cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Achmad Yudi Wahyudin
Contact Email
achmad.yudi@teknokrat.ac.id
Phone
+6285233338403
Journal Mail Official
jorle@teknokrat.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Zainal Abidin Pagaralam No.9-11 Labuhanratu, Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Research on Language Education
Published by Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27235092     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Education,
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
Journal of Research on Language Education (E-ISSN: 2723-5092) is a peer-reviewed journal published in Indonesia by the Faculty of Arts and Education, Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. This journal aims to facilitate and promote the dissemination of scholarly information on research and development in the field of linguistics, literature, and language teaching and learning. The articles published in this journal can be the result of research, conceptual thinking, ideas, innovations, best practices, and book reviews. The scopes of this journal include the following topic areas: - Literature - Language Studies - Linguistics - Second Language Acquisition Theory - Curriculum in Language Learning - Innovations in Language Teaching and Learning
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Bahasa dan Linguistik
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1 (2020)" : 5 Documents clear
AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH TEXTBOOK IN THE FIRST GRADE OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Tyas Desita Wengrum
Journal of Research on Language Education Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jorle.v1i1.783

Abstract

This research is attempted to analyze text reading from two different textbook publishers, Erlangga and Yudhistira Ghalia in the first grade of Junior High School. Those two textbooks are designed based on Curriculum 2013. The analysis is focused on the three aspects of Systemic Functional Linguistics; ideational meaning (transitivity), interpersonal meaning (mood structure), and textual meaning (theme-rheme). Those three aspects are used to analyze the contents of text reading in those two textbooks. In addition, clause complex, nominal group and lexis are used to find out the readability of those two textbooks that used by Junior High School students. These data analyzed by triangulation method. To analyze the data, the researcher used domain analysis, taxonomy analysis, componential analysis, and theme- culture analysis. The finding showed that content of reading text in Erlangga’s book is more detail in describing an object than Yudhistira Ghalia’s book. It can be concluded that Yudhistira Ghalia’s Book is more difficult and complicated for students of Junior High School than Erlangga’s book.
NEGOTIATION OF MEANING: STUDENTS’ AWARENESS OF THEIR MISTAKES IN USING ENGLISH FOR THE SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL Ferayani Ulrica
Journal of Research on Language Education Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jorle.v1i1.782

Abstract

In traditional classes, teachers teach grammar in a deductive way with meaningless activities. The activities do not emphasize the uses of English in real life and lack of communication among teachers and students. Language awareness might give the students a challenge to pose questions and encourage them to explore themselves on how language works. The teachers might be able to encourage the students to participate to lead them to get communicative skills by using negotiation of meaning. This article is intended to explore and analyze the students’ mistakes when negotiating meaning in the language learning process. The qualitative descriptive research was employed in this study with 33 students in senior high school as the subjects of the research. The data were from the students’ interviews and recordings. The finding revealed that the students produced mistakes in grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary. It showed that the extent of the students’ awareness in responding to a mistake in the negotiation of meaning was low. It was only 16 incorrect utterances that might be corrected by the students. It was divided into two sides, willingness and unwillingness to correct. Factors were affecting the students not to be aware during interaction such as focusing on meaning, the same proficiency level, and condition of the class.
ENHANCING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH WRITING OF SECONDARY STUDENTS THROUGH SHARED WRITING Mutiara Ayu; Zuraida Zuraida
Journal of Research on Language Education Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jorle.v1i1.781

Abstract

The objective of the study is to find out whether or not there was a significant difference in descriptive paragraph writing enhancement of secondary students who were taught through shared writing and those who were not. This study was conducted by using an experimental method. The sample of the study was 35 eighth grade students taken by using convenience sampling technique, 18 students belonged to experimental group and 17 students belonged to control group. The data were collected through pretest and posttest. In order to maintain validity, content validity was applied. Then, two raters were used to maintain reliability of the result. The experimental group was taught for twelve meetings by using Shared Writing. The result showed the students in the experimental getting the mean 14.67 with standard deviation 2.058 and control group getting the mean 12.00 with standard deviation 1.414 got a significant improvement in the posttest. There was a better significant improvement in descriptive paragraph writing in the experimental group who are taught by using Shared Writing if compared to the students in the control group.
IMPLEMENTING POWTOON TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ INTERNATIONAL CULTURE UNDERSTANDING IN ENGLISH CLASS Lulud Oktaviani; Berlinda Mandasari; Reynita Adlina Maharani
Journal of Research on Language Education Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jorle.v1i1.779

Abstract

The use of technology has increased rapidly in our daily activities since first industrial revolution and its features also becomes more and more enchanting from time to time. Thus, people are used to work with it to lighten their jobs, including education, such as delivering/learning material through multimedia, online teaching and learning, etc. It is line with the result of preliminary study that 56% students of English Literature at Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia (UTI) said their lecturers used more technology in class. Thus, the researchers used classroom action research in order to know whether the use of technology does not only help the lecturer in delivering material in a class but also improve students’ international culture understanding in English class. To collect the data, the researchers used observations, tests, and questionnaires. The subjects of this research were second semester students of English Literature at UTI. The finding showed that students’ international culture understanding improved after each cycle. Improvement was also seen based on the result of observations that students showed positive behaviour during the teaching and learning activity.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JIGSAW IN TEACHING ESP SPEAKING FOR ACCOUNTING DEPARTEMENT IN UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH LAMONGAN Naajihah Mafuudloh
Journal of Research on Language Education Vol 1, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33365/jorle.v1i1.724

Abstract

Speaking is a part of spoken and productive skills. In oral communication, the speakers and listeners are actively involved in the message. The speakers transfer a message in the appropriate language, and listeners have to interpret the message. Brown (2004) defines speaking as a productive skill that can be directly and empirically. In teaching speaking, lecturers should have a proper technique to enhance the students to be more active in the speaking class. Therefore, teachers need some appropriate techniques face that condition. Jigsaw is one of cooperative learning method that will help the students gain the information not only by reading the materials, but also sharing and discussing with their friends. Jigsaw consists of several groups, in which every group consists of several students who have various in ability, gender, religion and race. The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of Jigsaw, the supporting factors in Jigsaw, and the teacher’s obstacles in implementing Jigsaw. In conducting this study, the writer applied descriptive qualitative research as the research design because it described the phenomena that exist in the Jigsaw implementation. The data are collected in the form of words. The reseacher used observation and interview to gain the data. Based on the result that concluded, there were 3 important points. First, choosing material, making lesson plan, organizing Jigsaw in classroom, giving quiz, and evaluating were the steps in implementing Jigsaw for speaking class. Then supporting factors were media, professional teacher, situation surround the class, material, student’s motivation, and class management. Third, limited time and different level of student’s comprehension were the obstacles that faced by the lecturer. In conclusion, Jigsaw was recommended for teaching Speaking, because it gained the students to be more active and interactive in teaching and learning process.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 1 (2025): JORLE Vol. 6 No. 1 Vol 5, No 2 (2024) Vol 5, No 1 (2024) Vol 4, No 2 (2023) VOL 4, NO 1 (2023) Vol 3, No 2 (2022) Vol 3, No 1 (2022) Vol 2, No 2 (2021) Vol 2, No 1 (2021) Vol 1, No 1 (2020)