cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M Fauzi
Contact Email
fauzi.sh@gmail.com
Phone
+6281350004080
Journal Mail Official
risalahhukum@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Sambaliung, Gunung Kelua, Samarinda
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Risalah Hukum
Published by Universitas Mulawarman
ISSN : 0216969X     EISSN : 27233766     DOI : https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Risalah Hukum merupakan terbitan ilmiah berkala bidang ilmu hukum. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman sebagai media publikasi pemikiran, gagasan maupun hasil penelitian dalam berbagai bidang hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 222 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
Problematika Mediasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pertanahan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Badung Dewi, Dian; Nur Rahmanto; Dwi Wulan Titik Andari
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 2, Desember 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v21.i2.1918

Abstract

Mediation is a method for settling land disputes through negotiations mediated by a mediator. Its implementation, facilitated by the Land Office or the National Land Agency, is regulated in Article 43 paragraph 1 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020 concerning the Handling and Settlement of Land Cases. However, in practice, the Land Office of Badung Regency has consistently failed to This study examines the implementation of mediation over the past five years, from 2019 to 2024. It seeks to analyze the factors contributing to mediation failure and to identify strategies for strengthening the role of mediation in effectively resolving land disputes at the Land Office of Badung Regency. Employing empirical legal research, the study investigates how the law is applied in practice by exploring both internal and external factors that hinder successful mediation and proposing measures to improve its effectiveness. The findings indicate that mediation failures are caused by the absence of parties, lack of good faith, disagreements over proposed solutions, traditional beliefs conflicting with the law, and mediator-related internal factors. To enhance the effectiveness of mediation, strategic actions are needed, including raising public awareness of mediation benefits and procedures through consistent and intensive socialization, involving traditional and religious leaders, enhancing mediator competencies through thorough training, improving coordination among relevant institutions, and implementing regular monitoring and evaluation of the mediation process.
Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang: Perlindungan Pihak Ketiga Beritikad Baik dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia Harefa, Beniharmoni; Supardi
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 2, Desember 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v21.i2.2008

Abstract

Asset forfeiture in money laundering serves as a key tool to disrupt the economic benefits of crime and restore state losses, yet its implementation faces challenges in protecting bona fide third parties. The lack of clear and consistent standards for assessing good faith leads judges to decide case by case, creating legal uncertainty and potential injustice. Normative gaps, including disharmony regarding non-conviction-based forfeiture, exacerbate these ambiguities. This study employs a normative juridical method combining statute, case, and conceptual approaches. The statute approach examines the TPPU Law and the Corruption Eradication Law on asset forfeiture and third-party protection; the case approach analyzes judicial practice, including Decision No. 362/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Sel, to assess judges’ interpretation of good faith; the conceptual approach reviews doctrines, principles, and theories on asset forfeiture, property rights, and third-party protection. Findings show that judicial standards remain inconsistent, leaving third-party protection case-specific and legally uncertain. The study highlights the gap between normative frameworks and practice and underscores the urgent need for clearer, proportional standards for proving good faith in the anti-money laundering regime.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 222

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2005 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 21 No 2 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 2, Desember 2025 Vol 21 No 1 (2025): Volume 21, Nomor 1, Juni 2025 Vol 20 No 2 (2024): Volume 20, Nomor 2, Desember 2024 Vol 20 No 1 (2024): Volume 20, Nomor 1, Juni 2024 Vol 19 No 2 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 2, Desember 2023 Vol 19 No 1 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 1, Juni 2023 Vol 18 No 2 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 2, Desember 2022 Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022 Volume 17, Nomor 2, Desember 2021 Volume 17, Nomor 1, Juni 2021 Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020 Volume 16, Nomor 1, Juni 2020 Volume 15, Nomor 2, Desember 2019 Volume 15, Nomor 1, Juni 2019 Volume 10, Nomor 1, Juni 2014 Volume 8, Nomor 2, Desember 2012 Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2012 Volume 7, Nomor 2, Desember 2011 Volume 7, Nomor 1, Juni 2011 Volume 6, Nomor 2, Desember 2010 Volume 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2010 Volume 5, Nomor 2, Desember 2009 Volume 5, Nomor 1, Juni 2009 Volume 4, Nomor 2, Desember 2008 Volume 4, Nomor 1, Juni 2008 Volume 3, Nomor 1, Juni 2007 Volume 2, Nomor 2, Desember 2006 Volume 2, Nomor 1, Juni 2006 Volume 1, Nomor 2, Desember 2005 Volume 1, Nomor 1, Juni 2005 More Issue