cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 15 No 1 (2026)" : 4 Documents clear
Pluralism and Justice in Islamic Inheritance Law: Contextualization and Harmonization of Sharia Principles with Indonesian Social Realities Muhammad Hafis; Juliani Syafitri; Jumni Nelli
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.31-58

Abstract

This study aims to uncover the historical-philosophical foundations of pluralism in Islamic inheritance law through the Prophet Muhammad's mechanism of accommodation towards pre-Islamic traditions ('urf), as well as to provide an integrative methodological framework for contextualizing inheritance justice. This study is significant because it addresses the limitations of previous studies, which were descriptive and partial, by exploring the dynamic roots of Sharia in responding to socio-historical realities. This study employs an integrative qualitative approach with three analytical frameworks: first, philosophical-historical: tracing the dialectic between universal values (tsawābit) and contextual values (mutaghayyirāt) in inheritance law through asbāb al-nuzūl and pre-Islamic Arab social realities. Second, thematic-holistic: connecting inheritance verses (QS. An-Nisā’: 11-12) with the principle of justice across texts (QS. Al-Ḥujurāt: 13, Al-Mā’idah: 8) and maqāṣid al-syari’ah (hifẓ al-māl, al-nafs, al-nasl). Third, empirical-contextual: testing the implementation of universal-particular values in the Indonesian context. Based on this study, it can be concluded that the 2:1 inheritance ratio is responsive-contextual to the pre-Islamic Arab social structure (financial responsibility of men), not a rigid rule. The principle of universal justice in the Qur’an (‘adl, maṣlaḥah) opens space for recontextualization in the modern era, such as the Minangkabau hybrid model or the 1:1 share allocation that considers women’s economic contributions. This integrative framework of text-maqāṣid-contextuality offers a new perspective in inheritance ijtihad, promoting flexibility in Sharia based on substantive justice without disregarding the authenticity of the text. Policy implications include strengthening consultation mechanisms in the Compilation of Islamic Law (Article 183) and progressive reinterpretation in religious courts.
Regulatory Reform in The Era of Digital Constitutionalism Abdulloh; Khairul Fadli Rambe; Mulia Darma
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.59-80

Abstract

The digital era has permeated the legal and justice systems, posing serious challenges to constitutional justice. AI can replicate algorithmic bias and reinforce inequality. Indonesian regulations (the PDP Law and the ITE Law) are insufficient to address AI ethics and procedural justice. This gap requires a robust ethical framework for technology to be a tool of justice. This study aims to formulate ethical standards and principles based on Siyasah Dusturiyah, integrating them into Digital Constitutionalism to fill this legal void. The study uses a normative legal method (doctrinal legal research) with legislative and comparative approaches. A descriptive-comparative analysis examines the Indonesian legal framework alongside EU regulations (the EU AI Act and the GDPR) to identify best practices. Results show significant gaps in Indonesian law on AI ethics, in contrast to the EU's proactive integration of ethical standards. Thus, this study proposes adapting three principles—Ethical Impact Assessment, Human Oversight, and Right to Be Fixed—as the ethical foundation of Indonesian Digital Constitutionalism. Such adaptation is crucial to ensure accountability of digital systems and strengthen citizens' constitutional rights.
Prospects of AI Use in The Supreme Court: Comparison of Canada and Indonesia Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana; Hutauruk, Jeremy Aprilian; Rahman, Mohamad Juliandri; Hattori, Mariko
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.1-30

Abstract

The opportunities and challenges of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in law enforcement are the main focus of a comparative study between the Indonesian Supreme Court and Canadian judicial guidelines. In Canada, AI has been used to support transparency, speed, and consistency in decisions through decision prediction, case management, and legal data processing. This serves as an important inspiration for Indonesia, which is currently exploring the use of similar technology in its judicial system. The main challenges faced by Indonesia include limited digital infrastructure, the absence of comprehensive regulations governing the use of AI, and concerns regarding the integrity of decisions and the principle of justice. A normative juridical method combined with a comparative literature review was employed to examine the regulatory frameworks, court practices, and applications of artificial intelligence in each country. The study's findings indicate that despite the significant challenges in Indonesia, the opportunities for AI implementation remain vast. AI implementation must be supported by adaptive national policies, capacity building for judicial officials, and continuous oversight to maintain the integrity of decisions and legal certainty. This study provides strategic recommendations for strengthening Indonesia's legal system in an increasingly complex and dynamic digital era.
Living Law on The Margins: A Critical Review of Article 2 of The 2023 Indonesian Penal Code Putra, Antoni; Raspati, Lucky; Rachman, Taufik; Kurniawan, Iwan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.81-110

Abstract

The recognition of living law in society, as stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), appears to be a progressive step toward respecting legal pluralism in Indonesia. However, this recognition is conditional and places customary law in a subordinate position to state law. This article critically examines how Article 2 of the KUHP systematically narrows the space for customary law and disregards the sociological reality of living legal traditions. This study employs a normative juridical research method, focusing on the analysis of statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant academic literature. Customary law, which has long been effective in resolving social conflicts, is marginalized due to its perceived incompatibility with formalistic and universal legal principles. This article proposes a deliberative approach as an alternative through equal and dialogical engagement between state and customary legal systems, emphasizing affirmative recognition that respects the autonomy of local legal communities. In doing so, recognizing customary law should not be a limiting instrument but a means to strengthen contextual justice within Indonesia’s diverse society.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 15 No 1 (2026) Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue