cover
Contact Name
Yusuf Wisnu Mandaya
Contact Email
sanlar@unissula.ac.id
Phone
+6285399441898
Journal Mail Official
sanlar@unissula.ac.id
Editorial Address
2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building, Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26864428     DOI : 10.30659
Core Subject : Social,
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (SANLaR) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Master of Notary Program, Faculty of Law, UNISSULA, Semarang. SANLaR previously published in twice (2) a year, however, due to the increasing demand for writers and the increasing number of submitted manuscripts, the editorial team publishes them four (4) times a year they are in March, June, September and December. This shows the credibility and prestige of the SANLaR journal is getting better and known to many people. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, Researchers and practitioners for publishing the Articles of original research or review articles. The scope of the Articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics of law notaries including: Land and Rights Transfer Certificate; Legal engagements / agreements; Inheritance law; Security law; Agrarian law; Islamic banking; The law of islamic economics; Tax law; Auction; Insolvency; Intellectual property rights, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 383 Documents
Synergy between the North Sumatra Regional Police and the National Narcotics Agency of North Sumatra Province in Combating the Illicit Trafficking of Narcotics and Illegal Drugs Theresia Hutasoit; Janpatar Simamora; Ojak Nainggolan
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v8i1.52005

Abstract

In order to combat illicit narcotics trafficking in the Medan area—the provincial capital and the region with the highest level of narcotics circulation in North Sumatra—this study will examine the elements that help and those that hurt the cooperation between the North Sumatra Regional Police (Polda North Sumatra) and the National Narcotics Agency of North Sumatra Province (BNNP North Sumatra). This qualitative study confirmed the existence of operational synergy in the drug prevention, eradication, abuse, and illicit trafficking programs, as well as in the disclosure of large drug networks in combination, the existence of clear legal fees regarding cooperation between institutions, and a common vision.
Substantial Justice in the Court's Decision to Annul an Authentic Deed Nurhaliza Setyawan, Aqiila; Santoso, Bambang; Andi Fitriono, Riska
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v8i1.51983

Abstract

Agreements can be made in writing in the form of an authentic deed. A notary is an official authorized to create an authentic deed. The creation of an authentic deed must comply with the provisions of the Law.Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary Public amends Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public. In Decision Number 19/Pdt.G/2024/PN.Mks, the Judge declared the authentic deed, namely the Power of Attorney to Sell land made before a Notary, null and void because it was made without the knowledge of one of the parties. However, the Notary was not punished by the judge. This study focuses on discussing whether the judge's decision has reflected substantial justice. This study uses a legal research method with a prescriptive nature, and uses a case approach and a conceptual approach. The legal material analysis technique used is the deductive logic method with a syllogistic mindset. Aristotle's theory of justice states that justice is something that is assessed proportionally according to its role. Therefore, when viewed from Aristotle's theory of justice, the decision that the Notary was not punished for making a Power of Attorney to Sell without the knowledge of one of the parties does not provide substantial justice for the plaintiff. However, the judge could not make such a decision because the imposition of punishment on the notary was not requested in the petitum and he was bound by the principle of Iudex Non Ultra Petita. The principle of Iudex Non Ultra Petita stipulates that the judge cannot decide anything beyond what is requested in the petitum.
Dispute Resolution in Unwritten Agreements in Connection of Cooperation Reviewed from a Civil Law Perspective Ria Juliana Siregar; Martono Anggusti; Rio Saputra Manullang
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Master of Notary Law (S2), Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.v8i1.52099

Abstract

This study aims to describe the regulation of agreements according to Indonesian contract law (KUHPerdata), which then analyzes the legal force of agreements made orally and their proof in court. This research is a normative juridical research conducted with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that agreements are specifically regulated in the Civil Code, Book III, Chapter II concerning "Agreements Born from Contracts or Agreements" and Chapters V to XVIII which regulate the legal principles and norms of contract law in general, as well as contract law norms that have special characteristics better known as named agreements. The Civil Code itself does not explicitly mention "written agreements". If an oral agreement has fulfilled the requirements for a valid agreement according to the formulation of Article 1320 of the Civil Code, then it remains valid and has legal force to declare someone in default. However, if the verbal agreement is denied/not acknowledged by the party suspected of being in breach of contract, the verbal agreement does not have legal force to declare someone to be in breach of contract, because the agreement may or may not be true, depending on the evidence provided by the parties.