cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto
Contact Email
dodiksetiawan@uii.ac.id
Phone
+6287738216661
Journal Mail Official
plr.editor@uii.ac.id
Editorial Address
Doctorate Program Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia Jalan Cik Dik Tiro No. 1, Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Prophetic Law Review
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 26862379     EISSN : 26863464     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20885
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Prophetic Law Review is a law journal published by the Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia. The primary purpose of this journal is to disseminate research, conceptual analysis, and other writings of scientific nature on legal issues by integrating moral and ethical values. Articles published cover various topics on Islamic law, International law, Constitutional law, Private law, Criminal law, Administrative law, Procedural law, Comparative law, and other law-related issues either in Indonesia or other countries all over the world. This journal is designed to be an international law journal and intended as a forum for a legal scholarship which discusses ideas and insights from law professors, legal scholars, judges, and practitioners.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025" : 3 Documents clear
Constitutional Reinforcement of the Integration of Indonesian and Islamic Values Mahfud MD, Moh.; Heryansyah, Despan
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art2

Abstract

The importance of reaffirming the fundamental values of Indonesian arises from the emergence of issues such as radicalism, terrorism, intolerance, ethnicity, religious, racial, and intergroup-related conflicts, social and economic inequality, poor law enforcement and justice system, and many other social problems. This situation is further exacerbated by additional social, political, legal, and constitutional challenges. In addressing these issues, strengthening the rule of law based on the protection of human rights remains an imperative. However, reinforcing the fundamental values of Indonesian is equally crucial. Indonesian fundamental values are deeply rooted in and derived from the national identity of its people. This article focuses on three research questions. How to put religion and its values in the Indonesian fundamental values? How do Indonesian fundamental values deal with current political and legal turbulence? How does the implementation of Indonesian fundamental value pluralism in the legal system? This article is based on doctrinal research involving secondary data. This study found that Pancasila as the foundation of the state constitutes a modus vivendi or noble consensus, or mîtsâqon ghalîdzâ in a religious sense, so Indonesian Muslims should accept Pancasila as mîtsâqon ghalîdzâ. The strength of the national bond also stems from the commitment to the implementation of a unitary national law that is rooted in Pancasila, which generates hierarchical laws based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. As the state ideology, Pancasila constitutes the primary source of all legal sources. There should be no law conflicting with the precepts of Pancasila.
Reconciling Maṣlaḥah and the Rule of Distinction in the Yemen Conflict AL-Dafrawi, Ahmad Saad Ahmad; Yahya, Muhammad Tahir
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art3

Abstract

The prevailing discourse on armed conflict frequently asserts that the difficulty in safeguarding civilians does not arise from an absence of legal norms. Instead, it reflects the persistent failure of both state and non-state actors to comply with existing regulations, particularly those embedded in International Humanitarian Law (IHL). A closer examination, however, reveals that such non-compliance is often enabled by the strategic exploitation of ambiguities and structural weaknesses within the legal framework itself, regardless of the normative authority or humanitarian values these laws embody. The effectiveness of civilian-protection regimes therefore depends not only on the existence of legal provisions but also on their robust promotion, contextual legitimation, and implementation mechanisms that meaningfully engage and protect the intended beneficiaries. Against this backdrop, the present study conducts an in-depth exploration of the intersection between al-Maṣlaḥah (public interest) and the IHL principle of distinction within the specific context of Yemen’s protracted armed conflict. By adopting a case-study design supported by qualitative analysis of conflict documentation and reports, the research investigates how the synergy between al-Maṣlaḥah and the principle of distinction might inform more responsive and culturally grounded strategies to enhance civilian protection and reduce harm in complex and asymmetrical warfare settings. Drawing on Islamic jurisprudential thought, foundational IHL doctrines, and empirical evidence from Yemen, the study offers nuanced insights into both the structural challenges and latent opportunities for strengthening civilian-protection frameworks. Ultimately, it seeks to contribute to a more integrative and context-sensitive approach to civilian protection in contemporary armed conflicts.
Transforming Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution through E-Court for Simple, Fast, and Affordable Justice Asyiqin, Istianah Zainal; Fitriyanti, Fadia; Susila, M. Endriyo; Akbar, M. Fabian; Wirayudha, Dimas Putra
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2.art1

Abstract

This study critically examines the implementation of the electronic court (e-Court) system in resolving Sharia economic disputes within Indonesia’s Religious Courts, focusing on selected jurisdictions in Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Central Java, and East Java. Introduced through Supreme Court Regulations No. 1 of 2019 and No. 7 of 2022, the e-Court system aims to modernize judicial processes and realize justice that is simple, fast, and affordable. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research draws on data from eight Religious Courts: East Jakarta, South Jakarta, Sleman, Wonosari, Sidoarjo, Surabaya, Pemalang, and Slawi, through interviews, observation, and document analysis. Findings show that while the e-Court system enhances administrative efficiency and transparency, its implementation remains uneven. Urban courts such as Jakarta and Surabaya demonstrate successful digital integration, whereas Wonosari, Pemalang, and Slawi face obstacles in infrastructure, internet access, and digital literacy. These disparities create hybrid practices and raise concerns about procedural validity and data security. From a prophetic law perspective, the e-Court reform embodies the moral ideals of humanization (amar ma’ruf), liberation (nahi munkar), and transcendence (tu’minuna billah). However, unequal access to digital justice contradicts these prophetic values. The study concludes that achieving ethical and inclusive digital transformation requires embedding prophetic legal principles into judicial policy to ensure that modernization serves humanity and justice, not merely administrative efficiency.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2025 Vol. 7 No. 1 June 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 December 2024 Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2023 Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2023 Vol. 4 No. 2 December 2022 Vol. 4 No. 1 June 2022 Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2021 Vol. 3 No. 1 June 2021 Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2020 Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019 More Issue