Articles
584 Documents
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Prinsip Dalihan Natolu sebagai Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Adat Batak Toba ]]>
<![CDATA[Elisabeth Nurhaini Butarbutar]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (475.873 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1633
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap hak konstitusional masyarakat dalam nilai hukum “dalihan natolu” sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum Indonesia untuk upaya penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif-empiris. Titik beratnya adalah penelitian kepustakaan (library research), sedangkan studi hukum sebagai kenyataan (perilaku) yang bersifat empiris dilakukan melalui penelitian terhadap perilaku atau pola tingkah laku masyarakat mengikuti nilai hukum dalihan natolu sebagai hukum yang hidup (the living law. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap hak masyarakat adat Batak Toba, dijamin secara konstitusional dalam Pasal 18 ayat (2) jo. Pasal 28 I ayat (3) UUD Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia sepanjang masih eksis sebagai sub sistem hukum Indonesia juga sebagai identitas budaya dan hak masyarakat tradisional yang merupakan hak asasi manusia yang harus dihormati. Sebagai sub sistem hukum, prinsip dalihan natolu, juga mempunyai tata cara dan pembagian tugas yang tegas antara ketiga unsur kekeluargaan/kekerabatan dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi antara kerabat yang terikat dalam prinsip dalihan natolu. Di samping itu, secara yuridis, ditentukan bahwa hakim dan hakim konstitusi sebagai penegak hukum wajib untuk selalu mengikuti perkembangan nilai-nilai hukum dan keadilan masyarakat dalam mengadili dan memutuskan perkara yang dihadapkan kepadanya.This research aims to determine the legal protection of the constitutional rights of the community in the legal value of "dalihan natolu" as part of the Indonesian legal system for law enforcement efforts. This research is a normative-empirical research. The emphasis is on library research, whereas legal studies as facts (behavior) are empirical conducted research on behavior or behavioral patterns of society that apply the legal values of dalihan natolu as a living law. The results show that the legal protection of the constitutional rights of the Toba Batak indigenous people is guaranteed constitutionally within the Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia as long as it still exists as a sub-integral of the Indonesian legal system and remains recognized in law enforcement efforts, because as a sub-system of law, the principle of dalihan natolu, also has a clear procedure and division of tasks between the three elements of kinship or kinship in resolving conflicts that occur between relatives who are bound in the principle of dalihan natolu. The reality of the validity of the principle of natolu dalihan is supported by the constitutional recognition of the state and reinforced by the granting of rights to customary law communities as parties to the dispute in the Constitutional Court. In addition, the obligation of judges and constitutional judges as law enforcers to always follow the development of legal values and justice of the community in splving and deciding cases faced to them.]]>
<![CDATA[Tafsir Konstitusional atas Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilu dan Pilkada ]]>
<![CDATA[Anna Triningsih]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 2 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (415.62 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk16210
<![CDATA[Pemilu yang adil dan kredibel hanya dapat direalisasikan jika dikelola oleh badan independen. Konstitusi menyatakan bahwa pemilihan dilakukan oleh badan penyelenggara yang mandiri tanpa menjelaskan lebih lanjut makna kemandirian tersebut. Melalui metode penelitian hukum normatif dan dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui model kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu pascareformasi dan makna independensi Pasal 22E ayat (5) UUD 1945 berdasarkan interpretasi Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu pascareformasi adalah model independen yang tidak melibatkan perwakilan partai politik dan birokrasi. Sebagaimana tampak dari berbagai putusan pengujian undang-undang, Mahkamah Konstitusi menafsirkan bahwa kemandirian lembaga penyelenggara pemilu yang dikehendaki oleh UUD 1945 adalah kemandirian institusional, kemandirian fungsional, dan kemandirian personal.Credible and fair election can only be realized if managed by an independent institution. The Constitution states that elections are carried out by independent electoral management bodies without further explanation of the meaning of independence. Through normative legal research methods and by using statutory and case approaches, this research aims to find out the model of post-reform election management bodies and the meaning of independence of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution based on Constitutional Court interpretation. The results of this research found that the post-reform election organizing model is an independent model that does not involve representatives of political parties and bureaucracy. As can be seen from the judicial review rulings, the Constitutional Court interprets that the independence of election management bodies desired by the 1945 Constitution includes institutional independence, functional independence and personal independence.]]>
<![CDATA[Refleksi Kedaulatan Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Sumber Daya Alam Hayati di Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif ]]>
<![CDATA[Andriani Wahyuningtyas Novitasari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 4 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (346.421 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk17410
<![CDATA[The international law regime on EEZ has been developed by the international community through the United Nations Conference on and state practices. This regime is intended to protect the interests of coastal states from the danger of being depleted of biological natural resources by fishing activities based on the free sea regime. In addition, the EEZ is also intended to protect the interests of the coastal state in the field of marine environment conservation as well as marine scientific research in order to support the use of natural resources in the zone. UNCLOS gives sovereign rights to Indonesia as a coastal state to explore and exploit natural resources in the EEZ as well as jurisdictions relating to the exercise of these sovereign rights. For that reason needs integrated law enforcement an effort to conserve living natural resources in ZEE Indonesia. By using the normative legal writing method, this study describes how the concept of law enforcement of living natural resources in Indonesia's EEZ based on various laws and regulations.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Pengaturan Hukum Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dalam Berbagai Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi ]]>
<![CDATA[Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (427.993 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1826
<![CDATA[Law No. 5 Year 1990 on Conservation of Biological Resources and Ecosystem must be relevant and in harmony with regulation and Constitutional Court decisions. The issues of this article are : (1) How is the harmony between Law No. 5 Year 1990 on Conservation of Biological Resources and Ecosystem with other regulations ?; 2) how is the accordance between Law No. 5 Year 1990 on Conservation of Biological Resources and Ecosystem with Constitutional Court decisions? This is a normative research with conceptual and regulations approach. This article use secondary data with interactive model analysis. This research shows that : (1) Law No. 5 Year 1990 on Conservation of Biological Resources and Ecosystem has not considered Basic Agrarian Law and People’s Consultative Assembly No. IX/MPR/2001 as base of natural resources regulation. This regulation is neither according to other regulations nor responsive because this has not regulated modern biotechnology and genetic resources. (2) Law No. 5 Year 1990 on Conservation of Biological Resources and Ecosystem is not according to Constitutional Court Decision that emphasize on preventive aspect of natural resources management, protection and respect of indigenous people and substantive public participation. In another side, this regulation emphasize on curative aspect, irrespect and not protect indigenous people. This article recommends revision of this regulation and accord it with Constitutional Court Decision.]]>
<![CDATA[Menakar Konstitusionalitas Syari’at Islam dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh ]]>
<![CDATA[Khairul Fahmi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (455.535 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1638
<![CDATA[Salah satu point penting yang diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki terkait dengan penegakan hukum di Aceh adalah diberlakukannya Qanun dengan tujuan untuk menghormati tradisi sejarah Islam dan adat istiadat rakyat Aceh yang mayoritas muslim. Selain itu, untuk mensinergikan antara Qanun dengan pengadilan, maka di Provinsi Aceh dibentuk suatu sistem peradilan Syar’iyah yang tidak memihak dan independen, termasuk pengadilan tinggi yang tetap merupakan bagian dari sistem peradilan Republik Indonesia. Pembentukan Pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh merupakan salah satu upaya untuk membuat kekhususan sebagaimana diatur dalam perjanjian Helsinki pada tahun 2005. Namun, dalam dataran teknis pengaturan manajemen pengadilan Syar’iyah juga masih terkendala khususnya oleh karena adanya dua aturan hukum yang berlaku yaitu Qanun yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilam Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Aceh dan undang-undang yang dibuat oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat beserta Presiden. Hal tersebut berakibat Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh yang mengatur tentang teknis pengaturan pengadilan Syar’iyah dan pembuatan Qanun juga banyak di lakukan judicial review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisa tentang efektifitas pemberlakukan Qanun dan pengadilan Syar’iyah di Provinsi Aceh pasca di undangkannya Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Aceh. Adapun tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan metode penulisan normatif dengan pendekatan studi historis dan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan Syar’iyah yang telah dibentuk di Provinsi Aceh meski pada awalnya mengalami kendala namun dapat berjalan baik. Adanya kekhususan yang diberikan kepada Provinsi Aceh merupakan bagian dari upaya untuk menjalankan amanat konstitusi khususnya Pasal 18B UUD 1945. One crucial point stipulated in the Helsinki agreement related to law enforcement in Aceh is the enactment of the Qanun with the aim of respecting Islamic historical traditions and the customs of the Acehnese people who are predominantly Muslim. Besides, to synergise between the Qanun and the court, in the Province of Aceh a Syar'iyah justice system was formed which was impartial and independent, including a high court which remained part of the judicial system of the Republic of Indonesia. The establishment of the Shariah Law in Aceh Province was one of the efforts to make it specific as stipulated in the Helsinki agreement in 2005. However, in the field of technical management of the Syariah court management is also still constrained especially due to the existence of two applicable laws namely the Qanun made by the Aceh Province Regional People's Representative Council and laws made by the House of Representatives and the President. This resulted in the Law on the Government of Aceh governing the Syar'iyah court and the Qanun being judged by the Constitutional Court. This paper aims to analyse the effectiveness of the implementation of Qanun and the Syar'iyah court in Aceh Province after the enactment of the Law on the Governing of Aceh. The writing is made using normative writing methods with historical study approaches, and case study approaches. The results of the study showed that the Syar'iyah court which had been formed in the Aceh Province even though initially had problems but could work well. The specificity given to the Aceh Province is part of an effort to carry out the mandate of the constitution, especially Article 18B of the 1945 Constitution. ]]>
<![CDATA[RETRACTED: Politik Hukum Pemerintah dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi atas Kesehatan ]]>
<![CDATA[M Beni Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1837
<![CDATA[Jurnal Konstitusi has retracted article titled: "Politik Hukum Pemerintah dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi atas Kesehatan" by M Beni Kurniawan, from Vol. 18, No. 3 (2021) since there has been similar publication found in Jurnal HAM Vol. 12, No. 1 (2021).This retraction announcement is necessary to maintain publication ethics.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemetaan Pola Permohonan dan Putusan dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang dengan Substansi Hukum Islam ]]>
<![CDATA[Dian Agung Wicaksono]]>;
<![CDATA[Faiz Rahman]]>;
<![CDATA[Khotibul Umam]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.523 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1832
<![CDATA[The existence of Islamic law substance in national law, specifically in an Act, has been indirectly placed the Constitutional Court in the position that also has a role in determining the development of Islamic law in the national law system. It can be seen in the context of judicial review of Act that has Islamic law substance or that explicitly regulates Islamic law. This research specifically answers: (a) how is the justification of the inclusion of Islamic law in Indonesian national law? (b) how are the pattern of judicial review petitions and court decisions of Acts related to Islamic law? This research is normative-juridical research, which analyses secondary data such as laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and articles related to the inclusion of Islamic law in the national law. The results show that the justification of the accommodation of Islamic law in the national law system is related to the construction of state and religion relationship. It indicates that Indonesia is not a religious state, but it is a state that has a divine principle. Furthermore, based on the analysis of judicial review decisions from 2003 to 2019, the pattern of petitions and court decisions of judicial reviews of laws related to Islamic law substance shows at least three main petitions, namely: (a) questioning state intervention in the implementation of Islamic law; (b) questioning the administration of the implementation of Islamic law; (c) petitions for the inclusion of Islamic law in the positive law.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemilihan Umum Serentak yang Berintegritas sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Achmad Edi Subiyanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (328.4 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1726
<![CDATA[The implementation of the General Election of the President and Vice President after the General Election of Members of the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional People’s Legislative Assembly turned out to be unable to become a tool for transforming social change in the desired direction. The experience of these constitutional practices did not strengthen the governance system desired by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. That, through the Decision of the Constitutional Court General Elections are held simultaneously. However, there are weaknesses in the preparation of the policy for implementing general elections simultaneously. The decision of the Constitutional Court should be followed by an evidence-based policy making process with strong data and based on simulations of implementation. Therefore, the burden of organizing General Elections can be identified from the start and steps to minimize risk can be considered if things happen that are not desirable. Then what is equally important is that it needs to be evaluated on the issue of the integrity of the organizers or participants of the General Election, for example by tightening the recruitment system, so that it can create simultaneous elections with integrity in the future]]>
<![CDATA[Quo Vadis Pancasila sebagai Norma Konstitusi yang Tidak Dapat Diubah ]]>
<![CDATA[Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (453.874 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk1637
<![CDATA[Pancasila memiliki posisi khusus dalam UUD 1945, Selain Pasal 37 ayat (5) UUD 1945 yang menyatakan, “khusus mengenai bentuk Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia tidak dapat dilakukan perubahan,” Pancasila yang narasinya terdapat dalam Alinea Keempat Pembukaan UUD 1945 merupakan salah satu norma konstitusi yang tidak dapat diubah (unamendable article). Hal ini dikarenakan Pasal 37 ayat (1) UUD 1945 menyatakan hanya pasal-pasal UUD 1945 yang dapat diubah, sedangkan Pembukaan UUD 1945 bukanlah termasuk pasal UUD 1945. Tulisan ini bermaksud untuk mencari tahu kaitan antara kedudukan Pancasila dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan keberadaannya sebagai norma konstitusi yang tidak dapat diubah. Lebih lanjut, tulisan ini akan melihat konteks sejarah penentuan Pancasila sebagai dasar negara dan upaya untuk memasukan Pancasila dalam pasal UUD 1945. Selain itu, tulisan ini akan mengkaji putusan-putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang menyebut Pancasila sebagai sumber hukum dan dasar negara. Menurut Penulis, sebutan “Pancasila” perlu ditetapkan dalam pasal-pasal UUD 1945 untuk menegaskan secara expressis verbis bahwa Pancasila merupakan dasar negara atau ideologi bangsa. Hal ini penting untuk menjadikan Pancasila tidak sekedar sebagai jargon semata yang bahkan nama Pancasila tidak tersebutkan dalam UUD 1945 meskipun narasinya terdapat dalam Pembukaan UUD 1945.Pancasila has a special position in the 1945 Constitution, in addition to Article 37 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution which states, "specifically regarding the form of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, changes cannot be made," Pancasila which the narrative is contained in the Fourth Paragraph of the Opening of the 1945 Constitution is one of the constitutional norms that can not be changed (unamendable article). This is because Article 37 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution states that only the articles of the 1945 Constitution can be amended, while the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution does not belong to the 1945 Constitution. This paper intends to find out the relationship between the position of the Pancasila in Indonesian constitution and its existence as a constitutional norm which cannot be changed. Furthermore, this paper will look at the historical context of the determination of Pancasila as the basis of the state and efforts to include Pancasila in the 1945 Constitution article. In addition, this paper will examine the decisions of the Constitutional Court which called Pancasila as a source of law and the basis of the state. According to the author, the term "Pancasila" needs to be stipulated in the articles of the 1945 Constitution to expressly state that Pancasila is the basis of the state or ideology of the nation. It is important to make Pancasila not merely a jargon that even the name of Pancasila is not mentioned in the 1945 Constitution although the narrative is contained in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution. ]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Fraksi di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Pasca Reformasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Fathan Ali Mubiina]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (381.541 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk17210
<![CDATA[ The Faction of Political Party in the Indonesian House of Representatives or Parliament is as a strategic forum in the political system in Indonesia in order to connect between the process of forming government policy both in the executive and legislative branches with its citizens as a form of structured channeling of aspirations. Because in political parties there is a form of institutionalization of the expression of ideas, thoughts, views, and free beliefs in a democratic society. Then the political parties also according to the laws and regulations in force in the history of the development of political parties after the reform is to function as political education, absorb, channel and fight for the interests of the community, and prepare community members to fill political positions in accordance with the existing democratic mechanism in Indonesia through representative democracy. The pattern of relations between political parties and the DPR RI is quite simple, namely political parties have the right to participate in the election process for legislative members in the DPR RI. This legal research is prescriptive in nature, which is carried out to solve the legal issues at hand. ]]>
