cover
Contact Name
Rahmat Perdana
Contact Email
rahmat260997@gmail.com
Phone
+6282182864903
Journal Mail Official
cahayaic.jee@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher, Jl. Perumnas Griya Sungai Duren, No. 54 A, Jambi, Indonesia 36361
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE)
ISSN : 27164160     EISSN : 27161595     DOI : https://doi.org/10.37251/jee
Core Subject : Education, Social,
JEE publishes high-quality methodological assessment, evaluation, and study research texts in various educational settings and scientific disciplines with their own specific phenomena, as well as related studies that address issues of concern to education today. JEE discusses scientific research on how assessment and evaluation can improve educational outcomes; research on how various scientific disciplines can inform theoretical, practical, and political perspectives at various levels and education systems. This journal mainly covers manuscripts in the following fields: • Performance assessment • Instrument development • Policy analysis • Program evaluation • Test management • Development of research methodology • Curriculum assessment and evaluation • Local and global issue education 21st century • Learning evaluation and assessment • Including child development (childhood, primary, secondary, senior, vocation, and higher education)
Articles 611 Documents
Science Literacy Profile of High School Students as A Basis for Ethnoscience Integration in Learning Rahmawanti, Weni; Wasis, Wasis; Subekti, Hasan
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.3049

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the scientific literacy profile of high school students in physics using the PISA 2025 framework, focusing on identifying strengths and weaknesses in each competency dimension as a basis for developing ethnoscience-integrated learning. Methodology: This study employed a quantitative survey with a diagnostic approach using a science literacy test adapted from the PISA 2025 framework. The instrument consisted of 20 multiple-choice items. Data were collected online and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Benchmark Reference Assessment (PAP). Sampling used simple random sampling on grade XI students. Main Findings: The results show that students’ scientific literacy is in the moderate to low category with uneven competency distribution. Students performed better in explaining scientific phenomena but showed low achievement in designing investigations, evaluating evidence, and interpreting data. Scores ranged from 25 to 85, with an average of 55.07, indicating limited higher-order thinking skills. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides an updated empirical mapping of students’ scientific literacy using the PISA 2025 framework, which is still rarely applied. It offers a diagnostic basis for integrating ethnoscience in learning, emphasizing the development of higher-order thinking and contextual understanding aligned with students’ cultural environments.