cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Deswin Nur
Contact Email
jurnal@kppu.go.id
Phone
+6281289188713
Journal Mail Official
jurnal@kppu.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 36
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Published by Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha
ISSN : 20870361     EISSN : 28096304     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55869/kppu.v1i1
Core Subject : Economy,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Analisis empiris atas kebijakan persaingan Studi kasus atau bedah putusan KPPU (yang telah inkracht) baik dalam konteks kegiatan yang dilarang, perjanjian yang dilarang, dan penyalahgunaan posisi dominan Analisis atas transaksi merger dan akuisisi, serta studi kasus penanganan perkara merger dan akuisisi Pengembangan regulasi dan hukum beracara di KPPU Studi komparatif implementasi hukum persaingan usaha antarnegara (antara KPPU dengan negara lain) Isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan kelembagaan KPPU (struktur dan kinerja) Diskursus dan kritik teori tentang persaingan usaha Pengembangan metodologi riset terkait persaingan usaha Isu-isu yang berkaitan dengan pengawasan kemitraan UMKM (termasuk implementasi konsep ekonomi pasar Pancasila, atau perdebatan antara competition dan cooperation)
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Ekonomi, Ekonometrika dan Keuangan (semua kategori) - Ilmu Ekomomi dan Ekonometrika
Articles 35 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Isu Persaingan Industri Pelayanan Kesehatan Indonesia: Tantangan dan “Perisai” Pengawasan KPPU Muhammad Alfarizi; Zela Zalika
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v3i1.89

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the Epidemiological Transition are driving the pace of development of an increasingly advanced health system. The health service industry revolution has made all providers compete with each other to gain a competitive advantage amid Indonesia's potential health market. The insistence on oversight of competition in the health industry that is free from elements of the crime is fundamental to ensure that no party is disadvantaged in the healthcare industry environment. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of competition in the health service industry, the clinic industry, hospitals, health insurance, clinical pharmacy, medical devices, and traditional medicine in Indonesia from the perspective of business competition law and review the role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in preventing monopolistic practices. And unfair business competition in the health services sub-sector. This study uses a PRISMA-based systematic literature review with 38 articles ready for analysis. The results showed that competitor in the healthcare industry was hidden but dangerous, namely cheating and hiding hands with patients, the health business mafia, and corporate monopoly, which occupied the highest health business rating. Apart from that, KPPU found a crucial role in the shield function of supervising competition in the health service industry, which is very intriguing and full of loopholes for law violations.
Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Kemitraan UMKM dan Usaha Besar: Perbandingan Pengaturan di Indonesia dan Malaysia S.H.S. Ulil Albab; Erdha Widayanto; Kevin B Sibarani
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v3i1.98

Abstract

Abstract: The implementation of partnership relations between MSMEs and large businesses allows for a bargaining position gap. This scheme can actually hinder the development of MSMEs. This study aims to examine the supervision of partnerships between MSMEs and large businesses by comparing Indonesia and Malaysia as members of ASEAN which have created a Blueprint for MSME Development. Using normative juridical research methods with analytical descriptive research types and comparative studies using data sources from the literature. The results show that MyCC as the competition authority in Malaysia is not specifically responsible for supervising the implementation of partnership agreements, because competition law in Malaysia does not regulate in detail about partnership agreements so that partnerships are considered the same as other agreements in the context of business competition. Supervision of MSME partnerships in Indonesia is more effective because of the authority of the KPPU and the obligation to report partnership agreements made by MSMEs and large businesses are required to report the relevant institutions can be used to prevent potential business competition violations. Keywords: Partnership Supervision, MSMEs and Large Enterprises, Indonesia and Malaysia.
Interaksi Persaingan Usaha dan Perlindungan Data: Menelaah Bundeskartellamt v. Facebook Siti Shalima Safitri
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v3i1.99

Abstract

Big Data brings new challenges in terms of competition law and data protection. The intersection of data regulation with competition law is due to the fact that most digital products are paid for by users and consumers online by providing their personal data. The author will discuss whether data breaches can be considered a violation of competition law, in light of the German Facebook case in which the Bundeskartellamt investigated whether alleged violations of data protection provisions could mean that Facebook abused its dominant position in the digital market. The research uses a normative legal method with a literature study. The results of the research show that abuse of the digital market cannot be drawn from mere dominance or unfair contract terms, but rather there needs to be a combination of market power and the absence of other options for contract terms. If Facebook users are given more choices regarding how their data is collected, they will be deemed to give voluntary consent under data protection law. This research can serve as a guideline for Indonesian lawmakers and competition authorities to adjust competition regulations, especially in the era of digitalization.
Perbandingan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terkait Pembuktian Tindakan Diskriminasi di Sektor Digital Rezaldy; Nanda Diyan Saputra
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v3i1.101

Abstract

The development of the digital economy in Indonesia makes it easy for business actors to run their business, besides that it also has the potential to cause violations in the business competition sector such as the act of blocking internet access carried out by PT Telkom Indonesia against NETFLIX, this of course creates competition related to the verification mechanism. The purpose of this study is to find out the concept of regulation and proof in warning actions in the digital sector between Indonesia and Singapore. The theory used in analyzing the problems in this paper is the rule of reason and legal certainty. The conclusions obtained in this study are the provisions of Article 19 letter (d) of Law no. 5 of 1995 jo Perkom KPPU No.3 of 2011 has not comprehensively regulated complaints regarding actions in the digital sector, causing difficulties in the verification process, for this reason the authors compared it with the regulation prohibiting warning actions in the digital sector in Singapore.
Implikasi Legal Market Power Assessment dalam Big Data pada Era Ekonomi Digital Stefanus
Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha
Publisher : Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55869/kppu.v3i1.105

Abstract

The development of information and technology in the world of law has occurred since the digitalization era has also developed. In Indonesia itself, this development began with regulations regarding telecommunications to the latest regarding personal data protection. So far, regulations in Indonesia appear to be standing alone without any legal umbrella, although some legal experts have mentioned the Electronic Information and Transaction Law as a semi-legal umbrella for regulating digitalization in Indonesia. The inclusion of digitization elements in the form of Big Data as well as technology often creates a new disturbance for the enforcement of business competition law in Indonesia which we often know is difficult to prove legally, this can be seen from the existence of economics as one of the sciences that assists in the application business competition law, with the inclusion of Big Data a new science emerges which seems to need to be of concern to the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition in implementing technical regulations related to the Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia. Keywords: Big Data, Business Competition Law, and Digital Economy.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 35

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2021 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 2 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol 1 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Persaingan Usaha