cover
Contact Name
Ja'far Baehaqi
Contact Email
jafarbaehaqi@walisongo.ac.id
Phone
+6285225300659
Journal Mail Official
walrev.journal@walisongo.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sharia Faculty Office Building and Law 2nd Floor Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang Jl. Prof. Hamka Km. 02 Ngaliyan, Semarang 50185. Telp (024) 7601291 Fax (024) 7601291
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev)
ISSN : 27153347     EISSN : 7220400     DOI : 10.21580/walrev
Core Subject : Social,
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) is a scientific journal published in April and October each year by the Law Studies Program at the Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang. This journal has specifications as a medium of publication and communication of legal science ideas derived from theoretical and analytical studies, as well as research results in the field of legal science. The editor hopes that writers, researchers and legal experts will contribute in this journal.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 169 Documents
Over Capasity as an Opportunity fot the Directorate General of Correctors In Optimizing Revitalization Fatkhur Rokhman
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.2.5325

Abstract

Overcapacity is a condition in which a building is overloaded. Lots of riots or problems in prisons are caused by overcapacity. Therefore it is necessary to handle and treat overcapacity in prisons which initially became a problem and a threat that could create a potential opportunity in the development and implementation of correctional revitalization. The method used in the making of this journal uses descriptive qualitative research methods. By using secondary data sources, using literature study data collection techniques, and performing data analysis techniques in the form of collecting data, reducing data, presenting data, and concluding data so that it is easy to understand. In Correctional Revitalization, the condition of overcapacity in prisons can be used as an opportunity by placing inmates who have passed the assessment to be placed in minimum security prisons to be optimized or empowered through self-supporting programs such as training in plantations, fisheries, creative crafts, animal husbandry and agriculture and for personality development such as education.[]Overkapasitas merupakan suatu kondisi dimana di dalam sebuah bangunan mengalami kelebihan muatan. Banyak sekali kejadian kerusuhan atau masalah di dalam Lapas di sebabkan karena overkapasitas. Oleh karena itu perlu adanya penanganan dan pengolahan overkapasitas dalam Lapas yang awalnya menjadi masalah dan ancaman bisa menjadikan peluang yang potensial dalam pembinaan dan pelaksanaan revitalisasi pemasyarakatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam pembuatan Jurnal ini, menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder, menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka, dan melakukan teknik analisis data berupa mengumpulkan data, mereduksi data, menyajikan data, dan menyimpulkan data sehingga mudah dipahami. Dalam Revitalisasi Pemasyarakatan, kondisi overkapasitas dalam Lapas bisa dimanfaatkan menjadi sebuah peluang dengan menempatkan narapidana yang telah lulus assessment untuk di tempatkan ke dalam Lapas minimum Security untuk kemudian dioptimalkan atau diberdayagunakan melalui program pembinaan kemandirian seperti pelatihan perkebunan, peikanan, kerajinan kreatif, peternakan, dan pertanian dan untuk pembinaan kepribadian seperti pendidikan.
Legal Protection for Disability Workers in Semarang: Case Study at PT. Samwon Busana Indonesia Retno Indarti; Novita Dewi Masyithoh; Tri Nurhayati
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5555

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure legal protection and employment opportunities for persons with disabilities who work in various companies in the city of Semarang, Central Java. As is known, the right to work for citizens is regulated in Article 27 Paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution, which mandates the right of citizens to get a decent job and life. Every citizen has the same rights and the state (government) has regulated these rights in terms of obtaining employment without exception, including persons with disabilities. This study uses a juridical-empirical (non-doctrinal) approach, which examines how employment opportunities and legal protection of persons with disabilities in the city of Semarang, especially in PT. Samwon Clothing Indonesia. Primary data sources were obtained from PT. Samwon Busana Indonesia through interviews, secondary data in the form of legal material. Data Collection Method with Interview and Documentation methods, Data Analysis is done by a descriptive method. The results showed that employment opportunities for workers with disabilities in the city of Semarang, especially in PT Samwon Busana Indonesia had fulfilled one percent of the total employees. The total disability workers at the company are 14 out of a total of 1317 employees. In terms of legal protection, all employees both with disabilities and do not get the same rights and opportunities to be treated fairly. In addition, fulfillment of the rights of workers with disabilities is also fulfilled without discrimination.
Incoming Extradition in Indonesia and Its Implication to Human Rights Efendi Lod Simanjuntak
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2019.1.2.5213

Abstract

Law enforcement to transnational fugitives especially those perpetrators of money laundering with international dimension in Indonesia, in particular related to incoming extradition is needed to reconstruct. This is because hitherto, the decision to extradite is the decision of the executive branch as stipulated in Act No.1 of 1979 on Extradition. Hence, the consideration for the government to extradite is more on political concern rather than judicial. This practice is deemed neglecting the protection of human rights and creating legal uncertainty, especially in relation to detention period that could exceed beyond admissible time as stipulated in KUHAP because of the grace period on the issuance of the Presidential Decision. This research is doctrinal and field study. Based on findings in the field, incoming extradition request must be based on the court’s decision, or judicial order in the future to ensure protection of human rights and legal certainty of the person who is subject of the extradition and to the requested country. Penegakan hukum terhadap buronan transnasional, terutama para pelaku pencucian uang di Indonesia, perlu sebuah rekontruksi khususnya terkait dengan ekstradisi. Ini karena sampai sekarang, keputusan untuk mengekstradisi adalah keputusan cabang eksekutif sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.1 tahun 1979 tentang Ekstradisi. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangan bagi pemerintah untuk mengekstradisi lebih pada masalah politik daripada peradilan. Praktik ini dianggap mengabaikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama dalam kaitannya dengan masa penahanan yang dapat melebihi melampaui waktu yang dapat diterima sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHAP karena masa tenggang pada penerbitan Keputusan Presiden. Penelitian ini bersifat doktrinal dan studi lapangan. Berdasarkan temuan di lapangan, permintaan ekstradisi yang masuk harus didasarkan pada keputusan pengadilan, atau perintah pengadilan di masa depan untuk memastikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia dan kepastian hukum dari orang yang menjadi sasaran ekstradisi dan ke negara yang diminta.
The Unclear Status of The Suspect in the Investigation Stage: Case Study of The Extension of The Cooperation Agreement on The Management and Operation of The Jakarta International Container Terminal Reni Okpirianti; Topo Santoso; Nasriana Nasriana
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 4, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.10953

Abstract

Unclear status of the suspect in the investigation stage for the suspect even though it is not yet legally available that he is found guilty: What is the cause of the unclear status of the suspect at the investigation stage (case study of extension of the Cooperation Agreement for the Management and Operation of the Jakarta International (JICT) Terminal? or what are the legal consequence and what actions must be taken for the pending case at the investigation stage (adjudication) the purpose of the study is to find out the cause of the unclear status of the suspect at investigation stage and to find out and clary the legal consequences and actions to be taken on cases that are hanging at investigation stage (adjudication) by someone who has unclear suspect status on himself. The legal research methodology is a dogmatic study or doctrinal research. The cause of the unclear status of the suspect in the extension of the JICT Operation and Management Cooperation Agreement, the value of state losses as a result of the investigation reported by BPK, 1b. Remain in doubt. The Attorney General does not believe that there is a state loss in the JICT, Management Contract Extension All Procedure according to the rules have been carried out by suspect. The legal consequences for unclear status of the suspect are very detrimental to the suspect and injure the basic right of citizens to legal certainty and justice, 3b. The abuse of authority of the apparatus results in human right violations.3c. The legal action to be taken by the suspect is. Protection may be requested through a pre-trial which guarantees the rights of the suspect in accordance with his dignity as a human being. The termination of the investigation of the suspect may refer to the provisions of article 76 of the regulation of the National Police Chief No. 14 of 2012 concerning the management of criminal cases. Ketidakjelasan status tersangka dalam tahap penyidikan (pra ajudikasi), membawa konsekuensi hukum tersendiri bagi tersangka walaupun secara yuridis belum ada kepastian dinyatakan bersalah: Apakah penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka pada tahap penyidikan (studi kasus Perpanjangan Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan dan Pengoperasian Jakarta International Center Terminal (JICT)? atau Apakah akibat hukum dan tindakan apa yang harus dilakukan atas  perkara yang menggantung di tahap penyidikan (ajudikasi).Tujuan penelitian adalah, untuk mengetahui penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka dan untuk mengetahui dan memperjelas akibat hukum dan tindakan yang harus dilakukan atas perkara yang menggantung di tahap penyidikan (ajudikasi). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan studi dogmatik atau doctrinal research. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyebab ketidakjelasan status tersangka pada kasus Perpanjangan Perjanjian Kerjasama Pengelolaan dan Pengoperasian JICT, masih diragukan nilai kerugian negara hasil investigatif yang dilaporkan oleh BPK. Jaksa Agung tidak meyakini adanya kerugian negara dalam perpanjangan kontrak pengelolaan JICT. Semua prosedur sesuai aturan telah dilakukan oleh tersangka. Akibat hukum atas ketidakjelasan status tersangka sangat merugikan tersangka dan mencederai hak dasar warga negara untuk kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Atas penyalahgunaan wewenang aparat tersebut, berakibat pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM). Tindakan hukum yang harus dilakukan oleh tersangka adalah dapat dimintakan perlindungan melalui pranata pra peradilan yang akan menjamin hak-hak tersangka sesuai dengan harkat dan martabatnya sebagai manusia atas penghentian penyidikan, tersangka dapat mengacu pada aturan Ketentuan Pasal 76 Peraturan Kapolri No. 14 Tahun 2012 tentang Manajemen Perkara Pidana.
Legal Protection of Wages and Welfare of Journalists in the City of Semarang Munif Ibnu Fatchu Syarif
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.9035

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection of wages and welfare of journalists in the City of Semarang. The purpose of the study was to determine the implementation of wages and welfare of journalists as well as legal protection of wages and welfare of journalists in the city of Semarang. Journalists are included in the labor category, so for their services, they are entitled to receive wages. One of the problems that occur among journalists is the weak legal protection of wages and welfare when discussing employment issues in Indonesia. Wage protection is an important aspect of the workforce. Wage protection is the goal of workers/ laborers carrying out work to earn sufficient income to finance their lives, namely a decent living for humanity. As long as the worker/laborer does his job, he is entitled to remuneration which guarantees his life together with his family. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of wages and welfare of journalists is not following Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and Government Regulation Number 78 of 2015 concerning Wages. The wage system is the main problem. Journalists' work is not understood as a work process that ends with earning a wage; there is no firmness in the provision of working hours, benefits, and health insurance. The absence of these problems makes journalists not a few who violate the code of ethics. Not a few companies set a wage policy considering the company's ability, Semarang media wage standards, and skills possessed. Aspects of legal protection related to wages and welfare are weak. This is because of the difference between the working conception of journalists and the working conception of workers/laborers as referred to in the Manpower Act and Government Regulations concerning Wages. Ideally, it is necessary to create a legal umbrella for the implementation of maximum legal protection for economic, social, and technical aspects based on the work characteristics of permanent journalists so that they will be able to optimize work to achieve the maximum role of the press. Penelitian ini menganalisis perlindungan hukum pengupahan dan kesejahteraan wartawan di Kota Semarang. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui implementasi pengupahan dan kesejahteraan wartawan serta perlindungan hukum pengupahan dan kesejahteraan wartawan di Kota Semarang. Wartawan masuk dalam kategori tenaga kerja, sehingga atas jasanya berhak menerima upah. Salah satu masalah yang terjadi di kalangan wartawan adalah lemahnya perlindungan hukum pengupahan dan kesejahteraan, jika mengulas tentang masalah ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Perlindungan upah merupakan aspek penting bagi tenaga kerja. Perlindungan pengupahan merupakan tujuan dari pekerja/buruh melaksanakan pekerjaan untuk mendapatkan penghasilan cukup untuk membiayai kehidupannya, yaitu penghidupan yang layak bagi kemanusiaan. Selama pekerja/buruh melakukan pekerjaannya, ia berhak atas pengupahan yang menjamin kehidupannya bersama dengan keluarganya.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan pengupahan dan kesejahteraan wartawan belum sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 78 Tahun 2015 tentang Pengupahan. Sistem pengupahan adalah masalah utamanya. Kerja wartawan tidak dipahami sebagai proses kerja yang berakhir dengan perolehan upah; tidak ada ketegasan pemberian jam kerja, tunjangan dan jaminan kesehatan. Tiadanya masalah itu membuat wartawan tidak sedikit yang melanggar kode etik. Tidak sedikit perusahaan menetapkan kebijakan upah melihat kemampuan perusahaan, standar upah media Semarang dan keterampilan yang dimiliki. Aspek perlindungan hukum yang berhubungan dengan pengupahan dan kesejahteraan lemah. Hal ini karena perbedaan konsepsi kerja wartawan dengan konsepsi kerja pekerja/buruh sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan maupun Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Pengupahan. Idealnya perlu dibuatkan payung hukum demi terlaksanakannya perlindungan hukum yang maksimal terhadap aspek ekonomi, sosial dan teknis yang didasarkan pada karakteristik kerja wartawan tetap sehingga akan dapat mengoptimalkan kerja demi tercapainya peranan pers yang maksimal.
The Concept of Death Penalty in a Pancasila State (Perspective of Official Religion in Indonesia) Maria Anna Muryani; Noor Rosyida
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.2.6588

Abstract

The death penalty concept  in perspective the official religion in Indonesia is an issue that is worthy of study in line wiht the execution of drug convicts lately. MUI fatwa No.10/Munas VII/MUI/ 14/2005 on the death penalty in a Specific Crime allow the penalty in certain types of criminal  acts. In a latter sent to his congregation, paul chapter 13 yat 1-4 mention about the goverment’s authority to impose penalties for offenders. St. Agustine and Thomas Aquinas assume that the state, in order to achieve common prosperity, can performthe death penalty. St. Agustine assess the death penalty as a way to prevent crime and protect those who are innocent. Buton the other hand the human right activists who joined in contrast, Impartial and Elsam reject the death penalty and the Roman catholic Church and Christians argue that the death penalty should not be carried out because it violates basic human right, namely the righ to life. Therefore, research is the theme of the death penalty in the perspective of the official state religions in the frame Pancasila want to investigate this further on the death penalty in the perspective of religion are officially recognized by the state as defined in the following issues; How does the concept of the death penalty in perspective official religions in Indonesia are contained in their holy book? And How the concept of the death penalty to be reviewed from the perspective of the state ideology Pancasila? This research is a normative juridical or doctrinal research. This study uses several approaches that approach to the concept (conceptual approach), approach to the comparative (comparative approach) and approach to legislation (statute approach). This study was a descriptive analytical method of data collection in the form of a data library (library research) and interviews.[]Konsep hukuman mati dalam perspektif agama resmi di Indonesia merupakan sebuah isu yang patut dikaji sejalan dengan pelaksanaan eksekusi mati narapidana narkoba. Fatwa MUI No.10/Munas VII/MUI/14/2005 tentang pidana mati dalam Tindak Pidana Tertentu memungkinkan adanya pidana dalam jenis tindak pidana tertentu. Dalam surat terakhir yang dikirim ke jemaahnya, pasal 13 ayat 1-4 menyebutkan tentang kewenangan pemerintah untuk menjatuhkan sanksi bagi pelanggar. St Agustine dan Thomas Aquinas beranggapan bahwa negara, untuk mencapai kesejahteraan bersama, dapat melaksanakan hukuman mati. St Agustine menilai hukuman mati sebagai cara untuk mencegah kejahatan dan melindungi mereka yang tidak bersalah. Namun di sisi lain para aktivis HAM yang bergabung sebaliknya, Imparsial dan Elsam menolak hukuman mati dan Gereja Katolik Roma dan Kristen berpendapat bahwa hukuman mati tidak boleh dilakukan karena melanggar hak asasi manusia, yaitu hak untuk hidup. Oleh karena itu, penelitian yang mengangkat tema pidana mati dalam perspektif agama resmi negara dalam bingkai Pancasila ingin diteliti lebih jauh mengenai hukuman mati dalam perspektif agama yang diakui secara resmi oleh negara sebagaimana dirumuskan dalam isu-isu berikut; Bagaimana konsep hukuman mati dalam perspektif agama-agama resmi di Indonesia yang dimuat dalam kitab sucinya? Dan Bagaimana konsep hukuman mati ditinjau dari perspektif ideologi negara Pancasila? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif atau penelitian doktrinal. Penelitian ini menggunakan beberapa pendekatan yaitu pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Penelitian ini merupakan metode pengumpulan data deskriptif analitik berupa pustaka data (studi pustaka) dan wawancara.
Philosophical Study of Hans Kelsen's Thoughts on Law and Satjipto Rahardjo's Ideas on Progressive Law Muhammad Harun
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 1, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2019.1.2.4815

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare and evaluate the thoughts of Hans Kelsen with Satjipto Raharjo. Both offer their respective theories, namely Hans Kelsen's pure legal theory and Satjipto Rahardjo's progressive law. In this theory, both of them base their philosophical approach. After reviewing, the theories of these two figures are relevant for interpreting the law. This paper uses a critical paradigm with a combination of normative or doctrinal and sociological or non-doctrinal approaches. The results showed that Hans Kelsen directed his mind that legal positivism considers moral speech, values are finished and final when it comes to the formation of positive law. Pure Legal Theory is not a perfect copy of transcendental ideas, but it does not try to see the law as a posterity of justice. While Rahardjo's progressive law rests on the aspects of rules and behavior. Regulations will build a positive and rational legal system. While the behavioral or human aspects will drive the rules and systems that are built. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk membandingkan dan mengevaluasi pemikiran Hans Kelsen dengan Satjipto Raharjo. Keduanya menawarkan teori masing-masing, yaitu teori hukum murni Hans Kelsen dan hukum progresif Satjipto Rahardjo. Dalam teori ini, keduanya sama-sama mendasarkan pendekatan secara filosif. Setelah dikaji, teori dari kedua tokoh ini relevan untuk memaknai hukum. Tulisan ini menggunakan paradigima kritis dengan pendekatan kombinasi normatif atau doktrinal dan sosiologis atau non doktrinal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hans Kelsen lebih mengarahkan pikirannya bahwa positivisme hukum yang menganggap pembicaraan moral, nilai-nilai telah selesai dan final manakala sampai pada pembentukan hukum positif. Teori Hukum Murni bukanlah salinan ide transendental yang sempurna, namun tidak berusaha memandang hukum sebagai anak cucu keadilan. Sementara hukum progresifnya Rahardjo bertumpu pada aspek peraturan dan perilaku (rules and behavior). Peraturan akan membangun suatu sistem hukum positif yang logis dan rasional. Sedangkan aspek perilaku atau manusia akan menggerakkan peraturan dan sistem yang dibangun. 
Time for Punishment with Subjectivity: Study Philosophy of Law Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 1, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2019.1.1.4754

Abstract

The dominance of legal positivism in thought and law enforcement is a reality. Saintism of legal science presents a law that is conceptualized as something that exists in sensory terms, along with its straightforward, rational, and objective nature. Law is always requested objectively. Objectivity is done by freeing the subject's mind to the legal reality that already exists as an object. Therefore, various legal cases such as the case of Asyani, Rasminah, Minah and others, are things that are easily proven as violating the law because it is a violation of the text of the article of law. Such a way of law, is now starting to become a public concern. So, when objectivity begins to be questioned, that's when the real subjectivity of asking begins to be considered - and this will be explained [only] in the study of legal philosophy, especially paradigmatic studies. This paper will discuss the possibility of subjectivity in law, which will be presented in the paradigmatic study.
Joint Property Distribution upon Divorce Reviewed From the Contribution of Husband and Wife in the Household Eka Ristianawati
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 3, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.8078

Abstract

Joint property distribution has been regulated in the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI), namely, Article 97 which explains that a widow or widower is entitled to half of the joint property. The distribution is fair if the husband and wife make the same contribution in the marriage. However, in fact, today we often find that wives are being the backbone of the family while husbands do not earn a living or husbands earn a living for the family, but wives do not take care of the household. If such a situation is found, is the article 97 of KHI still relevant? This paper presents a concept of joint property distribution based on the contribution of husband and wife in marriage which is considered fairer for both of them than what has been stipulated in the KHI and the Civil Code Articles 128-129. The type of research used is descriptive research. This means that research is discussed in the form of an explanation described in words carefully and thoroughly. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that to obtain the justice, judges can act contra legem (against the law) where justice should give a share to everyone based on his services or contributions (Aristotle). The joint property distribution in marriage from a justice perspective is the distribution of joint property by assessing the amount of contribution of the parties. A fair share does not have to be 50% for widowers and 50% for widows. The husband can get a smaller share from the wife if the contribution is less during the marriage and does not carry out his obligation as the breadwinner and the wife can get a larger share from the husband if the wife plays a dual role, and vice versa.Pembagian harta bersama telah diatur dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam yakni pada pasal 97 dijelaskan bahwa janda atau duda berhak separuh dari harta bersama. Pembagian tersebut adil apabila suami dan istri memberikan kontribusi yang sama dalam perkawinan. Akan tetapi pada faktanya saat ini sering kita temui istri menjadi tulang punggung keluarga sedangkan suami tidak mencari nafkah atau suami mencari nafkah untuk keluarga akan tetapi istri tidak mengurus rumah tangga. Jika ditemukan keadaan seperti itu apakah masih relevan KHI pasal 97 tersebut. Tulisan ini menyajikan sebuah konsep pembagian harta bersama berdasarkan kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan yang dinilai lebih adil untuk keduanya daripada apa yang sudah diatur dalam KHI dan KUHPerdata Pasal 128-129. Hasil dari penelitian ini dijelaskan bahwa untuk mendapatkan sebuah keadilan hakim dapat bertindak contra legem (mengenyampingkan undang-undang) dimana keadilan itu seharusnya memberikan bagian kepada setiap orang didasarkan atas jasa-jasanya atau kontribusinya (aristoteles). Pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan jika dilihat dari perspektif keadilan adalah pembagian harta bersama dengan menilai besaran konstribusi para pihak. Dimana pembagian yang adil tidak harus 50 % untuk duda dan 50% untuk janda. suami bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih kecil dari istri apabila kontribusinya kurang selama perkawinan dan tidak menjalankan kewaibannya sebagai pencari nafkah dan istri bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih besar dari suami jika istri berperan ganda, begitu uga sebaliknya. 
Analysis of the Causes of Narcotics Recidivities in Class IIa Prisons in Bogor Yudha Nugraha Septiawan
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 2, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5321

Abstract

The risk can cause harm to someone, including people who have used narcotics. Drug abuse is a concern for many people today. Misuse of narcotics is a deviation of behavior or deeds that violate the law, and it is unfortunate if prisoners who are free to repeat the narcotics crime again. The problem that became the reference in this research is whether the factors that cause the repetition of narcotics crime, how the risk of repetition of narcotics crime, and how to overcome the narcotics crime repetition. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors, risks, and efforts in overcoming repetition of narcotics crime. This research was conducted using a qualitative approach by collecting data using interview, observation, and documentation methods. Data analysis is described in the form of sentence descriptions and analyzed qualitatively, then a conclusion is drawn. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded: (1) Factors that influence the repetition of narcotics crime are internal factors and external factors. (2) The risk of repetition of narcotics crime is carried out in the level of risk classification. (3) Efforts to overcome the repetition of narcotics crime shall be carried out in a preventive and repressive manner. The advice given is maximizing rehabilitation activities carried out in Corrections Institutions and maximizing coaching programs in Corrections Institutions

Page 6 of 17 | Total Record : 169