Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education
Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education (UJME) publishes research issues on mathematics education. The UJME processes manuscripts resulted from a research in mathematics education scope, which includes, but is not limited to the topics of didactic development research (DDR), research and development (RnD) in mathematics education, ethnomathematics, realistic mathematics education, psychology of mathematics education and technology in mathematical instruction. The manuscript must be original research, written in English, and not be simultaneously submitted to another journal or conference.
Articles
393 Documents
<![CDATA[Meta analysis of learning models in improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in junior highs school mathematics learning ]]>
<![CDATA[Khasanah, Uswatun]]>;
<![CDATA[Hidayah, Isti]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i1.55859
<![CDATA[The Industrial Revolution 4.0 requires students to have Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). To achieve this aim, an effective learning models is needed with various cosiderations. Many studies have been conductes and provide different conclusions, so that new problems arise regarding which learning models is considered more influential in improving students’ HOTS. This study aims to find, compared, and analyzed learning models that have been used in improved HOTS at the junior high school level. The method used being narrative meta-analysis. The subjects of this study were 2 (two) articles that met inclusion criteria and had passed the PRISMA procedure. The result showed that the effect size values for each group of Project Based Learning (PjBL) assisted by Geogebra, Challenges Based Learning (CBL) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) were 3.27, 2.25, and 1.09. This shows that PjBL assisted by Geogebra have a greater influence than other learning models because the synrax of the learning model applied and the learning media used.]]>
<![CDATA[Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in terms of the Habits of Mind in PBL with a Management System with a Goal Free Problems strategy ]]>
<![CDATA[Pradinar, Fanindya Dwisetiya]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiastuti, Emi]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i1.55860
<![CDATA[Problem Based Learning with a Management System with a Goal Free Problems strategy is given to improve the mathematical creative thinking skills of class X MIPA students at SMA Negeri 8 Semarang which are not yet optimal. . Purpose main from study this is analyze ability think learners reviewed from Habits of Mind , as consequence from application of learning models Problem Based Learning help The LMS is Google Classroom . Method research used _ that is mixed methods with posttest only control design . Sample taken two class with technique random sampling from population class X MIPA 8 Semarang . Experiment class use PBL model with Management System with Goal Free Problems strategy whereas class control using the PBL model. Subject in research this as much 8 student from class experiment . Qualitative data analysis i.e. result data interview and results test mathematical creative thinking skills subject research . Research results showing that : (1) ability think creative mathematical participant educate reviewed from Habits of Mind in PBL with Management System reach more from criteria minimum completeness is 68; (2) ability think creative mathematical participant educate reviewed from Habits of Mind in PBL with Management System reach completeness classic that is more from 75% of participants educate reach limit complete ; (3) average ability think creative mathematical reviewed from Habits of Mind in PBL with Management System more tall from Problem Based Learning model learning ; (4) proportion completeness results test ability think creative mathematical reviewed from Habits of Mind in PBL with Management System more tall from Problem Based Learning model learning ; (5) ability think creative mathematical with four indicator think creative is in the subject category Persisting , Thinking about Thinking , Thinking Flexibly , and Applying Past Knowledge to New Situations .]]>
<![CDATA[Motivation and Mathematics Achievement: A Case Study of Grade 11 students in Ghana ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i1.54578
<![CDATA[This study investigated the relationship between motivation and performance in mathematics using Deci and Ryan's Self Determination Theory. The participants were 2,575 grade 11 students from 10 senior high schools in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. The study employed a quantitative research approach and used a questionnaire and an achievement test to collect data. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. The study found that only amotivation and introjection, among the five sub constructs of motivation considered in the study, recorded statistically significant contributions (p ˂ .05) to students’ achievement. Teachers, lecturers, and researchers may need to seek practical ways to promote intrinsic motivation in students for better engagement with mathematics. The study also indicated the likelihood of different kinds of amotivation with varied influences on the learning of mathematics. As a result, more investigation is required.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems Based on the Components of the Mathematical Literacy Process ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.51046
<![CDATA[The low PISA Mathematics score of Indonesia was a strong background in this study. The results of the 2018 Mathematics PISA Indonesia scored 371, lower than the 2015 score of 386. This study is a qualitative study that aims to describe student errors in solving mathematical literacy problems on linear program material. The methods used documentation in the form of answer sheets, observations, and interviews. The validity of the data was obtained by using triangulation techniques from the three methods used. The research sample was taken by 25 students of class X SMA Negeri 4 Purworejo. The results of the research include: (1) as many as 20 students, or 80% of students, have not been able to formulate problems mathematically. Students have not been able to make an example of the problem correctly. (2) as many as 23 students, or 92% of students, have not been able to use mathematical concepts and, have not been able to write mathematical symbols (facts) correctly, have not been able to solve problems with correct mathematical principles and procedures. (3) as many as 22 students, or 88% of students, have not been able to make conclusions and evaluate the problems given. From these results, it can be said that 80% or more of students have not been able to solve math problems from the lowest stages of the literacy process.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on Self-Efficacy and Gender ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.57879
<![CDATA[This study aimed to describe students' mathematical problem solving ability based on self-efficacy and gender. The method used is descriptive qualitative through the provision of self-efficacy questionnaires, tests, interviews, and documentation. Six subjects were selected based on three levels of self-efficacy and gender from a total of 103 students in one class XI MIPA from three different schools. Research subjects were determined using a purposive sampling technique based on the Rasch model analysis. The test results of the subjects were analyzed using four Polya stages consisting of understanding the problem, making a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study indicate that (1) subjects with high levels of self-efficacy can fulfill all indicators systematically, confidently, and never give up where females are better than males; (2) subjects with medium levels of self-efficacy can fulfill three indicators well and confident, in which males are better than females; (3) subjects with low levels of self-efficacy only fulfill one indicator at making a plan which showed an attitude of giving up and not being confident, where females were better than males.]]>
<![CDATA[Bloom’s Taxonomy Analyze Category: The Analysis of Students’ Analytical Skills Based on Gender ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.58473
<![CDATA[This study aims to describe students' analytical skills based upon gender differences. Bloom's Taxonomy analyze category is the basis for determining the level of analytical skills. According to Bloom's Taxonomy, analytical skills consist of three cognitive processes: differentiating, organizing, and attributing. This type of research was qualitative, with the research subject as many as six students on the number material. This research was conducted on seventh-grade students at one of the junior high schools (SMP) in South Sumatra. Research subjects were determined reached from the results of initial mathematical abilities consisting of two students with high initial abilities, two medium early abilities, and one low initial ability. The study's results revealed that students’ analytical skills of girls were better than boys. Girls fulfill all cognitive processes of analytical skills. In contrast, in solving number problems, boys only achieve some of the cognitive analytical skills process.]]>
<![CDATA[Analysis of The Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts in Terms of Students' Confidence in Blended Learning ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59873
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the ability to understand mathematical concepts in Blended Learning and to determine the pattern of ability to understand mathematical concepts in terms of students' confidence in Blended Learning. The research method used is experimental research with a sequential explanatory strategy. The population of this study was class VII students of Junior High School 28 Semarang for the academic year 2020/2021, with the research sample being class VII A (experimental class) and class C (control class); sampling was done using a simple random sampling technique. Subjects to obtain quantitative data, namely students from the experimental class, were selected by nine students based on the grouping of the results of the self-confidence questionnaire. The data obtained from the calculation of quantitative data, namely the results of the study, show that Blended Learning is effective for improving students' understanding of mathematical concepts. In the analysis of test results and interviews, triangulation was carried out, namely based on the level of student confidence showing the pattern of students' ability to understand mathematical concepts, namely students with high levels of confidence had good mathematical concept skills, those with moderate confidence levels had sufficient mathematical concept understanding abilities, while students with low self-confidence, lack of mastery of the ability to understand mathematical concepts they have. It can be concluded that the higher the students' self-confidence, the more confident they will be in solving problems with their ability to understand mathematical concepts.]]>
<![CDATA[Application of Socrative-Based Assessment to Measure Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability with Problem Based Learning Model Viewed from Curiosity ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59901
<![CDATA[The study aims to (1) test whether the Problem Based Learning model with the application of Socrative-based assessment was effective for measuring students' mathematical creative thinking abilities and (2) describe mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of curiosity in Problem Based Learning model with the application of Socrative-based assessments. The research was included in the mix-method with a sequential explanatory design. The results showed that (1) Problem Based Learning with the application of Socrative assessment was said to be effective for measuring students' mathematical creative thinking abilities; (2) a description of students' mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of curiosity, it was found that students with a high level of curiosity were able to meet the indicators of creative thinking ability elaboration, originality, fluency, and flexibility and were able to explain how to solve smoothly with logical reasons, and students with a medium level of curiosity meeting the indicators of creative thinking ability of elaboration, fluency, and flexibility and being able to explain how to solve it smoothly with logical reasons, and students with a low level of curiosity fulfilling the indicators of creative thinking ability of elaboration and fluency and less able to explain how to solve it smoothly with logical reasons.]]>
<![CDATA[Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in DAPIC Problem Solving Learning with Scientific-RME Approach in Students Learning Independent ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59931
<![CDATA[Mathematical critical thinking ability is an ability that students in learning mathematics must possess. The purpose of this study was to analyze critical thinking ability reviewed from independence tend and to describe students’ critical thinking ability on DAPIC Problem Solving in independence tend. The population in the study were all students of class VIII Junior High School 43 Semarang Year 2020/2021. The research method used was a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design. Research results showed that: (1) students' mathematical critical thinking skills in DAPIC Problem Solving learning with the Scientific-RME approach could achieve minimum completeness criteria; (2) students' mathematical critical thinking skills in DAPIC Problem Solving learning with the Scientific-RME approach achieved classical learning completeness; (3) average critical thinking ability in the DAPIC Problem Solving learning with the Scientific-RME approach more than from Problem Based Learning; (4) proportion result test critical thinking ability in the DAPIC Problem Solving learning approach Scientific-RME is better than Problem Based Learning; (5) critical thinking ability with five indicators think critical is in the subject category high, moderate, and low learning independence tend.]]>
<![CDATA[Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Students Learning Motivation in Probing Prompting Learning ]]>
<![CDATA[ Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/ujme.v11i2.59937
<![CDATA[This research aimed (1) to analyze the effectiveness of Probing Prompting learning on students' mathematical critical thinking skills and (2) to describe mathematical critical thinking skills in terms of students' learning motivation in learning with the Probing Prompting model. This research method was a combination research method (mixed method) with the type of Explanatory Sequential Design. The results showed that: (1) the mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class achieved classical completeness; (2) the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Probing Prompting class is more than the proportion of mathematical critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning class; (3) the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Probing Prompting class is more than the average mathematical critical thinking ability of the Problem Based Learning class. Subjects with high learning motivation are able to meet all indicators of mathematical critical thinking skills, namely indicators of clarification, assessment, inference, and strategies. Subjects with moderate learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the clarification indicators; less able to meet the assessment indicators; tend to be able to meet the inference indicators; and able to meet the indicators of strategies. Subjects with low learning motivation tend to be able to fulfill the indicators of clarification, less able to meet the assessment indicators, less able to meet the inference indicators, and tend to be able to meet the indicators of strategies.]]>
