and supervision of high risks in AI systems, and it is recommended to establish a supervisory body responsible for AI risk management. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis kekosongan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terkait regulasi kecerdasan buatan (AI) di Indonesia dalam konteks deepfake. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya beberapa aturan tentang AI, regulasi ini belum cukup mengatur secara menyeluruh, terutama terkait aspek teknis, pelaksanaan, dan pengawasan AI. Maka, pengkajian untuk menganalsis lebih lanjut atas urgensi reformulasi UU ITE dikarenakan belum adanya peraturan spesifik yang mampu menutup kekosongan hukum terkait deepfake. Reformulasi UU ITE menjadi kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengatasi ancaman deepfake, teknologi manipulasi konten berbasis AI yang semakin marak di Indonesia, deepfake menciptakan konten manipulatif tanpa persetujuan korban, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian psikologis, stigma sosial, dan tantangan serius dalam privasi serta keamanan. Adapun penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan pendekatan perundang-undangan melalui analisis undang-undang dan peraturan turunannya dan pendekatan komparasi melalui analisis pengaturan EU AI Act dan China untuk memberikan saran reformulasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan adanya kekosongan hukum yang belum mengatur AI secara spesifik, yang berisiko pada penyalahgunaan teknologi dan menghambat kepastian hukum. Maka dengan membandingkan pengaturan EU dan China AI Act, temuan utama mencakup kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi prinsip-prinsip dasar dari EU AI Act, seperti transparansi, keamanan, dan keadilan, serta klasifikasi risiko untuk sistem AI. UU ITE saat ini belum mengatur aspek-aspek penting seperti labelling, mekanisme pelaporan, dan pengawasan terhadap risiko tinggi dalam sistem AI, serta disarankan untuk membentuk badan pengawas yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan risiko AI.
Pembagian Royalti Hak Cipta Sebagai Harta Bersama Dalam Perceraian Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1622/PDT.G/2023PA.JB Zahra, Arsya Yustisia; Roisah, Kholis
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.8933

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the distribution of joint property in decision number No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB, marking the first case of its kind in Indonesia involving royalties as an asset for joint property division. Divorce leads to the division of joint property. This study will center on discussing joint property derived from copyright, where the royalties from creative works owned by the creator are considered joint property and are requested by the spouse for division. The primary aim of this research is to explain that intangible movable property, in the form of copyright royalties, can be divided if it becomes joint property. This study uses A normative legal approach with a descriptive-analytical specification. It provides an analysis of the decision that serves as the basis for both parties in dividing copyright royalties as joint property under any applicable marriage law, whether it is customary law, Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Civil Code, or the Compilation of Islamic Law. All legal frameworks will yield the same result, which is that each party receives half of the joint property, showing consistency across all regulations concerning joint property. The results of this study show that, in the event of divorce, copyright royalties can be divided as joint property. However, this is not an absolute requirement of such a division, as seen in Decision No. 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) acquired during marriage, obtained and created or registered by one spouse during marriage are regarded as joint property. This is because even though the spouse may not be the holder of the rights, they have played a role in the creation of the IPR and are entitled to a share of this property in the event of divorce. Copyright; Joint Property; Royalties Tujuan penelitian ini mengupas pembagian pada sengketa perceraian kekayaan bersama pada putusan dengan nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023PA.JB merupakan kasus pertama di Indonesia dengan royalti sebagai objek pembagian harta kekayaan bersama. Putusnya perkawinan berakibat pembagian harta gono-gini. Hal yang dibahas pada penelitian kali ini hendak diperkecil ruang lingkupnya mengenai kekayaan bersama yang diperolah dari hak cipta yang dimana royalti hasil dari karya cipta milik pencipta yang menjadi kekayaan bersama diinginkan oleh pasangan kawinnya untuk dilakukan pembagian. Urgensi penelitian ini yakni menjelaskan bahwa benda bergerak tidak berwujud berupa royalti hasil karya cipta dapat dilakukan pembagian apabila menjadi sebuah kekayaan bersama. Metode yang diterapkan yakni yuridis normatif serta deskriptif analitis sebagai spesifikasi penelitian. Penelitian ini menjelaskan mengenai analisis putusan yang menjadi landasan bagi pihak terkait dalam melakukan pembagian royalti hak cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama menggunakan hukum perkawinan apapun, baik berupa Hukum Adat, Undang-Undang Perkawinan, KUHPerdata, dan KHI akan mendapatkan hasil yang sama yakni masing-masing memperoleh separuh dari kekayaan bersama, terdapat konsistensi dalam seluruh pengaturan mengenai kekayaan bersama. Hasil riset ini memperlihatkan bahwa pembagian royalti hasil karya cipta sebagai kekayaan bersama akibat adanya perceraian secara eksplisit tidak diatur dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, walaupun demikian tidak menutup kemungkinan pembagian royalti dapat terjadi seperti dalam Putusan Nomor 1622/Pdt.G/2023/PA.JB Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang didaftarkan serta didapat dari salah seorang sepanjang perkawinan menjadi kekayaan bersama, karena suami atau istri meskipun bukan pemegang hak akan tetapi turut bersumbangsih terwujudnya HKI tersebut, dan berhak mendapatkan harta tersebut apabila menemui perceraian. Hak Cipta; Kekayaan bersama; Royalti.
Legal Aspects of Women's Political Participation in a Gender Perspective Suryani, Ade Irma; Wardana, Dodi Jaya
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10634

Abstract

This study aims to explore the legal aspects of women's political participation from a gender perspective, emphasizing the problem of the gap between regulation and implementation in legal practice in Indonesia, as well as the obstacles faced by women in achieving an equal position in politics. This study is motivated by the ongoing gap in political participation between men and women in various countries, including Indonesia, which can be seen from the lack of women in important decision-making at the local and national levels. Women's representation in the public sphere, especially in politics and decision-making, has been regulated in various regulations, such as the Election Law and the 30% quota Affirmative Action Policy. However, in practice, these regulations often do not achieve the expected goals due to structural and cultural obstacles, and minimal sanctions for non-compliance. This study finds that although there has been normative progress in building a legal framework that supports women's participation, its implementation is still weak due to various obstacles, including gender-biased legal interpretations, patriarchal dominance in the political system, and the lack of effective monitoring mechanisms. The main contribution of this study lies in the in-depth analysis of the gap between the regulation and practice of women's representation. Using a normative and sociological legal approach, this study offers a new perspective in understanding this problem, not only as a legal issue but also as a structural and cultural problem that requires multidimensional intervention. This study also provides concrete recommendations to strengthen law enforcement and ensure that affirmative policies can run effectively, such as improving legal sanctions, increasing the capacity of supervisory institutions, and ongoing gender education. Uniquely, this study contributes to the legal literature and practice by providing a comprehensive roadmap to address the gap in the implementation of affirmative policies in women's representation. Furthermore, this study emphasizes that improving the gender-responsive legal system is not only a normative need but also a prerequisite for creating substantive justice in Indonesian society.

Page 3 of 7 | Total Record : 62

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): - Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MAY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOVEMBER Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MAY Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOVEMBER Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MAY Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOVEMBER Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): MAY More Issue