cover
Contact Name
Fatardho Zudri
Contact Email
fatardho@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.agronomi@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Meranti, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
ISSN : 20852916     EISSN : 23373652     DOI : -
Aims and Scope Aims Indonesian of Journal Agronomy (Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia), the official journal of the Indonesian Society for Agronomy, publishes primary research paper, review article, policy analysis and research notes and preliminary results in all areas of agronomy. Manuscripts could be written either in English or in Indonesia. Scope Indonesian of Journal Agronomy (Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia) covers agronomy in broad sense including plant production, genetic and plant breeding, plant physiology, plant ecology, plant biotechnology, modeling, seed science and technology and weeds science on food, horticulture, plantation, and forage crops.
Articles 977 Documents
Shallot distribution model under hydroclimatic extremes and soil physical properties in Sleman, Yogyakarta Umi Munawaroh; Muhamad Khoiru Zaki; Susilowati; Muhammad Rahman Yulianto
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 53 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v53i3.69500

Abstract

Global climate change significantly affects the agriculture sector, including reducing crop productivity and potential distribution through the frequency of hydrometeorological disasters. Despite its economic importance, limited research has explored the effects of such hydroclimatic extremes on shallot (Allium cepa var. aggregatum) cultivation. This study aims to identify the soil-climate conditions, extreme events, variable contributions, and potential distribution areas of shallot in Sleman regency. The MaxEnt model was used herein to predict the suitable distribution area of shallot under hydroclimatic extremes and soil physical properties. The results show that shallot potential distribution in Sleman regency is governed by the synergistic action of climatic extremes and soil physical structure based on MaxEnt analysis. The dominance of Consecutive Dry Days (CDD) and soil moisture underscores the necessity of maintaining a stable soil–water equilibrium under intensifying hydroclimatic variability. These insights support the use of high-resolution soil and climate mapping to inform adaptive irrigation scheduling, precision tillage, and organic amendment strategies. Keywords: Climate change; extreme events, maximum entropy, soil properties, species distributions
Photosynthetic activities of oil palm and its understory cover crops under shade Jumena Adijaya; Herdhata Agusta; Sudrajat Sudrajat; Supiandi Sabiham; Triadiati Triadiati
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.67921

Abstract

Photosynthesis is a key part of how oil palm ecosystems store carbon. The net CO₂ assimilation rate is greatly affected by the concentration of CO₂ between cells (Ci). Nonetheless, data on the assimilation–intercellular CO₂ (A/Ci) response of oil palm and understory vegetation in shaded mineral soil conditions remain inadequate. This study aimed to assess the A/Ci response characteristics and essential photosynthetic variables of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) and two understory cover crops, Asystasia gangetica and Nephrolepis biserrata, cultivated beneath mature oil palm canopies. The study was conducted at the Cikabayan Teaching Farm, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia. A portable photosynthesis system was used to measure gas exchange variables at different times of the day. These included net CO₂ assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci). The results indicated clear physiological differences in the responses of canopy and understory vegetation. The Ci values of oil palm remained fairly stable throughout the observation period. On the other hand, understory species showed greater changes, requiring more Ci in the morning and less in the afternoon. Nephrolepis biserrata exhibited higher net assimilation than A. gangetica, indicating greater photosynthetic efficacy in shaded environments. These findings underscore the divergent photosynthetic regulation between canopy and understory vegetation, underscoring the significance of understory plants in facilitating carbon assimilation dynamics in shaded oil palm ecosystems. Keywords: absorption of CO2; Asystasia gangetica; Nephrolepis biserrata; stomatal conductances
Application time of Wedelia trilobata leaf extract as a bioherbicide for controlling dominant weeds in soybeans Faisal Abdillah; Dyah Weny Respatie; Aziz Purwantoro
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.70636

Abstract

Wedelia leaf extract at a 40% concentration has been reported as an effective bioherbicide for inhibiting the growth of Cyperus rotundus, a dominant weed in soybean cultivation; however, information regarding the most effective application timing remains unavailable. Consequently, this study aimed to determine the optimal application time of Wedelia (Wedelia trilobata L.) leaf extract as a bioherbicide to control dominant weeds, specifically broadleaf weed (Tridax procumbens L.) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.), in soybean crops. The research employed a split-plot design, where the main plots consisted of the plant species (Tridax procumbens, Cyperus rotundus, and soybean), while the subplots consists of three application timings: 7 days before planting (D-7), at the time of planting (D0), and 7 days after planting (D+7), which were then compared against a C0- (negative control=without treatment) and a C0+ (positive control=using the chemical herbicide Pendimethalin (application within 7 days before planting) with dose 3 L ha-1). The results indicated that 7 days before planting (D-7) was the most effective time for applying the 40% Wedelia leaf extract in inhibiting the growth of Tridax procumbens and Cyperus rotundus in soybean cultivation. Keywords: Cyperus rotundus; timing application; Tridax procumbens; weed control
Pluchea indica metabolites production under chicken manure application in the rainy season Haya Azharul Jinan; Sandra Arifin Aziz; Maya Melati; Youngkwan Cho; Yulia Rahmah
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.71092

Abstract

Indian camphorweed (Pluchea indica), an indigenous vegetable, has promising potential as a cosmetic raw material because of its bioactive compounds. Research on cultivation techniques is relatively underexplored in agronomic research, particularly in fertilization practices for P. indica in the rainy season, a period that is critical for tropical agriculture. This study aimed to determine the optimal chicken manure dosage for the growth and yield of four-month-old Indian camphorweed during the rainy season. The experiment was conducted at IPB University, Indonesia, from November 2023 to February 2024. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was applied, consisting of four chicken manure dosages: 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 kg per plant, with three replications. Results showed that chicken manure application was found to enhance vegetative growth, branching, leaf yield, and leaf N and K status, indicating its suitability as an organic nutrient source under high-rainfall conditions. Regression analysis indicated the optimal dosage of chicken manure was 7.00 kg per plant for fresh weight yield at 27 weeks after planting (WAP). Chicken manure application changes the phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, that suggest the trade-offs between yield improvement and certain aspects of functional quality. Keywords: Indian camphorweed; optimum dosage; organic fertilizer
Effect of watering on incidence of self-pruning in lime (Citrus × aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle) Elda Kristiani Paisey; Edi Santosa; Ani Kurniawati; Supijatno Supijatno; Marlin Sefrila; Besse Amriati; Anjeli Sulistianti Paisey; Hayu Siwi Pribadi; Darius Dare; Nurlailah Nurlailah; Zarima Wibawati
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.68942

Abstract

The process of self-pruning represents a form of self-destruction among shaded or diseased branches, which has the potential to deplete the resources of the tree. This phenomenon is also observed in natural ecosystems. The self-pruning mechanism can be exploited to reduce the cost of pruning in cultivated plants, such as lime trees. The objective of this study was to ascertain the mechanisms that occur during self-pruning in response to drought and flooding induction. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Each replication contained three plants, giving a total of 45 plants. Samples were taken from three plants per treatment. The treatments comprised irrigation at field capacity, irrigation every day, irrigation every three days, irrigation every five days, and irrigation every seven days, and the data were analyzed using the Duncan Multiple Range Test at the 95% level. The secondary, tertiary, and quaternary branches that experienced self-pruning due to drought and flooding treatments had average lengths ranging from 3.06 to 9.53 cm and diameters between 0.50 and 1.84 mm. The physiological responses, including the photosynthetic rate, showed that both drought and inundation treatments led to a decrease in stomatal conductance and transpiration. Furthermore, the concentrations of ethylene, abscisic acid, and proline increased markedly after seven months of treatment-induced self-pruning. Keywords: abscisic acid; ethylene; proline
Combined application of broiler chicken manure and PGPR on growth, yield, and amylopectin content of waxy corn “Kumala F1” Abdul Latif; Maya Melati; Dhika Prita Hapsari
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.69924

Abstract

Glutinous corn or waxy corn is often used as a raw material for flour, while sweet glutinous corn is preferred when fresh harvest. Broiler manure is one of the organic fertilizers that can be used in the organic cultivation of sweet glutinous corn, and it needs to be optimized. The addition of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can be used to stimulate plant growth and increase fertilization efficiency. The experiment was conducted from March to August 2025 at IPB Experimental Field in Cikarawang B, Dramaga, Bogor. The experiment used s a randomized complete block design with doses of broiler manure and PGPR as treatment factors with 3 replications. The manure doses were 0, 10, 20, and 30 t ha-1, while 2 levels of PGPR were with and without PGPR. The concentration of PGPR was 20 g L-1 and was applied by soaking the seeds for about 30 minutes. The results showed that the average leaf numbers did not differ significantly at 8 weeks after planting. The highest leaf area index was recorded without PGPR application, while PGPR application increased root length. Amylopectin content showed a significant response at the lowest manure dose of 0 t ha-1. Keywords: amylopectin; C:N ratio; nutrient immobilization; sweet waxy corn.
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and ash applications enhance tomato yield in Ultisol Mahmudi Mahmudi; Ongki Aleksa Samson; Sherly Oktarianti
Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy)
Publisher : Indonesia Society of Agronomy (PERAGI) and Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24831/jai.v54i1.70805

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and cattle manure ash applied to Ultisol can enhance soil fertility and tomato productivity. The study aimed to analyze the effects of PGPR and cattle manure ash on the growth and yield of tomato in Ultisol. The experiment was conducted in Kubu Raya Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, from March to July 2025, using a factorial completely randomized design with PGPR application (with and without PGPR) and cattle manure ash (dolomite as control, 5, 10, 15, and 20 ton ha-1). A total of 10 treatment combinations were evaluated, with 3 replications. The PGPR significantly improved physiological performance, growth, and yield of tomato in Ultisol. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake increased by 0.65 g per plant and 0.23 g per plant, respectively, along with higher relative growth rates. The combination of PGPR and 5 ton ha-1 cattle manure ash enhanced plant height and shoot dry weight to levels similar to dolomite, while optimal root dry weight occurred at 10 ton ha-1 ash. Fruit number increased at 15 ton ha-1 ash, comparable to dolomite, although fruit weight per plant remained slightly lower. The results indicate that cattle manure ash can partially replace dolomite in tomato cultivation, can increase vegetative growth at 5 ton ha-1 and certain yield components at higher rates of 10 ton ha-1. Keywords: microorganisms; nutrient uptake; plant physiology; soil fertility; tomato productivity

Filter by Year

1994 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 54 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 53 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 53 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 53 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 52 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 52 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 52 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 51 No. 3 (2023): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 51 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 51 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Vol. 50 No. 3 (2022): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 50 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 50 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 49 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 49 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 49 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 48 No. 3 (2020): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 48 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 48 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 47 No. 3 (2019): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 47 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 47 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 46 No. 3 (2018): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 46 No. 2 (2018): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 46 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 45 No. 3 (2017): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 45 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 45 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 44 No. 3 (2016): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 44 No. 2 (2016): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 44 No. 1 (2016): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 43 No. 3 (2015): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 43 No. 2 (2015): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 43 No. 1 (2015): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 42 No. 3 (2014): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 42 No. 2 (2014): Jurnal agronomi indonesia Vol. 42 No. 1 (2014): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 41 No. 3 (2013): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 41 No. 2 (2013): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 41 No. 1 (2013): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 40 No. 3 (2012): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 40 No. 2 (2012): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 40 No. 1 (2012): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 39 No. 3 (2011): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 39 No. 2 (2011): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 39 No. 1 (2011): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 38 No. 3 (2010): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 38 No. 2 (2010): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 38 No. 1 (2010): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 37 No. 3 (2009): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 37 No. 2 (2009): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 37 No. 1 (2009): Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia Vol. 36 No. 3 (2008): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 36 No. 2 (2008): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 36 No. 1 (2008): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 35 No. 3 (2007): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 35 No. 2 (2007): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 35 No. 1 (2007): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 34 No. 3 (2006): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 34 No. 2 (2006): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 34 No. 1 (2006): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 33 No. 3 (2005): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 33 No. 2 (2005): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 33 No. 1 (2005): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 32 No. 3 (2004): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 32 No. 2 (2004): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 32 No. 1 (2004): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 31 No. 3 (2003): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 31 No. 2 (2003): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 31 No. 1 (2003): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 30 No. 3 (2002): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 30 No. 2 (2002): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 30 No. 1 (2002): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 29 No. 3 (2001): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 29 No. 2 (2001): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 29 No. 1 (2001): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 28 No. 3 (2000): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 28 No. 2 (2000): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 28 No. 1 (2000): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 27 No. 3 (1999): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 27 No. 2 (1999): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 27 No. 1 (1999): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 26 No. 3 (1998): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 26 No. 2 (1998): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 26 No. 1 (1998): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 25 No. 3 (1997): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 25 No. 2 (1997): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 25 No. 1 (1997): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 24 No. 1 (1996): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 23 No. 3 (1995): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 23 No. 2 (1995): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 23 No. 1 (1995): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 22 No. 2 (1994): Buletin Agronomi Vol. 22 No. 1 (1994): Buletin Agronomi More Issue