cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhamad Abas
Contact Email
jurnaljustisi.fh@ubpkarawang.ac.id
Phone
+6285318977135
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljustisi.fh@ubpkarawang.ac.id
Editorial Address
Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang Jalan Ronggo Waluyo Sirnabaya, Puseurjaya, Kec. Telukjambe Timur, Kabupaten Karawang, Jawa Barat 41361
Location
Kab. karawang,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
ISSN : 25282638     EISSN : 25805460     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36805/jjih
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum adalah jurnal akademik yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang. JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum pertama kali diterbitkan pada bulan september 2016, yang telah memuat artikel-artikel pendidikan khususnya ilmu hukum dan akan mewadahi serta memfasilitasi hasil penelitian dosen dan mahasiswa dalam pengembangan keilmuan hukum. JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum terbit 2 kali dalam 1 tahun di bulan September dan Maret pada setiap volumenya.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum" : 6 Documents clear
NETIZENS OPINIONS ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Hartanto, Hartanto; Santoso, Agus
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.5474

Abstract

Netizens/netizens in Indonesia have a role in the disclosure of several legal cases. Therefore, this study aims to capture how the opinions and aspirations (Opinions) of netizens related to the positive law enforcement process in the criminal case of theft of cocoa beans charged to Grandma Minah (Case No. 247/Pid.B/2009/PN. PWT). The case of Grandma Minah is considered a case that disturbs the community's sense of justice. Netizens assessed that dragging Grandma Minah into the legal process just because of the theft of 3 cocoa grains was an irony and contrary to conscience. Netizens contrast the disparity between the firmness of law enforcement in the Grandma Minah case and the firmness of law enforcement in corruption cases or cases involving the rulers and the powerful. The spirit of Law 40/2007 on the Company directs the existence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) which can also be used as a benchmark to view this case. In this study, the opinions of netizens are classified as positive because they hope that the law can be more just, humane and conscientious. However, in the future, the potential for the opinions of netizens, which is sometimes also based on minimal data/facts, has the potential to distort the independence of judges.
ABUSE OF AUTHORITY BY VILLAGE HEADS IN THE COMPLETE SYSTEMATIC LAND REGISTRATION PROGRAM (PTSL) (Case Study of Cikupa Village for Fiscal Year 2021) Zamzami Sulthony, Razy; Albab, Ulil; Amiludin, Amiludin
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.7572

Abstract

Abuse of authority by individual village heads in the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) is an important and interesting issue to research. This research aims to identify and analyze cases of abuse of authority that occurred in Cikupa Village in the 2021 fiscal year. The research method used is a case study with an empirical normative approach. Data was obtained through observation and document study. The research results show indications of abuse of authority by individual village heads in implementing PTSL, including misuse of funds, manipulation of data, and violations of procedures. The implication of these findings is the need for strict preventive and law enforcement measures to prevent abuse of authority in the future and ensure the continued success of PTSL implementation. This research makes an important contribution in understanding the dynamics of land program implementation at the local level and highlights the importance of transparent and accountable governance in the implementation of village government. Keywords: Cikupa Village, Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL).
THE CONCEPT OF AGRARIAN REFORM ON THE WELFARE OF FARMERS (CASE STUDY IN TANGERANG REGENCY) Puspita Sari, Annisa; Amiludin, Amiludin
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.7988

Abstract

In order to realize Agrarian Reform, Tangerang Regency has implemented a national program which is called as Agrarian Reform Movement, one of which is through asset legality. In fact, the Agrarian Reform Movement program run by Office of Land Affairs in Tangerang Regency regarding asset legality has not run well since there are still problems regarding land, one of which is that many people have not received legal certainty regarding their land rights. The aim of this study is to determine the concept of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) which is one of the Agrarian Reform schemes from the Agrarian Reform Synergy Movement program and its benefits for farmer welfare. Moreover, the research method used in this study is a qualitative research method with a normative legal approach and data sources obtained from secondary data. The result of this study shows that the implementation of PTSL conducted by the PTSL Adjudication Team in Tangerang Regency has run well in accordance with the target and PTSL certificate which is very beneficial for farmer welfare.
THE DISPARITY IN JUDGES' DECISIONS ON THE CRIME OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IS REVIEWED FROM LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2014 CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO LAW NO. 23 OF 2002 CONCERNING CHILD PROTECTION (Study of Decision Number 858/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjm and Number Rengganis, Mutiara; Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary; Arafat, Zarisnov
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.8003

Abstract

Sexual violence against children is a serious violation of human rights and moral norms. This study focuses on the disparity in sentencing in two cases of sexual violence against children involving the biological father as the perpetrator, namely decision Number 858/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjm and Number 137/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Grt. Both are included in the category of familial abuse, where violence occurs in the family environment. Although both cases involve violations of Article 81 paragraph (3) of the Child Protection Law with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, there are differences in sentencing. In the first verdict, the perpetrator was sentenced to 18 years in prison and chemical castration for 2 years, while in the second verdict, the perpetrator was sentenced to 20 years in prison without chemical castration. This disparity is caused by differences in juridical and non-juridical considerations by judges, although both aim to achieve legal certainty and the prevention of future crimes.
LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS AGAINST LIMESTONE MINING ACTIVITIES IN TAMANSARI VILLAGE, PANGKALAN DISTRICT ARE LINKED TO LAW NUMBER 3 OF 2020 CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO LAW NUMBER 4 OF 2009 CONCERNING MINERAL AND COAL MINING Setiawathi, Maya; Hidayat, Anwar; Arafat, Zarisnov
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.8004

Abstract

Law enforcement is the process of making efforts to uphold or function legal norms in real terms as a behavioral guideline in the legal relationship of community life. Mining crimes are acts that are prohibited by regulations that are subject to sanctions for perpetrators, in order to protect mineral and coal mining activities and businesses. Mining actors who do not have a permit are regulated in Article 158 of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. This action in limestone mining causes environmental damage and also triggers various negative impacts. The results of this study discuss how law enforcement efforts carried out by the Pangkalan Police in overcoming mining that does not have a permit in Tamansari Village, Pangkalan District and discuss the impact of the cause of air pollution in Tamansari Village, Pangkalan District as a result of this limestone mining. The empirical juridical research method used to answer the problems in this study with primary data sources consisting of the surrounding community, mining workers, community leaders, and law enforcement officials such as the police. The conclusion that can be drawn is that law enforcement efforts have not been maximized in overcoming mining that does not have permits because of the many resistance from the community, so further efforts are needed so that the public is aware of the law in Indonesia.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR NOTARIES IN MAKING A DEED OF STATEMENT OF MEETING RESOLUTION (PKR) BASED ON CIRCULAR DECISIONS OUTSIDE THE GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (GMS) MADE BY SHAREHOLDERS (Case Study at the Office of Notary Mulyani, S.H., M.Kn) Vironika, Tiyas; Abas, Muhamad; Arafat, Zarisnov
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.8008

Abstract

A notary is a public official authorized to make an authentic deed. The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is an organ of a limited liability company that has the highest authority in the company that is not given to the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners. This study examines how circular decisions are made outside the GMS at PT WSA and how legal protection for notaries against the preparation of a deed of Meeting Decision Statement (PKR) based on Circular Decisions outside the GMS according to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. This study aims to find out the circular decision making outside the GMS at PT WSA and the legal protection for notaries against the preparation of a deed of Meeting Decision Statement (PKR) based on the Circular Decision outside the GMS according to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions. The research method used is qualitative with a normative juridical approach. The hypothesis in this study is that the circular decision of PT WSA is carried out without being attended or carried out in the presence of a Notary. The notary does not play a role in making circular decisions of PT WSA, the notary only pours the contents of the circular decision into an authentic deed. So that the Notary cannot be prosecuted criminally or civilly, because in making the deed, the statement of the meeting decision has been in accordance with the content of the circular decision outside the GMS made by the shareholders of PT WSA without reducing, adding and changing its content

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 2 (2022): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum More Issue