cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ja'far Baehaqi
Contact Email
jafarbaehaqi@walisongo.ac.id
Phone
+6285225300659
Journal Mail Official
walrev.journal@walisongo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sharia Faculty Office Building and Law 2nd Floor Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang Jl. Prof. Hamka Km. 02 Ngaliyan, Semarang 50185. Telp (024) 7601291 Fax (024) 7601291
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev)
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
ISSN : 27153347     EISSN : 7220400     DOI : 10.21580/walrev
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) is a scientific journal published in April and October each year by the Law Studies Program at the Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang. This journal has specifications as a medium of publication and communication of legal science ideas derived from theoretical and analytical studies, as well as research results in the field of legal science. The editor hopes that writers, researchers and legal experts will contribute in this journal.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 169 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
Implementation of the Erga Omnes Principle on the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) concerning the Supreme Court's SE (MA) regarding Judicial Review Ceprudin Ceprudin
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.9423

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the decisions of the Constitutional Court (MK) and Circular Letters (SE) of the Supreme Court (MA) regarding Judicial Review (PK) in criminal cases. In March 2014, through decision No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, the Constitutional Court stated that in a criminal case, a PK may be conducted more than once. The verdict states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Interestingly, the Supreme Court issued SE No. 7 of 2014 which stipulates that PK is only allowed once. SEMA was signed on December 31, 2014, Chairman of the Supreme Court, Hatta Ali. The existence of the Constitutional Court and SEMA decisions has implications for the dualism of legal practice between only one time and maybe more than once in a PK application. Until now, the SEMA has not been revoked. The existence of the dualism of these rules seems to create uncertainty in the practice of PK law enforcement in Indonesia. Analysing the two legal products from two conflicting state institutions is very important to clarify the procedure for review. The review, which is also often called an extraordinary legal effort, is essential to maintain legal justice and safeguard the basic rights of citizens. In reviewing this fact, we will refer to the principle of Erga Omnes and its correlation with the protection of the basic rights of citizens. The principle of Erga Omnes (applies to everyone in the same case) must be heeded by all state institutions including the Supreme Court. In addition, regulation and its implementation must still pay attention to human rights. So this study uses the normative legal method. Based on the provisional facts presented, the authors hypothesise that SEMA should support the Constitutional Court's decision on PK as an implementation of the principle Erga Omnes and protect the basic rights of citizens. The principle of Erga Omnes and the framework for protecting basic human rights are two things that must be signed in the practice of review.[]Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dan Surat Edaran (SE) Mahkamah Agung (MA) tentang Peninjauan Kembali (PK) dalam perkara pidana. Pada Maret 2014, melalui putusan No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, MK menyatakan bahwa perkara pidana, PK boleh lebih dari satu kali. Putusan itu menyatakan Pasal 268 ayat (3) Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945. Menariknya, MA menerbitkan SE No. 7 Tahun 2014 yang menentukan bahwa PK hanya dibolehkan satu kali. SEMA ditandatangani pada 31 Desember 2014 Ketua MA, Hatta Ali. Adanya putusan MK dan SEMA itu berimplikasi pada dualisme praktik hukum antara hanya satu kali dan boleh lebih dari satu kali dalam permohonan PK. Hingga kini, SEMA tersebut belum dicabut. Adanya dualisme aturan tersebut seakan menimbulkan ketidakpastian praktik penegakkan hukum PK di Indonesia. Menganalisis dua produk hukum dari dua lembaga negara yang bertentangan itu sangat penting untuk menjernihkan tata cara peninjauan kembali. Peninjauan kembali yang juga kerap disebut upaya hukum luar biasa pada hakikatnya untuk menjaga keadilan hukum dan menjaga hak-hak dasar warga negara. Dalam mengkaji fakta ini, akan merujuk asas erga omnes dan korelasinya dengan perlindungan hak dasar warga negara. Asas erga omnes (berlaku bagi semua orang dalam perkara yang sama) harus diindahkan oleh semua lembaga negara termasuk MA. Selain itu, dalam sebuah aturan dan pelaksanaannya harus tetap memperhatikan hak asasi manusia. Sehingga kajian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif. Atas fakta sementara yang tesaji, penulis berhipotesa bahwa SEMA seharusnya mendukung putusan MK tentang PK sebagai implementasi asas erga omnes dan melindungi hak-hak dasar warga negara. Asas erga omnes dan kerangka perlindungan hak dasar manusia merupakan dua hal yang harus menjadi rambu-rambu dalam praktik peninjauan kembali.
Position and Functions of Judges in Enforcing the Supreme of the Law: Case Study of Code of Ethics Violation by Judge Titik Triwulan Tutik
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.9996

Abstract

This research is a rational-empirical research that aims; First, examine the existence of Judicial Power in a constitutional state based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Second, examine the position of Supreme Court Justices as law enforcement actors in Judicial Power according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Third, analyze whether the function of judges is Agung as a law enforcer in the Judicial Power as regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia reflects the principles of independence. There are two main functions of judicial power as the main characteristics of the rule of law and the principle of the rule of law: First, judicial power, both in terms of substance and administration, has been determined to be independent and integrated under the guidance of the Supreme Court, but at the same time its role The DPR to control the Supreme Court's powers is enhanced through determining the appointment and dismissal of Supreme Court justices, and by establishing a Judicial Commission to oversee the administrative aspects of judicial power. Second, taking into account the considerations of the Supreme Court, the President is given the right to grant clemency, abolition and amnesty. The enforcement of the rule of law is a necessity in a state of law and an independent, neutral (impartial) and competent judiciary is one element. The position and function of the Supreme Court judge holds a very important position and role, in enforcing the rule of law. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian rasional-empiris yang  bertujuan; Pertama, mengkaji eksistensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam negara Hukum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Kedua, menelaah kedudukan Hakim Agung sebagai pelaku penegak hukum dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Ketiga, menganalisis apakah fungsi Hakim Agung sebagai pelaku penegak hukum dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 mencerminkan prinsip-prinsip independensi. Terdapat dua fungsi utama dari kekuasaan kehakiman sebagai ciri pokok negara hukum dan prinsip negara hukum: Pertama, kekuasaan kehakiman, baik dari segi subtansinya maupun administrasinya, telah ditetapkan bersifat mandiri dan terpadu di bawah pembinaan MA, tetapi pada saat yang bersamaan peran DPR untuk mengontrol kekuasaan MA ditingkatkan melalui penentuan pengangkatan dan pemberhentian hakim agung, dan dengan pembentukan KY untuk mengawasi segi-segi administrasi kekuasaan kehakiman. Kedua, dengan memperhatikan pertimbangan MA Presiden diberi hak untuk memberikan grasi, abolisi dan amnesti. Penegakkan supremasi hukum merupakan sebuah keniscayaan dalam negara hukum dan peradilan yang mandiri (independen), netral (tidak memihak) dan kompeten merupakan salah satu unsur. Kedudukan dan fungsi hakim agung memegang posisi dan peran yang sangat penting, dalam penegakkan sumpremasi hukum tersebut.
Criminal Policy to Treat Delices Against Religion and Beliefs Harmony Yayan Muhammad Royani
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.8369

Abstract

The protection of the rights to freedom of religion and belief in the constitution aims to create a community life based on morals based on divinity. As a country with a high level of plurality from the aspects of religion and belief, protection of religious harmony and belief is necessary to achieve this goal. Based on the above points of thought, several problems can be formulated, namely how is the current criminal policy in overcoming offenses against religious and belief harmony. And what will the future criminal policy be in overcoming offenses against religious harmony and belief. The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach, where the data used are secondary sources in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.This research is a descriptive analytical study, namely research to describe the problem, analyze the problem and classify the problem for research purposes which are presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the criminal acts formulated in the Criminal Code are very limited, including not protecting beliefs protected by the constitution and there is still a divergence by including religious offenses in the Chapter on Public Order. In the non-penal policy, the regulations governing religious harmony are still ineffective and the current government is not serious about creating harmony between religious and believers. Future penal efforts can be made by updating the Criminal Code. As an effort to improve, the concept of the Criminal Code can formulate the provisions of offenses by looking at the provisions of offenses contained in the Draft Law on Religious Harmony. In non-penal efforts, the approach is through the formulation and implementation of government programs. Among them are approaches to understanding theology, education, dialogue and conflict resolution.Perlindungan atas hak kebebasan beragama dan berkepercayaan dalam konstitusi bertujuan supaya tercipta kehidupan masyarakat yang berlandaskan moral atas dasar ketuhanan. Sebagai negara dengan tingkat pluralitas yang tinggi dari aspek agama dan kepercayaan, maka perlindungan terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan mutlak dibutuhkan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Berdasarkan pokok pemikiran di atas, maka dapat dirumuskan beberapa permasalahan, yaitu bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal saat ini dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Dan bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal yang akan datang dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dimana data yang digunakan adalah sumber sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder maupun bahan hukum tersier. Adapun penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitis, yaitu penelitian untuk mendeskripsikan masalah, menganalisis masalah dan mengklasifikasi masalah untuk kepentingan penelitian yang disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa tindak pidana yang dirumuskan dalam KUHP sangatlah terbatas, diantaranya belum melindungi kepercayaan yang dilindungi konstitusi serta masih terdapat divergensi dengan memasukan delik agama dalam Bab Ketertiban Umum. Dalam kebijakan non penal, regulasi yang mengatur tentang kerukunan umat beragama masih kurang efektif serta pemerintah saat ini tidak serius menciptakan harmonisasi antar umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Upaya penal yang akan datang dapat dilakukan dengan pembaharuan KUHP. Sebagai upaya penyempurnaan, Konsep KUHP dapat memformulasikan ketentuan delik dengan melihat ketentuan delik yang terdapat dalam RUU Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Dalam upaya non penal, pendekatan melalui penyusunan dan pelaksanaan program pemerintah. Diantaranya dengan pendekatan pemahaman teologi, pendidikan, dialog dan resolusi konflik.
Dissolution of Islamic Community Organizations (Ormas) in the Context of a State of Law and a Democratic State Suteki Suteki; Abdul Jalil
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.2.10848

Abstract

Community organizations (Ormas) in a country are evidence of the existence of democracy in a country. Indonesia is a constitutional state as well as a democratic state according to Article 1 Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the 1945 Constitution. The existence of mass organizations is recognized and protected in Indonesia as part of the state's recognition of the rights of every citizen to freedom of association and assembly. The dissolution of CSOs carried out without court procedures, according to the author, is a violation of the concept of the rule of law adopted by Indonesia as well as the castration of the rights of association, assembly, and expression of opinion in a democratic country. This study uses a socio-legal approach, with analytical descriptive research methods. Sources of data used are primary data in the form of interviews. The primary legal materials used in this research are the Law on Ormas; and SKB concerning the Prohibition of Activities Using Symbols and Attributes and Termination of FPI Activities. The results of the study stated that the disbandment of mass organizations was politically and ideologically motivated, namely differences in political attitudes and aspirations between Islamic organizations and the government. The dissolution of mass organizations is the impact of the applied procedural democracy. Democracy is not practiced substantially, in a democratic climate, differences in aspirations are a necessity. The disbandment of mass organizations has an impact on disharmony relations between religion and the state, between religious adherents and the government, and has the potential to cause polarization in society. The direct impact of the disbandment of Islamic organizations is the difficulty of building a synergistic relationship between religion and the state, between religious adherents and the government.[]Organisasi kemasyarakatan (Ormas) di suatu negara adalah bukti hidupnya demokrasi di sebuah negara. Indonesia adalah negara hukum sekaligus negara demokrasi sesuai Pasal 1 Ayat 2 dan 3 UUD 1945. Keberadaan Ormas diakui dan dilindungi di Indonesia sebagai bagian bentuk pengakuan negara atas hak setiap warga negara atas kebebasan berserikat dan berkumpul. Pembubaran Ormas yang dilakukan tanpa prosedur pengadilan menurut penulis adalah menyalahi konsep negara hukum yang dianut oleh Indonesia sekaligus pengkebirian hak-hak berserikat, berkumpul, dan menyatakan pendapat di negara demokrasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio-legal, dengan metode penelitian deskriptif analitis. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data primer yang berupa hasil wawancara. Bahan hukum primer yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah UU tentang Ormas; dan SKB tentang Larangan Kegiatan Penggunaan Simbol dan Atribut Serta Penghentian Kegiatan FPI. Hasil penelitian menyatakan, pembubaran ormas dilatarbelakangi politis dan ideologis, yakni perbedaan pandangan sikap politik dan aspirasi antara ormas Islam dengan pemerintah. Pembubaran ormas merupakan imbas dari demokrasi prosedural yang diterapkan. Demokrasi tidak dipraktikkan secara substansial, dalam iklim demokrasi perbedaan aspirasi adalah keniscayaan. Pembubaran ormas berdampak pada hubungan yang disharmoni antara agama dengan negara, antara pemeluk agama dengan pemerintah, dan berpotensi menimbulkan polarisasi di tengah masyarakat. Dampak langsung dari pembubaran ormas Islam adalah kesulitan membangun relasi sinergi antara agama dengan negara, antara pemeluk agama dengan pemerintah. 
Implementation of Technology Transfer Based on Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment in the Context of Development of Industry in Indonesia A Hashbi Luthfi
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2019.1.2.4816

Abstract

Legal arrangements in the field of technology transfer related to foreign investment need to be considered in order for the entry of new technology in Indonesia. This article aims to know how the implementation of Technology Transfer under Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment in Indonesia and Transfer of technology developments in Indonesia with the Law No. 25 Year 2007 on Investment. The method used is a normative juridical analytical descriptive, whereas in analyzing the data using qualitative methods and presented descriptively. From this study shows that the main problem at the root problem of transfer of technology in Indonesia is the law governing the transfer of technology itself. That's because there is no obvious technical regulations regarding foreign investment for technology transfer in the discourse of transfer of technology as stipulated in Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment is only optional and not become an obligation for foreign investors to come. It was concluded that the concept of technology transfer in foreign investment in Indonesia is based on the principle of self-reliance, development Technology transfer through foreign investment in Indonesia has not had a clear regulation so here said technology transfer is only seen as a choice for investors not as a an obligation which is binding and accompanied with strict punishment. Pengaturan hukum di bidang alih teknologi yang terkait dengan investasi asing perlu dipertimbangkan untuk masuknya teknologi baru di Indonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi transfer teknologi berdasarkan UU No. 25 tahun 2007 tentang Investasi di Indonesia dan transfer perkembangan teknologi di Indonesia dengan UU No. 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Investasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitik yuridis normatif, sedangkan dalam menganalisis data menggunakan metode kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa masalah utama pada akar masalah transfer teknologi di Indonesia adalah hukum yang mengatur transfer teknologi itu sendiri. Itu karena tidak ada peraturan teknis yang jelas mengenai investasi asing untuk transfer teknologi dalam wacana transfer teknologi sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Investasi hanya opsional dan tidak menjadi kewajiban bagi investor asing untuk datang. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa konsep alih teknologi dalam investasi asing di Indonesia didasarkan pada prinsip kemandirian, pengembangan Transfer teknologi melalui investasi asing di Indonesia belum memiliki regulasi yang jelas sehingga disini dikatakan transfer teknologi hanya dipandang sebagai pilihan bagi investor bukan sebagai kewajiban yang mengikat dan disertai dengan sanksi tegas.
Legal Protection of Personal Data Financial Technology Based Online Loans from The Consumer Protection Act Iim Saputra Noptabi; Serlika Aprita; Mona Wulandari
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.11135

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal protection of personal data financial technology (Fintech) based on online loans in terms of the Consumer Protection Act and what are the legal consequences of personal data violations by fintech companies based on online loans in terms of the Consumer Protection Act. The type of research used is normative legal research. The conclusion of this study is that the legal protection of consumer personal data has been regulated by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) Circular and the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information concerning Confidentiality, Integrity and Security of Consumer Personal Data or Information and the Legal Consequences of Personal Data Violation, which is regulated in Article 47 of the Authority Regulation. Financial Services Number 77/POJK.01/2016 is an administrative sanction, then there is the Personal Data Protection Bill which regulates criminal sanctions. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum data pribadi financial technology berbasis pinjaman online ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen dan bagaimana akibat hukum pelanggaran data pribadi yang dilakukan perusahaan fintech berbasis pinjaman online ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian  ini adalah perlindungan hukum data pribadi konsumen telah diatur oleh Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dan Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika tentang Kerahasiaan, Keutuhan dan Keamanan Data atau Informasi Pribadi Konsumen dan Akibat Hukum Pelanggaran Data Pribadi yaitu diatur dalam Pasal 47 Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 adalah sanksi administratif, lalu terdapat Rancangan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi yang mengatur sanksi pidana.
Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes and Termination of Work Relations according to the Applicable Legislation Agus Pramono
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.2.6671

Abstract

This article discusses the settlement of industrial relations disputes and termination of employment according to the applicable laws. Industrial relations disputes can be divided into two types: disputes over rights and disputes over interests. The relationship between workers and employers is a relationship that needs each other; workers need wages, employers benefit. However, in practice there are problems, so employers give Warning Letters I and II which are followed by Termination of Employment (PHK). The process of resolving this problem can be carried out through Bipartite, Mediation, or to the Industrial Relations Court. This paper is written with a normative juridical approach. The results show that the labor-employer problem is getting more complicated since the existence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, one of which contains the elimination of the city / district minimum wage (UMK) and replaced with the provincial minimum wage (UMP). The elimination of MSEs results in lower wages for workers. In fact, in the Manpower Act Number 13 of 2003, no worker may receive a wage below the minimum wage, because the determination of wages is based on the calculation of Living Needs.[]Artikel ini membahas mengenai penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial dan pemutusan hubungan kerja menurut perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Perselisihan hubungan industrial menurut jenisnya dapat dibagi menjadi dua: perselisihan hak dan perselisihan kepentingan. Hubungan pekerja dan pengusaha merupakan hubungan yang saling membutuhkan; buruh memerlukan upah, pengusaha mendapatkan keuntungan. Namun, dalam prakteknya terjadi permasalahan, sehingga pengusaha memberikan Surat Peringatan I dan II yang diikuti dengan Pemutusan Hubugan Kerja (PHK). Proses penyelesaian persoalan ini dapat dilakukan melalui Bipartit, Mediasi, atau ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Tulisan ini ditulis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan buruh-pengusaha semakin pelik seja hadirnya Undang-Undang Omnibus Law Cipta Lapangan Kerja yang salah satu isinya penghapusan upah minimum kota/kabupaten (UMK) dan diganti dengan upah minimum provinsi (UMP). Penghapusan UMK membuat upah pekerja lebih rendah. Padahal, dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tak boleh ada pekerja yang mendapat upah di bawah upah minimum, karena penetapan upah didasarkan atas perhitungan Kebutuhan Layak Hidup.
Annual Leave Entitlement of Labor (A Comparison between Egypt Law with Indonesia) Jaedin Jaedin
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5530

Abstract

Wages are unimportant in work ties then leave pay is a worker's right that must be provided in accordance with the principle of no work no pay. Leave is a goal to restore labor to a physically stable and able to rest the human body. However, the regulations in Indonesia do not apply the law as in the State of Egypt, the employer revokes the wages of leave if the worker is provided with other services while on leave. Regulations in Egypt are in accordance with the Egyptian Law Number 12 of 2003 concerning relevance to the purpose of the leave itself, namely leave to rest the physical or body of the worker, not to utilize work leave at another employer. However, the regulations in Indonesia in Law Number 13 of 2003 have not been regulated as in Egypt. In Egypt, it is more comprehensive in expressing the principle of no work, no pay.
Crime of Makar and Its Enforcement in Post-Reform Indonesia Eman Sulaeman
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 1, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2019.1.1.4753

Abstract

In the era of reforms characterized by freedom of thought and opinion, the position of makar crime formulation in the criminal law book (KUHP) is very dilemmatic. Its  Formulation is needed to maintain state sovereignty. However,  its presence has not well defined yet. So,  it threatens the independence of Makar crime and its elements. This research will analyze the formulation of Makar crime in the Criminal law book (KUHP), its enforcement in Indonesia post-reforms, and its draft formulation in the Criminal law book (KUHP). Library research method through juridical-normative was used in this research. The result shows that the formulation of Makar crime which was set forth in Article 104, 106, 107, and 108 of the Criminal law book (KUHP) still has not define Makar and its parameters to the elements. Therefore, it is necessary to reform the criminal law effectively in accordance with the principles of law and democratic state in the Draft Law (RUU) of the Criminal law book (KUHP) in order to overcome makar crime.
The Victimological Context on Child Sexual Violence Anissaa Nuril Chasanah; Ridwan Arifin
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.10574

Abstract

Sexual violence against children is a crime that needs serious attention. In this crime, children as victims often do not get adequate legal protection and fulfill their rights as victims. This study aims to analyze child sexual crimes in the context of victimology and victim protection. This study uses a normative legal study approach by analyzing the applicable laws and regulations as well as literature review related to the protection of children as victims of sexual crimes. This study proves and confirms that the protection of children in cases of sexual crimes has been legally guaranteed through the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims, the Law on Child Protection, and the Law on Human Rights. However, the process of fulfilling the rights of children as victims in these crimes does not yet have adequate aspects of justice for children. The existing criminal law instruments are only oriented towards punishment and deterrence of perpetrators of sexual crimes. Kekerasan seksual terhadap anak menjadi salah satu tindak pidana yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian serius. Pada tindak pidana ini, anak sebagai korban seringkali tidak mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dan pemenuhan hak-haknya sebagai korban secara memadai. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kejahatan seksual anak dalam konteks viktimologi dan perlindungan korban. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan studi hukum normatif dengan menganalisis aturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta kajian kepustakaan berkaitan dengan perlindungan anak sebagai korban kejahatan seksual. Studi ini membuktikan dan menegaskan bahwa perlindungan anak dalam kasus kejahatan seksual telah dijamin secara yuridis melalui Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak, dan Undang-Undang Hak Asasi Manusia. Namun demikian proses pemenuhan hak-hak anak sebagai korban dalam tindak pidana tersebut belum memiliki aspek keadilan yang memadai bagi anak. Instrumen hukum pidana yang ada hanya berorientasi terhadap pemidanaan dan penjeraan terhadap pelaku kejahatan seksual.

Page 4 of 17 | Total Record : 169

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) Vol 5, No 2 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol 5, No 1 (2023) Vol 4, No 2 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022) Vol 4, No 1 (2022) Vol 3, No 2 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) More Issue